I have common scenario but I am not able to figure out the solution in Mule 4 batch. In my flow I have a http listner which invokes the flow and then I am calling DB select and then using a batch to upsert data into salesforce.
by default batch will create stats in On-Complete phase and my requirement is to send exact stats as response but I am not able to access it outside of batch. Tried with vars, attributes and even tried VM publish (in this case response will not go back to listner)
Can someone please guide me on this? I'm attaching the flow design for reference.
flow design
Thanks.
You can't. Batch works in the background, your flow will be long gone before your batch is done.
My suggestion is you (1) Store the reporting data somewhere and (2) get to the data using another request/way.
Here's the documentation: https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-runtime/4.2/batch-processing-concept
You can store the payload in on-complete phase in an objectStore and can retrieve it later to build your report. The payload stored in the on-complete phase is a java object that has properties that you would need to build your report. (For e.g.loadedRecords, failedRecords etc)..
Related
Working on a piece of the project where a report needs to be generated with all the flow details(memory used, number of records processed, Processes ran successful, failed, etc). Most of the details are present on the Summary tab, but the requirement is to have separate reports.
Can any one help me with solution/steps/examples/screens/videos.
Thanks much.
Every underlying behavior of the UX/UI that Apache NiFi provides is also accessible through an API (in fact, the UI calls the API to perform each of these tasks). So you can invoke the GET /system-diagnostics API to return that information in JSON form, and then parse this data and present it in whatever form you like.
I am using Mule 4 and Anypoint 7.
In my flow I want to insert records into a database but still keep the original payload in the message.
Previously I would have placed the database connector into an enricher scope so that the original payload is not replaced after the database action has completed.
How can I do this using Mule 4?
I do have the alternative of saving the payload as a variable and then use set payload after the database action but there are a few different database actions and thought the enricher scope made the flow look cleaner so just wanted to see if the functionality was still there somewhere.
Thanks
As you've seen, Enrichers are no longer a scope in Mule 4. We need to use Targets now to achieve similar functionality. Go to the 'Advanced' tab of the Insert configuration and in the Output section specify the 'Target Variable' and 'Target Value'. This provides the same functionality as an enricher.
I have a subroutine in my Controller
<HttpPost>
Sub Index(Id, varLotsOfData)
'Point B.
'By the time it gets here - all the data has been accepted by server.
What I would like to do it capture the Id of the inbound POST and mark, for example, a database record to say "Id xx is receiving data"
The POST receive can take a long time as there is lots of data.
When execution gets to point B I can mark the record "All data received".
Where can I place this type of "pre-POST completed" code?
I should add - we are receiving the POST data from clients that we do not control - that is, it is most likely a client's server sending the data - not a webbrowser client that we have served up from our webserver.
UPDATE: This is looking more complex than I had imagined.
I'm thinking that a possible solution would be to inspect the worker processes in IIS programatically. Via the IIS Manager you can do this for example - How to use IIS Manager to get Worker Processes (w3wp.exe) details information ?
From your description, you want to display on the client page that the method is executing and you can show also a loading gif, and when the execution completed, you will show a message to the user that the execution is completed.
The answer is simply: use SignalR
here you can find some references
Getting started with signalR 1.x and Mvc4
Creating your first SignalR hub MVC project
Hope this will help you
If I understand your goal correctly, it sounds like HttpRequest.GetBufferlessInputStream might be worth a look. It allows you to begin acting on incoming post data immediately and in "pieces" rather than waiting until the entire post has been received.
An excerpt from Microsoft's documentation:
...provides an alternative to using the InputStream propertywhich waits until the whole request has been received. In contrast, the GetBufferlessInputStream method returns the Stream object immediately. You can use the method to begin processing the entity body before the complete contents of the body have been received and asynchronously read the request entity in chunks. This method can be useful if the request is uploading a large file and you want to begin accessing the file contents before the upload is finished.
So you could grab the beginning of the post, and provided your client-facing page sends the ID towards the beginning of its transmission, you may be able to pull that out. Of course, this would be reading raw byte data which would need to be decoded so you could grab the inbound post's ID. There's also a buffered one that will allow the stream to be read in pieces but will also build a complete request object for processing once it has been completely received.
Create a custom action filter,
Action Filters for executing filtering logic either before or after an action method is called. Action Filters are custom attributes that provide declarative means to add pre-action and post-action behavior to the controller's action methods.
Specifically you'll want to look at the
OnActionExecuted – This method is called after a controller action is executed.
Here are a couple of links:
http://www.infragistics.com/community/blogs/dhananjay_kumar/archive/2016/03/04/how-to-create-a-custom-action-filter-in-asp-net-mvc.aspx
http://www.asp.net/mvc/overview/older-versions-1/controllers-and-routing/understanding-action-filters-vb
Here is a lab, but I think it's C#
http://www.asp.net/mvc/overview/older-versions/hands-on-labs/aspnet-mvc-4-custom-action-filters
I have a mule flow and I want to automate the execution of the application without http listener
I want the mule application execute without enter "localhost:8081/app"
is it a way to do this?
Screenshots of the flow
As I understood from your question, I can suggest the below steps
1) Add Composite source at the start of your flow.
2) Place the existing HTTP inbound endpoint into Composite source scope.
3) As an addition, add the quartz inbound endpoint into composite source scope and configure it at what time you want to run using cron expression.
This approach enables you option to trigger the flow using either HTTP URL or automated execution through quartz component using cron expression.
Please comment on this answer if you feel my understanding is wrong.
Do you simply want the app to run at scheduled intervals? If so, I think the Quartz connector would be you best choice.
Is this the scenario you are after?
I have a couple of flows that rely on session variables that are generated in one flow and then passed to the other. Is it safe to rely on session variables used by two asynchronous flows? I guess I don't fully understand the scope of 'sessionVars' in a mule application or in a given mule message.
The mule session has nothing to do with the Java EE session that is shared across threads. The mule session is part of the MuleMessage and how they works is explained here, therefor if you want to share something across multiple flows processing the same message that is the way to go.
If instead you are looking into a way to store a value from a flow processing the message A and pick that value from a flow processing the message B you should consider store this value into the objectstore
I am pretty sure that session variables are returned to http endpoints that are request-response. This could expose sensitive data. I am trying to locate the original mention and official mitigation strategy but have yet to locate it again.
But an easy solution is to remove them at return point of a flow
Edit:
Found the thing I was looking for...
`
<http:connector name="NoSessionConnector">
<service-overrides sessionHandler="org.mule.session.NullSessionHandler"/>
</http:connector>
`
found here under 'HTTP Response Header'
http://www.mulesoft.org/documentation/display/current/HTTP+Transport+Reference
Or, you can also create a custom SessionHandler