Unable to load partitions in Athena with case sensitivity ON - amazon-s3

I have data in S3 which is partitioned in YYYY/MM/DD/HH/ structure (not year=YYYY/month=MM/day=DD/hour=HH)
I set up a Glue crawler for this, which creates a table in Athena, but when I query the data in Athena it gives an error as one field has duplicate name (URL and url , which the SerDe converts to lowercase, causing a name conflict).
To fix this, I manually create another table (using the above table definition SHOW CREATE TABLE), adding 'case.insensitive'= FALSE to the SERDEPROPERTIES
WITH SERDEPROPERTIES ('paths'='deviceType,emailId,inactiveDuration,pageData,platform,timeStamp,totalTime,userId','case.insensitive'= FALSE)
I changed the s3 directory structure to the hive-compatible naming year=/month=/day=/hour= and then created the table with 'case.insensitive'= FALSE, then ran the MSCK REPAIR TABLE command for the new table, which loads all the partitions.
(Complete CREATE TABLE QUERY)
But upon querying, I can only find 1 data column (platform) and the partition columns, rest of all the columns are not parsed. But I've actually copied the Glue-generated CREATE TABLE query, with the case_insensitive=false condition.
How can I fix this?

I think you have multiple, separate issues: one with the crawler, and one with the serde, and one with duplicate keys:
Glue Crawler
If Glue Crawler delivered on what they promise they would be a fairly good solution for most situations and would save us from writing the same code over and over again. Unfortunately, if you stray outside of the (undocumented) use cases Glue Crawler was designed for, you often end up with various issues, from the strange to the completely broken (see for example this question, this question, this question, this question, this question, or this question).
I recommend that you skip Glue Crawler and instead write the table DDL by hand (you have a good template in what the crawler created, it just isn't good enough). Then you write a Lambda function (or shell script) that you run on a schedule to add new partitions.
Since your partitioning is only on time, this is a fairly simple script: it just needs to run every once in a while and add the partition for the next period.
It looks like your data is from Kinesis Data Firehose which produces a partitioned structure at hour granularity. Unless you have lots of data coming every hour I recommend you create a table that is only partitioned on date, and run the Lambda function or script once per day to add the next day's partition.
A benefit from not using Glue Crawler is that you don't have to have a one-to-one correspondence between path components and partition keys. You can have a single partition key that is typed as date, and add partitions like this: ALTER TABLE foo ADD PARTITION (dt = '2020-05-13') LOCATION 's3://some-bucket/data/2020/05/13/'. This is convenient because it's much easier to do range queries on a full date than when the components are separate.
If you really need hourly granularity you can either have two partition keys, one which is the date and one the hour, or just the one with the full timestamp, e.g. ALTER TABLE foo ADD PARTITION (ts = '2020-05-13 10:00:00') LOCATION 's3://some-bucket/data/2020/05/13/10/'. Then run the Lambda function or script every hour, adding the next hour's partition.
Having too a granular partitioning doesn't help with performance, and can instead hurt it (although the performance hit comes mostly from the small files and the directories).
SerDe config
As for the reason why you're only seeing the value of the platform column, it's because it's the only case where the column name and property have the same casing.
It's a bit surprising that the DDL you link to doesn't work, but I can confirm that it really doesn't. I tried creating a table from that DDL, but without the pagedata column (I also skipped the partitioning, but that shouldn't make a difference for the test), and indeed only the platform column had any value when I queried the table.
However, when I removed the case.insensitive serde property it worked as expected, which got me thinking that it might not work the way you think it does. I tried setting it to TRUE instead of FALSE, which made the table work as expected again. I think we can conclude from this that the Athena documentation is just wrong when it says "By default, Athena requires that all keys in your JSON dataset use lowercase". In fact, what happens is that Athena lower cases the column names, but it also lower cases the property names when reading the JSON.
With further experimentation it turned out the path property was redundant too. This is a table that worked for me:
CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE `json_case_test` (
`devicetype` string,
`timestamp` string,
`totaltime` string,
`inactiveduration` int,
`emailid` string,
`userid` string,
`platform` string
)
ROW FORMAT SERDE 'org.openx.data.jsonserde.JsonSerDe'
STORED AS INPUTFORMAT 'org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TextInputFormat'
OUTPUTFORMAT 'org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveIgnoreKeyTextOutputFormat'
LOCATION 's3://some-bucket/data/'
I'd say that case.insensitive seems to cause more problems than it solves.
Duplicate keys
When I added the pagedata column (as struct<url:string>) and added "pageData":{"URL":"URL","url":"url"} to the data, I got the error:
HIVE_CURSOR_ERROR: Row is not a valid JSON Object - JSONException: Duplicate key "url"
And I got the error regardless of whether the pagedata column was involved in the query or not (e.g. SELECT userid FROM json_case_test also errored). I tried the case.insensitive serde property with both TRUE and FALSE, but it had no effect.
Next, I took a look at the source documentation for the serde, which first of all is worded much better, and secondly contains the key piece of information: that you also need to provide mappings for the columns when you turn off case insensitivity.
With the following serde properties I was able to get the duplicate key issue to go away:
WITH SERDEPROPERTIES (
"case.insensitive" = "false",
"mapping.pagedata" = "pageData",
"mapping.pagedata.url" = "pagedata.url",
"mapping.pagedata.url2"= "pagedata.URL"
)
You would have to provide mappings for all the columns except for platform, too.
Alternative: use JSON functions
You mentioned in a comment to this answer that the schema of the pageData property is not constant. This is another case where Glue Crawlers unfortunately don't really work. If you're unlucky you'll end up with a flapping schema that includes some properties some days (see for example this question).
What I realised when I saw your comment is that there is another solution to your problem: set up the table manually (as described above) and use string as the type for the pagedata column. Then you can use functions like JSON_EXTRACT_SCALAR to extract the properties you want during query time.
This solution trades increased complexity of the queries for way fewer headaches trying to keep up with an evolving schema.

Related

Is the column of type JSON deprecated?

In the bigquery console, when creating a table, there used to be type JSON as an option for the column types but weirdly enought it was never present in their docs We used this column type in our production tables, and discovered later on that you can't select it in queries otherwise bigquery throws an error, and the json functions also didn't work with it. So we simply stopped using this column in the queries but they still exist in our tables.
However, in the past couple of days, all queries against this table are failing with this error 400 Json is not enabled for current project. and this column type is not present in the bigquery console anymore. It seems it was removed or deprecated? I checked the release notes, but the latest release was way before the error occured. This broke our production environment, and we couldnt even export the data because exporting gave the same error. Instead we had to use a new table without this column which meant we lost all our history.
Did anyone face the same problem with any other column types before, is it normal that a type is deprecated without users being notified beforehand. This is making me question the reliability of bigquery.
Please reach out to Google Cloud support and we will help you fix your issue with that problematic table. You may also want to try fixing it yourself using the ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN statement that is currently in public preview [1]. This will drop the erroneous column (the data in that column only will be lost). The rest of the data will remain usable.
[1] https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/data-definition-language#alter_table_drop_column_statement
I ran into the same error message few days ago and was surprised to read about this policy change that's not backed up by a mitigation process. My attempt to use Vlad Grachev suggestion to drop this column did not prevail, as the console does not allow to query this table (same "Json is not enabled for current project." error).
My only remediation at this point is:
build a new table where the json column is switched to type string
create a pipeline that transforms the objects to strings
migrate the data through the pipeline to the new table
In BigQuery Json data can be stored in a column type "Record.Are you referring the same by JSON column type?
BigQuery uses the RECORD (or STRUCT) type to represent nested structure. A column of RECORD type is in fact a large column containing multiple child columns. For more information Refer the link below,
Json Data in BigQuery
if you are not refering to the Record Data type, The Json Column type might be a test feature that might not dependent on deprecation scheme

Airflow - Bigquery operator not working as intended

I'm new with Airflow and I'm currently stuck on an issue with the Bigquery operator.
I'm trying to execute a simple query on a table from a given dataset and copy the result on a new table in the same dataset. I'm using the bigquery operator to do so, since according to the doc the 'destination_dataset_table' parameter is supposed to do exactly what I'm looking for (source:https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/_api/airflow/contrib/operators/bigquery_operator/index.html#airflow.contrib.operators.bigquery_operator.BigQueryOperator).
But instead of copying the data, all I get is a new empty table with the schema of the one I'm querying from.
Here's my code
default_args = {
'owner':'me',
'depends_on_past':False,
'start_date':datetime(2019,1,1),
'end_date':datetime(2019,1,3),
'retries':10,
'retry_delay':timedelta(minutes=1),
}
dag = DAG(
dag_id='my_dag',
default_args=default_args,
schedule_interval=timedelta(days=1)
)
copyData = BigQueryOperator(
task_id='copyData',
dag=dag,
sql=
"SELECT some_columns,x,y,z FROM dataset_d.table_t WHERE some_columns=some_value",
destination_dataset_table='dataset_d.table_u',
bigquery_conn_id='something',
)
I don't get any warnings or errors, the code is running and the tasks are marked as success. It does create the table I wanted, with the columns I specified, but totally empty.
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
EDIT: I tried the same code on a much smaller table (from 10Gb to a few Kb), performing a query with a much smaller result (from 500Mb to a few Kb), and it did work this time. Do you think the size of the table/the query result matters? Is it limited? Or does performing a too large query cause a lag of some sort?
EDIT2: After a few more tests I can confirm that this issue is not related to the size of the query or the table. It seems to have something to do with the Date format. In my code the WHERE condition is actually checking if a date_column = 'YYYY-MM-DD'. When I replace this condition with an int or string comparison it works perfectly. Do you guys know if Bigquery uses a particular date format or requires a particular syntax?
EDIT3: Finally getting somewhere: When I cast my date_column as a date (CAST(date_column AS DATE)) to force its type to DATE, I get an error that says that my field is actually an int-32 (Argument type mismatch). But I'm SURE that this field is a date, so that implies that either Bigquery stores it as an int while displaying it as a date, or that the Bigquery operator does some kind of hidden type conversion while loading tables. Any idea on how to fix this?
I had a similar issue when transferring data from other data sources than big-query.
I suggest casting the date_column as follows: to_char(date_column, 'YYYY-MM-DD') as date
In general, I have seen that big-query auto detection schema is often problematic. The safest way is to always specify schema before executing its corresponding query, or use operators that support schema definition.

How can I extract 'Memory Use Statistics' from ST03N?

I want to select following data from ST03N in a report:
After a performance trace, I noticed that the data might be stored in one of the tables:
MONI
SWNCMONI
I do not exactly know how to extract the CLUSTD data from the table.
I heard of using function module: SWNC_COLLECTOR_GET_AGGREGATES , but the data does not exactly match with the data from ST03N.
As one probably knows, the MONI and the newer SWNCMONI database tables are cluster tables and shouldn't be read directly, use new FM SWNC_COLLECTOR_GET_AGGREGATES for that.
Nevertheless, if you still want this:
TYPES: tt_memory TYPE TABLE OF swncaggmemory.
DATA: ms_monikey TYPE swncmonikey,
dummy TYPE tt_memory.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <tab> TYPE ANY TABLE.
ASSIGN dummy TO <tab>.
ms_monikey-component = <instance_id>.
ms_monikey-comptype = 'NW Workload'.
ms_monikey-assigndsys = <host>.
ms_monikey-periodtype = 'D'.
ms_monikey-periodstrt = '20200713'.
IMPORT datatable TO <tab>
FROM DATABASE swncmoni(wj) ID ms_monikey
IGNORING STRUCTURE BOUNDARIES.
As you can see that data for PFCG differs from ST03n in spite it is called for the same date.
Answering on your second question: why it differ?
It may depends on data aggregation setting for memory profile
also try to play with aggregation period. Actually I also wasn't able to find correspondence between them.
Many useful info about ST03 is here
https://blogs.sap.com/2007/03/16/how-to-read-st03n-datasets-from-db/

Is it possible to overwrite a partition in BigQuery?

This article: https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/writing-results states that it is possible to overwrite a BigQuery table with new data however what I'd like to do is overwrite a partition (or multiple partitions). Is that possible?
I've read through tonnes of of documentation about inserting data into BigQuery (e.g. https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/creating-column-partitions) and can't find any reference to overwriting partitions so I assume the answer to my question is "no", but thought I'd ask anyway.
You can always over-write a partitioned table in BQ using the postfix of YYYYMMDD in the output table name of your query, along with using WRITE_TRUNCATE as your write disposition (i.e. to truncate whatever is existing in that partition and write new results).
So, lets say when you run your query, and you want to overwrite a partition for date 2019-01-15 in your table named xyz, you just set the output destination for your query results to be yourdataset.xyz$20190115 and specify the write disposition to be WRITE_TRUNCATE.
Hope it helps.
You are in luck! This is possible through MERGE DML.
https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/using-dml-with-partitioned-tables#pruning_partitions_when_using_a_merge_statement
My advice is to play around with it a bit. If you can't get it working, post a new question with specific data/queries.

Google BigQuery - Insert All with Table Suffix failing

I have a project where I was previously creating tables on Insert. I am attempting to instead perform an insertAll with a templateSuffix. It seems to work great with new tables, but I have this odd case.
The following URL (https://gist.github.com/dovy/b5b5b25e660ac037aaa130294ab42e3a) provides an example insert. I have some data from a source, the desired table (table_schema.txt) and a template schema (table_template_schema.txt). The only difference between the two schemas is the order of the last 2 columns:
|- cache_file: string
|- deduped: integer
The error I get is
HttpError:
https://www.googleapis.com/bigquery/v2/projects/flash-student-96619/datasets/log_data_v7/tables/day/insertAll?alt=json
returned "Provided Schema does not match Table
flash-student-96619:log_data_v7.day20160423. Template and generated
table schemas are incompatible"
Is insertAll really that picky? There's no way to re-order columns unless I do a query and replace on the same table. That seems incredibly painful.
Any clues from anyone out there?
I ended up doing a standard insert without tableSuffix and if it failed (try/catch) I did a insert with tableSuffix. That bypasses this insane requirement of perfect order and all works for me.
Just wish I didn't have to get around this.