How can i make an offline app. For ex. user needs to use an app in offline like bible, dictionary app etc..
How can I make similar like this?
Every mobile app is an offline app unless it communicate with a server via some sort of https request.
Anyway, I would suggest you look into Async Storage (built-in react-native) or i would personally use SQLite.
Make sure to save your data mostly or wherever possible as text and render it on some sort of object to display. which will take less space than images making your apps faster and smaller in size.
Related
Some days before, i saw a blog post about why we need to keep whatsapp open on our smartphone to make it work on our PC.
It said that WhatsApp fetches the data (messages) from our smartphone and shows them on our pc which seems pretty good as it will lower the load on our database.
So now i wanted to know if there is a way to do so in react-native i.e, access the localStorage of one device from another.
Why i want to do that?
I am building an app where in the profile, i also take the profile picture from the user and i don't want to store it on the database but instead store it locally and serve it from there.
The reason for that is that we need buckets to store media files and serve them from there and i wanted to cut that part when deploying my app.
I have been using Firebase Web SDK for my react-native app (I am using FIRESTORE to store the data). Up to this point, I have had no problems. It all works smoothly. But now I want to add some kind of offline storage mechanism to my app so that I could still offer some functionality or display some content that was cached from the last connected session even if my users are offline. After some investigation, I have the impression that react-native-firebase is the preferred way to go. Now I have some questions and I like to get some advice from the experienced.
Is react-native-firebase the only option to go? I have quickly read about AsyncStorage and it is just a key-value storage. Considering the simplest thing I want to do is page through a list of firestore documents, this kind of storage seems not to be suitable to do this offline. Like If I wanted to do this with AsyncStorage I would have to put all the content (maybe hundreds of documents) I get from the firestore backend, persist them as a single string value, fetch them back, parse them, page them etc. And write custom logic& methods for all these.
If I was to use react-native-firebase, just enabling the offline storage -I assume- takes care of this for you and you don't have to write any custom logic for offline storage usage. I assume the data that has persisted for offline usage has the same structure as it does in firestore database. I feel like If I use anything other than react-native-firebase, I would have to handle all the custom logic for persisting, reading and rendering the data offline myself. Is that right?
The biggest concern I have is the amount of code refactoring that might be required. I have many lines of code and so many .get().then() like lines where I get and render the data from firestore. In the documentation of react-native-firebase it says:
...aims to mirror the official Firebase Web SDK as closely as
possible.
I am not sure to what extent this is true. I have checked the react-native-firebase's firestore module's reference documentation but I just can't tell how many of these querying methods are actually supported.
So, the way to go is react-native-firebase's way? Would it take a heavy toll on me trying to refactor the existing code? Any similar experience do you have?
I would appreciate any help.
Thanks a lot...
Maintainer of the react-native-firebase library here.
...aims to mirror the official Firebase Web SDK as closely as possible.
This is a minor disclaimer as there are some differences between the two, mainly down to how certain things have to be implemented with React Native.
For example, enablePersistence does not exist on RNFB. Instead, persistence is enabled by default and can be toggled off (or on) via settings().
Is react-native-firebase the only option to go? I have quickly read about AsyncStorage and it is just a key-value storage. Considering the simplest thing I want to do is page through a list of firestore documents, this kind of storage seems not to be suitable to do this offline. Like If I wanted to do this with AsyncStorage I would have to put all the content (maybe hundreds of documents) I get from the firestore backend, persist them as a single string value, fetch them back, parse them, page them etc. And write custom logic& methods for all these.
This is technically possible, however there are downsides to this as you have mentioned. With Firestore, when the device goes offline (quite common on apps) and you attempt a read/write it'll read/update your local cache, which will still trigger event listeners. When the app goes back online, it'll automatically re-sync with the server for you.
If I was to use react-native-firebase, just enabling the offline storage -I assume- takes care of this for you and you don't have to write any custom logic for offline storage usage. I assume the data that has persisted for offline usage has the same structure as it does in firestore database. I feel like If I use anything other than react-native-firebase, I would have to handle all the custom logic for persisting, reading and rendering the data offline myself. Is that right?
This is all handled for you. We wrap around the native Firebase SDKs so expect the same level of consistency if you were developing a native Android/iOS app if not using React Native.
The biggest concern I have is the amount of code refactoring that might be required. I have many lines of code and so many .get().then() like lines where I get and render the data from firestore.
Generally everything is the same apart from a few minor methods for reasons mentioned above.
So, the way to go is react-native-firebase's way? Would it take a heavy toll on me trying to refactor the existing code? Any similar experience do you have? I would appreciate any help.
I'd recommend anyone developing with React Native & Firebase to use RNFB. It provides a lot of extra functionality the Web SDK cannot provide with React Native. Apart from a more cumbersome setup & changing imports, it should work very much the same.
I am making a mobile app using Cordova and I need to save some sensitive and not so sensitive data inside the phone. I am a bit lost on what is the best way to do it.
I need to save:
A JSON web-token (for authentication).
A response from server (I save this to populate my page in case the GET request fails).
Coordinates information when user is logging data to the app (for later upload to a server from with in the app). These will be many separate logs, and can be large in size for local storage ~5-10 MB.
Till now i have been successfully saving everything I need to the local storage but I don't think that is the correct way to do it. So that is why I need some help in deciding what is the best course to take from security point of view.
Saving server response is just for better UI experience and static in size so I guess local storage is a good option to use.
But web-tokens and GPS logs is sensitive information and I dont want to keep it in the local storage as it is accessible from outside the app.
What other options do I have?
Cordova still doesn't have encrypted storage.
Is saving to files a good approach? This here says that data contained inside cordova.file.applicationStorageDirectory is private to the app.So can I use it to save the logs and the token?
The plugin also lists the file systems for Android and iOS and lists which of those are private.
I am currently working with android phones but want to extend the app to iOS later. I have never worked with file systems and caches before so I am a bit lost.
How does the Dropbox Datastore API differ from similar offerings like Parse? One difference that I see is that my users pay for server storage instead of me. Are there other differences?
Disclaimer: I'm a Dropbox engineer who worked on the Datastore API, and know about the Parse API only indirectly. Weigh my opinion appropriately. Major differences I know of (pro and con):
Dropbox Datastores are free to the developer, and free the user for the first 5MB per-app (after which their Dropbox quota applies). Parse charges developers based on how many API requests they’re making.
Parse has minimal offline support, while Dropbox has full offline operation. With Dropbox, if the developer modifies data while offline, those modifications will be reflected in subsequent queries (with Parse, those changes are not reflected). Dropbox provides on-device query logic (unlike Parse) so that apps can continue to generate the views they need to, even when there’s no Internet available. In addition, Parse does not provide conflict resolution or querying offline.
Parse provides the ability to share data between users, and global data for all users of the app. Dropbox Datastores only support per-user data (for each app) for now (sharing is on the roadmap).
I would also add that:
Parse is full feature of backend of as service. You can find a pretty complete list of the other player in this field: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backend_as_a_service. They provide feature like:
Data service
User registration/auth
Push notification
Social
The dropbox Datastore APIs is more focusing on data services. (You also got the User part for free too?) Also it works full offline.
The Parse framework can store data that can be ready by any user in the application.
The Dropbox datastore, store data for each user, and you can't accesss data from other user. That's the main difference.
So easy to get lost in this since you have to read between the lines. My take is that with Datastore you are working with objects stored offline locally as json. I'm hoping they will soon release a Xamarin Android component - they released an IOS component last month. Since Xamarin targets both Android and IOS and Winphone, who knows why they made a dedicated IOS DLL for Xamarin but I digress. With Parse, it appears to me their intent is the always-connected-device. Sure you can save queries locally and you can save (save eventually) locally where Parse will push to the server when it is connected. But saving "eventually" and saving queries for offline work is a different design than just saving and letting Parse do it all in the background for you - which it does not unless I have missed something that would make this attractive to me. I cannot see Parse useable for devices that you know will be sometimes-connected, without a lot of code to make this happen and sync.
I am designing a web app that fetches data every time a user logs into his/her account. The data is an xml file containing image links and some text. I want this data (after image fetch/load from the actual link) to be stored locally so that every time an user opens the app it doesn't have to load everything from scratch. Locally stored contents should load first, then in the background some network processing shall be done so that the newer data is automatically updated. For storing the data I am planning to use SQLite but is there any other efficient way other than this to do the same ?
How does facebook app do this kind of stuff ? Thank you so much
The Facebook app is not really a web app but rather a native Cocoa Touch app.
If you are really creating a web app, your only option is to use localstorage and fetching new data asynchronously using XMLHTTPRequest.
If – on the other hand – your app is a native app, you’ll most likely want to use Core Data for storage and get incremental updates in a separate thread (or using libdispatch in case you’re only targetting post 4.0 devices) using a separate managed object context which you can then merge to the main thread using mergeChangesFromContextDidSaveNotification:.