So, im doing research to know if its a good alternative to implement keycloak on the environment i'm working at.
Im using LDAP to manage users at my workingplace. I was wondering if is there a way to use keycloak as auth service in all upcoming systems and some of the existing ones. We are currently managing it with an IDP that we need to improve or replace, also there are some systems use their own login (this will eventually change).
The main problem i've crossed is that keycloak synchronizes against ldap and i dont want user data to be stored on keycloak, maybe if its only login data. User data is planned to be kept only on ldap's database in case that any userdata needs to be updated.
So is there a way to use keycloak only as an auth service fetching user credentials from ldap on every auth request?
pd: maybe i am mistaken on the meaning of what's an auth service an whats an IDP.
Actually it is not necessary that LDAP users are synced to Keycloak.
Keycloak supports both options
Importing and optionally syncing users from LDAP to Keycloak
or
Always getting the User info from LDAP directly.
But keycloak will always generate some basic federated user in it's database (e.g. for keeping up a session when using OpenID Connect - but you should not really care about that).
As far as I know (but I've not used that myself) you could also use keycloak to maintain the LDAP users data and write changes back to LDAP (see "Edit Mode" in Keycloak documentation)
Check Keycloak documentation regarding LDAP stuff to get more information https://www.keycloak.org/docs/6.0/server_admin/#_ldap
Beside the User-Data Topic, Keycloak provides a lot of different Protocols (like SAML and OpenIDConnect) to provide authentication for your services. So you could use different/multiple authentication protocols depending on your applications with just one "LDAP-Backend"
Related
We're using Keycloak server for authenticating against several IDPS (google, active directory, etc). We have a spring gateway microservice which plays role of a client and several other microservices which play role of resource servers.
When user authenticates via keycloak, we want to associate the authenticated user with some custom fields (like context, roles, user details) from our custom database (NOT Keycloak DB) and send those fields to other microservices as well, so that we do not need to load the fields from DB in every microservice.
How would you do that? Making a GlobalFilter in the Gateway which would add those fields to request headers and setting those headers somehow to the principal object in resource servers? Or using cache (redis) to store the fields on gateway and load them in resource servers? Or do you have some other solution? For example extending access token, overiding UserDetailsService, etc..
What's important to note is, that we don't want to extends Keycloak Database, since we want to have the whole role management in our custom database. Reason for that is that keycloak schema is not very flexible. We want to use keycloak only as a dummy authentication server.
The preferred option for security related values is for Keycloak to reach out to your APIs or custom data sources at the time of token issuance, then include your domain specific claims in JWT access tokens. In keycloak I believe this is done via a protocol mapper, as in this answer.
This design pattern is discussed in the Claims Best Practices article. It is recommended to not send secure values such as roles in custom headers etc, since they are potentially easier to change by a hostile party. Instead each API should receive the JWT and validate it, in a zero trust manner, then use the received claims for authorization.
For non secure values, such as a session_id or correlation_id used for logging, simple HTTP headers work well.
Sorry but it doesn't accept "hi everyone "
I have several apps which are authenticated by ldap. can keycloack replace this authentication with ldap? and in this way I do not touch to the configuration Of applications ?
Thank you
You can read this article https://wjw465150.gitbooks.io/keycloak-documentation/content/server_admin/topics/user-federation/ldap.html
By default Keycloack copy your ldap data but you can choose keycloack use your ldap data :
By default, Keycloak will import users from LDAP into the local Keycloak user database. This copy of the user is either synchronized on demand, or through a periodic background task. The one exception to this is passwords. Passwords are not imported and password validation is delegated to the LDAP server. The benefits to this approach is that all Keycloak features will work as any extra per-user data that is needed can be stored locally. This approach also reduces load on the LDAP server as uncached users are loaded from the Keycloak database the 2nd time they are accessed. The only load your LDAP server will have is password validation. The downside to this approach is that when a user is first queried, this will require a Keycloak database insert. The import will also have to be synchronized with your LDAP server as needed.
Alternatively, you can choose not to import users into the Keycloak user database. In this case, the common user model that the Keycloak runtime uses is backed only by the LDAP server. This means that if LDAP doesn’t support a piece of data that a Keycloak feature needs that feature will not work. The benefit to this approach is that you do not have the overhead of importing and synchronizing a copy of the LDAP user into the Keycloak user database
So I want to have single sign in, in all the products using a auth server but that's not only for employees, keycloak should be used to that like auth0?
There are also some advantages to Keycloak:
Keycloak is also available with support if you buy JBoss EAP (see http://www.keycloak.org/support.html). This might be cheaper than the enterprise version of Auth0. If you want to use custom DB, you need enterprise version of Auth0 anyway.
Keycloak has features which are not available in Auth0:
Fine-grained permissions and role-based access control (RBAC) and attribute-based access control (ABAC) configurable via web admin console or custom code or you can write yuour own Java and JavaScript policies. This can be also implemented in Auth0 via user rules (custom JavaScript) or Authorization plugin(no code, less possibilities). In Keycloak you can do more without code (there are more types of security policies available out of the box e.g. based on role, groups, current time, an origin of the request) and there is a good support for custom developed access control modules. Here some more detailed research would be interesting to compare them.
Keycloak also offers a policy enforcer component - which you can connect to from your backend and verify whether the access token is sufficient to access a given resource. It works best with Java Web servers, or you can just deploy an extra Java Server with Keycloak adapter which will work as a gatekeeper and decide which request go through and which are blocked. All this happens based on the rules which you can configure via Keycloak web interface. I am not sure such policy enforcer is included in Auth0. On top of that, Keycloak can tell your client application which permissions you need when you want to access a given resource so you do not need to code this in your client. The workflow can be:
Client application wants to access resource R.
Client application asks Keycloak policy enforcer which permission it needs to access resource R.
Kecloak policy enforcer tells the client application which permission P it needs.
The client application requests an access token with permission P from Keycloak.
The client makes a request to the resource server with the access token containing permission P attached.
Policy enforcer which guards the resource server can ask Keycloak whether permission P is enough to access resource R.
When Keycloak approves, the resource can be accessed.
Thus, more can be centralized and configured in Keycloak. With this workflow, your client and resource server can outsource more security logic and code to Keycloak. In Auth0 you probably need to implement steps 2,3,6 on your own.
Both Auth0 and Keycloak should be able to achieve your goal - assuming you want only social (facebook, google etc), and /or username & password authentication?
Auth0 is the less risky option, keycloak is good for non-commercial & where you can afford production outages without a global 24x7 support team. Here a few other reasons why I'd recommend Auth0 - the documentation is world class, they have quickstart samples so you can get up and running in minutes, and easy access to more advanced options - passwordless, authentication, MFA, anomaly detection, x9's reliability, rate-limiting, an extensive management api, extensions for everything eg exporting logs to log aggregator, and so on. Anyhow, good luck with your project, and obviously what suits best may simply be down to your own project requirements.
Should add, if you are doing mobile, then Auth0 put a lot of effort into adding the necessary specialised security flows to target mobile (native / hybrid) apps. For instance, PKCE usage when using /authorize endpoint. Please bear that in mind, as not certain how keycloak has been implemented to handle this - alot of IDMs still do this incorrectly today.
I'm a newbie in the LDAP + Liferay + OpenAM world, so I wonder if someone could point me in the right direction in a problem I have. In a real life environment, there are 2 LDAP servers, a OpenAM server and a Liferay application. What the customer needs is to authenticate users in Liferay against OpenAM, and OpenAM should use the LDAP servers. Problem is, the user exists only in one of the LDAP servers (it will be moved from one to the other in one point of the future). What the customer wants is:
Users must be able to authenticate independently of what LDAP contains the user.
The obtained token must be valid for both LDAP servers, as it will be used in a different service (I have no control over it) against only one of them to validate authentication.
As I said, I'm new to this world so, if the answer is too complex (I'm afraid it will be for me), maybe you could point me to books or docs that could resolve this scenario.
Thanks
You should configure LifeRay to use OpenAM for all authentications and you can configure OpenAM to use both LDAP servers (use different realms).
Details for OpenAM configuration will be in the OpenAM documentation.
As the previous answer states you should route all your authentication requests to the OpenAM server and let it validate the credentials against the right LDAP server. Using two different realms (one for each LDAP server) won't work in your case since that will require LifeRay to know where to find the user before hand. Also, sessions are linked to a specific realm.
There are multiple solutions to your problem. Here are just a couple:
Option 1
If you have control over the authentication flow. That is, if your application uses a custom UI and communicates with OpenAM via REST, you could create two different authentication module instances under a single realm (let's say two instances of the DataStore authentication module) each one pointing to a different LDAP server.
Let's call this module instances DataStore1 and DataStore2. Your application can collect the user credentials (username and password) and submit them to DataStore1. If authentication succeeds the user is already logged in. If it fails, the application can try with DataStore2.
Of course this is not ideal since you'll be making two authentication requests per login instead of just one.
Option 2
A better option (though more complicated to implement) would be creating a custom authentication module. This module can try authenticating the user against LDAP Server 1 and then try with LDAP Server 2 if the first authentication failed. Notice that with this option you don't need custom logic on the application side since it will only send a single authentication request to the OpenAM server. In fact, you can protect your application with an OpenAM Policy Agent.
Another advantage of this approach over Option 1 is that you can migrate your users behind the scenes assuming that the end goal is to migrate users from LDAP Server 1 to LDAP Server 2. If the first authentication succeeds your custom code could read the user entry from LDAP Server 1 and copy it over to LDAP Server 2.
Hope this helps you solve the problem.
I have a web application (PHP, but doesn't matter). It uses LDAP for authentication (already working), and it allows users to search LDAP (already working).
But when searching, I use a generic process account to bind() and then run the search().
What I would like is to use the LDAP account that logs in to be the same account that binds for the searching. But the only way I see to do that is to store the user's credentials in the sessions (bad!).
Nutshell: can I get a "state/session/??" token from LDAP, to bind() and then search() on subsequent http requests?
(btw, using Active Directory.)
Basic LDAP doesn't provide anything like this. The credentials that you present when binding are used for the rest of the connection, so if you could keep an LDAP connection open across multiple HTTP requests (and share LDAP connections among however many server jobs you have running), then you could avoid saving credentials.
There are various extensions to LDAP floating around (including several within Active Directory), so it's possible that one of those adds sessions-across-connections, but if so, I'm not aware of it.
As a sort-of-workaround, because Active Directory supports GSSAPI and because of how Kerberos works, you ought to be able to use the user's credentials to request a Kerberos ticket for accessing LDAP then store that ticket as your "state/session/??" token. This Kerberos ticket would only be valid for accessing LDAP and would auto-expire, so this would avoid the pitfalls of storing the user's credentials in the session. I don't know if your LDAP library supports GSSAPI and would give you enough control to do this or not.