How to remove blocks section from Shopify schema - shopify

How could I remove blocks section from shopify schema code? I simply tried to delete it but was not able to save due to a strange error. Please see the code below:
{% schema %}
{
"name": "Featured Collection",
"settings": [
{
"type": "collection",
"id": "featured_collection",
"label": "Collection"
},
{
"type": "text",
"id": "collection_button_label",
"label": "Button Label",
"default": "Learn More"
}
],
"blocks": [
{
"type": "section",
"name": "Section",
"settings": [
]
}
],
"presets": [
{
"name": "Featured Collection",
"category": "Product"
}
]
}
{% endschema %}
I can save the above code without any error. But When I remove the code section of "blocks", I get the following error:
Error: New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1577470637989'. Type must be defined in schema.New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1577470668608'. Type must be defined in schema

The error is kind of self explanatory. The error message
Error: New schema is incompatible with the current setting value.
Invalid type value for block '1577470637989'. Type must be defined in
schema.New schema is incompatible with the current setting value.
Invalid type value for block '1577470668608'. Type must be defined in
schema
It states that new schema that you are trying to save is not compatible with existing data you have. Shopify does not know what to do with existing blocks of those types which you want to remove.
So just remove those blocks from Shopify Customizer first and then edit the schema.

Related

AJV - How to validate relative references

I have a json that is used as ref in another json in the same folder:
jsonBase.json
{
"type": "number",
"title": "Your salary",
"presentation": {
"inputType": "money"
}
}
jsonFinal.json
{
"$ref": "jsonBase.json",
"presentation": {
"currency": "EUR"
}
}
When using AJV validate, the schema is invalid (it's missing the required properties), ignoring the base.json.
I checked this github issue and read the docs but I still don't understand exactly what change I need to make in order for the json to be valid.
Here's the codesandbox with demo.
You can only use $ref in a schema to reference a schema. It doesn't work in JSON instances.

How to add default URL in Sections Schema

I have been trying to create a schema for a dynamic section, and use some predefined default URL for some pages but liquid cannot accept it. This is the schema code:
{% schema %}
{
"name": "My New Section",
"class": "homepage-section",
"tag": "section",
"settings": [
{
"type": "text",
"id": "section-heading",
"label": "Section Heading",
"default": "Default Heading",
"info": "Meaningful copy in 25 characters or less."
},
{
"type": "url",
"id": "link-1",
"label": "Link URL 1",
"default": "/collections/mycollection"
}
],
"presets": [
{
"name": "My New Section",
"category": "My Sections"
}
]
}
{% endschema %}
So, for the "type": "url" I try to define the default collection "default": "collections/mycollection" and this is the error message when I try to save the file:
This file contains the following errors: Error: Invalid schema:
setting with id="link" default must be a string or datasource access
path
I tried some different options without success:
"default": "https://testing.myshopify.com/"
"default": "https://testing.myshopify.com/"
"default": "collections/mycollection"
"default": "collections/mycollection"
Please, let me know if there is anyway to handle it.
You need to read the documentation regarding the special input type provided by Shopify called URL
According to the documentation, you can only set these 2 URLs by default:
/collections
/collections/all
This is because these are two URLs that are present after the store creates automatically, one is set for all collections list pages and once for all products pages. so Shopify knows these two's have already existed.
So these are two default values that you accept into URL fields into the Shopify schema.

JSON Schema Array Validation Woes Using oneOf

Hope I might find some help with this validation issue: I have a JSON array that can have multiple object types (video, image). Within that array, the objects have a rel field value. The case I'm working on is that there can only be one object with "rel": "primaryMedia" allowed — either a video or an image.
Here are the object representations for the image and video case, both showing the "rel": "primaryMedia".
{
"media": [
{
"caption": "Caption goes here",
"id": "ncim87659842",
"rel": "primaryMedia",
"type": "image"
},
{
"description": "Shaima Swileh arrived in San Francisco after fighting for 17 months to get a waiver from the U.S. government to be allowed into the country to visit her son.",
"headline": "Yemeni mother arrives in U.S. to be with dying 2-year-old son",
"id": "mmvo1402810947621",
"rel": "primaryMedia",
"type": "video"
}
]
}
Here's a stripped-down version of the schema I created to validate this using oneOf (assuming this will handle my case). It doesn't however, work as intended.
{
"$id": "http://example.com/schema/rockcms/article.json",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"definitions": {},
"properties": {
"media": {
"items": {
"oneOf": [
{
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"caption": {
"type": "string"
},
"id": {
"type": "string"
},
"rel": {
"enum": [
"primaryMedia"
],
"type": "string"
},
"type": {
"enum": [
"image"
],
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"caption",
"id",
"rel",
"type"
],
"type": "object"
},
{
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {
"description": {
"type": "string"
},
"headline": {
"type": "string"
},
"id": {
"type": "string"
},
"rel": {
"enum": [
"primaryMedia"
],
"type": "string"
},
"type": {
"enum": [
"video"
],
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"description",
"headline",
"id",
"rel",
"type"
],
"type": "object"
}
]
},
"type": "array"
}
}
}
Using the JSON Schema validator at https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net, the schema validates when data is correctly presented, but the doesn't work when trying to catch errors.
In the case below, headline is added for a video, and it's missing id. This should fail because headline isn't allowed on video, and id is required.
{
"media": [
{
"headline": "Yemeni mother arrives in U.S. to be with dying 2-year-old son",
"rel": "primaryMedia",
"type": "video"
}
]
}
The results I get from the validator, however, aren't entirely expected. Seems it's conflating the two object schemas in its response.
In addition to this, I've separately found that the schema will allow the population of BOTH a video and image object in media, which isn't expected.
Been trying to figure out what I've done wrong, but am stumped. Would very much appreciate some feedback, if anyone has to offer. Thanks in advance!
Validator Response:
Message: JSON is valid against no schemas from 'oneOf'.
Schema path: #/properties/media/items/oneOf
Message: Property 'headline' has not been defined and the schema does not allow additional properties.
Schema path: #/properties/media/items/oneOf/0/additionalProperties
Message: Value "video" is not defined in enum.
Schema path: #/properties/media/items/oneOf/0/properties/type/enum
Message: Required properties are missing from object: description, id.
Schema path: #/properties/media/items/oneOf/1/required
Message: Required properties are missing from object: caption, id.
Schema path: #/properties/media/items/oneOf/0/required
Your question is formed of three parts, but the first two are linked, so I'll address those, although they don't have a "solution" as such.
How can I validate that only one object in an array has a specific key, and the others do not.
You cannot do this with JSON Schema.
The set of JSON Schema keywords which are applicable to arrays do not have a means for expressing "one of the values must match a schema", but rather are applicable to either ALL of the items in a the array, or A SPECIFIC item in the array (if items is an array as opposed to an object).
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-handrews-json-schema-validation-01#section-6.4
The validation output is not what I expect. I expect to only see the failing branch of oneOf which relates to my object type, which
is defined by the type key.
The JSON Schema specification (as of draft-7) does not specify any format for returning errors, however the error structure you get is pretty "complete" in terms of what it's telling you (and is similar to how we are specifying errors should be returned for draft-8).
Consider, the validator knows nothing about your schema or your JSON instance in terms of your business logic.
When validating a JSON instance, a validator may step through all values, and test validation rules against all applicable subschemas. Looking at your errors, both of the schemas in oneOf are applicable to all items in your array, and so all are tested for validation. If one does not satisfy the condition, the others will be tested also. The validator cannot know, when using a oneOf, what your intent was.
You MAY be able to get around this issue, by using an if / then combination. If your if schema is simply a const of the type, and your then schema is the full object type, you may get a cleaner error response, but I haven't tested this theory.
I want ALL items in the array to be one of the types. What's going on here?
From the spec...
items:
If "items" is a schema, validation succeeds if all elements in the
array successfully validate against that schema.
oneOf:
An instance validates successfully against this keyword if it
validates successfully against exactly one schema defined by this
keyword's value.
What you have done is say: Each item in the array should be valid according to [schemaA]. SchemA: The object should be valid according to on of these schemas: [the schemas inside the oneOf].
I can see how this is confusing when you think "items must be one of the following", but items applies the value schema to each of the items in the array independantly.
To make it do what you mean, move the oneOf above items, and then refactor one of the media types to another items schema.
Here's a sudo schema.
oneOf: [items: properties: type: const: image], [items: properties: type: image]
Let me know if any of this isn't clear or you have any follow up questions.

JIRA Rest API select minimal resource

I am using JIRA REST API for querying issues with below jql
jql=project =SLUB and "Agile Team" in ("Iris (B2C)")&fieldsByKeys=true&fields=status&maxResults=1
I am getting api response as
{
"expand": "names,schema",
"startAt": 0,
"maxResults": 1,
"total": 1172,
"issues": [
{
"expand": "operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields",
"id": "35988",
"self": "https://xyz.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/issue/35988",
"key": "SLUB-7071",
"fields": {
"status": {
"self": "https://xyz.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/status/10200",
"description": "",
"iconUrl": "https://xyz.atlassian.net/",
"name": "To Do",
"id": "10200",
"statusCategory": {
"self": "https://xyz.atlassian.net/rest/api/2/statuscategory/2",
"id": 2,
"key": "new",
"colorName": "blue-gray",
"name": "To Do"
}
}
}
}
]
}
How can I only fetch status name instead of complete status resource. Please suggest.
https://docs.atlassian.com/jira/REST/latest/#d2e3181
Check This .
The fields param (which can be specified multiple times) gives a comma-separated list of fields to include in the response. This can be used to retrieve a subset of fields. A particular field can be excluded by prefixing it with a minus.
By default, only navigable (*navigable) fields are returned in this search resource. Note: the default is different in the get-issue resource -- the default there all fields (*all).
*all - include all fields
*navigable - include just navigable fields summary,comment - include just the summary and comments
-description - include navigable fields except the description (the default is *navigable for search)
*all,-comment - include everything except comments
Copied From Here.

Error loading file stored in Google Cloud Storage to Big Query

I have been trying to create a job to load a compressed json file from Google Cloud Storage to a Google BigQuery table. I have read/write access in both Google Cloud Storage and Google BigQuery. Also, the uploaded file belongs in the same project as the BigQuery one.
The problem happens when I access to the resource behind this url https://www.googleapis.com/upload/bigquery/v2/projects/NUMERIC_ID/jobs by means of a POST request. The content of the request to the abovementioned resource can be found as follows:
{
"kind" : "bigquery#job",
"projectId" : NUMERIC_ID,
"configuration": {
"load": {
"sourceUris": ["gs://bucket_name/document.json.gz"],
"schema": {
"fields": [
{
"name": "id",
"type": "INTEGER"
},
{
"name": "date",
"type": "TIMESTAMP"
},
{
"name": "user_agent",
"type": "STRING"
},
{
"name": "queried_key",
"type": "STRING"
},
{
"name": "user_country",
"type": "STRING"
},
{
"name": "duration",
"type": "INTEGER"
},
{
"name": "target",
"type": "STRING"
}
]
},
"destinationTable": {
"datasetId": "DATASET_NAME",
"projectId": NUMERIC_ID,
"tableId": "TABLE_ID"
}
}
}
}
However, the error doesn't make any sense and can also be found below:
{
"error": {
"errors": [
{
"domain": "global",
"reason": "invalid",
"message": "Job configuration must contain exactly one job-specific configuration object (e.g., query, load, extract, spreadsheetExtract), but there were 0: "
}
],
"code": 400,
"message": "Job configuration must contain exactly one job-specific configuration object (e.g., query, load, extract, spreadsheetExtract), but there were 0: "
}
}
I know the problem doesn't lie either in the project id or in the access token placed in the authentication header, because I have successfully created an empty table before. Also I specify the content-type header to be application/json which I don't think is the issue here, because the body content should be json encoded.
Thanks in advance
Your HTTP request is malformed -- BigQuery doesn't recognize this as a load job at all.
You need to look into the POST request, and check the body you send.
You need to ensure that all the above (which seams correct) is the body of the POST call. The above Json should be on a single line, and if you manually creating the multipart message, make sure there is an extra newline between the headers and body of each MIME type.
If you are using some sort of library, make sure the body is not expected in some other form, like resource, content, or body. I've seen libraries that use these differently.
Try out the BigQuery API explorer: https://developers.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/v2/jobs/insert and ensure your request body matches the one made by the API.