I am trying to send a modifiable box with a no-mod script inside it to another user and cannot get the hoped for result. What I was hoping for is that the recipient could modify the box but not the script. Sadly that is not what happens.
What happens is that the user receives the box, and upon opening it, it shows the MOD box checked, and even says "You can modify this object". Good. And, indeed, the user can change the texture of the box, save it to inventory, re-rez it and the texture survives unchanged. Still good.
BUT, when the user changes the GROUP the box belongs to, with the box rezzed, they can do it and it seems to work. But as soon as they take the box back into inventory three things happen.
(1) where it used to say, in inventory (no copy) it now says (no copy) (no modify) and
(2) when they rez it again, the GROUP reverts to what it was when I sent out the box, and
(3) curiously, the texture does not revert.
I looked for any further posts here regarding permissions.
I found and read with interest an Oct 14 thread: Modify permissions changed when sending items in a box in the Second Life Community Forum.
Of course I found the overall result of that problem to be basically: "Second Life does that sometimes".
I imagine this is relatively easy for someone else to replicate on some different sim, with
different avatars and different box, on a different day if any of that changes things.
Advice? Links to the best place on-line to read up on permissions?
Links to other discussion forums where I might find assistance such as StackOverflow?
Thank you.
Afterthought #1 -- Yes I did set modify BOTH with the box Rezzed and with it in inventory.
The permissions shown in inventory are the most restrictive permissions on the object and its contents. The object is still modifiable but the inventory listing will show no modify if a script inside the object is no modify.
The group is set to the active group of the person rezzing it (or, in viewers with "rez under land group" enabled, the land group, should the person rezzing it be a member). Groups are not stored when the object is taken back into your inventory; it has nothing to do with the group you set it to.
Related
Foreword: I've searched around on this question a fair bit and found answers which are close to a solution, but not what I'm looking for. So here I am, and I hope someone can help me. I'm relatively new to VSTS, so be gentle (or at least constructive) ;P
The Question: I'm looking for a way to restrict access to specific tickets (NOT by ticket type) that contain NDA protected data, whilst keeping them in the same backlog and iterations as the rest of the tickets related to a project.
We have many different NDA protected customers, so whilst creating a new ticket type per NDA, and restricting access to this, could work, it's not the solution I'm looking for.
Alternatively, I'm barking up the wrong tree, and there is an entirely different and "better way" to support this use-case?
Edit 1 - More info: Let's say I have 1 backlog for a product. It contains only 2 work items. It's important there is only 1 backlog for planning and overview by a product owner.
One of the two work items contains sensitive information only half the development team should have visibility to. How do I keep both tickets in the same backlog and iterations, but hide the sensitive one from some team members?
Thanks in advance for your time!
Regarding permission of work items in a team project, you can set the permission in area and iteration scope, but can’t for specific work items.
So, you need to put these work items in different area and manage permission for this area. Simple steps:
Go to team project admin page
Work=>Areas
Click New/New child, to create a new area.
Click …=>Security, set the permission for the group(s) or user(s)
Click the default team’s settings => Areas
Click + Select areas to add that area in order to show related work items (in that area)
I have set up two referral credit rules.
All acting users get 7 default credits every time they trigger the event mq_app_open
Referred acting users get 10 default credits every time they trigger the event mq_app_open
mq_app_open is a custom event that I am recording on app open.
I can see that rule 1 is getting applied but can never get rule 2 to be applied.
What actually does "Referred acting users" actually mean?
I think the issue probably relates to the fact that when I open the app from a (universal) deeplink I see two events
open
mq_app_open
For each of Session Referring Branch Link ID, Session Referring Click ID and Session Referring Link URL are all null.
Oddly, when I let the app go into the background and then the foreground again I see the following events
open
referred session
For these two events Session Referring Branch Link ID, Session Referring Click ID have values but Session Referring Link URL is null.
I am not sure why any of these values are null when it would seem they should all reference back to the link url that was clicked on.
Alex from Branch.io here:
Referred acting users is a rather confusing way to say 'users who take action and open the app after clicking on a Branch link'. We should probably adjust our terminology to make this a bit clearer. For most purposes, you can think of this as Referred users.
I am actually not certain why rule 1 is working but rule 2 is not. Possibly there is some conflict with having two rules applying to the same user from the same event — you could try refactoring the rules so that Referring users get 7 points and Referred users get 17.
Those session parameters should be coming back with values, assuming a link was clicked. We probably need to do a bit more debugging to see what's going on — would you mind submitting a ticket to the Branch integrations team so that we can dig into the code and the backend config of your specific app?
I'm having this issue:
I'm using VBS to extract all meetings from our conference rooms.
Sometimes I get from the same room 2 meetings that overlap each other for a certain amount of time. But, outlook shows only one of them.
I've tried to check all the item.fields to see what seems to be the criteria by which a meeting is shown in shared calendar, or not, but all seems to be the same for both.
I would have uploaded my code here, but it is very long, about 350 code lines.
So, my question is, what property is used by outlook to show to other people in a shared calendar, a meeting, if it overlaps with another one?
I`ve found the answer.
Microsoft uses this model for recurrent appointments:
When a recurring event is created, the item.isRecurring is set to True.
then the colection occurrences is added to item, and reccuring pattern object.
If you delete or modify one or more occurrences, anther object is added to occurences, exception. All deleted, or modified occurrences can be found here.
the strange thing is that even if an occurence is deleted, you can still find it as active, and thus, overlaying with the appointments created afterwards.
The trick is to check all the way, even in exceptions, in order to be able to get same view as in Outlook.
if you need additional details, pm me.
I have 2 1/2 years experience of VB.Net, mostly self taught, so please bear with me if I seem rather noobish still and do not know some of the basics. I would recommend you grab a cup of tea before starting on this, as it appears to have got quite long...
I currently have a rather large application (VB.Net website) of over 15000 lines of code at the last count. It does not do retail or anything particularly complex like that - it is literally just a wholesale viewing website with admin frontend, catalogue / catalogue management system and pageview system.
I don't really know much about how .Net applications work in the background - whether they are all loaded on the same thread or if each has its own thread... I just know how to code them, or at least like to think I do... :-)
Basically my application is set up as follows:
There are two different areas - the customer area and the administration frontend.
The main part of the customer frontend is the Catalogue. The MasterPage will load a list of products but that's all, and this is common to all the customer frontend pages.
I tend to work on only one or several parts of the application at a time before uploading the changes. So, for example, I may alter the hierarchy of the Catalogue and change the Catalogue page to match the hierarchy change whilst leaving everything else alone.
The pageview database is getting really quite large and so it is getting rather slow when the application is first requested due to the way it works.
The application timeout is set to 5 minutes - don't know how to change it, I have even tried asking this question on here and seem to remember the solution was quite complex and I was recommended not to change it, but if a customer requests the application 5 minutes after the last page view then it will reload the application from scratch. This means there is a very slow page load whenever it exceeds 5 minutes of inactivity.
I am not sure if this needs consideration to determine how best to split the application up, if at all, but each part of the catalogue system is set up as follows:
A Manager class at the top level, which is used by the admin frontend to add, edit and remove items of the specified type and the customer frontend to retrieve a list of items of the specified type. For example the "RangeManager" will contain a list of product "Ranges" and will be used to interact with these from the customer frontend.
An Item class, for example Range, which contains a list of Attributes. For example Name, Description, Visible, Created, CreatedBy and so on. The form for adding / editing loops through these to display relevant controls for the administrator. For example a Checkbox for BooleanAttribute.
An Attribute class, which can be of type StringAttribute, BooleanAttribute, IntegerAttribute and so on. There are also custom Attributes (not just datatypes) such as RangeAttribute, UserAttribute and so on. These are given a data field which is used to get a piece of data specific to the item it is contained in when it is first requested. Basically the Item is given a DataRow which is stored and accessed by Attributes only when they are first requested.
When one item is requested from a specific manager is requested, the manager will loop through all the items in the database and create a new instance of the item class. For example when a Range is requested from the RangeManager, the RangeManager will loop through all of the DataRows in the Ranges table and create a new instance of Range for each one. As stated above it simply creates a new instance with the DataRow, rather than loading all the data into it there and then. The Attributes themselves fetch the relevant data from the DataRow as and when they're first requested.
It just seems a tad stupid, in my mind, to recompile and upload the entire application every time I fix a minor bug or a spelling mistake for a word which is in the code behind (for example if I set the text of a Label dynamically). A fix / change to the Catalogue page, the way it is now, may mean a customer trying to view the Contact page, which is in no way related to the Catalogue page apart from by having the same MasterPage, cannot do so because the DLL is being uploaded.
Basically my question is, given my current situation, how would people suggest I change the architecture of the application by way of splitting it into multiple applications? I mean would it be just customer / admin, or customer / admin and pageviews, or some other way? Or not at all? Are there any other alternatives which I have not mentioned here? Could web services come in handy here? Like split the catalogue itself into a different application and just have the masterpage for all the other pages use a web service to get the names of the products to list on the left hand side? Am I just way WAY over-complicating things? Judging by the length of this question I probably am, and it wouldn't be the first time... I have tried to keep it short, but I always fail... :-)
Many thanks in advance, and sorry if I have just totally confused you!
Regards,
Richard
15000 LOC is not really all that big.
It sounds like you are not pre-compiling your site for publishing. You may want to read this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1y1404zt(v=vs.80).aspx
Recompiling and uploading the application is the best way to do it. If all you are changing is your markup, that can be uploaded individually (e.g. changing some html layout in an aspx page).
I don't know what you mean here by application timeout, but if your app domain recycles every 5 minutes, then that doesn't seem right at all. You should look into this.
Also, if you find yourself working on various different parts of the site (i.e. many different changes), but need to deploy only some items in isolation, then you should look into how you are using your source control tools (you are using one, aren't you?). Look into something like GIT and branching/merging.
Start by reading:
Application Architecture Guide
for writing an offline client to the Google Reader service I would like to know how to best sync with the service.
There doesn't seem to be official documentation yet and the best source I found so far is this: http://code.google.com/p/pyrfeed/wiki/GoogleReaderAPI
Now consider this: With the information from above I can download all unread items, I can specify how many items to download and using the atom-id I can detect duplicate entries that I already downloaded.
What's missing for me is a way to specify that I just want the updates since my last sync.
I can say give me the 10 (parameter n=10) latest (parameter r=d) entries. If I specify the parameter r=o (date ascending) then I can also specify parameter ot=[last time of sync], but only then and the ascending order doesn't make any sense when I just want to read some items versus all items.
Any idea how to solve that without downloading all items again and just rejecting duplicates? Not a very economic way of polling.
Someone proposed that I can specify that I only want the unread entries. But to make that solution work in the way that Google Reader will not offer this entries again, I would need to mark them as read. In turn that would mean that I need to keep my own read/unread state on the client and that the entries are already marked as read when the user logs on to the online version of Google Reader. That doesn't work for me.
Cheers,
Mariano
To get the latest entries, use the standard from-newest-date-descending download, which will start from the latest entries. You will receive a "continuation" token in the XML result, looking something like this:
<gr:continuation>CArhxxjRmNsC</gr:continuation>`
Scan through the results, pulling out anything new to you. You should find that either all results are new, or everything up to a point is new, and all after that are already known to you.
In the latter case, you're done, but in the former you need to find the new stuff older than what you've already retrieved. Do this by using the continuation to get the results starting from just after the last result in the set you just retrieved by passing it in the GET request as the c parameter, e.g.:
http://www.google.com/reader/atom/user/-/state/com.google/reading-list?c=CArhxxjRmNsC
Continue this way until you have everything.
The n parameter, which is a count of the number of items to retrieve, works well with this, and you can change it as you go. If the frequency of checking is user-set, and thus could be very frequent or very rare, you can use an adaptive algorithm to reduce network traffic and your processing load. Initially request a small number of the latest entries, say five (add n=5 to the URL of your GET request). If all are new, in the next request,
where you use the continuation, ask for a larger number, say, 20. If those are still all new, either the feed has a lot of updates or it's been a while, so continue on in groups of 100 or whatever.
However, and correct me if I'm wrong here, you also want to know, after you've downloaded an item, whether its state changes from "unread" to "read" due to the person reading it using the Google Reader interface.
One approach to this would be:
Update the status on google of any items that have been read locally.
Check and save the unread count for the feed. (You want to do this before the next step, so that you guarantee that new items have not arrived between your download of the newest items and the time you check the read count.)
Download the latest items.
Calculate your read count, and compare that to google's. If the feed has a higher read count than you calculated, you know that something's been read on google.
If something has been read on google, start downloading read items and comparing them with your database of unread items. You'll find some items that google says are read that your database claims are unread; update these. Continue doing so until you've found a number of these items equal to the difference between your read count and google's, or until the downloads get unreasonable.
If you didn't find all of the read items, c'est la vie; record the number remaining as an "unfound unread" total which you also need to include in your next calculation of the local number you think are unread.
If the user subscribes to a lot of different blogs, it's also likely he labels them extensively, so you can do this whole thing on a per-label basis rather than for the entire feed, which should help keep the amount of data down, since you won't need to do any transfers for labels where the user didn't read anything new on google reader.
This whole scheme can be applied to other statuses, such as starred or unstarred, as well.
Now, as you say, this
...would mean that I need to keep my own read/unread state on the client and that the entries are already marked as read when the user logs on to the online version of Google Reader. That doesn't work for me.
True enough. Neither keeping a local read/unread state (since you're keeping a database of all of the items anyway) nor marking items read in google (which the API supports) seems very difficult, so why doesn't this work for you?
There is one further hitch, however: the user may mark something read as unread on google. This throws a bit of a wrench into the system. My suggestion there, if you really want to try to take care of this, is to assume that the user in general will be touching only more recent stuff, and download the latest couple hundred or so items every time, checking the status on all of them. (This isn't all that bad; downloading 100 items took me anywhere from 0.3s for 300KB, to 2.5s for 2.5MB, albeit on a very fast broadband connection.)
Again, if the user has a large number of subscriptions, he's also probably got a reasonably large number of labels, so doing this on a per-label basis will speed things up. I'd suggest, actually, that not only do you check on a per-label basis, but you also spread out the checks, checking a single label each minute rather than everything once every twenty minutes. You can also do this "big check" for status changes on older items less often than you do a "new stuff" check, perhaps once every few hours, if you want to keep bandwidth down.
This is a bit of bandwidth hog, mainly because you need to download the full article from Google merely to check the status. Unfortunately, I can't see any way around that in the API docs that we have available to us. My only real advice is to minimize the checking of status on non-new items.
The Google API hasn't yet been released, at which point this answer may change.
Currently, you would have to call the API and dis-regard items already downloaded, which as you said isn't terribly efficient as you will be re-downloading items every time, even if you already have them.