How to configure gem5 simulator for SMART Microarchitecture - gem5

I am new to gem5 simulator, here I am trying to compare the results(simulation parameters) of the various architecture of NoC(like baseline, SMART). I am not able to configure the NoC in SMART architecture can someone tell me how to configure the simulator to support SMART architecture.

Related

very old CPU INTEL 8086 + 8087 EMBEDDED system Intel IC-86 Compiler

It was old challenge for me but I have succeed to build my own embedded system based on a 80188 INTEL ( like 8086). I am using the compiler C 4.5 from Intel. As I want to go further I would like to integrate the 8087 coprocessor.
This technology is older that 40 years...
Before spending time to wire the 8087 on by board I am trying to use the 8087 emulator given by the compiler. IC-86 version 4.5 from INTEL.
I cannot find the way to link the E87.lib and relocate the library in my project.
Does someone could share examples of link/relocate using a 8087 on an embedded system?
Sounds that the libraries given for the 8087 can't be relocated in the 20-bits addresses?

How can I use QEMU to simulate mixed platforms?

Backgournd
There is a lot of documentation about using QEMU for simulating a system of particular architecture (a "platform").
For example, x86, ARM or RISCV system.
The first step is to configure QEMU target-list, for example ./configure --target-list=riscv32-softmmu.
It's also possible to provide multiple targets in the target-list, but apparently that builds an independent simulation for each specified platform.
My goal, however, is to simulate a system with mixed targets: an x86 machine which also hosts a RISCV embedded processor over PCI.
Obviously I need to implement a QEMU PCI device which would host the RISCV device on the x86 platform, and
I have a good idea how to implement a generic PCI device.
However, I'm not sure about the best approach to simulate both x86 and RISCV together on the same QEMU simulation.
One approach is to run two instances of QEMU (as two separate processes) and use some sort of IPC for communicating between the x86 and the RISCV simulation.
Another possible (?) approach could be to build RISCV QEMU as a loadable library and load it from x86 QEMU.
Perhaps it's even possible to have a single QEMU application that simulates both x86 and RISCV?
Yet another approach is not to use QEMU for simulating the RISCV device. I could implement a QEMU PCI device that completely encapsulates a RISCV simulation such as tiny-emu, but I would rather use QEMU for both x86 and RISCV.
My questions are:
Are there some guidelines or examples for a mixed-target QEMU project?
I've searched for examples but only found references to using QEMU as a single platform simulation, where first you choose which platform you would like to run.
What would be the best approach for simulating a mixed platform in QEMU? Separate QEMU processes with IPC? Or is there a way to configure QEMU in such a way that it could simulates a mixed platform?
Related
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-12/msg01969.html
QEMU does not support running multiple target architectures in the same QEMU process. (This is something we would in theory like to be able to do, but it would require a lot of reworking of core parts of QEMU which assume that the target architecture is known at compile time. So far nobody has felt it important enough to put in the significant development effort needed.)
So if you want to do this you'll need to somehow stitch together a QEMU process for the primary architecture with some other process to do the secondary architecture (QEMU or otherwise). This has been done (for instance Xilinx have an out-of-tree QEMU-based system that does this kind of thing with multiple QEMU processes) but I'm not aware of any easy off-the-shelf frameworks or setups to do it. I suspect that figuring out how time/clocks interact between the two simulations is one of the tricky aspects.
There is another option
you can start 2 QEMU processes and connect them through socket
Then you can create run script that start both of them in your order
its less "clock" accurate but good enough for virtual your HW
The other option is https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/MultiProcessQEMU
but you will need some hacking this experimental code
Use renode. It not only provides easy multi cpu simulation, but also hdl and multimachine simulation synchronozed in a single process.

What exactly is QEMU? Emulator? VM?

I am trying to make a use of QEMU in my embedded software development process. I think it will be useful for me to run my code without having to touch the hardware. Especially when the software is sitting in the user-space of Linux. Now, I am trying to get my head wrapped around the big concepts in QEMU.
At what point is QEMU virtualizing the hardware? Can I assume it virtualizes x86 when the host platform is also x86 with virtualization technology built into the processor?
In other words, can I assume QEMU is emulating the hardware when the target platform is not the same as host platform?
It's a general-purpose emulator software (type 2 hypervisor) which can use virtualization when the target and hosts are of the same architecture. In Linux you need to enable the KVM kernel module to be able to use the virtualization technology of the processor.

install vxworks on vortex 86d

I wonder by any chance is there a way to install vxworks on vdx86d(vdx6354)? I searched a lot on the net and did not find NO to this question, but no manual or help could be find by me. anybody did this before and know how to do it?
VxWorks certainly runs on PC architecture x86 targets; there is probably already a suitable 80486 BSP that will suit this board. You can search for a suitable BSP here. There is only one BSP explicitly listed for 486 targetted at VxWorks 5.4/Tornado 2.0 - so it is as antique as 486 architecture itself. VxWorks 6.9 however has a single unified BSP for x86 which will no doubt work with your board.
VxWorks is not "installed" as such in the same way as a GPOS such as Linux or Windows; rather you link your application with the VxWorks libraries to create an application image that runs directly on boot. How the bootstrap process works varies between architectures and hardware implementation, but as a generic PC architecture board, booting a VxWorks application on your board will be the same as any other PC target. As such what you need to look for are directions on booting VxWorks on PC architecture rather then being specific about your actual board.
On PC architecture you can boot from mass-storage, or from a network server. Booting via a network connection is the normal method during debug/development. A great deal of the information available is for older versions of VxWorks. However it seems that it is possible to boot VxWorks via a VxWorks specific bootstrap, or from a generic PC bootloader such a s U-Boot.
Ultimately Wind River Support is probably a good starting point.

How do I use the Silicon Laboratories IDE with SDCC?

I'm thinking about using a microcontroller with an 8051 core from Silicon Laboratories.
I hope that I can use C rather than assembly language, so I installed SDCC.
I installed the "Silicon Laboratories IDE" to download the executable binaries to the on-chip Flash program memory.
It also supposedly can be set up (under the Project > Tool Chain Integration menu)
to use "any" 8051 compiler.
I tried to set it up to use SDCC, but every time I hit the "Assemble/Compile File" button it tells me
"Compiler process did not sucessfully complete."
How do I get new C code I write onto the SiLabs C8051F310 chip?
Is there a web site with a step-by-step HOWTO?
(Would it be easier to use a MAKEFILE that calls SDCC, only using the "Silicon Laboratories IDE" for the very last step of downloading the executable binary to the chip?)
Start with Silicon Labs Application Note 198 - INTEGRATING SDCC 8051 TOOLS INTO THE SILICON LABS IDE*. It is written for an older version of the IDE, but the general configuration should remain the same. It is probably important to note that AN198 needs updating for SDCC 3.0.0. Additional information from the Silicon Labs MCU User Forum or Microcontrollers Knowledge Base may prove useful as well.
The SDCC Compiler User Guide* can be useful if additional command line options are desired.
The Silicon Labs USB Debug Adapter can be used with the Silicon Labs IDE and the on-chip debug/programming circuitry of the C8051F310* for programming the MCU and debugging your code.
* PDF Link