INSERT INTO Confirmed (TotalDeaths, Population)
SELECT TotalDeaths, Population
FROM Deaths
WHERE UID IS NOT NULL;
Copy the values for the columns named TotalD and Pop from the Deaths Table to the Confirmed Table (same names, both contains UID primary Key)
Failed to execute query. Error:
Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'UID', table 'dbo.Confirmed'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails. The statement has been terminated.
I keep running into a problem where I get compiler errors due to the primary key not allowing nulls. I'm not sure where the null keys are even coming from when it shouldn't be null to begin with.
Both tables have very similar columns, but in this case all that needs to be mentioned is that there are three columns in both tables that are crucial, which are: UID int NOT NULL, TotalDeaths int NOT NULL, Population int NOT NULL.
Seems to be UID is not null column. Use below query
INSERT INTO Confirmed (UID, TotalDeaths, Population)
SELECT UID, TotalDeaths, Population
FROM Deaths
WHERE UID IS NOT NULL;
Related
I have created an empty table with the following SQL statement. My understanding (based on this tutorial: https://www.postgresqltutorial.com/postgresql-tutorial/postgresql-serial/) was that SERIAL PRIMARY KEY will automatically provide an auto-incremented id for every new row:
CREATE TABLE "shema".my_table
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
transaction text NOT NULL,
service_privider text NOT NULL,
customer_id text NOT NULL,
value numeric NOT NULL
)
WITH (
OIDS = FALSE
);
ALTER TABLE "shema".my_table
OWNER to admin;
Now I am querying another tables and would like to save the result of that query into my_table. The result of the query outputs following schema:
transaction
service_provider
customer_id
value
meaning the schema of my_table minus id. when I try to execute:
INSERT into my table
Select {here is the query}
Then I am getting an error that column "id" is of type integer but expression is of type text. I interpret it that the sql query is looking for id column and cannot find it. How can I insert data into my_table without explicitly stating id number but have this id auto-generated for every row?
Always mention the columns you want to INSERT:
INSERT INTO schemaname.my_table("transaction", service_privider, customer_id, value)
SELECT ?, ?, ?, ?;
If you don't, your code will break now or somewhere in the future.
By the way, transaction is a reserved word, try to use a better column name.
Consider the following schema:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS snippet_types (
id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
name TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE
);
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS snippets (
id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
title TEXT,
content TEXT,
type INTEGER NOT NULL,
FOREIGN KEY(type) REFERENCES snippet_types(id)
);
This schema assumes a one-to-many relationship between tables and allows efficiently maintaining a set of ENUMs in the snippet_types table. Efficiency comes from the fact that we don't need to store the whole string describing snippet type in the snippets table, but this decision also leads us to some inconvenience: upon inserting we need to retrieve snippet id from snippet_types and this leads to one more select and check before inserting:
SELECT id FROM snippet_types WHERE name = "foo";
-- ...check that > 0 rows returned...
INSERT INTO snippets (title, content, type) values ("bar", "buz", id);
We could also combine this insert and select into one select like that:
INSERT INTO snippets (title, content, type)
SELECT ("bar", "buz", id) FROM snippet_types WHERE name = "foo"
However, if "foo" type is missing in snippet_types then 0 rows would have been inserted and no error returned and I don't see a possibility to get a number of rows sqlite actually inserted.
How can I insert ENUM-containing tuple in one query?
I'm working on a database for my school project in which I have to produce a functional database by normalizing sample tables given to us.
One table I'm having trouble with is itineraries. I produce 3 tables from the normalization which are "Destinations", "Itineraries" and "Itinerary_Destinations".
The code for Destinations is:
create table Destinations
(
DestinationID varchar(5) primary key,
Name varchar(45)
);
The code for Itineraries is:
create table Itineraries
(
ItineraryID varchar(5),
Name varchar(45)
);
The code for the last table is:
create table Itinerary_Destinations
(
DI varchar(5) primary key,
ItineraryID varchar(5) foreign key references Itineraries(ItineraryID),
Itinerary_Name varchar(45),
DestinationID varchar(5) foreign key references Destinations(DestinationID),
Destination_Name varchar(45)
);
Data has already been inserted into all 3 tables with the exception of 'Destination_Name' and 'Itinerary_Name' columns. The code I'm attempting to use is returning as error. The code is shown below.
insert into Itinerary_Destinations (Itinerary_name)
select Name from Itineraries where
Itineraries.ItineraryID = ItineraryID;
The error it returns is
Msg 515, Level 16, State 2, Line 1 Cannot insert the value NULL into
column 'DI', table 'DDDAssignment.dbo.Itinerary_Destinations'; column
does not allow nulls. INSERT fails. The statement has been terminated.
Is there a method to accomplish the task of inserting the Destination_Name and Itinerary_Name without creating new records that require primary keys?
Or should I do it manually?
If you want to modify records which already exist, then you should be using an UPDATE rather than an INSERT:
UPDATE a
SET Itinerary_name = b.Name
FROM Itinerary_Destinations a
INNER JOIN Itinerary_name b
ON a.ItineraryID = b.ItineraryID;
But, if you do have some data which is not already logically associated with the Itinerary_Destinations table, then using an insert is appropriate.
use coalesce funtion in case null it will insert blank string, as your column does not allow null value thats why you got that error in your query
insert into Itinerary_Destinations (Itinerary_name)
select coalesce(Name,' ') from Itineraries where
Itineraries.ItineraryID = ItineraryID;
I beginning to learn how to write trigger with this basic database.
I'm also making my very 1st database.
Schema
Team:
TeamID int PK (TeamID int IDENTITY(0,1) CONSTRAINT TeamID_PK PRIMARY KEY)
TeamName nvarchar(100)
History:
HistoryID int PK (HistoryID int IDENTITY(0,1) CONSTRAINT HistoryID_PK PRIMARY KEY)
TeamID int FK REF Team(TeamID)
WinCount int
LoseCount int
My trigger: when a new team is inserted, it should insert a new history row with that team id
CREATE TRIGGER after_insert_Player
ON Team
FOR INSERT
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO History (TeamID, WinCount, LoseCount)
SELECT DISTINCT i.TeamID
FROM Inserted i
LEFT JOIN History h ON h.TeamID = i.TeamID
AND h.WinCount = 0 AND h.LoseCount = 0
END
Executed it returns
The select list for the INSERT statement contains fewer items than the insert list. The number of SELECT values must match the number of INSERT columns.
Please help thank. I'm using SQL Server
The error text is the best guide, it is so clear ..
You try inserting one value from i.TeamID into three columns (TeamID,WinCount,LoseCount)
consider these WinCount and LoseCount while inserting.
Note: I Think the structure of History table need to revisit, you should select WinCount and LoseCount as Expressions not as actual columns.
When you specify insert columns, you say which columns you will be filling. But in your case, right after insert you select only one column (team id).
You either have to modify the insert to contain only one column, or select, to retrieve 3 fields as in insert.
If you mention the columns where values have to be inserted(Using INSERT-SELECT).
The SELECT Statement has to contain the same number of columns that have been specified to be inserted. Also, ensure they are of the same data type.(You might face some issues otherwise)
I have a sample table like below where Course Completion Status of a Student is being stored:
Create Table StudentCourseCompletionStatus
(
CourseCompletionID int primary key identity(1,1),
StudentID int not null,
AlgorithmCourseStatus nvarchar(30),
DatabaseCourseStatus nvarchar(30),
NetworkingCourseStatus nvarchar(30),
MathematicsCourseStatus nvarchar(30),
ProgrammingCourseStatus nvarchar(30)
)
Insert into StudentCourseCompletionStatus Values (1, 'In Progress', 'In Progress', 'Not Started', 'Completed', 'Completed')
Insert into StudentCourseCompletionStatus Values (2, 'Not Started', 'In Progress', 'Not Started', 'Not Applicable', 'Completed')
Now as part of normalizing the schema I have created two other tables - CourseStatusType and Status for storing the Course Status names and Status.
Create Table CourseStatusType
(
CourseStatusTypeID int primary key identity(1,1),
CourseStatusType nvarchar(100) not null
)
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('AlgorithmCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('DatabaseCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('NetworkingCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('MathematicsCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('ProgrammingCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('OperatingSystemsCourseStatus')
Insert into CourseStatusType Values ('CompilerCourseStatus')
Create Table Status
(
StatusID int primary key identity(1,1),
StatusName nvarchar (100) not null
)
Insert into Status Values ('Completed')
Insert into Status Values ('Not Started')
Insert into Status Values ('In Progress')
Insert into Status Values ('Not Applicable')
The modified table is as below:
Create Table StudentCourseCompletionStatus1
(
CourseCompletionID int primary key identity(1,1),
StudentID int not null,
CourseStatusTypeID int not null CONSTRAINT [FK_StudentCourseCompletionStatus1_CourseStatusType] FOREIGN KEY (CourseStatusTypeID) REFERENCES dbo.CourseStatusType (CourseStatusTypeID),
StatusID int not null CONSTRAINT [FK_StudentCourseCompletionStatus1_Status] FOREIGN KEY (StatusID) REFERENCES Status (StatusID),
)
I have few question on this:
Is this the correct way to normalize it ? The old table was very helpful to get data easily - I can store a student's course status in a single row, but now 5 rows are required. Is there a better way to do it?
Moving the data from the old table to this new table seems to be not an easy task. Can I achieve this using a query or I have to manually to do this ?
Any help is appreciated.
vou could also consider storing results in flat table like this:
studentID,courseID,status
1,1,"completed"
1,2,"not started"
2,1,"not started"
2,3,"in progress"
you will also need additional Courses table like this
courserId,courseName
1, math
2, programming
3, networking
and a students table
students
1 "john smith"
2 "perry clam"
3 "john deere"
etc..you could also optionally create a status table to store the distinct statusstrings statusstings and refer to their PK instead ofthestrings
studentID,courseID,status
1,1,1
1,2,2
2,1,2
2,3,3
... etc
and status table
id,status
1,"completed"
2,"not started"
3,"in progress"
the beauty of this representation is: it is quite easy to filter and aggregate data , i.e it is easy to query which subjects a particular person have completed, how many subjects are completed by an average student, etc. this things are much more difficult in the columnar design like you had. you can also easily add new subjects without the need to adapt your tables or even queries they,will just work.
you can also always usin SQLs PIVOT query to get it to a familiar columnar presentation like
name,mathstatus,programmingstatus,networkingstatus,etc..
but now 5 rows are required
No, it's still just one row. That row simply contains identifiers for values stored in other tables.
There are pros and cons to this. One of the main reasons to normalize in this way is to protect the integrity of the data. If a column is just a string then anything can be stored there. But if there's a foreign key relationship to a table containing a finite set of values then only one of those options can be stored there. Additionally, if you ever want to change the text of an option or add/remove options, you do it in a centralized place.
Moving the data from the old table to this new table seems to be not an easy task.
No problem at all. Create your new numeric columns on the data table and populate them with the identifiers of the lookup table records associated with each data table record. If they're nullable, you can make them foreign keys right away. If they're not nullable then you need to populate them before you can make them foreign keys. Once you've verified that the data is correct, remove the old de-normalized columns. Done.
In StudentCourseCompletionStatus1 you still need 2 associations to Status and CourseStatusType. So I think you should consider following variant of normalization:
It means, that your StudentCourseCompletionStatus would hold only one CourseStatusID and another table CourseStatus would hold the associations to CourseType and Status.
To move your data you can surely use a query.