I have a table that I saved as a report and created a dashboard that displays the table.
I want to add inputs for each field on the table to be able to filter the table data.
This is the table
I added a text box as the first input
How do I link the text box that has a token called purchCostReferenceToken to the purchCostReference column on the table?
Strictly speaking, the input and the table are not related. The input controls the search and the table is one way to represent the results of the search.
To control the search, use the input token in it. Use dollar signs to denote the token. For example,
index=foo purchCostReference=$purchCostReferenceToken$ | ...
You will need a default value for the token to make this work when no input is provided. Usually, that value is *.
Related
I have a question about laravel jetstream, in my application I use 2 tables to define information about a user. I have the users table and a table called fans that contains extra information about that specific role.
In the register function I was able to add custom input fields and send the information to the different database tables, in the CreateNewUser of Fortify.
When I tried adding these inputs in the update-profile-information.blade.php, i wanted the value of the input to be filled in with the information present in the database. I noticed that the values placed in the inputs are being controlled by wire:model.defer="state.something", but i cant figure out how to add information to the state so that the data from the fan table could also be set as values for input fields.
I created a table in SAP via se11, then I used the table maintenance generator.
Now I edit the table via sm30:
The second and the third column: Both have the heading "Feldname".
The first "Feldname" column is called COLUMN_NAME and its data element is "Fieldname".
The second "Feldname" column is called AUTH_FIELD and its data element is "XUFIELD"
I would like to see the column names which I gave the columns in se16 (COLUMN_NAME, AUTH_FIELD) in the heading.
How to prevent the table maintenance generator from giving other names in the headings?
Option 1 - use custom data elements:
Instead of using Fieldname and XUFIELD data elements, you can create your custom data elements and give them what header you would like.
(You will have to regenerate table maintenance)
Option 2 - editing screen
When generated the table maintenance, you supplied a function group and a screen number.
Go to SE80 -> Function Groups -> <function_group_supplied> -> screens -> <screen_supplied>.
Then edit it as you want.
Note: Modifying a generated object is considered risky. Your customized changes might be overwritten in a future regeneration.
Add custom data elements with suitable descriptions. Let the new data elements refer to the original ones (resp. the domains) to avoid having to reinvent everything.
Data element descriptions can be translated.
You can set different descriptions for different lengths, e.g. "Field" for the narrow column with length 10, and "Field name" for a wide label with length 30.
Regenerating the maintenance screen won't accidentally delete the changed descriptions.
I'm new to PDI and Kettle, and what I thought was a simple experiment to teach myself some basics has turned into a lot of frustration.
I want to check a database to see if a particular record exists (i.e. vendor). I would like to get the name of the vendor from reading a flat file (.CSV).
My first hurdle selecting only the vendor name from 8 fields in the CSV
The second hurdle is how to use that vendor name as a variable in a database query.
My third issue is what type of step to use for the database lookup.
I tried a dynamic SQL query, but I couldn't determine how to build the query using a variable, then how to pass the desired value to the variable.
The database table (VendorRatings) has 30 fields, one of which is vendor. The CSV also has 8 fields, one of which is also vendor.
My best effort was to use a dynamic query using:
SELECT * FROM VENDORRATINGS WHERE VENDOR = ?
How do I programmatically assign the desired value to "?" in the query? Specifically, how do I link the output of a specific field from Text File Input to the "vendor = ?" SQL query?
The best practice is a Stream lookup. For each record in the main flow (VendorRating) lookup in the reference file (the CSV) for the vendor details (lookup fields), based on its identifier (possibly its number or name or firstname+lastname).
First "hurdle" : Once the path of the csv file defined, press the Get field button.
It will take the first line as header to know the field names and explore the first 100 (customizable) record to determine the field types.
If the name is not on the first line, uncheck the Header row present, press the Get field button, and then change the name on the panel.
If there is more than one header row or other complexities, use the Text file input.
The same is valid for the lookup step: use the Get lookup field button and delete the fields you do not need.
Due to the fact that
There is at most one vendorrating per vendor.
You have to do something if there is no match.
I suggest the following flow:
Read the CSV and for each row look up in the table (i.e.: the lookup table is the SQL table rather that the CSV file). And put default upon not matching. I suggest something really visible like "--- NO MATCH ---".
Then, in case of no match, the filter redirect the flow to the alternative action (here: insert into the SQL table). Then the two flows and merged into the downstream flow.
I would like to have a complete copy of a Record Permission field.
For example - I have a field "OWNER" which is Record Permission type.
I want to create another field called "OWNER_COPY" which will always include the value which was selected in the OWNER field.
I thought of few ways to do so but none succeeded:
Crete a new Record Permission field (OWNER_COPY) but it has no option to be calculated (it doesn't have the option: "Set the value of this field using....")
Create calculated Text field (OWNER_COPY)- but if I'm writing [OWNER] in the formula it will provide the ID of the value and not its name.(e.g. if the owner was "Oliver", I will get his id - "123"" in the "OWNER_COPY" field).
Crete regular Text field (OWNER_COPY) and add a rule. but I couldn't find any kind of rule which can fit this case.
Any suggestions?? Thanks in advance :)
Archer can't copy value of RP to anther RP.
I used a custom object for this purpose. The limitation is that the field will be populated only when end user actually interact with a form. The good thing is that the field will be populated instantly.
As an alternative you can use a data feed as Tanveer described above, but in this case there will be a delay between the time when you save the record and population of the 2nd RP field.
I have just started implementing search module in a project, where I have a form with fixed fields consisting of combo box, text box, radio button etc (around 200 fields in multiple tabs), and later client should be able to add extra fields too. Once user fills the fields which he wants to search, that search criteria also he should be able to save. For all these reasons, for each field I am associating metadata in the following format.
"EntityName.attributeName": attributeValue
Once the user fills the form fields to search, I will validate form data and and only non empty fields metadata I am sending to server in JSON format. Everything is fine till now. But I am facing an issues now.
Using the metadata of each field I will create a new criteria for each field. but if there are fields where one field metadata depends on other field metadata I am struck.
In the form I have few special category fields in following format : for example DOB,
FROM DATE (meta data: entity1.dob)
TO DATE (meta data: entity1.dob)
both fields belongs to same entity and same column only field name in the UI is different
Like this I have around 20 fields which asks for FROM and TO to query the range (it need not be on date, for example no of bed rooms..it can be on integer, string etc)
My query formation should be in the following way depending on user search criteria. If user entered only FROM field of number of bed rooms then I have to query using EQUAL to operator in sql and if both mentioned then MORETHANEQUAL to for FROM field and LESSTHANEQUAL to for to field. So how I can handle this special case ?
like if he entered number of fields as 4 in TO field of number of bed rooms, then I have to query for houses having number of bed rooms equal to 4. but if in FROM he entered 3 and in To if he entered 7 then I have to query for houses having greater than or equal to 3 bed rooms and less than or equal to 7 bed rooms.
Since I have same metadata for these category fields also I am unable to proceed, to achieve this, what kind of metadata I need to prepare ?
How I can generalize this process to handle all the cases ?
my technology stack: ExtJs, Eclipse Link, spring.
and what are the best practices to follow to support custom fields adding feature in Forms in enterprise applications ?
Off of the top of my head, I would create wizards for these particular cases. So for example, have a custom wizard that allows the user to define a "from" field, a "to" field, and then the comparison operator in one action. This wizard could also be responsible for adding custom properties to the generated fields that could be used by your validation routine. So based on the combo of from, to, and operator, you could create a flexible validation mechanism for ensuring that correct values are entered, ranges are correct, whatever.
You might consider this "wizard" approach for all custom fields, in fact. I could see you predefining all the possible custom field types that could be used and create classes that can be used for those. The classes could be responsible not only for the field creation, but also for providing any custom validation, pre-submit transformation, etc. This approach would make adding new custom field types incredibly simple since all you'd have to do is follow the same implementation as the others that already exist, extend an existing one, etc.