GORM LOG sql: expected 0 arguments, got 1
my code is
func GetPipelineConfigKey(riskConfigKey string) string{
var PipelineConfigKey string
sql := fmt.Sprintf("SELECT context_name FROM hawk_context_name WHERE id = (SELECT service_line_id FROM risk_predict_config_key WHERE config_key = '%s');", riskConfigKey)
contextDb.Exec(sql, &PipelineConfigKey)
return PipelineConfigKey
}
Exec has the following signature
func (s *DB) Exec(sql string, values ...interface{}) *DB {
values is a varargs parameter here, for each variable you pass to Exec, there should be a ? in your sql query. You pass 1 argument but query don't expect any argument(no ?). Thats why you get following error.
sql: expected 0 arguments, got 1
Maybe you want to save the result in PipelineConfigKey. Use this way for that
Create a result struct
type Result struct {
Name string
}
And scan result
db.Raw(sql).Scan(&result)
Full Code:
type Result struct {
Name string
}
func GetPipelineConfigKey(riskConfigKey string) string{
sql := fmt.Sprintf("SELECT context_name FROM hawk_context_name WHERE id = (SELECT service_line_id FROM risk_predict_config_key WHERE config_key = '%s');", riskConfigKey)
db.Raw(sql).Scan(&result)
return result.Name
}
Related
I'm trying to build a simple orm layer for golang.
Which would take a struct and generate the cols [] which can then be passed to sql function
rows.Scan(cols...) which takes pointers of fields in the struct corresponding to each of the columns it has found in the result set
Here is my example struct
type ExampleStruct struct {
ID int64 `sql:"id"`
aID string `sql:"a_id"`
UserID int64 `sql:"user_id"`
And this is my generic ORM function
func GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(model *ExampleStruct) map[string]interface{} {
typeOfModel := reflect.TypeOf(*model)
ValueOfModel := reflect.ValueOf(*model)
columnToDataPointerMap := make(map[string]interface{})
for i := 0; i < ValueOfModel.NumField(); i++ {
sql_column := typeOfModel.Field(i).Tag.Get("sql")
structValue := ValueOfModel.Field(i)
columnToDataPointerMap[sql_column] = structValue.Addr()
}
return columnToDataPointerMap
}
Once this method works fine i can use the map it generates to create an ordered list of sql pointers according to the column_names i get in rows() object
However i get below error on the .Addr() method call
panic: reflect.Value.Addr of unaddressable value [recovered]
panic: reflect.Value.Addr of unaddressable value
Is it not possible to do this ?
Also in an ideal scenario i would want the method to take an interface instead of *ExampleStruct so that it can be reused across different db models.
The error says the value whose address you want to get is unaddressable. This is because even though you pass a pointer to GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(), you immediately dereference it and work with a non-pointer value later on.
This value is wrapped in an interface{} when passed to reflect.ValueOf(), and values wrappped in interfaces are not addressable.
You must not dereference the pointer, but instead use Type.Elem() and Value.Elem() to get the element type and pointed value.
Something like this:
func GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(model *ExampleStruct) map[string]interface{} {
t := reflect.TypeOf(model).Elem()
v := reflect.ValueOf(model).Elem()
columnToDataPointerMap := make(map[string]interface{})
for i := 0; i < v.NumField(); i++ {
sql_column := t.Field(i).Tag.Get("sql")
structValue := v.Field(i)
columnToDataPointerMap[sql_column] = structValue.Addr()
}
return columnToDataPointerMap
}
With this simple change it works! And it doesn't depend on the parameter type, you may change it to interface{} and pass any struct pointers.
func GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(model interface{}) map[string]interface{} {
// ...
}
Testing it:
type ExampleStruct struct {
ID int64 `sql:"id"`
AID string `sql:"a_id"`
UserID int64 `sql:"user_id"`
}
type Point struct {
X int `sql:"x"`
Y int `sql:"y"`
}
func main() {
fmt.Println(GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(&ExampleStruct{}))
fmt.Println(GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(&Point{}))
}
Output (try it on the Go Playground):
map[a_id:<*string Value> id:<*int64 Value> user_id:<*int64 Value>]
map[x:<*int Value> y:<*int Value>]
Note that Value.Addr() returns the address wrapped in a reflect.Value. To "unwrap" the pointer, use Value.Interface():
func GetSqlColumnToFieldMap(model interface{}) map[string]interface{} {
t := reflect.TypeOf(model).Elem()
v := reflect.ValueOf(model).Elem()
m := make(map[string]interface{})
for i := 0; i < v.NumField(); i++ {
colName := t.Field(i).Tag.Get("sql")
field := v.Field(i)
m[colName] = field.Addr().Interface()
}
return m
}
This will output (try it on the Go Playground):
map[a_id:0xc00007e008 id:0xc00007e000 user_id:0xc00007e018]
map[x:0xc000018060 y:0xc000018068]
For an in-depth introduction to reflection, please read blog post: The Laws of Reflection
I am trying to find the find the result of num1 raised to the power num2:
This is my code ->
fun power(num1 : Int, num2: Int): Int {
var result = 1
while (num2 != 0) {
return result *= num1
num2--
}
}
But the above code is producing the following error -->
Calculator.kt:30:16: error: assignments are not expressions, and only expressions are allowed in this context
return result *= num1
^
Calculator.kt:33:5: error: a 'return' expression required in a function with a block body ('{...}')
}
^
I have read a number of articles but not able to understand. Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thank you
An expression is something that evaluates to a value. An assignment is something that assigns a value to a variable or property.
x *= y is an assignment that is shorthand for x = x * y.
You cannot return an assignment, because it does not evaluate to a value. An assignment contains an expression on the right side of the equals sign, but as a whole does not represent an expression.
There are some other syntax problems you have. You can't modify a function paramter's value (num2-- isn't allowed).
The logic also doesn't make sense. return returns an expression immediately. To fix your code, you need to create a local variable from num2, and move the return statement to the end.
fun power(num1 : Int, num2: Int): Int {
var result = 1
var count = num2
while (count != 0) {
result *= num1
count--
}
return result
}
FYI, there's a function called repeat that is simpler than using a while loop with a counter. It runs the code inside the brackets by the number of times you give.
fun power(num1 : Int, num2: Int): Int {
var result = 1
repeat(num2) {
result *= num1
}
return result
}
You function contains multiple errors, I suggest you to study Kotlin, here a reference. Kotlin website has some more material.
Back to your problem, I have modified your function:
fun power(num1 : Int, num2: Int): Int {
var result = 1
var num2_local = num2
while (num2_local != 0) {
result *= num1
num2_local--
}
return result
}
Problems with your version:
you return from the function immediately
basic types args passed to kotlin functions are passed by const copy, this means that you cannot modify them (e.g num2--)
If you keep a local modifiable reference (var keyword) withing your function, then you achieve your goal
I am experiencing some really weird inconsistencies when executing queries, and was wondering if anyone knew why.
Imagine I have a struct defined as follows:
type Result struct {
Afield string `db:"A"`
Bfield interface{} `db:"B"`
Cfield string `db:"C"`
Dfield string `db:"D"`
}
And a MySQL Table with the following cols:
A : VARCHAR(50)
B : INT
C : VARCHAR(50)
D : VARCHAR(50)
The query I would like to execute:
SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A="a"
first way it can be executed:
db.Get(&result, `SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A="a"`)
second way it can be executed:
db.Get(&result, `SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A=?`, "a")
The inconsistencies I am experiencing are as follows: When executing the query the first way, the type of Bfield is int. However, when executing the query the second time, it is []uint8.
This outcome is occurring for example when B is 1.
Why is the type of Bfield different depending on how the query is executed?
connection declaration:
// Connection is an interface for making queries.
type Connection interface {
Exec(query string, args ...interface{}) (sql.Result, error)
Get(dest interface{}, query string, args ...interface{}) error
Select(dest interface{}, query string, args ...interface{}) error
}
EDIT
This is also happening using the Go database/sql package + driver. The queries below are assigning Bfield to []uint8 and int64 respectively.
db is of type *sql.DB
query 1:
db.QueryRow(SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A="a").Scan(&result.Afield, &result.Bfield, &result.Cfield, &result.Dfield)
-- > type of Bfield is []uint8
query 2:
db.QueryRow(SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A=?, "a").Scan(&result.Afield, &result.Bfield, &result.Cfield, &result.Dfield)
--> type of Bfield is int64
EDIT
Something else to note, when chaining multiple WHERE clauses, as long as at least 1 is populated using ?, the query will return int. Otherwise if they are all populated in the string, it will return []uint8
Short answer: because the MySQL driver uses a different protocol for queries with and without parameters. Use a prepared statement to get consistent results.
The following explanation refers to the standard MySQL driver github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql, version 1.4
In the first case, the driver sends the query directly to MySQL, and interprets the result as a *textRows struct. This struct (almost) always decodes results into a byte slice, and leaves the conversion to a better type to the Go sql package. This works fine if the destination is an int, string, sql.Scanner etc, but not for interface{}.
In the second case, the driver detects that there are arguments and returns driver.ErrSkip. This causes the Go SQL package to use a PreparedStatement. And in that case, the MySQL driver uses a *binaryRows struct to interpret the results. This struct uses the declared column type (INT in this case) to decode the value, in this case to decode the value into an int64.
Fun fact: if you provide the interpolateParams=true parameter to the database DSN (e.g. "root:testing#/mysql?interpolateParams=true"), the MySQL driver will prepare the query on the client side, and not use a PreparedStatement. At this point both types of query behave the same.
A small proof of concept:
package main
import (
"database/sql"
"log"
_ "github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql"
)
type Result struct {
Afield string
Bfield interface{}
}
func main() {
db, err := sql.Open("mysql", "root:testing#/mysql")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
if _, err = db.Exec(`CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS mytable(A VARCHAR(50), B INT);`); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
if _, err = db.Exec(`DELETE FROM mytable`); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
if _, err = db.Exec(`INSERT INTO mytable(A, B) VALUES ('a', 3)`); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
var (
usingLiteral Result
usingParam Result
usingLiteralPrepared Result
)
row := db.QueryRow(`SELECT B FROM mytable WHERE A='a'`)
if err := row.Scan(&usingLiteral.Bfield); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
row = db.QueryRow(`SELECT B FROM mytable WHERE A=?`, "a")
if err := row.Scan(&usingParam.Bfield); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
stmt, err := db.Prepare(`SELECT B FROM mytable WHERE A='a'`)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer stmt.Close()
row = stmt.QueryRow()
if err := row.Scan(&usingLiteralPrepared.Bfield); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
log.Printf("Type when using literal: %T", usingLiteral.Bfield) // []uint8
log.Printf("Type when using param: %T", usingParam.Bfield) // int64
log.Printf("Type when using prepared: %T", usingLiteralPrepared.Bfield) // int64
}
Your first SQL string, in MySql is ambigous and can have too meaning as explained on StackOverflow in following address
When to use single quotes, double quotes, and back ticks in MySQL
Depending on SQL-MODE, your SQL command can be interpreted as
SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A='a'
that is what I think you are expecting.
or as
SELECT A, B, C, D FROM table WHERE A=`a`
To avoid this ambiguity, can you make a new FIRST test in replacing double quotes by single quote ?
If the same behavior continue to be there, my answer is not a good response.
If BOTH SQL select return same value, your question has been solved.
Using ` character, you pass a variable name and not a string value !
The base concept creating a Database Manager API for getting data through an API. I am using the GORM for getting data of the instances of the strcuts. So there is 300-400 struct which represents the tables.
type Users struct {
ID int64
Name string
}
type Categories struct {
ID int64
Category string
}
The next step I implement a function which is return the correct instance of the struct by table name, what I get through the API endpoint param.
func GetModel(model string) interface{} {
switch model {
case "users":
return Users{}
case "categories"
return Categories{}
}
return false
}
After there is an operations struct where the only one field is the DB. There is methods, for example the GetLast() where I want to use the GORM db.Last(&users) function.
func (o Operations) GetLast(model string) interface{} {
modelStruct := GetModel(model)
.
.
.
return o.DB.Last(&modelStruct)
}
There is points so this is what I don't know. The current solution is not working because in this case it is an interface{} I need make a type assertion more info in this question. The type assertion is looks like:
func (o Operations) GetLast(model string) interface{} {
modelStruct := GetModel(model)
.
test := modelStruct.(Users)
.
return o.DB.Last(&test)
}
This solution working, but in this case I lost the modularity. I try using the reflect.TypeOf(modelStruct), but it is also not working because the result of the reflect.TypeOf is a reflect.Type, with is not a golang type.
Basically I solved the problem, for getting the model as a pointer, and after I return it back as a json file.
So my model is the following:
var Models = map[string]interface{}{
"users": new(Users),
"categories": new(Categories),
}
And it is return back a new model by table type. what I can use for gorm First() function. Then json Marshal it, and return.
func (o Operation) First(model string, query url.Values) string {
modelStruct := Models[model]
db := o.DB
db.First(modelStruct)
response, _ := json.Marshal(modelStruct)
clear(modelStruct)
return string(response)
}
Before the return I clear the model pointer because the First() function store callbacks for the latest queries.
func clear(v interface{}) {
p := reflect.ValueOf(v).Elem()
p.Set(reflect.Zero(p.Type()))
}
I use https://github.com/jmoiron/sqlx to make queries to Postgres.
Is it possible to get back the whole row data when inserting a new row?
Here is the query I run:
result, err := Db.Exec("INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES ($1)", user.Name)
Or should I just use my existing user struct as the source of truth about the new entry in the database?
Here is docs about transaction of sqlx:
The result has two possible pieces of data: LastInsertId() or RowsAffected(), the availability of which is driver dependent. In MySQL, for instance, LastInsertId() will be available on inserts with an auto-increment key, but in PostgreSQL, this information can only be retrieved from a normal row cursor by using the RETURNING clause.
So I made a complete demo for how to execute transaction using sqlx, the demo will create an address row in addresses table and then create a user in users table using the new address_id PK as user_address_id FK of the user.
package transaction
import (
"database/sql"
"github.com/jmoiron/sqlx"
"log"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
)
import (
"github.com/icrowley/fake"
)
type User struct {
UserID int `db:"user_id"`
UserNme string `db:"user_nme"`
UserEmail string `db:"user_email"`
UserAddressId sql.NullInt64 `db:"user_address_id"`
}
type ITransactionSamples interface {
CreateUserTransaction() (*User, error)
}
type TransactionSamples struct {
Db *sqlx.DB
}
func NewTransactionSamples(Db *sqlx.DB) ITransactionSamples {
return &TransactionSamples{Db}
}
func (ts *TransactionSamples) CreateUserTransaction() (*User, error) {
tx := ts.Db.MustBegin()
var lastInsertId int
err := tx.QueryRowx(`INSERT INTO addresses (address_id, address_city, address_country, address_state) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4) RETURNING address_id`, 3, fake.City(), fake.Country(), fake.State()).Scan(&lastInsertId)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "insert address error")
}
log.Println("lastInsertId: ", lastInsertId)
var user User
err = tx.QueryRowx(`INSERT INTO users (user_id, user_nme, user_email, user_address_id) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4) RETURNING *;`, 6, fake.UserName(), fake.EmailAddress(), lastInsertId).StructScan(&user)
if err != nil {
tx.Rollback()
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "insert user error")
}
err = tx.Commit()
if err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "tx.Commit()")
}
return &user, nil
}
Here is test result:
☁ transaction [master] ⚡ go test -v -count 1 ./...
=== RUN TestCreateUserTransaction
2019/06/27 16:38:50 lastInsertId: 3
--- PASS: TestCreateUserTransaction (0.01s)
transaction_test.go:28: &transaction.User{UserID:6, UserNme:"corrupti", UserEmail:"reiciendis_quam#Thoughtstorm.mil", UserAddressId:sql.NullInt64{Int64:3, Valid:true}}
PASS
ok sqlx-samples/transaction 3.254s
This is a sample code that works with named queries and strong type structures for inserted data and ID.
Query and struct included to cover used syntax.
const query = `INSERT INTO checks (
start, status) VALUES (
:start, :status)
returning id;`
type Row struct {
Status string `db:"status"`
Start time.Time `db:"start"`
}
func InsertCheck(ctx context.Context, row Row, tx *sqlx.Tx) (int64, error) {
return insert(ctx, row, insertCheck, "checks", tx)
}
// insert inserts row into table using query SQL command
// table used only for loging, actual table name defined in query
// should not be used from services directly - implement strong type wrappers
// function expects query with named parameters
func insert(ctx context.Context, row interface{}, query string, table string, tx *sqlx.Tx) (int64, error) {
// convert named query to native parameters format
query, args, err := tx.BindNamed(query, row)
if err != nil {
return 0, fmt.Errorf("cannot bind parameters for insert into %q: %w", table, err)
}
var id struct {
Val int64 `db:"id"`
}
err = sqlx.GetContext(ctx, tx, &id, query, args...)
if err != nil {
return 0, fmt.Errorf("cannot insert into %q: %w", table, err)
}
return id.Val, nil
}
PostgreSQL supports RETURNING syntax for INSERT statements.
Example:
INSERT INTO users(...) VALUES(...) RETURNING id, name, foo, bar
Documentaion: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-insert.html
The optional RETURNING clause causes INSERT to compute and return value(s) based on each row actually inserted (or updated, if an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause was used). This is primarily useful for obtaining values that were supplied by defaults, such as a serial sequence number. However, any expression using the table's columns is allowed. The syntax of the RETURNING list is identical to that of the output list of SELECT. Only rows that were successfully inserted or updated will be returned.