I'm just taking a look at the following query
select * from tablename
where id like '%%';
So that it can handle parameters to include all of the data or filtered data like bellow
select * from tablename
where id like '%1%';
Which is fine for most parameters I use but this seems wrong for an ID because it will return all data that has IDs containing 1 which I don't want
To get around this I can only append the where clause if the ID is given but that seems like a pain in the butt
Is it possible to use a different type of where clause so that a wildcard can be used in a where equals clause instead of a where like clause, example
select * from tablename
where id = '*';
So that the same query can be used to return all or filtered data? Pass parameter '*' for all or parameter '1' for ID 1 specifically
(I'm not sure if it matters for this case but I'm using PostgreSQL 9.6.12 in this example)
This would often be expressed as:
where (id = :id or :id is null)
null is the "magic" value that represents all rows.
Related
I am trying to write a query where I need to check whether a value is not present in an array of strings returned by another nested query how can I do that,
For example I have to check whether,
1234 is present in [abc_1234,fgh_12345,ghi_5343]
Hence 1234 is present in string abc_1234 so I will not select 1234.
I hope I understand your request correctly. You have a query returning strings, e.g. 'abc_1234' and 'fgh_12345'. You have a table with values, e.g. '1234'. You want to select rows from the table where the value is not part of any of the strings of the existing query.
This is where the anti-join pattern comes into play. You outer-join the undesired rows, so all rows that found no partner are the desired ones:
select *
from mytable m
left join (<your query here>) q on instr(q.string, m.value) > 0
where q.string is null;
(Instead of INSTR you can also use LIKE: on q.string like '%' || m.value || '%'. It should not matter which of the string operations you choose.)
Let's say that we have a table named Data with Id and Weather columns. Other columns in that table are not important to this problem. The Weather column can be null.
I want to display all rows where Weather fits a condition, but if there is a null value in weather then display null value.
My SQL so far:
SELECT *
FROM Data d
WHERE (d.Weather LIKE '%'+COALESCE(NULLIF('',''),'sunny')+'%' OR d.Weather IS NULL)
My results are wrong, because that statement also shows values where Weather is null if condition is not correct (let's say that users mistyped wrong).
I found similar topic, but there I do not find appropriate answer.
SQL WHERE clause not returning rows when field has NULL value
Please help me out.
Your query is correct for the general task of treating NULLs as a match. If you wish to suppress NULLs when there are no other results, you can add an AND EXISTS ... condition to your query, like this:
SELECT *
FROM Data d
WHERE d.Weather LIKE '%'+COALESCE(NULLIF('',''),'sunny')+'%'
OR (d.Weather IS NULL AND EXISTS (SELECT * FROM Data dd WHERE dd.Weather LIKE '%'+COALESCE(NULLIF('',''),'sunny')+'%'))
The additional condition ensures that NULLs are treated as matches only if other matching records exist.
You can also use a common table expression to avoid duplicating the query, like this:
WITH cte (id, weather) AS
(
SELECT *
FROM Data d
WHERE d.Weather LIKE '%'+COALESCE(NULLIF('',''),'sunny')+'%'
)
SELECT * FROM cte
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM Data WHERE weather is NULL AND EXISTS (SELECT * FROM cte)
statement show also values where Wether is null if condition is not correct (let say that users typed wrong sunny).
This suggests that the constant 'sunny' is coming from end-user's input. If that is the case, you need to parameterize your query to avoid SQL injection attacks.
I'm given the following statement:
SELECT id FROM record_database WHERE id = <up to me to complete the statement>
The record database has different fields, among which are id and name.
I'm supposed to complete this select statement so that it displays all the ids and all the corresponding names side by side, and this should be done using this one line of SQL code. A hint was given that UNION or OR can be used.
I tried variations of the following:
SELECT id FROM record_database WHERE id = '*'
UNION
SELECT name FROM record_database WHERE name = '*';
But none of these worked. I tried doing this with AND, tried using display columns, but those didn't work either.
Any help would be appreciated.
This smells a great deal like homework, so I won't offer a complete answer, but you can't just union queries that return dissimilar result sets. I'm inferring that ID is an integer while NAME is some varchar, which won't union as you've listed in your hint.
When you say "complete," are you restricted to adding things to the end? If so, its a non-starter. You can't increase the list of fields being returned merely by adding things to the "WHERE" clause. You need to add things to the actual field list to get them to be returned, so you might clarify whether you are truly restricted to appending to the query you;ve given.
If you are looking for:
id
name
id next
name next
Then use this trick:
SELECT col2
FROM (
SELECT id, col2=convert ( varchar (size of name field),id)
FROM table
WHERE ....
UNION ALL
SELECT id, name
FROM table
WHERE ....
)
ORDER BY id
This order by will bring id and name side by side and col2 will contain id in first row and name in second row.
Cheating. Make the select return 0 rows and add another one that will show 2 columns. All in one and the same line:
SELECT id FROM record_database WHERE id = NULL;SELECT id,name FROM record_database;
No more time should be wasted on silly problems like this.
If both id and name are char (or varchar), you could also do this, concatting the two columns into one:
SELECT id FROM record_database WHERE id = NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT id || '--' || name FROM record_database ;
The id || '--' || name part differs from one DBMS to another. In some, the + is the concat operator, in others there are special functions. So you may need to use:
id + '--' + name
or:
CONCAT(id, '--', name)
Try this
SELECT * FROM record_database WHERE id = '*' OR name = '*'
Is there a variable in SQL that can be used to represent ALL the possible values of a field? Something like this pseudo-code
SELECT name FROM table WHERE id = *ALL_EXISTING_ID-s*
I want to return all rows in this case, but later when I do a search and need only one item I can simply replace that variable with the id I'm looking for, i.e.
SELECT name FROM table WHERE id = 1
The simplest way is to remove the WHERE clause. This will return all rows.
SELECT name FROM table
If you want some "magic" value you can use for the ID that you can use in your existing query and it will return all rows, I think you're out of luck.
Though you could use something like this:
SELECT name FROM table WHERE id = IFNULL(?, id)
If the value NULL is provided, all rows will be returned.
If you don't like NULL then try the following query, which will return all rows if the value -1 is provided:
SELECT name FROM table WHERE id = IFNULL(NULLIF(?, -1), id)
Another approach that achieves the same effect (but requires binding the id twice) is:
SELECT name FROM table WHERE (id = ? OR ? = -1)
How can you query a column for any value in that column? (ie. How do I build a dynamic where clause that can either filter the value, or not.)
I want to be able to query for either a specific value, or not. For instance, I might want the value to be 1, but I might want it to be any number.
Is there a way to use a wild card (like "*"), to match any value, so that it can be dynamically inserted where I want no filter?
For instance:
select int_col from table where int_col = 1 // Query for a specific value
select int_col from table where int_col = * // Query for any value
The reason why I do not want to use 2 separate SQL statements is because I am using this as a SQL Data Source, which can only have 1 select statement.
Sometimes I would query for actual value (like 1, 2...) so I can't not have a condition either.
I take it you want some dynamic behavior on your WHERE clause, without having to dynamically build your WHERE clause.
With a single parameter, you can use ISNULL (or COALESCE) like this:
SELECT * FROM Table WHERE ID = ISNULL(#id, ID)
which allows a NULL parameter to match all. Some prefer the longer but more explicit:
SELECT * FROM Table WHERE (#id IS NULL) OR (ID = #id)
A simple answer would be use: IS NOT NULL. But if you are asking for say 123* for numbers like 123456 or 1234 or 1237 then the you could convert it to a varchar and then test against using standard wild cards.
In your where clause: cast(myIntColumn as varchar(15)) like '123%'.
Assuming the value you're filtering on is a parameter in a stored procedure, or contained in a variable called #Value, you can do it like this:
select * from table where #Value is null or intCol = #Value
If #Value is null then the or part of the clause is ignored, so the query won't filter on intCol.
The equivalent of wildcards for numbers are the comparators.
So, if you wanted to find all positive integers:
select int_col from table where int_col > 0
any numbers between a hundred and a thousand:
select int_col from table where int_col BETWEEN 100 AND 1000
and so on.
I don't quite understand what you're asking. I think you should use two different queries for the different situations you have.
When you're not looking for a specific value:
SELECT * FROM table
When you are looking for a specific value:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE intcol = 1
You can use the parameter as a wildcard by assigning special meaning to NULL:
DECLARE #q INT = 1
SELECT * FROM table WHERE IntegerColumn = #q OR #q IS NULL
This way, when you pass in NULL; you get all rows.
If NULL is a valid value to query for, then you need to use two parameters.
If you really want the value of your column for all rows on the table you can simply use
select int_col
from table
If you want to know all the distinct values, but don't care how many times they're repeated you can use
select distinct int_col
from table
And if you want to know all the distinct values and how many times they each appear, use
select int_col, count(*)
from table
group by int_col
To have the values sorted properly you can add
order by int_col
to all the queries above.
Share and enjoy.