It is possible in MS ACCESS 2016 to create a column in a table that is a conditional SUM of another table?
Example
Table 1 - Columns
ID, NAME, TOTAL
Table 2 - Columns
ID, NAME, IDREF, CUSTO
Data:
Table 1
ID | Name | Total
---+-------+----------------------------------------------------------------
35 | Test | "SUM(CUSTO) of ALL ELEMENTS OF TABLE 2 WHERE table2.IDREF = table1.ID"
Table 2
ID | Name | IDREF | CUSTO
---+-------+-------+--------
1 | Test | 35 | 50
2 | Test | 35 | 30
3 | abcd | 12 | 30
4 | Test | 35 | 10
The result should be:
table 1
ID | Name | Total
---+------+------
35 | Test | 90 (50 + 30 + 10 from table 2 where idref = 35)
You can use a subquery:
select t1.*,
(select sum(t2.CUSTO)
from table2 as t2
where t2.idref = t1.id
) as total
from table1 as t1;
More efficiently, consider an aggregate subquery in JOIN to run only once and not SELECT subquery that runs for every row.
SELECT t1.*, agg.Total
FROM table1 as t1
INNER JOIN
( SELECT t2.idref, SUM(t2.CUSTO) AS Total
FROM table2 as t2
GROUP BY t2.idref
) AS agg
ON agg.idref = t1.id
Alternatively, replace subquery with exact saved query for even more efficiency per Allen Browne's optimizing query tips in MS Access:
A subquery will be considerably faster than a domain aggregate function. In most cases, a stacked query will be faster yet (i.e. another saved query that you include as a "table" in this query.)
SELECT t1.*, q.Total
FROM table1 as t1
INNER JOIN mySavedAggQuery q
ON q.idref = t1.id
Related
I have two tables with the same variables referring to attributes of a person.
How can I combine data from two such tables picking the best available value for each column from each table for each field?
Requirements:
For each field, I would like to fill it with a value from either one of the tables, giving a preference to table 1.
Values can be NULL in either table
In the combined table, the value for column 1 could come from table 2 (in case table 1 is missing a value for that person) and the value for column 2 could from table 1 (because both tables had a value, but the value from table 1 is preferred).
In my real example, I have many columns, so an elegant solution with less code duplication would be preferred.
Some users may exist in only one of the tables.
Example:
Table 1:
user_id | age | income
1 | NULL| 58000
2 | 22 | 60000
4 | 19 | 35000
Table 2:
user_id | age | income
1 | 55 | 55000
2 | 19 | NULL
3 | 22 | 33200
Desired output:
user_id | age | income
1 | 55 | 58000
2 | 22 | 60000
3 | 22 | 33200
4 | 19 | 35000
I think that's a full join and priorization logic with colaesce():
select user_id,
coalesce(t1.age, t2.age) as age,
coalesce(t1.income, t2.income) as income
from table1 t1
full join table2 t2 using(user_id)
Use full outer join if user_id in each table is unique.
SELECT
COALESCE(t1.user_id, t2.user_id) AS user_id,
GREATEST(t1.age, t2.age) AS age,
GREATEST(t1.income, t2.income) AS income
FROM t1
FULL OUTER JOIN t2 ON t1.user_id = t2.user_id
try like below using coalesce()
select t1.user_id, coalesce(t1.age,t2.age),
t1.income>t2.income then t1.income else t2.income end as income
table1 t1 join table2 t2 on t1.usesr_id=t2.user_id
You can use below code:
With TableA(Id,age,income) as
( --Select Common Data
select table_1.id,
--Select MAX AGE
case
when table_1.age> table_2.age or table_2.age is null then table_1.age else table_2.age
end,
--Select MAX Income
case
when table_1.income>table_2.income or table_2.income is null then table_1.income else table_2.income
end
from table_1 inner join table_2 on table_2.id=table_1.id
union all
-- Select Specific Data of Table 2
select table_2.id,table_2.age,table_2.income
from table_2
where table_2.id not in (select table_1.id from table_1)
union all
-- Select Specific Data of Table 1
select table_1.id,table_1.age,table_1.income
from table_1
where table_1.id not in (select table_2.id from table_2)
)select * from TableA
I have two tables:
total_table =
| Title | Value |
|-------|-------|
| total | 20 |
breakdown_table =
| Title | Value |
|--------|-------|
| total | 20 | (this is the same as the above table)
| type a | 10 |
| type b | 5 |
| type c | 5 |
I would like to create a new table which includes both columns from breakdown_table but adds a 3rd column that shows the breakdown percentages (100%, 50%, 25%, 25%). How can I do this without hardcoding the denominator?
Here's some syntax I've tried but it keeps giving me errors about commas and equijoin. I'm not trying to join the tables with a key, I just want to use the single value in the total_table.
data_out = SELECT breakdown_table.*,
breakdown_table.Value / total.Value
FROM breakdown_table, total_table;
You can cross join the tables (properly):
SELECT
b.*,
100.0 * b.Value / t.Value as data_out
FROM breakdown as b cross join total as t;
You can try using cross join:
select t1.Title, t1.Value, 100 * t1.Value / t2.Value AS BPCT
from mytable t1
cross join mytable t2
where t2.Title = "total"
Very similar to other answers here but will get you the percentages in the right format.
select t1.*, format(t1.value/1.0/t2.value,'P0') as pcnt
from breakdown_table t1 cross apply total_table t2
If you wish to use the implicit join method, then you need to change the column name in total_table
select t1.*,format(value*1.0/total,'P0') as pcnt
from breakdown_table t1,(select value as total from total_table) t2
Say, I have a table that looks like this:
ID | PNo | MM | CP |
---|-----|------|----|
1 | 13 | True | 4 |
2 | 92 | True | 3 |
3 | 1 | True | 3 |
4 | 13 | False| 2 |
5 | 13 | True | 3 |
6 | 1 | True | 3 |
I want to go through all PNos and compare all rows with that PNo and only select those that have different values in field MM.
My plan was to create a table with the distinct values of PNo, iterate through that table by using the usual record set and write an SQL query for each PNo.
Now my problem is the construction of the SQL query.
I can select all rows with Table.PNo = rs("PNo") but I have no idea how to formulate the query to catch the rows with varying values.
You can use a subquery:
Select *
From YourTable
Where PNo IN
(Select T.PNo
From YourTable
Group By PNo, MM
Having Count(*) = 2)
I think this should work.
This will create a cartesian product on y our PNo field. i.e. Every record connected to every record (but just on that PNo).
SELECT *
FROM Table1 T1 INNER JOIN Table1 T2 ON T1.PNo = T2.PNo
You'll end up with 9 instances of PNo 13, 4 of 1 and 1 of 92. Now we just want to return the ones where MM is different, so add that to the WHERE clause.
SELECT *
FROM Table1 T1 INNER JOIN Table1 T2 ON T1.PNo = T2.PNo
WHERE T1.MM <> T2.MM
ORDER BY T1.ID
This will return four records. PNo 1 and 92 will have vanished as the MM result was the same for those. ID number 4 will be returned twice as the MM value is different from that in ID 1 and ID 5.
To remove the duplicate value you could then use DISTINCT:
SELECT DISTINCT T1.ID, T1.PNo, T1.MM, T1.CP
FROM Table1 T1 INNER JOIN Table1 T2 ON T1.PNo = T2.PNo
WHERE T1.MM <> T2.MM
ORDER BY T1.ID
Note: One of the differences between the answer given by #Jonathan and mine is that his query is updateable and mine isn't.
The following should do what you want:
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE PNo in
(SELECT t.PNo FROM MyTable t
INNER join MyTable f
ON t.PNo = f.PNo
WHERE t.MM = true and f.MM = false)
The inner join ensures that only those PNos that have both MM false and MM true are included.
I want to create a view in my database, based on these three tables:
I would like to select the rows in table3 that has the highest value in Weight, for rows that has the same value in Count.
Then I want them grouped by Category_ID and ordered by Date, so that if two rows in table3 are identical, I want the newest.
Let me give you an example:
Table1
ID | Date | UserId
1 | 2015-01-01 | 1
2 | 2015-01-02 | 1
Table2
ID | table1_ID | Category_ID
1 | 1 | 1
2 | 2 | 1
Table3
ID | table2_ID | Count | Weight
1 | 1 | 5 | 10
2 | 1 | 5 | 20 <-- count is 5 and weight is highest
3 | 1 | 3 | 40
4 | 2 | 5 | 10
5 | 2 | 3 | 40 <-- newest of the two equal rows
Then the result should be row 2 and 5 from table 3.
PS I'm doing this in mssql.
PPS I'm sory if the title is not appropriate, but I did not know how to formulate a good one.
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT
t3.*
,RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY [Count] ORDER BY [Weight] DESC, Date DESC) highest
FROM TABLE3 t3
INNER JOIN TABLE2 t2 ON t2.Id = t3.Table2_Id
INNER JOIN TABLE1 t1 ON t1.Id = t2.Table1_Id
) t
WHERE t.Highest = 1
This will group by the Count (which must be the same). Then it will determine which has the highest weight. If two of more of them have the same 'heighest' weight, it takes the one with the most recent date first.
You can use RANK() analytic function here, and give those rows a rank and than choose the first rank for each ID
Something like
select *
from
(select
ID, table2_ID, Count, Weight,
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY ID ORDER BY Count, Weight DESC) as Highest
from table3)
where Highest = 1;
This is the syntax for Oracle, if you not using it look in the internet for the your syntax which should be almost the same
Platform: Oracle 10g
I have a table (let's call it t1) like this:
ID | FK_ID | SOME_VALUE | SOME_DATE
----+-------+------------+-----------
1 | 101 | 10 | 1-JAN-2013
2 | 101 | 20 | 1-JAN-2014
3 | 101 | 30 | 1-JAN-2015
4 | 102 | 150 | 1-JAN-2013
5 | 102 | 250 | 1-JAN-2014
6 | 102 | 350 | 1-JAN-2015
For each FK_ID I wish to show a single result showing the two most recent SOME_VALUEs. That is:
FK_ID | CURRENT | PREVIOUS
------+---------+---------
101 | 30 | 20
102 | 350 | 250
There is another table (lets call it t2) for the FK_ID, and it is here that there is a reference
saying which is the 'CURRENT' record. So a table like:
ID | FK_CURRENT | OTHER_FIELDS
----+------------+-------------
101 | 3 | ...
102 | 6 | ...
I was attempting this with a flawed sub query join along the lines of:
SELECT id, curr.some_value as current, prev.some_value as previous FROM t2
JOIN t1 curr ON t2.fk_current = t1.id
JOIN t1 prev ON t1.id = (
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT id FROM (
SELECT id, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SOME_DATE DESC) as rno FROM t1
WHERE t1.fk_id = t2.id
) WHERE rno = 2
)
)
However the t1.fk_id = t2.id is flawed (i.e. wont run), as (I now know) you can't pass a parent
field value into a sub query more than one level deep.
Then I started wondering if Common Table Expressions (CTE) are the tool for this, but then I've no
experience using these (so would like to know I'm not going down the wrong track attempting to use them - if that is the tool).
So I guess the key complexity that is tripping me up is:
Determining the previous value by ordering, but while limiting it to the first record (and not the whole table). (Hence the somewhat convoluted sub query attempt.)
Otherwise, I can just write some code to first execute a query to get the 'current' value, and then
execute a second query to get the 'previous' - but I'd love to know how to solve this with a single
SQL query as it seems this would be a common enough thing to do (sure is with the DB I need to work
with).
Thanks!
Try an approach with LAG function:
SELECT FK_ID ,
SOME_VALUE as "CURRENT",
PREV_VALUE as Previous
FROM (
SELECT t1.*,
lag( some_value ) over (partition by fk_id order by some_date ) prev_value
FROM t1
) x
JOIN t2 on t2.id = x.fk_id
and t2.fk_current = x.id
Demo: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/d3e640/15
Try out this:
select t1.FK_ID ,t1.SOME_VALUE as CURRENT,
(select SOME_VALUE from t1 where p1.id2=t1.id and t1.fk_id=p1.fk_id) as PREVIOUS
from t1 inner join
(
select t1.fk_id, max(t1.id) as id1,max(t1.id)-1 as id2 from t1 group by t1.FK_ID
) as p1 on t1.id=p1.id1