It's a .jar available in various versions at Maven Repo.
But what category is it? It is published by org.codehaus.groovy, the same outfit that I get my groovy-all dependency from. I also find that import groovy.sql doesn't work in a script unless I specifically include this dependency. So it would appear not to be part of the core language.
Outside a Gradle context I find that I have to manually put the .jar file under ~/.groovy/lib in order to use it. If I put the wrong version (e.g. 2.5.9 for 3.0.2) under ~/.groovy/lib the script won't run... even if I'm not using groovy.sql at all!
Is this a "dependency"? It seems a typically powerful and hassle-free Groovy way of manipulating databases. Are there any other powerful add-on (non-core) Groovy .jar file modules like this, which have to be manually placed under ~/.groovy/lib, that I should know about?
groovy consists of subprojects:
https://github.com/apache/groovy/tree/master/subprojects
and groovy-sql one of the subprojects
all subprojects are published in maven as separate libraries
prior to version 2.5 there was groovy-all-XX.jar that includes all other groovy libraries
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy-all/2.4.19/
however starting from v 2.5 groovy-all represented by groovy-all-XX.pom that depends on all other groovy libraries
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/groovy/groovy-all/2.5.0/
so, to include all groovy features you have to specify groovy-all in your maven/gradle/... dependency
and finally useful site to dig dependencies:
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.codehaus.groovy/groovy-all/3.0.2
Related
When setting up h2o.ai for production the documentation tells you how "Build and extract a model" which ultimately leads you to
Download the MOJO and the resulting h2o-genmodel.jar
What I'm wondering, is if that h2o-genmodel.jar is really tied to the mojo zip file, or if one jar can work with multiple different model zips?
The latest h2o-genmodel.jar will work with all MOJO files. (Note that this is not the case for POJOs or with early versions of the h2o-genmodel.jar.)
I can update the documentation to include this clarification.
I've been fighting with this for a while and reading a lot of docs pages and other questions but still can't get it to work.
In my ORMLite project, I have a ormlite-core project which has core functionality and then a -jdbc and -android projects (with more planned). Each of these sub-projects include the core functionality but add per-architecture implementations. I want to release a single set of jars for both the -jdbc and -android versions -- i.e. I want to copy the -core javadocs and sources into the resulting jars.
For the javadocs, it was cake with the includeDependencySources config entry set to true. However, I've been fighting for a while now on how to get the source jars released by the -android package to include the -core sources. I've tried the maven-dependency-plugin to copy and unpack the dependency sources to target/sources but I see no easy way to get them to be included in the source jar -- with the appropriate paths. I've gone over the maven-source-plugin and maven-assembly-plugin docs but I'm still in the dark.
If someone has figured out the magic maven fu to get this done, can they please share the appropriate working pom.xml examples? Thanks much.
I've reviewed the following similar questions among others. I've also looked at the Sonatype Maven manual and read a bunch web pages posing similar questions.
Delivering a single jar with a Maven project
Maven - 'all' or 'parent' project for aggregation?
While not an answer to the question, a possible reason why a parameter like <includeDependencySources> is not present for maven source plugin is because, while javadocs can be generated from a jar containing classes, the sources cannot be. The plugin cannot assume that the sources of the dependencies are available to it since they do not get installed by default.
I guess the best answer to this question at this time is "you can't get there from here". This requires extensions to the maven-source-plugin.
I ended up determining that combining these sub-projects into the same jar was not a good idea and now I release 3 separate jars.
I'm new to Maven and have skimmed over the documentation as I am following the Hibernate tutorial at http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/core/reference/en/html_single/#tutorial-firstapp-mvn.
I have installed Maven and successfully setup a web-app but this does not contain all of the standard directories mentioned in the tutorial. Am I going mad?
When building my Maven project I am using the maven-archetype-webapp. This gives me the arh-webapp\src\main\resources and arh-webapp\src\main\webapp directories but I'm missing quite a few directories mentioned on the link http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html.
Surely I don't have to manually add these? If not then the Hibernate documentation does not mention what archetype to use in order to achieve the directory structure used in their tutorial. Please can someone enlighten me.
What archetype do I need to use in order to have the above directory plus the src/main/java directory? If there is no such archetype then can easily append these using Maven? and how?
Surely you'll have to manually add these.
Just create those directories that according to the Maven convention are missing. Remember, a Maven Archetype is just a starting point to save you time configuring your workspace. After encountering many problems in some Archetypes myself I've been accustomed to just use a basic-web-app-archetype and then customize it myself, as a beginner with Maven you'll be better off doing that, and will learn a lot.
Regards.
Not all the directories mentioned are required for your standard web application. In fact, the reason behind the presence of the src/main/java, src/main/resources and the src/main/webapp directories is due to the archetype that you've used.
IMHO, the book titled "Better Builds with Maven" will serve you better; the Sonatype books on Maven might also help. The complete Maven documentation is also available as a PDF file, for future reference.
But just in case, you need some clarity on the terms used, here's some:
Archetype: A pattern for projects. Simple web applications (with no dependencies on other frameworks/libraries) have their own archetypes, so do applications using Spring, Hibernate, Seam, etc. Some archetypes will result in creation of different directories, as they are coded that way. You might be able to change the directory structures in most cases, although I cannot vouch for every archetype. For instance, it is quite possible to place your sources in 'src' instead of 'src/main/java', although this requires additional configuration in the POM.
Lifecycles, Phases and Goals: A Maven build lifecycle is a series of phases, with each phase executing a set of goals. Maven can be commanded to execute a build phase, which results in execution of all phases until and including the specified phase.
Maven plugins: Maven plugins contain one or more goals. Goals need not be bound to phases, but usually you would bind them to particular phases. Plugins are the basis for everything operational in Maven; you're using plugins even though you are just compiling the application (the Maven compiler plugin is a core plugin that is present in the Maven distribution).
I hope the above helps, but I would suggest that the reference books be followed.
Suppose, I have an opensource project that depends on some library, that must be patched in order to fix some issues. How do I do that? My ideas are:
Have that library sources set up as a module, keep them in my vcs. Pros: simple. Cons: some third party sources in my repo, might slow down build process, hard to find a patched place (though can be fixed in README)
Have a module, like in 1, but keep patched source files only, compile them with orignal library jar in classpath and somehow replace *.class files in library jar on build. Pros: builds faster, easy to find patched places. Cons: hard to configure, that jar hackery is non-obvious (library jar in repository and in my project assembly would be different)
Keep patched *.class files in main/resources, and replace on packaging like in 2). Pros: almost none. Cons: binaries in vcs, hard to recompile a patched class as patch compilation is not automated.
One nice solution is to create a distinct project with patched library sources, and deploy it on local/enterprise repository with -patched qualifier. But that would not fit for an opensourced project that is meant to be easily buildable by anyone who checks out its sources. Or should I just say "and also, before you build my project, please check out that stuff and run mvn install".
One nice solution is to create a distinct project with patched library sources, and deploy it on local/enterprise repository with -patched qualifier. But that would not fit for an opensourced project that is meant to be easily buildable by anyone who checks out its sources. Or should I just say "and also, before you build my project, please check out that stuff and run mvn install".
This is what I would do (and actually what I do) for both a corporate and an opensource project. Get the sources, put them under version control in a distinct project, patch them, rebuild the patched library (and include this information in the version, something like X.Y.Z-patched), deploy it to a repository (you could use SVN for this, a la Google Code1), declare the repository in your POM and update the dependency to point on your patched version.
With this approach, you can say to your users: check out my code and run mvn install and they will just get the patched version without any extra action. This is IMHO the cleanest way (not error prone, no class path order mess, no increase of the build time, etc).
1 Lots of people are deploying their code to their hosted subversion repository (how-to in this post).
One nice solution is to create a distinct project with patched library sources, and deploy it on local/enterprise repository with -patched qualifier. But that would not fit for an opensourced project that is meant to be easily buildable by anyone who checks out its sources. Or should I just say "and also, before you build my project, please check out that stuff and run mvn install".
I'd agree with this and Pascal's answer. Some additional notes:
you may use dependency:unpack on the original artifact and then combine that with your compiled classes if you don't want to rebuild the whole dependant project
in either case, your pom.xml will need to correctly represent the dependencies of that library
you can still integrate this as part of your project's build to avoid the 'deploy to a repository' step
make sure you honour the constraints of the project's license when doing all this!
Summary: I'm looking for a way to instruct maven to search for dependencies in target/classes instead of jar in the local repository
Say I have 2 modules, A and B where A depends on B. Both are listed in a module S. Normally I need to run 'mvn install' in S. I'm looking for a way to run 'mvn compile' so that when A is compiled its classpath will contain ../B/target/classes instead of ~/.m2/repository/com/company/b/1.0/b-1.0.jar.
(my reason is so that i can have continous compilation without the need to go through packaing and installation, or, more exactly, use 'mvn scala:cc' on multiple modules)
I don't think that this is possible without horrible hacking, this is just not how maven works. Maven uses binary dependencies and needs a local repository to resolve them. So, the maven way to handle this is to launch a reactor build on all modules. Just in case, have a look at Maven Tips and Tricks: Advanced Reactor Options.
But, during development, can't you just import all your projects in your IDE and use "project references" (i.e. configure your projects to depend on source code instead of a JAR) like most Java developers are doing? This is the common approach to avoid having to install an artifact to "see" the modifications.
If this is not possible and if you really don't want to install artifacts into your local repository, then you'll have to move your code into a unique module.
i know this is annoying. which helped me here is definitely IDE support. eclipse and IntelliJ are clever to collect all dependencies once a maven-project import is done. even cross module dependencies are compiled live.