I have used MAX(Date) and that will get me what i need until i put the qty in the mix, since they get different results after they fix things it has multiple answers and makes me group by the qty which in the end gives me multiple results. i just want the last count numbers.
SELECT (CH.MOD_DATE_TIME),LH.LOCN_BRCD ,DSP_SKU, (CH.ACTL_INVN_QTY-CH.EXPTD_QTY) "NET VAR" FROM CYCLE_COUNT_HIST CH , LOCN_HDR LH, ITEM_MASTER IM WHERE CH.WHSE = 'SH1' AND CH.LOCN_ID = LH.LOCN_ID AND CH.SKU_ID = IM.SKU_ID AND IM.CD_MASTER_ID = '147001' and DSP_SKU LIKE 'JBLBAR31BLKAM' AND LH.LOCN_BRCD = 'HAHK42A01' AND trunc(CH.CREATE_DATE_TIME) > SYSDATE-120
It returns 3 rows of results and I want the most recent line only. I plan to modify this to (select dsp_sku, sum(NET_VAR) in the end to run a summary of the sku.
I think you can use subquery.
You just need to put the following condition in where clause:
where .....
AND
CH.MOD_DATE_TIME = (select MAX( MOD_DATE_TIME)
from cycle_count_hist)
Related
I have the following tables below and their schema:
INV
id, product code, name, ucost, tcost, desc, type, qoh
1,123,CPASS 700,1.00,5.00,CPASS 700 Lorem, COM,5
2,456,Shelf 5,2.00,6.00,Shelf 5 KJ, BR,3
GRP
id,type,desc
1,COM,COMPASS
2,BR,SHELF
Currently I have a query like this:
SELECT INV.*,GRP.DESCR AS CATEGORY
FROM INV LEFT JOIN GRP ON INV.TYPE = GRP.TYPE
WHERE INV.QOH = 0
There is no problems with that query.
Right now,I want to know the SUM of the TCOST of every INV record where their QOH is 0.
In this situation, does that I mean all I have to do is to write a separate query like the one below:
SELECT SUM(TCOST)
FROM INV
WHERE QOH = 0
Does it make any sense for me to try and combine those two queries as one ?
First understand that SUM is the aggregate function hence either you can run the Query like
(SELECT SUM(TCOST) FROM INV WHERE QOH=0) as total
This will return Sum of TCOST in INV Table for mentioned condition.
Another approach is finding the Sum based on the some column (e.g. Type)
you could write query like
SELECT Type , SUM(TCOST) FROM INV WHERE QOH=0 GROUP BY type ;
Its not clear on what criteria you want to sum . But I think above two approaches would provide you fare idea .
Mmm, you could maybe use a correlated query, though i'm not sure it's the best approach since I'm not sure I understand what your attempting to do:
SELECT INV.*,
GRP.DESCR AS CATEGORY ,
(SELECT SUM(TCOST) FROM INV WHERE QOH=0) as your_sum
FROM INV LEFT JOIN GRP ON INV.TYPE = GRP.TYPE
WHERE INV.QOH = 0
If you want only one value for the sum(), then your query is fine. If you want a new column with the sum, then use window functions:
SELECT INV.*, GRP.DESCR AS CATEGORY,
SUM(INV.TCOST) OVER () as sum_at_zero
FROM INV LEFT JOIN
GRP
ON INV.TYPE = GRP.TYPE
WHERE INV.QOH = 0;
It does not make sense to combine the queries by adding a row to the first one, because the columns are very different. A SQL result set requires that all rows have the same columns.
In the following query I am trying to get TotalQty to SUM across both the locations for item 6112040, but so far I have been unable to make this happen. I do need to keep both lines for 6112040 separate in order to capture the different location.
This query feeds into a Jasper ireport using something called Java.Groovy. Despite this, none of the PDFs printed yet have been either stylish or stained brown. Perhaps someone could address that issue as well, but this SUM issue takes priority
I know Gordon Linoff will get on in about an hour so maybe he can help.
DECLARE #receipt INT
SET #receipt = 20
SELECT
ent.WarehouseSku AS WarehouseSku,
ent.PalletId AS [ReceivedPallet],
ISNULL(inv.LocationName,'') AS [ActualLoc],
SUM(ISNULL(inv.Qty,0)) AS [LocationQty],
SUM(ISNULL(inv.Qty,0)) AS [TotalQty],
MAX(CAST(ent.ReceiptLineNumber AS INT)) AS [LineNumber],
MAX(ent.WarehouseLotReference) AS [WarehouseLot],
LEFT(SUM(ent.WeightExpected),7) AS [GrossWeight],
LEFT(SUM(inv.[Weight]),7) AS [NetWeight]
FROM WarehouseReceiptDetail AS det
INNER JOIN WarehouseReceiptDetailEntry AS ent
ON det.ReceiptNumber = ent.ReceiptNumber
AND det.FacilityName = ent.FacilityName
AND det.WarehouseName = ent.WarehouseName
AND det.ReceiptLineNumber = ent.ReceiptLineNumber
LEFT OUTER JOIN Inventory AS inv
ON inv.WarehouseName = det.WarehouseName
AND inv.FacilityName = det.FacilityName
AND inv.WarehouseSku = det.WarehouseSku
AND inv.CustomerLotReference = ent.CustomerLotReference
AND inv.LotReferenceOne = det.ReceiptNumber
AND ISNULL(ent.CaseId,'') = ISNULL(inv.CaseId,'')
WHERE
det.WarehouseName = $Warehouse
AND det.FacilityName = $Facility
AND det.ReceiptNumber = #receipt
GROUP BY
ent.PalletId
, ent.WarehouseSku
, inv.LocationName
, inv.Qty
, inv.LotReferenceOne
ORDER BY ent.WarehouseSku
The lines I need partially coalesced are 4 and 5 in the above return.
Create a second dataset with a subquery and join to that subquery - you can extrapolate from the following to apply to your situation:
First the Subquery:
SELECT
WarehouseSku,
SUM(Qty)
FROM
Inventory
GROUP BY
WarehouseSku
Now apply to your query - insert into the FROM clause:
...
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT
WarehouseSKU,
SUM(Qty)
FROM
Inventory
GROUP BY
WarehouseSKU
) AS TotalQty
ON Warehouse.WarehouseSku = TotalQty.WarehouseSku
Without seeing the actual schema DDL it is hard to know the exact cardinality, but I think this will point you in the right direction.
I am having some issues with Over Partition by. I am trying to get:
Desired Result
The inventory ordered column is the problem using this code:
select
l.whseloc,l.invtid,
l.qty,
case when f.MRPFlag= 0 then 'NON-Usable' else 'Usable' end as NetStatus,
SUM(p.qtyord-p.qtyrcvd) over (Partition by l.invtid) as InventoryOrdered,
SUM(l.qty*f.mrpflag)over(partition by l.invtid) as TotalNet
from location l (nolock)
join inventory i (nolock) on l.invtid=i.invtid
join loctable f (nolock) on l.whseloc=f.whseloc
left join [dbo].[opspurord] p (nolock) on l.InvtID=p.InvtID
What am I doing wrong?
First Try
There is not enough information (no sample data) in the question to tell you where you have gone wrong, so I will describe how to debug and fix the problem.
Display PARTITION BY columns and aggregated columns in your result set as separate columns, while keeping everything else the same.
select l.whseloc, l.invtid, l.qty,
case when f.MRPFlag= 0 then 'NON-Usable' else 'Usable' end as NetStatus,
SUM(p.qtyord-p.qtyrcvd) over (Partition by l.invtid) as InventoryOrdered,
p.qtyord-p.qtyrcvd AS InventoryOrderedRowSUM
SUM(l.qty*f.mrpflag)over(partition by l.invtid) as TotalNet,
l.qty*f.mrpflag AS TotalNetRowSUM
from location l (nolock)
...
ORDER BY l.invtid -- Add Order BY to make it easier to analyse data
l.invtid - this will show you groups of rows which summed by SUM function
InventoryOrderedRowSUM - shows you the value produced for each row. If you manually add up these values for a given l.invtid you should get the same result as InventoryOrdered.
Where to go from here:
By looking at the individual InventoryOrderedRowSUM you should be able to tell what combination of these values gives you the desired result. Once you have this worked out, you can adjust your InventoryOrdered function. If this is not obvious, then you need repeat the above process while adding p.qtyord and p.qtyrcvd to the result set.
I suspect that InventoryOrdered should just be p.qtyord-p.qtyrcvd (no SUM needed) based on the fact that 11200 is divisible by 1600.
I'm creating a report in SSRS and I can't use the IIF statement within the report to get the following done. I'm getting aggregate errors when I try to sum within the SSRS report.
`IIF(Fields!Period=0,0,IIF(Period=13,0,Balance/12))`
Works fine up until the moment I try to Sum.. get a silly aggregate error "Aggregate functions other than First, Last, Previous, Count, and Count Distinct can only aggregate data of a single data type"... These are all integers.
Basically I have a value in Master.Balance that I need to divide by 12 only when Secondary.Period equals 0 or 13. If Secondary.Period equals 0 or 13 then the value should be 0. I know my problem has to do with including the relationship between the tables, but I just don't know how to write that in.
Here is what I'm trying to use:
`CASE
WHEN Secondary.Period=0 OR Secondary.Period=13
THEN 0
ELSE Master.Balance/12
End As BudByPer`
Here is how the two tables are related to each other:
`FROM Master LEFT OUTER JOIN Secondary
ON Master.Project = Secondary.Project
AND Master.object = Secondary.object
AND Master.org = Secondary.org
`
How do I get the above into this:
SELECT DISTINCT Master.Project, Master.Object, Master.Fund, Master.Segment, Master.Balance, Secondary.project, Secondary.object, Secondary.org, Secondary.Period, Secondary.object, Secondary.Project.
FROM Master LEFT OUTER JOIN Secondary
ON Master.Project = Secondary.Project
AND Master.object = Secondary.object
AND Master.org = Secondary.org
WHERE (Master.object>=600000)
ORDER BY [Master.Fund]
You just need a select, it looks fine to me...
SELECT
Master.account,
Master.segment,
Secondary.desc,
Secondary.bud,
Segment.Num,
Segment.office,
CASE
WHEN Secondary.Period=0 OR Secondary.Period=13 THEN 0
ELSE Master.Balance/12
End As BudByPer
FROM Master
LEFT JOIN Secondary
ON Master.Project = Secondary.Project
AND Master.object = Secondary.object
AND Master.org = Secondary.org
I'm utilizing four separate tables and i can't seem to figure out why my DISTINCT isn't filtering the results. I'm trying to get a single result for each acct.Name in this query. Regardless if i use DISTINCT or not, i get the exact same results.
Select DISTINCT
acct.Name,
inv.InvoiceNumber,
acct.AccountNumber,
addr.Line1,
addr.Line2,
addr.Line3,
addr.City,
addr.StateOrProvince,
addr.postalcode
FROM InvoiceBase inv, AccountBase acct
JOIN AccountExtensionBase base
ON base.AccountId = acct.AccountId
JOIN CustomerAddressBase addr
ON addr.ParentId = acct.AccountId
WHERE
inv.AccountId=acct.AccountId And
base.New_cocat_master = 1 And
base.New_CompanyId = 1 And
inv.StateCode = 0 And
inv.Name = '2013 ' + acct.AccountNumber
ORDER by acct.Name
The first result i get now has the first three values (acct.Name, inv.InvoiceNumnber, acct.AccountNumber) and the rest of the columns are blank. The second row has all of the columns with the information. I'm just trying to make the acct.Name to be DISTINCT
The rows are DISTINCT
This may be confusing when you are selecting multiple strings, since there might be hidden characters/spaces. Select the length of each one of those fields and compare the so called duplicate rows.
Turns out all i had to do was add in a simple clause in the WHERE, since the address is required for a valid invoice (where to send it):
WHERE
base.New_cocat_master = 1 And
base.New_CompanyId = 1 And
inv.StateCode = 0 And
inv.Name = '2013 ' + acct.AccountNumber And
addr.Line1 IS NOT NULL