Anyone already used https://reimagined.github.io/resolve/ and got hot reload for react working?
Cheers
-raf
TL;DR
This small DIFF (3 files) for the HackerNews example application illustrates how to implement the simplest HMR:
* On Diffy: https://diffy.org/diff/kgfz1h97zr9sisxcfkb0m5cdi
* Permalink: https://pastebin.com/hv87aquw
hacker-news/client/hmr.js
hacker-news/client/index.js
hacker-news/config.app.js
Complete answer:
Although the reSolve frameworkâs examples mostly use React, it is up to you how you implement the frontend, so you can implement custom logic to support hot reloading.
Also, note that the reSolve framework supports automatic rebuilding of server bundles and custom client sources specified in the application config as in the following code sample:
https://github.com/reimagined/resolve/blob/master/examples/hacker-news/config.app.js#L49-L67
So, you can take one of the following two approaches to implement hot reloading in your reSolve-based application:
1) Implement an SSR renderer for your application, like in this example: https://github.com/reimagined/resolve/blob/master/examples/hacker-news/client/ssr.js. You can even use a simplified version of this file containing only imports - it will suffice for the task. The main point is that this SSR renderer is rebuilt automatically after any of UI source files is changed, which you can use as an indication of file changes. On the client side, you can send long-polling requests to this handler and invoke page reloading on a change.
2) Generate a fully custom frontend using a builder that provides hot reloading out-of-the-box (for example, create-react-app), and link that frontend to your reSolve application as in the following example:
https://github.com/reimagined/resolve/tree/master/examples/with-vanillajs
Related
I'm trying to build a dynamic database connection via Agroal inside a native image. It's not possible to use the default config params because I don't know the connection params at compile time. Is that even possible right now?
The connection is built like this at runtime:
AgroalDataSource.from(
AgroalDataSourceConfigurationSupplier()
...)
I'm currently seeing this error:
Class io.agroal.pool.ConnectionHandler[] is instantiated reflectively but was never registered.
Register the class by using org.graalvm.nativeimage.hosted.RuntimeReflection
The installed features include: [agroal, cdi, jdbc-h2, jdbc-mysql, jdbc-postgresql, kotlin, narayana-jta, resteasy, resteasy-jackson]
It runs fine on the JVM, but not using Graal. It feels like it should be possible and I'm probably missing something here. I was hoping adding agraol extension would be sufficient but obviously isn't picked up correctly.
The current situation is that we configure Agroal for native images only if you have a datasource defined using Quarkus configuration.
Thus for your use case, for now, you will have to do what we do automatically manually. What we do being registering some classes for reflection and including some resources in the native image.
See https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/master/extensions/agroal/deployment/src/main/java/io/quarkus/agroal/deployment/AgroalProcessor.java#L91 and https://quarkus.io/guides/writing-native-applications-tips#using-a-configuration-file.
Obviously, that's not ideal. Could you open an issue on our GitHub so that we can discuss it internally and see if we should/can improve the situation?
In the end, you would still need some reflection registration for your JDBC driver though.
I've working on modification of the 'shoutem.notification-center' extension using as a guide this tutorial and I'm having some issues.
At first I tried to use the Extend the extension approach, but like I've posted on this issue, didn't quite work.
So I've tried the Directly modify approach, which works fine on my local phone, but once I use the command shoutem push to send my modifications to the server, the instance on Appetize never stops the 'Building your application' message.
The major problem is that there's no error code or feedback.
That was not the first time that happened, I had the same issue modifying other extensions. Any idea why this is happening?
The issue is likely one of two things.
New native dependencies were added that the Builder preview cannot process due to it's predefined binary.
Your directly modified extension works locally, but not on the Builder because locally it's path is still AppName/extensions/shoutem.extName, but on the Builder it's AppName/extensions/yourDevName.extName, so it fails.
The first one can be resolved by either using a non-native solution as a replacement for the native dependency you were using, or to simply use a local emulator for previewing purposes.
The second can be resolved by making sure all extensions that reference the one you directly modified are edited to now reference your new directly modified extension instead of shoutem.extName.
If you could shoot me your app ID in a comment I can let you know which one it is and what the best steps to fix it would be.
My application has 2 purposes:
It needs to run stand-alone, where it needs routing for choosing a
study etc.
Or, it runs integrated in an other project, and only needs
one controller and one view.
Currently i have a routeProvider configured for the stand-alone application, injecting the pages in the ng-view tag in the HTML.
Now is my question: How can i inject an controller and view in the ng-view (For the integration). I cannot manipulate the HTML since it is static. I cant use a single routeProvider rule, because this can interfeir the application that integrates mine (Other plugins can use the #/.. for info or other things).
In your situation you can't use routeProvider when other stuff interferes.
Of Course you could prevent routeProvider to act on outside changes of the hashbang with workarounds but thats not nice.
routeProvider will listen to all changes of the url after the hashbang.
So what you should do is to manually bootstrap() your angular app with the controllers you need. If your app is small enough you could even use directives to achieve lazy loading of templates with the attribute templateUrl : "/myurl"
Usually to create a dynamic App use Routing. Simnple point.
The best way to use Angular if you want to unleash all its might don't integrate it.
I explain why:
+ Your state never gets lost due to page reloads
+ You have full control of the environment and don't have to worry about interfering scripts etc.
+ If your user should manually reload, you can redirect to home/login or even better use requireJS or HTML5 local storage to recover your scopes after a reload
Cheers, Heinrich
I'm creating a workflow app with pyramid and i'm searching how to make the application modulable : meaning create a core app with sqlalchemy models, base forms with wtforms, and some base templates with mako.
The basic structure of the "Core" app is:
App_Core/core.ini
/setup.py
/...
/App_Core/
/__init__.py
/models.py
/forms.py
/utils.py
/templates/
/templates/base.mako...
/static/
/static/staticfiles...
My goal is to create 1 application per workflow which will be included in the Core app : it seems possible to do that via the includeme function provided with pyramid.
I want to include each workflow via the core.ini file, for example:
pyramid.includes =
workflow_app1
workflow_app2
workflow_app3
...
I defined an new app called workflow_app1 with the following structure:
worflow_app1/
/setup.py
/...
/workflow_app1/
/__init__.py
/models.py
/forms.py
/views.py
/templates/
/templates/workflow_app1.mako
/...
And the _init_.py file will contain the includeme function and will define new routes:
def includeme(config):
config.add_route('route1', '/route1/')
config.add_route('route2', '/route2/')
config.scan()
When i'm writing a view for the worflow_app1, i'm rendering to a template included with that app, but when i'm calling it from the core app, it can't render the template and gives the following error:
TopLevelLookupException: Cant locate template for uri 'workflow-app1.mako'
This error quite logical cause the mako.directories directive is given with the path App_Core_PATH/templates so my template should be in the same folder.
Question1:
Is it possible to make mako searching in each folder of modules the wanted templates?
Question2:
Is it possible to make the workflow-app1.mako inheriting of the base.mako from the core app?
Thanks by advance for your answer.
The solution that I would recommend is switching to asset specs for your templates. They are explicit, allow overriding, and provide better control over your template hierarchy. This means that you would stop using mako.directories and instead use 'workflow_app1:templates/workflow_app1.mako' in your inherits or include or renderer arguments. Given this, it's obvious that you can inherit from your base.mako in your core app, whereas managing the mako.directories option is more difficult.
If you're deadset on mako.directories then you can add a line to it every time you add a package to pyramid.includes.
mako.directores =
App_Core:templates
workflow_app1:templates
workflow_app2:templates
Another option is to switch to jinja2, as its plugin has the ability to add search paths after the fact. Thus your included modules can config.add_jinja2_search_path(...) throwing themselves into the lookup order. Pyramid's mako integration does not offer this option right now.
Does anybody know what if direct update updates everything that lives in the common directory structure. I used the same code base for multiple apps, the only change being certain settings within a js file that tells the application how to act. Is there a directory i can put that js file that would be safe from the direct update feature?
I cant seen to find any specific information on IBM's website.
I think you guys need to be careful which terms you are using in order to not confuse people who may be looking for similar help.
Environments are specific to the OS you are using. iOS, Blackberry, Android, and etc. environments.
Skins are based on the environment, and aren't generic to all platform. When you create a skin you must choose which environment you are running in.
So to correct some, direct updates will update all skin resources in targeted environments.
For example: You have an app with Android and iOS versions
When you create skins, you are creating essentially a responsive type of design to your parameters. For instance, if you have a 2.3 vs 4.2 Android OS, you can set a look and feel for both. However, these utilize a single web resource base. The APK would be the same for both versions of the app (by default) and have 2 available skins. On runtime utilizing IBM Worklight's 'Runtime Skinning' (hence the name) it goes through the parameter check for the OS and loads that skins overriding web code.
You could technically override all of the web code to be completely different for both skins, but that would be bulky and inefficient.
When you direct update you are updating all the resources of that particular environment (to include both skins), not the common folder/environment.
So an updated Android (both skins) would have updated web resources (if you deployed the android wlapp) and an iOS version would stay the same.
If you look at the Android project after build (native -> assets -> www -> default or skin) you can find the shared web resources generated by the common environment. However that is only put there every time you do a new build.
In the picture, I have an older version of the Android built for both skins on the left. On the right is a preview of the newer common resources after deploying only the common.wlapp. So you can see that they are separate.
Sorry if it was long winded, but I thought I would be thorough.
To answer the original question, have you thought of having all the parameters of the store loaded from user input or a setup? If you are trying to connect to 3 different store, create some form for settings control that will access different back ends or specific adapters. You could also create 3 different config.js that load depending on the parameters that you set so that you set. The other option is to set different versions of your apps specific to the store.
Example. Version 1.11, 1.12,1.13 can be 3 versions of the same app for store 1, 2, & 3. They can be modified and change and have 3 sets of web resources. When you need to update, jump up to version 1.21, 1.22,1.23. It seems a bit of a work around, but it may be your best bet at getting 3 versions of the same app to fall within the single application category. (keep 3 config.js types for modifying for the 3 stores).
To the best of my knowledge Direct Update will update every web resource of the skin you're using (html, css, js). However, I'm no expert with it.
If you're supporting only Android and iOS applications and need a way to store settings I recommend JSONStore. Otherwise look into Cordova Storage, Local Storage or IndexedDB.
Using a JSONStore collection called settings will allow you to store data on disk inside the app's directory. It will persist until you call one of the removal methods like destroy or until the application is uninstalled. There are also ways of linking collections to Worklight Adapters to pull/push data from/to a server. The links below will provide further details.
the only change being certain settings within a js
Create a collection for your settings:
var options = {};
options.onSuccess = function () {
//... what to do after init finished
};
options.onFailure = function () {
//... what to do if init fails
}
var settings = WL.JSONStore.initCollection('settings',
{background: 'string', itemsPerPage: 'number'}, options);
You can add new settings after initCollection onSuccess has been called:
settings.add({background: 'red', itemsPerPage: 20}, options);
You can find settings stored after initCollection onSuccess has been called:
settings.findAll({onSuccess: function (results) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(results));
}});
You can read more about JSONStore in the Getting Started Modules. See Modules: 7.9, 7.10, 7.11, 7.12. There is further information inside the API Documentation in IBM InfoCenter. The methods described above are: initCollection, add and findAll.
Since version 5.0.3 I think, direct update will not update all the webresources, only those of the skin you are using.
say you have skin def and skin skin2
you are on def
make change to def on the server -> you will get a direct update for
def only
make change to skin2 on server-> no direct update for you.
you are on skin2:
make change to skin2 on server -> direct update for skin2 only
make change to def javascript which also resides on skin2 ( and therefor end result is def+skin2 concatination), update only skin2
make change to def,just to a picture(also checking pic extension from application-descriptor: ") -> no direct update
Thats how direct update works.
Please also share some more details about what is the problem, I see you use a js file, where do you change it? what do you mean excatly, give a better (simplified) real life example, because it is unclear what you are trying.