This is the SQL I am trying to create with JOOQ -
select distinct(kmp.*) from office_all_company_kmp kmp
inner join company_kmp companykmp on kmp.id=companykmp.kmp_id
where companykmp.company_id=?1
I am writing code in Kotlin. I had 2 issues doing this -
In the select clause, unless I add a .asList() to the fields array, I couldn't get it compiling.
The fetch mapper had to be handcoded. Is there a way I can use do this without writing all that code? I can map records fetched back from one table without writing any mapping.
Here's what I am talking about:
fun OfficeAllCompanyKmpDao.findByCompany(companyId: UUID): List<OfficeAllCompanyKmp> =
this.ctx()
.selectDistinct(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.fields().asList()) // without the asList() it wouldn't compile
.from(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP)
.join(COMPANY_KMP).on(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.ID.eq(COMPANY_KMP.KMP_ID))
.where(COMPANY_KMP.COMPANY_ID.eq(companyId))
.fetch { // how do I write the mapper without manually writing code like the below?
OfficeAllCompanyKmp(
id = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.ID],
officeId = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.OFFICE_ID],
din = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.DIN],
pan = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.PAN],
name = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.NAME],
dateOfBirth = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.DATE_OF_BIRTH],
address = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.ADDRESS],
email = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.EMAIL],
kmpDetails = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.KMP_DETAILS],
createdTimestamp = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.CREATED_TIMESTAMP],
updatedTimestamp = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.UPDATED_TIMESTAMP],
versionNo = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.VERSION_NO],
createdUserId = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.CREATED_USER_ID],
updatedUserId = it[OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.UPDATED_USER_ID]
)
}
A better approach than inner joining and then removing duplicates again would be to semi join your other table using IN or EXISTS:
this.ctx()
.selectFrom(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP)
.where(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.ID.`in`(
select(COMPANY_KMP.KMP_ID)
.from(COMPANY_KMP)
.where(COMPANY_KMP.COMPANY_ID.eq(companyId)))
.fetchInto(OfficeAllCompanyKmp::class.java)
Or, alternatively, use jOOQ's synthetic LEFT SEMI JOIN syntax (see also this blog post for an explanation for this syntax, or this one for joins in general, or Wikipedia's nice explanation about semi joins)
this.ctx()
.select()
.from(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP)
.leftSemiJoin(COMPANY_KMP)
.on(OFFICE_ALL_COMPANY_KMP.ID.eq(COMPANY_KMP.KMP_ID))
.and(COMPANY_KMP.COMPANY_ID.eq(companyId))
.fetchInto(OfficeAllCompanyKmp::class.java)
Your problem 1) went away by using different jOOQ API, where you don't have to list all columns explicitly in SELECT. Your problem 2) is fixed easily by calling fetchInto() instead.
Related
In Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations, they describe a method of creating SQL statements "as objects, as opposed to text", but this is somewhat of a lie. They use the objects to create the text which then populates str sqlStatement = selectExpr.getExpression(null);
This sqlStatement would then feed the obsolete statement.executeQuery(sqlStatement);.
I can make the warning go away by using executeQueryWithParameters() with an empty map (SqlParams::create()) as the second parameter, but this seems to be "cheating".
Is there a way I can/should refactor the following to populate the map correctly?
SQLBuilderSelectExpression selectExpression = SQLBuilderSelectExpression::construct();
selectExpression.parmUseJoin(true);
SQLBuilderTableEntry vendTable = selectExpression.addTableId(tableNum(VendTable));
SQLBuilderTableEntry dirPartyTable = vendTable.addJoinTableId(tableNum(DirPartyTable));
SQLBuilderFieldEntry accountNum = vendTable.addFieldId(fieldNum(VendTable, AccountNum));
SQLBuilderFieldEntry name = dirPartyTable.addFieldId(fieldNum(DirPartyTable, Name));
SQLBuilderFieldEntry dataAreaId = vendTable.addFieldId(fieldNum(VendTable, dataAreaId));
SQLBuilderFieldEntry blocked = vendTable.addFieldId(fieldNum(VendTable, Blocked));
vendTable.addRange(dataAreaId, curext());
vendTable.addRange(blocked, CustVendorBlocked::No);
selectExpression.addSelectFieldEntry(SQLBuilderSelectFieldEntry::newExpression(accountNum, 'AccountNum'));
selectExpression.addSelectFieldEntry(SQLBuilderSelectFieldEntry::newExpression(name, 'Name'));
str sqlStatement = selectExpression.getExpression(null);
// FIXME:
ResultSet resultSet = statement.executeQueryWithParameters(sqlStatement, SqlParams::create());
Below is how you would write your code as a standard X++ query. However, I must note that what you're doing may not be the best approach.
DirPartyTable is a special table in AX as it supports inheritance, so you should make sure you fully understand the framework. See:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamicsax-2012/appuser-itpro/implementing-the-global-address-book-framework-white-paper
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/fin-ops/organization-administration/overview-global-address-book
Code:
VendTable vendTable;
DirPartyTable dirPartyTable;
while select AccountNum from vendTable
where vendTable.Blocked == CustVendorBlocked::No
// DataAreaId along with Partition, are automatically included in the query context depending
// on the company context you're executing the code from
// && vendTable.dataAreaId == curext()
join Name from dirPartyTable
where dirPartyTable.RecId == vendTable.Party
{
info(strFmt("Account: %1; Name: %2", vendTable.AccountNum, dirPartyTable.Name));
}
Regarding an AOT query, look in the AOT at \Queries\VendTableListPage and expand the data sources and learn from it.
Regardless of what OP is trying to do with the query, the answer to the question of "how do I correctly replace executeQuery with executeQueryWithParameters" can be found in the following article.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/dev-ref/query-with-parameters
The new *WithParameters APIs were introduced as a way to mitigate sql injection attacks which may occur when building up sql strings manually with un-sanitized sql parameters as input.
Snippet of the code example from above doc shows how to correctly populate the map to match the sql statement:
str sql = #"
UPDATE Wages
SET Wages.Wage = Wages.Wage * #percent
WHERE Wages.Level = #Level";
Map paramMap = SqlParams::create();
paramMap.add('percent', 1.1); // 10 percent increase
paramMap.add('Level', 'Manager'); // Management increase
int cnt = statement.executeUpdateWithParameters(sql, paramMap);
How can I transform this sql to codeigniter query? I have screenshot of an EER diagram to help you understand better. So there are three tables to join. I guess, one is "pjesma", then "izvodjac", and "izvodi_pjesmu". This sql works when I run it and gives me results I want. I am also using pagination so I need limit and offset somehow included.
SELECT pjesma_id, naslov, naziv
FROM pjesma p, izvodjac i, izvodi_pjesmu ip
WHERE p.pjesma_id = ip.pjesma_pjesma_id
AND i.izvodjac_id = ip.izvodjac_izvodjac_id
in model:
public function paginacija_pjesme($limit, $offset) {
$this->db->select('pjesma_id', 'naslov', 'naziv');
$this->db->from('pjesma p');
$this->db->join('izvodi_pjesmu ip', 'p.pjesma_id=ip.pjesma_pjesma_id');
$this->db->join('izvodjac i', 'i.izvodjac_id=ip.izvodjac_izvodjac_id');
$this->db->limit($limit, $offset);
$query = $this->db->get();
return $query->result();
}
EDIT:
So in select I used wrong syntax, this line:
$this->db->select('pjesma_id', 'naslov', 'naziv');
should be like this:
$this->db->select('pjesma_id, naslov, naziv');
A few things, as you are dealing with objects within the query builder class, you can method-chain and make things a little less cluttered.
You are maybe getting an ambiguous column error, joining and not prefixing your select. Hard to tell without the error being posted you are facing.
Always best to (just in case) set defaults to your method arguments as well, in case you pass a blank variable (or don't need to for whatever reason).
When you are using multiple tables in the FROM statement you are actually doing a CROSS JOIN, and your new code is giving INNER JOIN,trying the join syntax direct to your SQL server might help as you are not actually doing the same thing between your first written query, and the codeigniter one..
Try the below with LEFT join just to see... If there are NULL joins using INNER they will be omitted
public function paginacija_pjesme($limit = 10, $offset = 0) {
$query = $this->db->select('p.pjesma_id, p.naslov, i.naziv')
->from('pjesma p')
->join('izvodi_pjesmu ip', 'p.pjesma_id = ip.pjesma_pjesma_id', 'left')
->join('izvodjac i', 'i.izvodjac_id = ip.izvodjac_izvodjac_id', 'left')
->limit($limit, $offset)
->get();
return $query->result();
}
Are you getting any errors? what do you see if you print_r($query->result()) ?
try also spitting out $this->db->last_query() - this will output the SQL codeigniter has build. Then running this directly to your database, and see the results from there. You might even see the issue without needing to run it.
This is an example of what your current codeigniter code is generating (as you can see, different to your original query):
SELECT pjesma_id, naslov, naziv
FROM pjesma p
INNER JOIN izvodi_pjesmu ip ON p.pjesma_id = ip.pjesma_pjesma_id
INNER JOIN izvodjac i ON i.izvodjac_id = ip.izvodjac_izvodjac_id
# LIMIT 10,0
I have following sql query in my hbm file. The SCHEMA, A and B are schema and two tables.
select
*
from SCHEMA.A os
inner join SCHEMA.B o
on o.ORGANIZATION_ID = os.ORGANIZATION_ID
where
case
when (:pass = 'N' and os.ORG_ID in (:orgIdList)) then 1
when (:pass = 'Y') then 1
end = 1
and (os.ORG_SYNONYM like :orgSynonym or :orgSynonym is null)
This is a pretty simple query. I had to use the case - when to handle the null value of "orgIdList" parameter(when null is passed to sql IN it gives error). Below is the relevant java code which sets the parameter.
if (_orgSynonym.getOrgIdList().isEmpty()) {
query.setString("orgIdList", "pass");
query.setString("pass", "Y");
} else {
query.setString("pass", "N");
query.setParameterList("orgIdList", _orgSynonym.getOrgIdList());
}
This works and give me the expected output. But I would like to know if there is a better way to handle this situation(orgIdList sometimes become null).
There must be at least one element in the comma separated list that defines the set of values for the IN expression.
In other words, regardless of Hibernate's ability to parse the query and to pass an IN(), regardless of the support of this syntax by particular databases (PosgreSQL doesn't according to the Jira issue), Best practice is use a dynamic query here if you want your code to be portable (and I usually prefer to use the Criteria API for dynamic queries).
If not need some other work around like what you have done.
or wrap the list from custom list et.
Using Entity Framework, I'm trying to join two tables like this.
...
join f in ent.FTypes on Int32.Parse(c.CourseID[0].ToString()) equals f.FTypeID
...
The first character of the string CourseID is a digit, and FTypeID is an int.
This doesn't seem to work though. The exception message I get is:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'Int32 Parse(System.String)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression."} System.Exception {System.NotSupportedException}
What I want to replicate is the SQL string equivalent (which works fine):
join FType f on SUBSTRING(c.CourseID, 1, 1) = f.FTypeID
Does anyone have the solution to have to do this in LINQ to Entities?
This is a rather nasty join, but I did some testing in Entity Framework with similar data and arrived at something you can test on yours.
It uses string.Substring to grab the first character from your string operand, and then uses a combination of the EF-only method SqlFunctions.StringConvert (these methods are found in System.Data.Objects.SqlClient) with a cast to double1 and finally a string.Trim2 for your integer operand.
I have tested this and confirmed that all functions are supported at least in EF 4. Several other methods proposed or featured in the question do not work, because Entity Framework does not know how to tranlsate them to the appropriate SQL equivalent.
join f in ent.FTypes
on c.CourseID.Substring(0, 1)
equals SqlFunctions.StringConvert((double)f.FTypeID).Trim()
It produces a SQL join that looks like the following:
INNER JOIN [dbo].[FTypes] AS [Extent2]
ON ((SUBSTRING([Extent1].[CourseID], 0 + 1, 1)) = (LTRIM(RTRIM(STR( CAST( [Extent2].[FTypeID] AS float))))))
OR ((SUBSTRING([Extent1].[CourseID], 0 + 1, 1) IS NULL) AND (LTRIM(RTRIM(STR( CAST( [Extent2].[FTypeID] AS float)))) IS NULL))
So based on that, you might want to do some additional filtering as necessary.
Give it a shot and see if that helps solve the problem.
1 The cast to double is necessary because SqlFunctions.StringConvert does not have an overload for integer and there is no other single best match, so I force one.
2 The resultant string needs to be trimmed because the string conversion generates some excess padding.
I'm not sure this worked 8 years ago, but modern EF6 implementation allows you to add anonymous types, so you can add the conversion to your initial select statements, and then you can just compare that new properties directly in the join.
from c in ent.Courses
select new { typeId = c.CourseId.Substring(0, 1), c }
join f in ent.FTypes.Select(t => new { stringId =
t.FTypeId.ToString(), t }
on c.typeId equals f.stringId into ...
NOTE: The join-statement does not appear to support ToString() but the select-statements do.
You could also move the CouresId.Substring into the join statement, but that may run less efficiently there.
Results in SQL like this:
INNER JOIN [ent].[FTypes] AS [Extent2] ON
(LTRIM(RTRIM(SUBSTRING([Extent1].[nvarchar(max)], 3 + 1, 1)))) =
CAST([Extent2].[Id] AS nvarchar(max))
I'm currently struggling on how to execute my query on a Table object in Zend and get a Rowset in return. Reason I need particularly THIS is because I'm modifying a code for existing project and I don't have much flexibility.
Query:
SELECT *
FROM `tblname` ud
WHERE ud.user_id = some_id
AND
(
(ud.reputation_level > 1)
OR
(
(SELECT COUNT( * )
FROM `tblname` t
WHERE t.user_id = ud.user_id
AND t.category_id <=> ud.category_id
AND t.city_id <=> ud.city_id
) = 1
)
)
Is there a way to describe this query using Select object?
Previous SQL solution was very simple and consisted of one WHERE clause:
$where = $this->getAdapter()->quoteInto("user_id = ?",$user_id);
return $this->fetchAll($where);
I need to produce same type of the result (so that it could be processed by existing code) but for more complicated query.
Things I've tried
$db = Zend_Db_Table::getDefaultAdapter();
return $db->query($sql)->fetchAll();
---------------- OR ----------------------
return $this->fetchAll($select);
---------------- OR ----------------------
return $this->_db->query($sql)->fetchAll();
But they either produce arrays instead of objects or fail with Cardinality violation message.
I would appreciate any help on how to handle SQL text queries in Zend.
$dbAdapter = Zend_Db_Table::getDefaultAdapter();
//change the fetch mode becouse you don't like the array
$dbAdapter->setFetchMode(Zend_Db::FETCH_OBJ);
$sql = "you're long sql here";
$result = $dbAdapter->fetchAll($sql);
Zend_Debug::dump($result);
exit;
For a list of all fetch modes go to Zend_Db_Adapter
To write you're query using Zend_Db_Select instead of manual string , look at Zend_Db_Slect