I'm new to microservice architecture. I was reading about it and start to be interested in developing website using the architecture. I've used Lumen micro framework.
What I am going to ask you has been browsed on the internet and I couldn't find the way. So, I finally reached out to stackoverflow. Below is the overview of my current implementation.
Up until this point, I am able to request user, patient, treatment, etc.. data from the api gateway and get the response data properly.
When client requests user data like name, department, client requests this route, http://localhost:8000/users/1, (port 8000 is for api gateway and 8001 for user service, let's say) and gateway goes to 8001 and grab the user data.
I've also enabled the authorization between api gateway and individual services in order to prevent separately perform CRUD operatons to the individual services - when request goes from gateway to service, I have put the pregenerated token (which is also predefined in the service) in the header and when it reaches the service, the service validates if the token is equal by comparing its predefined one. So, it's working.
But to be able to request from api gateway to services, I've used client credentials grant type. So, here is my question.
How can I implement the login and register? Does client credentials
grant type enable to do so? If not, what is the appropriate one? What
is the right way to implement the system? Could you please kindly explain in
advance? Thank you so much.
Updated
In conclusion, I want to know how to configure authentication between front-end and api gateway.
Your API architecture looks good - nothing there needs to change. However there are 3 parts to the architecture:
APIs (done)
UIs (to do)
Authorization Server (maybe use a free cloud one?)
As a next step maybe focus on login. My tutorial will help you to understand the interaction and what needs to be coded in UIs. Or if you prefer just view the message workflow.
Registering users can be a more complex topic and depends on the type of system. Happy to answer follow up questions if it helps.
Related
I have a Single Page App application which is working based on RESTful APIs. Generally, all APIs have a route access which can be found while inspecting web application.
Although I have authentication mechanism based on user tokens, a hacker can find the API routes and use his given token to send many requests to APIs directly.
What is the best solution to prevent such behavior? I was thinking about CSRF, but as APIs are based on REST, and the project is a SPA, I think I should have another mechanism.
May you help me please?
You cannot authenticate the client application, it is not possible. If a user can send a request from an spa, because they have the credentials and the endpoints to send them to, they can use whatever client from Burp through ZAP or Postman to curl or whatever else to send the request.
Your API must be resilient, you should have rate limiting, user quotas, monitoring and secure operation practices in general on the server side based on your threat model to mitigate this risk.
In practice this might mean hosting the API in a way that's resilient to DoS on the network level, having a per-user request rate limit, identifying functionality that is a burden for the server for some reason (calls external services, sends email and so on) and protect/monitor those even more carefully. There is no one size fits all solution.
within Cumulocity (hosted) we have our own application with plugins written using AngularJS.
From this application we want to send a request to a microservice that we have running as well.
However, the microservice ask for authorization information when sending a get request. (How) Can we overcome this?
The reason we have decided to do it like this is so that we do not have to expose critical information.
Thanks
All microservice invocations require authentication with a valid user in the tenant.
If you really want to expose something without authentication, you can create a dummy user with no other permissions in the tenant and hardcode the credentials of that user in your AngularJS code. However, this is a risk for you, as it makes it easy for malicious users to bombard your tenant with potentially charged API requests (depending on your service provider pricing model).
If the information that you want to expose is not dynamic (maybe tenant configuration or so), you could upload such information as part of a web application. E.g., you upload a "config" application with a single file "config.json" and load that from your AngularJS application using the URL /apps/config/config.json. Not sure if that is your case.
All requests to Cumulocity including those to microservices must be authenticated fully. There is no way to access a microservice without valid credentials.
The platform needs this information to determine if the user and tenant have sufficient access rights to perform the requested action. Even if your microservice does not require special permissions to access. Cumulocity will at least need to check if the originating tenant is allowed to use the microservice.
I have an application that has a couple of features that I would like third parties business to avail of. for example the user information gets passed to us and we run ID checks and send back a token with information.
I think I can use a third party API management service like 3scale but what do I have to do on my end to 'expose' this API?
Thanks!
With AWS API Gateway, you can setup a simple http proxy to your application. Based on your needs, you can use features like auth, throttling, API keys management, client certificates etc.
Here is a blog explaining some of this.
Hope this helps, Ritisha.
As mentioned by Ritisha, API Gateway definitely can work, but it is sort of lock it.
I would recommend checking https://tyk.io/, which is an open source Gateway with commercial options. And for example it provides you Cloud version, where you do not need to expose any ports on your side at all. You just configure your API in dashboard and can just bind your CNAME record to the proxied API. This should work really well to try it out. And if you grow up this options, you can host it on your own, or use Hybrid environment, when all user requests come to your own server (no 3-rd parties), but on the other hand, have nice configuration dashboard in the cloud.
Hope it helps!
We're trying to figure out a best practice for IPC authentication and authorization. I'll explain.
We have a micro-services based architecture SaaS with a dedicated service for authentication. This service is responsible for doing the authentication and managing auth tokens (JWTs).
Everything works perfectly good with users that login and start to consume resources from the different services.
The question now is how to authentication and authorize requests which being initiated by other services (without the context of a specific user)?
Should we generate a dedicated user per service and treat it like
any other user in the system (with appropriate permissions)?
Should
we have a "hard coded"/dynamic token deployed among the services?
Any other ideas?
Our biggest concern is such tokens/passwords will be compromised at some point since requests from one service to another is treated with high level of permissions.
Cheers,
I'm not a microservices expert, just started to get my feet wet in the microservices world. From what I've read until now, this could be handled in many ways, one of which as you mentioned is hard coding api-keys so that services recognise one another. But I never liked this idea personally - also using a user per service like you mentioned. A solution I really liked is using Oauth2 for handling these scenarios - an interesting implementation I found is Gluu Server and I think client credentials grant type is what you're looking for - refer https://gluu.org/docs/integrate/oauth2grants/.
Have fun :)
Normally, API Gateway is integral part of any MS system.
All the services encapsulated and should be not accessible without API Gateway.
Such encapsulation allows direct communication between the services, without providing the requester payload, which should be required if the request comes straight from API Gateway.
In that case the request threated as something different, and follows different logic/middleware pipeline. No additional special users needed.
Iam a student and i making my internship. Sorry for my bad englis
The situation
2 people are building an backend for an message system. There are actual and passed messages. The main backend contains all the data from all the messages. This backend pushes only actual messages to and database from an mini backend which only contains the actual alerts. These actual alerts are provided by an api to multiple front ends such as an app.
I need to do research about api gateways which can make the data in the mini backend accesable for external developers. These developers only need to register or request an account so we know which application/developer connects with our api. We don't have end users with user accounts.
The API need to be scalable because in the future (over a couple of months) this system wil replace an old system. The current system needs to be handle more then 5.000.000 requests in a couple of minutes when sending out an emergency message/alert.
My problem
I googled a lot about authentication methods and i read about OAuth2. This is only necessary for authenticate end users with an user account? I dont have that so OAuth is to complex for my situation i think. But when i look in the documentation of several API Gateways like Mulesoft, Amazon API Gateway and some more i always come back by OAuth and not by an simple authentication token system or something.
See this link and then Creating a client registration flow. This uses OAuth or do i understand this incorrectly?
So now my questions
Is there an default method such as google or facebook uses for authenticate external applications by an API key? and how is this method/framwork/idunno caled?
Is it posible that i can/need to do this with OAuth?
Some example API gateways that can fill in my wishes will be great!
Amazon Api Gateway team here.
Our service supports native API keys which satisfy simple use cases. Are you interested in a simple mechanism to authenticate clients when they access your API? Some limitations would be that it's harder to manage a large number of keys, and there wouldn't really be any authorization to specific backend resources, only authentication to access the API in general.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/how-to-api-keys.html
OAuth is better for dynamic user bases where new users register and you want to be able to control access for existing users over time. It is also useful when users have personal data that only they should be able to access.
Jack