So I follow every step that the Microsoft Docs say and what this person said on Stackoverflow. I make sure that I check the Add Follow-up Prompt add the Q and A, then I check the Context Only box. Once I do that I save and train my bot. When I go to test it, I put the Context Only Q in the test environment and it still shows even though it specifies that Context-only (this follow-up will not be understood out of the contextual flow).
What am I doing wrong?
So I contacted their support and it was an issue on their end.
After talking with Microsoft they rolled out an update to fix this bug.
Context only works as stated now.
Related
I have extended a class by one method, using the Enhancement Framework.
Now, my problem is that I want to add ABAPDoc to it but cannot find any way to do it!
The code in the Enhancement Include section seems to be editable in no way.
Is there any way to do it at all? I tried also from ADT in Eclipse but this calls the SAP GUI anyway.
What are you trying to do is indeed impossible.
The enhancement include is a technical object and it cannot be edited from the tab you highlighted, it is auto-generated as you changing pre- and post-methods.
What this tab shows is not an include itself, but the placement of the enh. include within the parent object
If you want to change the method comment from enhancement, you should go to Technical details tab and click on changed object, or just go to the class in SE24 and press to pre/post exit button, and you will end up in the same include:
You can write the ABAPDoc-syntaxed comment, but for me it didn't work, and Eclipse didn't recognized my comment written in SAPGui, maybe you will be luckier.
ABAPDoc team describes this piece in a fuzzy manner, it may be an expected behavior:
This ABAPDoc is only available to ADT and not SE80? I can not use it in SAP GUI development?
You can also write it in the source code and you will get also warnings when you execute a check, but there is no dedicated tools support like source code element information or quick assist (Ctrl+1)
To your principal question, ABAPDoc is a two-way road when viewing: the ABAPDocs can be viewed both from the Eclipse and SE80, and they are automatically showed in SE80 description fields (but only if they are declared synchronized).
But it seems to be a one-way road for edit: they can be created only in ADT Eclipse to be fully compatible. If the object cannot be opened in Eclipse natively like your enhancement you are out of the luck.
I put seems because I am not 100% sure. Maybe on later systems it was fixed, but on my 750 they are not recognized by Eclipse for enhanced methods.
The only reliable way of "editing" via SE80 is writing the comments to descriptions and then importing these SE80 descriptions into ABAPDoc in Eclipse
which is ridiculous in context of your question, so there is no way for you.
A few years back i worked in a company where i could press CTRL+T and a TODO-comment was generated - say my ID to be identified by other developers was xy45 then the generated comment was:
//TODO (xy45):
Is something available from within Intellij 14 Ultimate or did they write their own plugin for it?
What i tried: Webreserach, Jetbrais documentations - it looks like its not possible out of the box (i however ask before i write a plugin for it) or masked by the various search results regarding the TODO-view (due to bad research skills of mine).
There is no built-in feature in IntelliJ IDEA to generate such comments, so it looks like they did write their own plugin.
Found something that works quite similar but is not boundable to a shortcut:
File -> Settings -> Live Templates
I guess the picture says enoth to allow customization (consult the Jetbrains documentation for more possibilities). E.g. browse to the Live Template section within the settings, add a new Live Template (small green cross, upper right corner in the above picture) and set the context where this Live Template is applicable.
Note: Once you defined the Live Template to be applicable within Java (...Change in the above image where the red exclamation marks are shown) context you can just type "t", "todo" and hit CTRL+Space (or the shortcut you defined for code completion).
I suggest to reconsider using that practice at all. Generally you should not include redundant information which is easily and more reliably accessible through your Version Control System (easily available in Idea directly in editor using Annotate feature). It is similiar to not using javadoc tag #author as the information provided with it is often outdated inaccurate and redundant. Additionaly, I don´t think author of TODO is that much valuable information. Person who will solve the issue will often be completly different person and the TODO should be well documented and descriptive anyway. When you find your own old TODO, which is poorly documented, you often don't remember all the required information even if you were the author.
However, instead of adding author's name, a good practice is to create a task in you issue management system and add identifier of this task to the description of the todo. This way you have all your todos in evidence at one place, you can add additional information to the task, track progress, assign it etc. My experience is that if you don´t use this, todos tend to stay in the code forever and after some time no one remembers clearly the details of the problem. Additionaly, author mentioned in the todo is often already gone working for a different company.
Annotated TODO with issue ID
I have a manual test result with various iterations. Some iterations passed the test but other s didn't. I need to create and link a bug to a specific test result iteration (the one that didn't pass the test) but when I choose to create and link a bug it always defaults to the first iteration. I can't see how to choose the specific iteration I want to link the bug to.
Before the click:
After the click:
On http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd380693.aspx they show how to link a bug to a test result. However, they don't specify on how to link a Bug to a particular iteration.
Thanks in advance!
You'd select it in Iteration dropdown under Classification above.
Apparently there is no way to do this once the test run has finished. It's a usability bug that Microsoft needs to fix. At least that what a Testing Microsoft Partner say on the MSDN Forums. The only way to to this is from the Test Runner itself.
In the documentation:
Buttons Save or Fork are always present in the UI. First one appears if no fiddle was loaded, the latter is used to create a new fiddle from the existing one.
I ONLY see SAVE when the fiddle is brand new, then RUN/update/fork. In Fx4 and Safari 5 on MAC (and Fx 4 on pc)
UPDATE: New BASE functionality does exactly what I wanted.
From the SO FAQ
Stack Overflow is for professional and
enthusiast programmers, people who
write code because they love it. We
feel the best Stack Overflow questions
have a bit of source code in them, but
if your question generally covers …
a specific programming problem
a software algorithm
software tools commonly used by programmers
matters that are unique to the programming profession
… then you’re in the right place to ask your question!
When you log into JsFiddle, you'll get a Set as Base button, which will make the revision you're working on the base version - think of it as an alias for john/7hd62/12/ -> john/7hd62/.
I ran into an issue where set as base would not save my work. The solution was to:
make a change.
Update to get a new version.
Set as Base.
Hope that helps
I always use Update to save and create a new revision.
I haven't seen the button Save... maybe it is so that we can't Save to a version, but always need to Update to a new version, so everybody can look at the same code at a certain version.
Have a look on Issue #225 in JSFiddle GitHub Repository - URL for the latest version of a fiddle such as /xxxxx/latest/:
#zalun: Please read http://doc.jsfiddle.net/basic/introduction.html#setting-base-version
Sharing a latest fiddle is not always what you wanted. Because anyone is able to save "latest" fiddle, someone would be able to change it to the content you wouldn't like to share. With setting a base version you are the person who chooses which version is shared under default "no version" URL.
The idea is that given a specific input to the program, somehow I want to automatically step-in through the complete program and dump its control flow along with all the data being used like classes and their variables. Is their a straightforward way to do this? Or can this be done by some scripting over gdb or does it require modification in gdb?
Ok the reason for this question is because of an idea regarding a debugging tool. What it does is this. Given two different inputs to a program, one causing an incorrect output and the other a correct one, it will tell what part of the control flow differ for them.
So What I think will be needed is a complete dump of these 2 control flows going into a diff engine. And if the two inputs are following similar control flows then their diff would (in many cases) give a good idea about why the bug exist.
This can be made into a very engaging tool with many features build on top of this.
Tell us a little more about the environment. dtrace, for example, will do a marvelous job of this in Solaris or Leopard. gprof is another possibility.
A bumpo version of this could be done with yes(1), or expect(1).
If you want to get fancy, GDB can be scripted with Python in some versions.
What you are describing sounds a bit like gdb's "tracepoint debugging".
See gdb's internal help "help tracepoint". You can also see a whitepaper
here: http://sourceware.org/gdb/talks/esc-west-1999/
Unfortunately, this functionality is not currently implemented for
native debugging, but I believe that CodeSourcery is doing some work
on it.
Check this out, unlike Coverity, Fenris is free and widly used..
How to print the next N executed lines automatically in GDB?