I want Write ALTER TABLE SQL statement to add a column to the table. The column is classified as NUMBER datatype, NOT NULL attribute, and primary key.
But it shows ORA-01758.
ALTER TABLE INSURANCE
ADD (INS_ID NUMBER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL);
If I select DEFAULT 0, it really solves the problem, but I cannot set up a primary key and INS_ID shows 0, not (null)
Because this table's data is from a excel document, what should I solve it without delete data?
If I must delete data how restore it easily?
Typically you can either:
provide a default value so oracle can fill the column as it creates, satisfying the constraint or
create the column as nullable, fill it with relevant data, then enable the not null restriction/make it the primary key after it has data or
empty the table
1 is not an option for you, because the values will have to be unique if they are to be a primary key. You could consider associating the column with a sequence or making it an identity column though
2 is a likely option for you if an auto generated incrementing number is no good as a PK (for example the key data is already known or calculated)
3 is something you've already said is not an option
Give some thought to the ongoing maintenance requirements - every front end app that writes data into this table will need to be upgraded to understand it has a primary key unless you're using a sequence/identity or similar that provides a unique value for the row. If there will be a lot to update and you dont care to have a PK in a particular form or from some existing value/relationship elsewhere, having an auto number PK can be helpful. If this data needs to relate to existing data that has a key, you need to upgrade front end apps so they can respect the new PK
Related
I needed to modify by a datatable by setting the id column as the PRIMARY KEY in order to work with it on a client I am developing. However, I forgot to copy/screen-cap the already existing records and now I get the feeling data is missing. Was it possible that setting a column as the primary key could've affected data in other columns?
FYI, I set the primary key by going into the design, right clicking the column, and clicking on "Set as primary key"
What 'design' tool were you using? The only thing that would make sense would be if there were duplicate ids, but that should give an error instead of picking random rows. The only other thing I can think of would be if you had a foreign key set to cascade deletes and deleted rows in the child table.
You only say you have an 'idea' that rows were deleted. That makes me think that you might be just doing some simple 'select top(100) *' query or something and don't see the same data as you had before, i.e. you used to see ids like 2093939 and now you only see 1, 2, 3, etc.
When creating a primary key or a clustered index, that can alter the order that rows are returned by default. Creating a clustered primary key would most likely then return the rows in ascending order in that case by default. Could this be the case?
I'm learning SQLite from this webiste: SQLite Tutorial.
I was reading the article they had on the AUTOINCREMENT command.
My question had to do with their explanation of why this feature is useful:
The main purpose of using AUTOINCREMENT attribute is…
To prevent SQLite to reuse value that has not been used or from the previously deleted row.
I'm confused about this explanation as it doesn't explain in detail what the implications of this statement is.
Could someone please give more detail about what happens in the background, if this feature is implemented differently for different platforms or specific packaging of the engine in different packages (npm packages etc.).
Also, more importantly, give examples of use cases where using this feature would be necessary and what would be both the proper and improper ways of using it.
Thanks to all!
To prevent SQLite to reuse value that has not been used or from the
previously deleted row.
AUTOINCREMENT property ensure that newly generated id will be unique that will be not from any already used id in that column or should not be from id that has been deleted. It is mostly used in primary key of table where we need unique property which has not been used so far.
In most of relational database, there is AutoIncrement property but in Oracle, I've seen Sequence which similarly acts AutoIncrement property.
For e.g : if you have 10 rows which has AutoIncrement column called id and has value from 1 to 10. Now, you delete all rows and insert new one, then new row will have id = 11 becase 1 to 10 has already been used. You do not need to specify id value as it automatically fills up new row id value by checking previous inserted value.
This feature is usually being used on the table's primary key (I personally prefer to name it ID), like this:
CREATE TABLE MYTABLE(
ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT NOT NULL,
...
);
If you are learning SQLite, you should know that the table's primary key absolutely mush be unique for each record in this table.
So if you are inserting a record to the table without AUTOINCREMENT on its primary key, the database will force you to specify ID of each new record.
If there are already some records in your table, you may ask yourself a question like "What ID whould I put in the record to ensure that it will be unique?"
This is what AUTOINCREMENT was created for. If AUTOINCREMENT is set on the table's primary key, you don't longer need to specify it when inserting a record, so you don't longer need to think what ID to put there.
Now how does it work. If AUTOINCREMENT is set on the table's primary key, a special number of added records (let's name it as a variable "added") is being stored along with the table's data in the database. When you issue the INSERT command with this table, its ID will be calculated like
added + 1
And the added variable will be incremented (autoINCREMENT)
Initially, added's value is 0.
For example, as Akash KC already said, if 10 records were added to the table, the next record's ID will be 11.
The detail is that AUTOINCREMENT doesn't mind deletions - if you take an empty table, add 10 records to it, delete one of them with ID 5 (for example) and then add a new one, its ID will be 11 as well.
This is a bit of a gneral question, but I can't seem to find an explicit answer.
Let's say I have an import table, with a primary key added by Access. Then another table that I use to cleanup, etc. then connect to Excel.
If I delete a record from my first table (let's say, primary key 123). And then I append a bunch of records to it, will primary key 123 be used, or will Access "know" that that key was used previously and subsequently deleted? Will it fill a record using that key because it's available?
a primary key added by Access
This is always an AutoNumber column.
It will not re-use a previously deleted ID.
Exception: if you delete the last appended record(s), and then compact&repair the database, the AutoNumber "seed" will be reset to (current maximum ID) + 1.
But gaps in the IDs will never be filled.
Assume that I know that updating a primary key is bad.
There are other questions which imply that the inserted and updated table records match by position (the first of one matches the first of the other.) Is this a fact or coincidence?
Is there anything that could join the two tables together when the primary key changes on an update?
There is no match of inserted+deleted virtual table row positions.
And no, you can't match rows
Some options:
there is another unique unchanging (for that update) key to link rows
limit to single row actions.
use a stored procedure with the OUTPUT clause to capture before and after keys
INSTEAD OF trigger with OUTPUT clause (TBH not sure if you can do this)
disallow primary key updates (added after comment)
Each table is allowed to have one identity column. Identity columns are not updateable; they are assigned a value when the records are inserted (or when the column is added), and they can never change. If the primary key is updateable, it must not be an identity column. So, either the table has another column which is an identity column, or you can add one to it. There is no rule that says the identity column has to be the primary key. Then in the trigger, rows in inserted and updated that have the same identity value are the same row, and you can support updating the primary key on multiple rows at a time.
Yes -- create an "old_primary_key" field in the table you're updating, and populate it first.
Nothing you can do to match-up the inserted and deleted psuedo table record keys -- even if you store their data in a log table somewhere.
I guess alternatively, you could create a separate log table that tracked changes to primary keys (old and new). This might be more useful than adding a field to the table you're updating as I suggested right at first, as it would allow you to track more than one change for a given record. Just depends on your situation, I guess.
But that said -- before you do anything, please go find a chalk board and write this 100 times:
I know that updating a primary key is bad.
I know that updating a primary key is bad.
I know that updating a primary key is bad.
I know that updating a primary key is bad.
I know that updating a primary key is bad.
...
:-) (just kidding)
I’m trying to merge a few pairs of SQLite3 databases that have the same tables (and schemas). Some of the tables are pretty simple and just have rows of plain data, but some of the tables have primary keys. Some of the keys are unique like a URL (eg url LONGVARCHAR PRIMARY KEY), and some of them are just simple integer indexes, but NOT set to auto-increment (eg id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY).
I’ve found several topics on merging databases (and I had already manually merged one pair of non-primary-key databases without effort), but am concerned about the ones with keys which may already exist in both.
My question is what happens if a row is inserted to a database where a row with the same key already exists? It should overwrite the row that has that key right? I was hoping that it would append them to the table and update the key, but that only works if the key has a numeric component that is set to auto-increment correct?
Can anyone confirm my suppositions—and if possible, offer a suggestion on the easiest way to append such rows?
Thanks a lot.
You should have no problems if you set the primary key in the destination table to auto increment.
Therefore, when you do you bulk insert command or whatever you are using to insert values into your new table, you simply do not supply input for your primary key field and there will NEVER be a duplicate.
Columns:
ID Name
Just don't provide ID field, ie/
INSERT INTO tableName ("Synetech")
The insert would just add this with the next available ID index in the table.
Good Luck!
If you try to INSERT a duplicate primary key, it will give you an error and not allow the insert. SQLite also supports the 'REPLACE INTO' syntax, which will update on a duplicate primary key.
If you want to append on duplicates, you will have to check whether a field with that key already exists, and if so then change the key to some new value. The correct way to do this likely depends on your application. For integer keys you could just take the max+1, but for the url keys it's not clear what the correct behavior should be.