Find the true start end dates for customers that have multiple accounts in SQL Server 2014 - sql

I have a checking account table that contains columns Cust_id (customer id), Open_Date (start date), and Closed_Date (end date). There is one row for each account. A customer can open multiple accounts at any given point. I would like to know how long the person has been a customer.
eg 1:
CREATE TABLE [Cust]
(
[Cust_id] [varchar](10) NULL,
[Open_Date] [date] NULL,
[Closed_Date] [date] NULL
)
insert into [Cust] values ('a123', '10/01/2019', '10/15/2019')
insert into [Cust] values ('a123', '10/12/2019', '11/01/2019')
Ideally I would like to insert this into a table with just one row, that says this person has been a customer from 10/01/2019 to 11/01/2019. (as he opened his second account before he closed his previous one.
Similarly eg 2:
insert into [Cust] values ('b245', '07/01/2019', '09/15/2019')
insert into [Cust] values ('b245', '10/12/2019', '12/01/2019')
I would like to see 2 rows in this case- one that shows he was a customer from 07/01 to 09/15 and then again from 10/12 to 12/01.
Can you point me to the best way to get this?

I would approach this as a gaps and islands problem. You want to group together groups of adjacents rows whose periods overlap.
Here is one way to solve it using lag() and a cumulative sum(). Everytime the open date is greater than the closed date of the previous record, a new group starts.
select
cust_id,
min(open_date) open_date,
max(closed_date) closed_date
from (
select
t.*,
sum(case when not open_date <= lag_closed_date then 1 else 0 end)
over(partition by cust_id order by open_date) grp
from (
select
t.*,
lag(closed_date) over (partition by cust_id order by open_date) lag_closed_date
from cust t
) t
) t
group by cust_id, grp
In this db fiddle with your sample data, the query produces:
cust_id | open_date | closed_date
:------ | :--------- | :----------
a123 | 2019-10-01 | 2019-11-01
b245 | 2019-07-01 | 2019-09-15
b245 | 2019-10-12 | 2019-12-01

I would solve this with recursion. While this is certainly very heavy, it should accommodate even the most complex account timings (assuming your data has such). However, if the sample data provided is as complex as you need to solve for, I highly recommend sticking with the solution provided above. It is much more concise and clear.
WITH x (cust_id, open_date, closed_date, lvl, grp) AS (
SELECT cust_id, open_date, closed_date, 1, 1
FROM (
SELECT cust_id
, open_date
, closed_date
, row_number()
OVER (PARTITION BY cust_id ORDER BY closed_date DESC, open_date) AS rn
FROM cust
) AS t
WHERE rn = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT cust_id, open_date, closed_date, lvl, grp
FROM (
SELECT c.cust_id
, c.open_date
, c.closed_date
, x.lvl + 1 AS lvl
, x.grp + CASE WHEN c.closed_date < x.open_date THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS grp
, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY c.cust_id ORDER BY c.closed_date DESC) AS rn
FROM cust c
JOIN x
ON x.cust_id = c.cust_id
AND c.open_date < x.open_date
) AS t
WHERE t.rn = 1
)
SELECT cust_id, min(open_date) AS first_open_date, max(closed_date) AS last_closed_date
FROM x
GROUP BY cust_id, grp
ORDER BY cust_id, grp
I would also add the caveat that I don't run on SQL Server, so there could be syntax differences that I didn't account for. Hopefully they are minor, if present.

you can try something like that:
select distinct
cust_id,
(select min(Open_Date)
from Cust as b
where b.cust_id = a.cust_id and
a.Open_Date <= b.Closed_Date and
a.Closed_Date >= b.Open_Date
),
(select max(Closed_Date)
from Cust as b
where b.cust_id = a.cust_id and
a.Open_Date <= b.Closed_Date and
a.Closed_Date >= b.Open_Date
)
from Cust as a
so, for every row - you're selecting minimal and maximal dates from all overlapping ranges, later distinct filters out duplicates

Related

SQL - Find the min(date) since a category has its most recent value

I need some help with this problem.
Assuming I have following table:
contract_id
tariff_id
product_category
date (DD.MM.YYYY)
month (YYYYMM)
123456
ABC
small
01.01.2021
202101
123456
ABC
medium
01.02.2021
202102
123456
DEF
small
01.03.2021
202103
123456
DEF
small
01.04.2021
202104
123456
ABC
big
01.05.2021
202105
123456
DEF
small
01.06.2021
202106
123456
DEF
medium
02.06.2021
202106
123456
DEF
medium
01.07.2021
202107
The table is partitioned by month.
This is a part of my table containing multiple contract_ids.
I'm trying to figure out for every contract_id, since when it has its most recent tariff_id and since when it has the product_category_id='small' (if it doesn't have small as product category, the value should then be Null).
The results will be written into a table which gets updated every month.
So for the table above my latest results should look like this:
contract_id
same_tariff_id_since
product_category_small_since
123456
01.06.2021
NULL
I'm using Hive.
So far, I could only come up with this solution for same_tariff_id_since:
The problem is that it gives me absolute min(date) for the tariff_id and not the min(date) since the most recent tariff_id.
I think the code for product_category_small_since will have mostly the same logic.
My current code is:
SELECT q2.contract_id
, q3.tariff_id
, q2.date
FROM (
SELECT contract_id
, max(date_2) AS date
FROM (
SELECT contract_id
, date
, min(date) OVER (PARTITION BY tariff_id ORDER BY date) AS date_2
FROM given_table
)q1
WHERE date=date_2
GROUP BY contract_id
)q2
JOIN given_table AS q3
ON q2.contract_id=q3.contract_id
AND q2.date=q3.date
Thanks in advance.
One approach for solving this type of query is to do a grouping of the sequences you want to track. For the tariff_id sequence grouping, you want a new "sequence grouping id" for each time that the tariff id changes for a given contract id. Since the product_category can change independently, you need to do a sequence grouping id for that change as well.
Here's code to accomplish the task. This only returns the latest version of each contract and the specific columns you described in your latest results table. This was done against PostgreSQL 9.6, but the syntax and data types can probably be modified to be compatible with Hive.
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qSk3Mb9Xfp1NDo5VeA1qHh/8
select q2.contract_id
, to_char(min(q2."date (DD.MM.YYYY)")
over (partition by q2.contract_id, q2.contract_tariff_sequence_id), 'DD.MM.YYYY') as same_tariff_id_since
, to_char(min(case when q2.product_category = 'small' then q2."date (DD.MM.YYYY)" else null end)
over (partition by q2.contract_id, q2.contract_product_category_sequence_id), 'DD.MM.YYYY') as product_category_small_since
from(
select q1.*
, sum(case when q1.tariff_id = q1.prior_tariff_id then 0 else 1 end)
over (partition by q1.contract_id order by q1."date (DD.MM.YYYY)" rows unbounded preceding) as contract_tariff_sequence_id
, sum(case when q1.product_category = q1.prior_product_category then 0 else 1 end)
over (partition by q1.contract_id order by q1."date (DD.MM.YYYY)" rows unbounded preceding) as contract_product_category_sequence_id
from (
select *
, lag(tariff_id) over (partition by contract_id order by "date (DD.MM.YYYY)") as prior_tariff_id
, lag(product_category) over (partition by contract_id order by "date (DD.MM.YYYY)") as prior_product_category
, row_number() over (partition by contract_id order by "date (DD.MM.YYYY)" desc) latest_record_per_contract
from contract_tariffs
) q1
) q2
where latest_record_per_contract = 1
If you want to see all the rows and columns so you can examine how this works with the sequence grouping ids etc., you can modify the outer query slightly:
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/qSk3Mb9Xfp1NDo5VeA1qHh/10
If this works for you, please mark as correct answer.

Query without WHILE Loop

We have appointment table as shown below. Each appointment need to be categorized as "New" or "Followup". Any appointment (for a patient) within 30 days of first appointment (of that patient) is Followup. After 30 days, appointment is again "New". Any appointment within 30 days become "Followup".
I am currently doing this by typing while loop.
How to achieve this without WHILE loop?
Table
CREATE TABLE #Appt1 (ApptID INT, PatientID INT, ApptDate DATE)
INSERT INTO #Appt1
SELECT 1,101,'2020-01-05' UNION
SELECT 2,505,'2020-01-06' UNION
SELECT 3,505,'2020-01-10' UNION
SELECT 4,505,'2020-01-20' UNION
SELECT 5,101,'2020-01-25' UNION
SELECT 6,101,'2020-02-12' UNION
SELECT 7,101,'2020-02-20' UNION
SELECT 8,101,'2020-03-30' UNION
SELECT 9,303,'2020-01-28' UNION
SELECT 10,303,'2020-02-02'
You need to use recursive query.
The 30days period is counted starting from prev(and no it is not possible to do it without recursion/quirky update/loop). That is why all the existing answer using only ROW_NUMBER failed.
WITH f AS (
SELECT *, rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY PatientId ORDER BY ApptDate)
FROM Appt1
), rec AS (
SELECT Category = CAST('New' AS NVARCHAR(20)), ApptId, PatientId, ApptDate, rn, startDate = ApptDate
FROM f
WHERE rn = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT CAST(CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, rec.startDate,f.ApptDate) <= 30 THEN N'FollowUp' ELSE N'New' END AS NVARCHAR(20)),
f.ApptId,f.PatientId,f.ApptDate, f.rn,
CASE WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, rec.startDate, f.ApptDate) <= 30 THEN rec.startDate ELSE f.ApptDate END
FROM rec
JOIN f
ON rec.rn = f.rn - 1
AND rec.PatientId = f.PatientId
)
SELECT ApptId, PatientId, ApptDate, Category
FROM rec
ORDER BY PatientId, ApptDate;
db<>fiddle demo
Output:
+---------+------------+-------------+----------+
| ApptId | PatientId | ApptDate | Category |
+---------+------------+-------------+----------+
| 1 | 101 | 2020-01-05 | New |
| 5 | 101 | 2020-01-25 | FollowUp |
| 6 | 101 | 2020-02-12 | New |
| 7 | 101 | 2020-02-20 | FollowUp |
| 8 | 101 | 2020-03-30 | New |
| 9 | 303 | 2020-01-28 | New |
| 10 | 303 | 2020-02-02 | FollowUp |
| 2 | 505 | 2020-01-06 | New |
| 3 | 505 | 2020-01-10 | FollowUp |
| 4 | 505 | 2020-01-20 | FollowUp |
+---------+------------+-------------+----------+
How it works:
f - get starting point(anchor - per every PatientId)
rec - recursibe part, if the difference between current value and prev is > 30 change the category and starting point, in context of PatientId
Main - display sorted resultset
Similar class:
Conditional SUM on Oracle - Capping a windowed function
Session window (Azure Stream Analytics)
Running Total until specific condition is true - Quirky update
Addendum
Do not ever use this code on production!
But another option, that is worth mentioning besides using cte, is to use temp table and update in "rounds"
It could be done in "single" round(quirky update):
CREATE TABLE Appt_temp (ApptID INT , PatientID INT, ApptDate DATE, Category NVARCHAR(10))
INSERT INTO Appt_temp(ApptId, PatientId, ApptDate)
SELECT ApptId, PatientId, ApptDate
FROM Appt1;
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX Idx_appt ON Appt_temp(PatientID, ApptDate);
Query:
DECLARE #PatientId INT = 0,
#PrevPatientId INT,
#FirstApptDate DATE = NULL;
UPDATE Appt_temp
SET #PrevPatientId = #PatientId
,#PatientId = PatientID
,#FirstApptDate = CASE WHEN #PrevPatientId <> #PatientId THEN ApptDate
WHEN DATEDIFF(DAY, #FirstApptDate, ApptDate)>30 THEN ApptDate
ELSE #FirstApptDate
END
,Category = CASE WHEN #PrevPatientId <> #PatientId THEN 'New'
WHEN #FirstApptDate = ApptDate THEN 'New'
ELSE 'FollowUp'
END
FROM Appt_temp WITH(INDEX(Idx_appt))
OPTION (MAXDOP 1);
SELECT * FROM Appt_temp ORDER BY PatientId, ApptDate;
db<>fiddle Quirky update
You could do this with a recursive cte. You should first order by apptDate within each patient. That can be accomplished by a run-of-the-mill cte.
Then, in the anchor portion of your recursive cte, select the first ordering for each patient, mark the status as 'new', and also mark the apptDate as the date of the most recent 'new' record.
In the recursive portion of your recursive cte, increment to the next appointment, calculate the difference in days between the present appointment and the most recent 'new' appointment date. If it's greater than 30 days, mark it 'new' and reset the most recent new appointment date. Otherwise mark it as 'follow up' and just pass along the existing days since new appointment date.
Finallly, in the base query, just select the columns you want.
with orderings as (
select *,
rn = row_number() over(
partition by patientId
order by apptDate
)
from #appt1 a
),
markings as (
select apptId,
patientId,
apptDate,
rn,
type = convert(varchar(10),'new'),
dateOfNew = apptDate
from orderings
where rn = 1
union all
select o.apptId, o.patientId, o.apptDate, o.rn,
type = convert(varchar(10),iif(ap.daysSinceNew > 30, 'new', 'follow up')),
dateOfNew = iif(ap.daysSinceNew > 30, o.apptDate, m.dateOfNew)
from markings m
join orderings o
on m.patientId = o.patientId
and m.rn + 1 = o.rn
cross apply (select daysSinceNew = datediff(day, m.dateOfNew, o.apptDate)) ap
)
select apptId, patientId, apptDate, type
from markings
order by patientId, rn;
I should mention that I initially deleted this answer because Abhijeet Khandagale's answer seemed to meet your needs with a simpler query (after reworking it a bit). But with your comment to him about your business requirement and your added sample data, I undeleted mine because believe this one meets your needs.
I'm not sure that it's exactly what you implemented. But another option, that is worth mentioning besides using cte, is to use temp table and update in "rounds". So we are going to update temp table while all statuses are not set correctly and build result in an iterative way. We can control number of iteration using simply local variable.
So we split each iteration into two stages.
Set all Followup values that are near to New records. That's pretty easy to do just using right filter.
For the rest of the records that dont have status set we can select first in group with same PatientID. And say that they are new since they not processed by the first stage.
So
CREATE TABLE #Appt2 (ApptID INT, PatientID INT, ApptDate DATE, AppStatus nvarchar(100))
select * from #Appt1
insert into #Appt2 (ApptID, PatientID, ApptDate, AppStatus)
select a1.ApptID, a1.PatientID, a1.ApptDate, null from #Appt1 a1
declare #limit int = 0;
while (exists(select * from #Appt2 where AppStatus IS NULL) and #limit < 1000)
begin
set #limit = #limit+1;
update a2
set
a2.AppStatus = IIF(exists(
select *
from #Appt2 a
where
0 > DATEDIFF(day, a2.ApptDate, a.ApptDate)
and DATEDIFF(day, a2.ApptDate, a.ApptDate) > -30
and a.ApptID != a2.ApptID
and a.PatientID = a2.PatientID
and a.AppStatus = 'New'
), 'Followup', a2.AppStatus)
from #Appt2 a2
--select * from #Appt2
update a2
set a2.AppStatus = 'New'
from #Appt2 a2 join (select a.*, ROW_NUMBER() over (Partition By PatientId order by ApptId) rn from (select * from #Appt2 where AppStatus IS NULL) a) ar
on a2.ApptID = ar.ApptID
and ar.rn = 1
--select * from #Appt2
end
select * from #Appt2 order by PatientID, ApptDate
drop table #Appt1
drop table #Appt2
Update. Read the comment provided by Lukasz. It's by far smarter way. I leave my answer just as an idea.
I believe the recursive common expression is great way to optimize queries avoiding loops, but in some cases it can lead to bad performance and should be avoided if possible.
I use the code below to solve the issue and test it will more values, but encourage you to test it with your real data, too.
WITH DataSource AS
(
SELECT *
,CEILING(DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN([ApptDate]) OVER (PARTITION BY [PatientID]), [ApptDate]) * 1.0 / 30 + 0.000001) AS [GroupID]
FROM #Appt1
)
SELECT *
,IIF(ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY [PatientID], [GroupID] ORDER BY [ApptDate]) = 1, 'New', 'Followup')
FROM DataSource
ORDER BY [PatientID]
,[ApptDate];
The idea is pretty simple - I want separate the records in group (30 days), in which group the smallest record is new, the others are follow ups. Check how the statement is built:
SELECT *
,DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN([ApptDate]) OVER (PARTITION BY [PatientID]), [ApptDate])
,DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN([ApptDate]) OVER (PARTITION BY [PatientID]), [ApptDate]) * 1.0 / 30
,CEILING(DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN([ApptDate]) OVER (PARTITION BY [PatientID]), [ApptDate]) * 1.0 / 30 + 0.000001)
FROM #Appt1
ORDER BY [PatientID]
,[ApptDate];
So:
first, we are getting the first date, for each group and calculating the differences in days with the current one
then, we are want to get groups - * 1.0 / 30 is added
as for 30, 60, 90, etc days we are getting whole number and we wanted to start a new period, I have added + 0.000001; also, we are using ceiling function to get the smallest integer greater than, or equal to, the specified numeric expression
That's it. Having such group we simply use ROW_NUMBER to find our start date and make it as new and leaving the rest as follow ups.
With due respect to everybody and in IMHO,
There is not much difference between While LOOP and Recursive CTE in terms of RBAR
There is not much performance gain when using Recursive CTE and Window Partition function all in one.
Appid should be int identity(1,1) , or it should be ever increasing clustered index.
Apart from other benefit it also ensure that all successive row APPDate of that patient must be greater.
This way you can easily play with APPID in your query which will be more efficient than putting inequality operator like >,< in APPDate.
Putting inequality operator like >,< in APPID will aid Sql Optimizer.
Also there should be two date column in table like
APPDateTime datetime2(0) not null,
Appdate date not null
As these are most important columns in most important table,so not much cast ,convert.
So Non clustered index can be created on Appdate
Create NonClustered index ix_PID_AppDate_App on APP (patientid,APPDate) include(other column which is not i predicate except APPID)
Test my script with other sample data and lemme know for which sample data it not working.
Even if it do not work then I am sure it can be fix in my script logic itself.
CREATE TABLE #Appt1 (ApptID INT, PatientID INT, ApptDate DATE)
INSERT INTO #Appt1
SELECT 1,101,'2020-01-05' UNION ALL
SELECT 2,505,'2020-01-06' UNION ALL
SELECT 3,505,'2020-01-10' UNION ALL
SELECT 4,505,'2020-01-20' UNION ALL
SELECT 5,101,'2020-01-25' UNION ALL
SELECT 6,101,'2020-02-12' UNION ALL
SELECT 7,101,'2020-02-20' UNION ALL
SELECT 8,101,'2020-03-30' UNION ALL
SELECT 9,303,'2020-01-28' UNION ALL
SELECT 10,303,'2020-02-02'
;With CTE as
(
select a1.* ,a2.ApptDate as NewApptDate
from #Appt1 a1
outer apply(select top 1 a2.ApptID ,a2.ApptDate
from #Appt1 A2
where a1.PatientID=a2.PatientID and a1.ApptID>a2.ApptID
and DATEDIFF(day,a2.ApptDate, a1.ApptDate)>30
order by a2.ApptID desc )A2
)
,CTE1 as
(
select a1.*, a2.ApptDate as FollowApptDate
from CTE A1
outer apply(select top 1 a2.ApptID ,a2.ApptDate
from #Appt1 A2
where a1.PatientID=a2.PatientID and a1.ApptID>a2.ApptID
and DATEDIFF(day,a2.ApptDate, a1.ApptDate)<=30
order by a2.ApptID desc )A2
)
select *
,case when FollowApptDate is null then 'New'
when NewApptDate is not null and FollowApptDate is not null
and DATEDIFF(day,NewApptDate, FollowApptDate)<=30 then 'New'
else 'Followup' end
as Category
from cte1 a1
order by a1.PatientID
drop table #Appt1
Although it's not clearly addressed in the question, it's easy to figure out that the appointment dates cannot be simply categorized by 30-day groups. It makes no business sense. And you cannot use the appt id either. One can make a new appointment today for 2020-09-06.
Here is how I address this issue. First, get the first appointment, then calculate the date difference between each appointment and the first appt. If it's 0, set to 'New'. If <= 30 'Followup'. If > 30, set as 'Undecided' and do the next round check until there is no more 'Undecided'. And for that, you really need a while loop, but it does not loop through each appointment date, rather only a few datasets. I checked the execution plan. Even though there are only 10 rows, the query cost is significantly lower than that using recursive CTE, but not as low as Lukasz Szozda's addendum method.
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#TEMPTABLE') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #TEMPTABLE
SELECT ApptID, PatientID, ApptDate
,CASE WHEN (DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN(ApptDate) OVER (PARTITION BY PatientID), ApptDate) = 0) THEN 'New'
WHEN (DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN(ApptDate) OVER (PARTITION BY PatientID), ApptDate) <= 30) THEN 'Followup'
ELSE 'Undecided' END AS Category
INTO #TEMPTABLE
FROM #Appt1
WHILE EXISTS(SELECT TOP 1 * FROM #TEMPTABLE WHERE Category = 'Undecided') BEGIN
;WITH CTE AS (
SELECT ApptID, PatientID, ApptDate
,CASE WHEN (DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN(ApptDate) OVER (PARTITION BY PatientID), ApptDate) = 0) THEN 'New'
WHEN (DATEDIFF(DAY, MIN(ApptDate) OVER (PARTITION BY PatientID), ApptDate) <= 30) THEN 'Followup'
ELSE 'Undecided' END AS Category
FROM #TEMPTABLE
WHERE Category = 'Undecided'
)
UPDATE #TEMPTABLE
SET Category = CTE.Category
FROM #TEMPTABLE t
LEFT JOIN CTE ON CTE.ApptID = t.ApptID
WHERE t.Category = 'Undecided'
END
SELECT ApptID, PatientID, ApptDate, Category
FROM #TEMPTABLE
I hope this will help you.
WITH CTE AS
(
SELECT #Appt1.*, RowNum = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY PatientID ORDER BY ApptDate, ApptID) FROM #Appt1
)
SELECT A.ApptID , A.PatientID , A.ApptDate ,
Expected_Category = CASE WHEN (DATEDIFF(MONTH, B.ApptDate, A.ApptDate) > 0) THEN 'New'
WHEN (DATEDIFF(DAY, B.ApptDate, A.ApptDate) <= 30) then 'Followup'
ELSE 'New' END
FROM CTE A
LEFT OUTER JOIN CTE B on A.PatientID = B.PatientID
AND A.rownum = B.rownum + 1
ORDER BY A.PatientID, A.ApptDate
You could use a Case statement.
select
*,
CASE
WHEN DATEDIFF(d,A1.ApptDate,A2.ApptDate)>30 THEN 'New'
ELSE 'FollowUp'
END 'Category'
from
(SELECT PatientId, MIN(ApptId) 'ApptId', MIN(ApptDate) 'ApptDate' FROM #Appt1 GROUP BY PatientID) A1,
#Appt1 A2
where
A1.PatientID=A2.PatientID AND A1.ApptID<A2.ApptID
The question is, should this category be assigned based off the initial appointment, or the one prior? That is, if a Patient has had three appointments, should we compare the third appointment to the first, or the second?
You problem states the first, which is how I've answered. If that's not the case, you'll want to use lag.
Also, keep in mind that DateDiff makes not exception for weekends. If this should be weekdays only, you'll need to create your own Scalar-Valued function.
using Lag function
select apptID, PatientID , Apptdate ,
case when date_diff IS NULL THEN 'NEW'
when date_diff < 30 and (date_diff_2 IS NULL or date_diff_2 < 30) THEN 'Follow Up'
ELSE 'NEW'
END AS STATUS FROM
(
select
apptID, PatientID , Apptdate ,
DATEDIFF (day,lag(Apptdate) over (PARTITION BY PatientID order by ApptID asc),Apptdate) date_diff ,
DATEDIFF(day,lag(Apptdate,2) over (PARTITION BY PatientID order by ApptID asc),Apptdate) date_diff_2
from #Appt1
) SRC
Demo --> https://rextester.com/TNW43808
with cte
as
(
select
tmp.*,
IsNull(Lag(ApptDate) Over (partition by PatientID Order by PatientID,ApptDate),ApptDate) PriorApptDate
from #Appt1 tmp
)
select
PatientID,
ApptDate,
PriorApptDate,
DateDiff(d,PriorApptDate,ApptDate) Elapsed,
Case when DateDiff(d,PriorApptDate,ApptDate)>30
or DateDiff(d,PriorApptDate,ApptDate)=0 then 'New' else 'Followup' end Category from cte
Mine is correct. The authors was incorrect, see elapsed

How to find latest status of the day in SQL Server

I have a SQL Server question that I'm trying to figure out at work:
There is a table with a status field which can contain a status called "Participate." I am only trying to find records if the latest status of the day is "Participate" and only if the status changed on the same day from another status to "Participate."
I don't want any records where the status was already "Participate." It must have changed to that status on the same day. You can tell when the status was changed by the datetime field ChangedOn.
In the sample below I would only want to bring back ID 1880 since the status of "Participated" has the latest timestamp. I would not bring back ID 1700 since the last record is "Other," and I would not bring back ID 1600 since "Participated" is the only status of that day.
ChangedOn Status ID
02/01/17 15:23 Terminated 1880
02/01/17 17:24 Participated 1880
02/01/17 09:00 Other 1880
01/31/17 01:00 Terminated 1700
01/31/17 02:00 Participated 1700
01/31/17 03:00 Other 1700
01/31/17 02:00 Participated 1600
I was thinking of using a Window function, but I'm not sure how to get started on this. It's been a few months since I've written a query like this so I'm a bit out of practice.
Thanks!
You can use window functions for this:
select t.*
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by cast(ChangedOn as date)
order by ChangedOn desc
) as seqnum,
sum(case when status <> 'Participate' then 1 else 0 end) over (partition by cast(ChangedOn as date)) as num_nonparticipate
from t
) t
where (seqnum = 1 and ChangedOn = 'Participate') and
num_nonparticipate > 0;
Can you check this?
WITH sample_table(ChangedOn,Status,ID)AS(
SELECT CONVERT(DATETIME,'02/01/2017 15:23'),'Terminated',1880 UNION ALL
SELECT '02/01/2017 17:24','Participated',1880 UNION ALL
SELECT '02/01/2017 09:00','Other',1880 UNION ALL
SELECT '01/31/2017 01:00','Terminated',1700 UNION ALL
SELECT '01/31/2017 02:00','Participated',1700 UNION ALL
SELECT '01/31/2017 03:00','Other',1700 UNION ALL
SELECT '01/31/2017 02:00','Participated',1600
)
SELECT ID FROM (
SELECT *
,ROW_NUMBER()OVER(PARTITION BY ID,CONVERT(VARCHAR,ChangedOn,112) ORDER BY ChangedOn) AS rn
,COUNT(0)OVER(PARTITION BY ID,CONVERT(VARCHAR,ChangedOn,112)) AS cnt
,CASE WHEN Status<>'Participated' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS ss
,SUM(CASE WHEN Status!='Participated' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)OVER(PARTITION BY ID,CONVERT(VARCHAR,ChangedOn,112)) AS OtherStatusCnt
FROM sample_table
) AS t WHERE t.rn=t.cnt AND t.Status='Participated' AND t.OtherStatusCnt>0
--Return:
1880
try this with other sample data,
declare #t table(ChangedOn datetime,Status varchar(50),ID int)
insert into #t VALUES
('02/01/17 15:23', 'Terminated' ,1880)
,('02/01/17 17:24', 'Participated' ,1880)
,('02/01/17 09:00', 'Other' ,1880)
,('01/31/17 01:00', 'Terminated' ,1700)
,('01/31/17 02:00', 'Participated' ,1700)
,('01/31/17 03:00', 'Other' ,1700)
,('01/31/17 02:00', 'Participated' ,1600)
;
WITH CTE
AS (
SELECT *
,row_number() OVER (
PARTITION BY id
,cast(ChangedOn AS DATE) ORDER BY ChangedOn DESC
) AS seqnum
FROM #t
)
SELECT *
FROM cte c
WHERE seqnum = 1
AND STATUS = 'Participated'
AND EXISTS (
SELECT id
FROM cte c1
WHERE seqnum > 1
AND c.id = c1.id
)
2nd query,this is better
here CTE is same
SELECT *
FROM cte c
WHERE seqnum = 1
AND STATUS = 'Participated'
AND EXISTS (
SELECT id
FROM cte c1
WHERE STATUS != 'Participated'
AND c.id = c1.id
)

Query for getting previous date in oracle in specific scenario

I have the below data in a table A which I need to insert into table B along with one computed column.
TABLE A:
Account_No | Balance | As_on_date
1001 |-100 | 1-Jan-2013
1001 |-150 | 2-Jan-2013
1001 | 200 | 3-Jan-2013
1001 |-250 | 4-Jan-2013
1001 |-300 | 5-Jan-2013
1001 |-310 | 6-Jan-2013
Table B:
In table B, there should be no of days to be shown when balance is negative and
the date one which it has gone into negative.
So, for 6-Jan-2013, this table should show below data:
Account_No | Balance | As_on_date | Days_passed | Start_date
1001 | -310 | 6-Jan-2013 | 3 | 4-Jan-2013
Here, no of days should be the days when the balance has gone negative in recent time and
not from the old entry.
I need to write a SQL query to get the no of days passed and the start date from when the
balance has gone negative.
I tried to formulate a query using Lag analytical function, but I am not succeeding.
How should I check the first instance of negative balance by traversing back using LAG function?
Even the first_value function was given a try but not getting how to partition in it based on negative value.
Any help or direction on this will be really helpful.
Here's a way to achive this using analytical functions.
INSERT INTO tableb
WITH tablea_grouped1
AS (SELECT account_no,
balance,
as_on_date,
SUM (CASE WHEN balance >= 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
OVER (PARTITION BY account_no ORDER BY as_on_date)
grp
FROM tablea),
tablea_grouped2
AS (SELECT account_no,
balance,
as_on_date,
grp,
LAST_VALUE (
balance)
OVER (
PARTITION BY account_no, grp
ORDER BY as_on_date
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING
AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)
closing_balance
FROM tablea_grouped1
WHERE balance < 0
AND grp != 0 --keep this, if starting negative balance is to be ignored
)
SELECT account_no,
closing_balance,
MAX (as_on_date),
MAX (as_on_date) - MIN (as_on_date) + 1,
MIN (as_on_date)
FROM tablea_grouped2
GROUP BY account_no, grp, closing_balance
ORDER BY account_no, MIN (as_on_date);
First, SUM is used as analytical function to assign group number to consecutive balances less than 0.
LAST_VALUE function is then used to find the last -ve balance in each group
Finally, the result is aggregated based on each group. MAX(date) gives the last date, MIN(date) gives the starting date, and the difference of the two gives number of days.
Demo at sqlfiddle.
Try this and use gone_negative to computing specified column value for insert into another table:
select temp.account_no,
temp.balance,
temp.prev_balance,
temp.on_date,
temp.prev_on_date,
case
WHEN (temp.balance < 0 and temp.prev_balance >= 0) THEN
1
else
0
end as gone_negative
from (select account_no,
balance,
on_date,
lag(balance, 1, 0) OVER(partition by account_no ORDER BY account_no) prev_balance,
lag(on_date, 1) OVER(partition by account_no ORDER BY account_no) prev_on_date
from tblA
order by account_no) temp;
Hope this helps pal.
Here's on way to do it.
Select all records from my_table where the balance is positive.
Do a self-join and get all the records that have a as_on_date is greater than the current row, but the amounts are in negative
Once we get these, we cut-off the rows WHERE the date difference between the current and the previous row for as_on_date is > 1. We then filter the results a outer sub query
The Final select just groups the rows and gets the min, max values for the filtered rows which are grouped.
Query:
SELECT
account_no,
min(case when row_number = 1 then balance end) as balance,
max(mt2_date) as As_on_date,
max(mt2_date) - mt1_date as Days_passed,
min(mt2_date) as Start_date
FROM
(
SELECT
*,
MIN(break_date) OVER( PARTITION BY mt1_date ) AS min_break_date,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER( PARTITION BY mt1_date ORDER BY mt2_date desc ) AS row_number
FROM
(
SELECT
mt1.account_no,
mt2.balance,
mt1.as_on_date as mt1_date,
mt2.as_on_date as mt2_date,
case when mt2.as_on_date - lag(mt2.as_on_date,1) over () > 1 then mt2.as_on_date end as break_date
FROM
my_table mt1
JOIN my_table mt2 ON ( mt2.balance < mt1.balance AND mt2.as_on_date > mt1.as_on_date )
WHERE
MT1.balance > 0
order by
mt1.as_on_date,
mt2.as_on_date ) sub_query
) T
WHERE
min_break_date is null
OR mt2_date < min_break_date
GROUP BY
mt1_date,
account_no
SQLFIDDLE
I have a added a few more rows in the FIDDLE, just to test it out

T-SQL query to obtain the no of days an item was at the current price

Declare #sec_temp table
(
sec_no varchar(10),
amount money,
price_date date
)
insert #sec_temp
values
('123ABC', 25, '2011-01-20'),
('123ABC', 25, '2011-01-19'),
('123ABC', 25, '2011-01-18'),
('123ABC', 20, '2011-01-15'),
('123ABC', 22, '2011-01-13'),
('456DEF', 22, '2011-01-13')
Problem: To list out the distinct sec_no with the latest price (amount) and the number of days it was at the current price. In this case,
Result:
sec_no amount no_of_days_at_price
123ABC 25 3 e.g. 01-18 to 01-20
456DEF 22 1 e.g. 01-13
select
a.sec_no,
a.amount,
min(price_date) as FirstDateAtPrice,
No_of_days_at_price = COALESCE(DATEDIFF(d, c.price_date, a.price_date),0)
from (
select *, ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by sec_no order by price_date desc) rn
from #sec_temp) a
outer apply (
select top 1 *
from #sec_temp b
where a.sec_no=b.sec_no and a.amount <> b.amount
order by b.price_date desc
) c
where a.rn=1
The subquery A works out the greatest-1-per-group, which is to say the most recent price record for each sec_no. The subquery C finds the first prior record that holds a different price for the same sec_no. The difference in the two dates is the number of days sought. If you need it to be one for no prior date, change the end of the COALESCE line to 1 instead of 0.
EDITED for clarified question
To start counting from the first date equal to the current rate, use this query instead
select
sec_no,
amount,
No_of_days_at_price = 1 + DATEDIFF(d, min(price_date), max(price_date))
from (
select *,
ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by sec_no order by price_date desc) rn,
ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by sec_no, amount order by price_date desc) rn2
from #sec_temp
) X
WHERE rn=rn2
group by sec_no, amount
AND FINALLY If the required result is actually the days between
the first date on which the price is equal to current; and
today
Then the only part to change is this:
No_of_days_at_price = 1 + DATEDIFF(d, min(price_date), getdate())
Here's one approach, first looking up the latest price, and then the last price that was different:
select secs.sec_no
, latest.amount as price
, case when previous.price_date is null then 1
else datediff(day, previous.price_date, latest.price_date)
end as days_at_price
from (
select distinct sec_no
from #sec_temp
) secs
cross apply
(
select top 1 amount
, price_date
from #sec_temp
where sec_no = secs.sec_no
order by
price_date desc
) latest
outer apply
(
select top 1 price_date
from #sec_temp
where sec_no = secs.sec_no
and amount <> latest.amount
order by
price_date desc
) previous
This prints:
sec_no price days_at_price
123ABC 25,00 5
456DEF 22,00 1