Snort not detecting Pings with other devices - system

I have a problem with Snort, I've just installed the program on a R-Pi. 2 other computers on the same network can ping the R-Pi with success.
However I had the idea that snort was able to be run in Promiscuous mode meaning that it can see all traffic in a local network... without needing to run it inline in the network.
When i try ping the other two computers in the same network Snort does not pick this up.
Changes i have tried....
Ruleset set to -
alert icmp any any -> any any
Config file set to -
ipvar HOME_NET 192.168.43.0/32 (<this is my home network range)

If you're using a virtual machine, make sure that your network configuration is setup as bridged adapter and promiscuous mode is enabled in your virtual machine with snort.
I'm using virtual box and this is how it looks like:

Does Snort start up correctly? If the whole rule is given in the question, then perhaps the SID for it was not indicated.
You can try:
alert tcp any any -> any any (msg: "Just a test alert"; sid:1000001;)

Related

Where can I find a tutorial on setting up tun devices to use with ssh -w?

I have a remote machine (Linux) and a local laptop (MacOS), I would like to resolve network traffic to certain domains/IPs transparently via the local laptop in an effort to essentially share a VPN that's running on the laptop with the remote machine.
The network conditions of the laptop are unpredictable as it could be on public wifi, mobile tethering or my home network - so I cannot set up a VPN running on a static IP.
I wondered if I could forward UDP traffic over SSH via -R, host a wireguard server on the laptop and connect to it on the remote. Turns out that's not possible.
However, OpenSSH has the -w flag (docs) that allows the tunneling of any kind of IP traffic over SSH but requires setting up tun devices on both ends. I don't know exactly what that means or where to get started learning about it.
Googling tutorials on SSH tunnels turns up results for TCP port tunneling (-L and -R), but nothing on -w.
Can you point me in a direction where I can figure out how to do this and if this will even work for me?

Trying to connect to the pfsence web interface

I have installed and set up pfsence on virtual box and it is booting up properly and seems to be working fine. My problems are:
When I tried to ping the LAN IP from my computer's command prompt it does not receive the packets but if i ping it from inside the virtual machine using pfsence then it returns packets.
Also if I try the IP in the browser it does not take me to the pfsence interface. I used all defaults when installing the the pfsence.
Any suggestions will be welcomed
LAN IP - 192.168.20.20
pfsence version - 2.4.5
This means that you are unable to route into the VM from your computer. What is the Network Adapter for your VM attached to in your VirtualBox settings? If you configure it with a NAT you can achieve your desired configuration.
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html#network_nat

Connecting to ubuntu home server without internet connection

I am running an Ubuntu server with my laptop through an Orcale VirtualBox and I try to maximize the bandwidth of my home server, as it really slows down my internet connection. My router supports up to 300Mbit upload/download speed and my laptop wifi's card up to 150bit.
I configured my server with the following(static IP, configured by vim /etc/network/interfaces):
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.240
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.1.1
dns-nameservers 192.168.1.1
192.168.1.1 is my default gateway, and I just configured a static IP which ends with 240.
When my laptop's WIFI is on, I can easily access the server's files(.html files etc) through chrome from any computer on my house, as I just need to enter the server's IP into the browser, plus I can access the server through SSH. But when It's off, I can't even access the server's HTML files through the laptop itself, though I can see that the server is still running on VirtualBox. When I turn the WIFI once again, I can run services which require Apache2 but they really slow my internet connection, as a result I can barely surf the web. I am trying to configure the server to use only the bandwidth of my router, since my actual internet connection is 30 Mbit download and 1.90 Mbit upload(according to speedtest), and It probably interferes with it. Is it possible to access the server without WIFI connection, so it will purely use my router's speed?
Any help would be appreciated.
1) Looks like you using bridged networking in VM config. When your network adapter is connected to real network - you can interact with your VM via network bridge. When it's not connected - your bridge is also closed. If you need to interact with your VM without WiFi connection - you can add one more virtual network adapter to you VM config: use "Host-only" adapter and configure it on both VM and host PC. Your VM will use new host-only adapter to interact with your PC, and old bridged adapter to interact with other network.
2) Check your WiFi speed near the router. Maybe it's too far or provides too weak signal.
PS. Sorry for my poor english.

Hosting site using xampp server from local network without port-forwarding

I want to make my site available world wide. Im using xampp server for hosting. I have no access to any kind of servers and modems. Situation is shown below:
My site server has local ip assigned by wifi router and it runs Windows 8.
Remember I have no access on any kind of servers and modems so port port-forwarding is impossible (out of my scope).
Its actually difficult, but not impossible.
One way, I would approach this is:
I would host a page on internet.
Then take request and store it in database.
One of my program will always be running from my computer.
Then check for request and curl the request to localhost. For this you may use Node.js (taking data from database using GET method and curl it to localhost).
This is the best I could think of. And I am working on it, when the code is ready I'll make it open source and notify you :)
But still, it's difficult, as you need to put user's request to sleep for 2 seconds and then transferring it.
Its slow, but may work out for you.
Disadvantages:
Program will be very slow and memory usage will be more.
Breaking may happen many times.
High bandwidth wastage
If not encrypted, MIM (Men in Middle) may possible.
Advantages:
Indirect method of hosting
Need not to worry about your code being lost.
I am looking forward for a better alternative and I would like to keep this question for bounty once again.
If you cannot open the necessary ports within your LAN you will require access to an external server. However, the external server does not need to host any code, e.g.
Create a Linux based ec2 instance using Amazon's free tier.
Install a package to redirect remote to local ports:
a. using socat:
Install socat using your distributions package manager
Connect via SSH: ssh -N -R 42500:127.0.0.1:80 -o ServerAliveInterval=60 ubuntu#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -N -R 8080:localhost:80 "socat TCP-LISTEN:8080,fork TCP:127.0.0.1:42500"
b. using a webserver and reverse proxy:
Install apache or nginx and any required reverse proxy modules and configure your VirtualHost to proxy requests to a local port, e.g. :8080 -> 127.0.0.1:42500
Connect via SSH: ssh -N -R 42500:127.0.0.1:80 -o ServerAliveInterval=60 ubuntu#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Your machine is now reachable via the ec2 instance http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/.
I occasionally use this technique when debugging web service callbacks.
Update 17-02-2014
If you are a Windows user you will need to install a third-party tool to support ssh. Options include:
cygwin
git bash
PuTTY
PuTTY is the easiest choice if you are not familiar with *nix tools. To configure remote port forwarding in PuTTY expand the following setting: Connection -> SSH -> Tunnels. Given the previously described scenario, populate Source port as 42500, Desination as 127.0.0.1:80 and tick the Remote option. (You may also need to add the path to a PuTTY compatible private key in the Connection -> SSH -> Auth tab depending on your server configuration.
To test you have successfully forwarded a port, execute the command netstat -lnt on your server. You will see output similar to:
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:42500 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
Finally you can test with curl http://127.0.0.1:42500. You will see the output of your own machines web root running on port 80.
if you don't have a public IP address and cannot use port forwarding it is impossible to host the site
As people have said you need a public IP address. However, even if you did you should not use xampp as a public server, as it is designed for development and therefore has some security settings disabled.
I would recommend buying some shared web hosting, and uploading it to that. (you can get cheap hosting if you google 'shared web hosting', plus free .tk domains are avaliable: http://www.dot.tk/)
Do your company has any vpn network?
If it does and you have access to the vpn network, you can include your server to the vpn network and your guest will only need to login to your company vpn network then access your site like in a local network without using port forwarding. And since your data is very confidential, I assume that using vpn will also help to increase the security of your data.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thank You.
What you are asking is not possible without port forwarding.
Lets break it into steps.
To host your site locally you will need a IP that is static so that
users can access it specifically.
You will need a domain so that it can be converted into user friendly name.
A 24x7 Internet Connection is must! You added a Wifi Router in your Diagram and most of today's router are capable of port forwarding.
What i will do in your scenario is:
Instead of using XAMP, i will install WAMP because i am more familiar with it and easy to configure.(totally personal preference)
Then i would set my server "ONLINE".(Google how to set WAMP server online)
Forward port "80" from router settings to my local computer ip address.(mostly it is tagged as "Virtual Server","Firewall","Port Forwarding",etc vary router to router in settings)
Suppose you have a local ip "192.168.1.3" and global/router IP "254.232.123.232" then you would redirect all the HTTP request done towards router to your local IP.
[[[[254.232.123.232]]]] --+ :80 +-- --------->192.168.1.3
That is good for now, but then you will need to tackle dynamic IP problem of router. But don't worry, thanks to some free sites that will be easy!
Go to no-ip.org -> Setup Account -> and create a entry, just a subdomain for now to test whether everything is working fine.(subdomain like mysite.no-ip.org, later purchase a real Domain)
Input your IP address there(Router IP) and download its application which will automatically update their server if your local IP changes.
Wait for some minutes and Voila! Your site is live.

Net.Sockets : PC Portnumber changes dynamically in LAN via (DLINK)router

Hi i am creating server/client application using .net.Sockets something like cybercafe software.
Im following this example on codeproject Simple Socket Chat Program
there is no problem i run it on local pc. But when i run the client in the other pc in network i got a problem.
says :
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
I tried to use netstat -a on cmd and i found out that the portnumbers of all the p.c on our network always changes.
Is there any way to do it without using portnumber and just hostname or ipaddress only.
I need help...
Thanks in Regards
First, the random port numbers under Local Address in netstat are done so that everything gets a unique local port.
Also, a port is necessary for sockets.
The problem you are having is most likely because the firewall where your server software is located is blocking that port. For Windows 7 (and presumably Vista), you can unblock the port by running WF.msc, going to Inbound Rules on the left, clicking New Rule on the right, and adding a new program or port rule. The rest of the steps should be self-explanatory.