I would like to create a simple Telegram bot using JavaScript. But when I am trying to google it (since I'm not very good at working with APIs) I can find only solutions which are using Node.js.
So, that is the question. Is there any reasons why I can't use pure js for this purpose? If there aren't, are there any articles to read?
Thanks in advance
"Pure JS" has no mechanisms for input or output, so it can't make network requests. It depends on the host environment to provide such things.
Example host environments include webpages (running in web browsers), Node.js, and Adobe Photoshop.
Node.js is a common solution because it is designed to allow a wide range of software development to be done in JavaScript. This is why you see plenty of solutions using it.
(Web browsers, by contrast, are designed to let authors of webpages run programs on visitors' computers just because the visitor clicked a link to the webpage — as such there are major restrictions on what JavaScript programs in webpages are allowed to do. Likewise, Photoshop is designed to let people use JS to automate graphics manipulation, not perform general programming work.)
Related
I am trying to build a desktop app.
I am thinking of using electron on the recommendation of a web-developer friend of mine, but as I am the only sole developer, I don't have the means to test the software on different platforms(OS, hardware etc.).So I am anticipating that this will cause a problem later, in the end, to test/debug software on different platforms and different OS.
I have ruled out web-apps because of some privacy concerns of the users for the remote data hosting.
Software is pretty lightweight and is almost equivalent to the image viewer apps with some slight modifications.
How to solve the problem of variations of different platforms?
Any literature suggestions pointing me in the general direction are also welcome.
Sometimes it helps to think of Electron as two processes.
The renderer vs the main processes. Generally the renderer process which runs the HTML/CSS/JS is it's own isolated component, and you communicate to the main process using IPC.
So generally for the UI, you can use mostly any web based testing framework to test reliability. At Amna, for example, we use Cypress as our E2E testing platform. You an also use something like QAWolf. Both should work with localhost. In general, most website testing tools should work fine, and consistently across platforms.
Where this gets tricky is when a UI functionality makes a call to the OS or the main process. For example, saving to the disk, or launching a program.
The general flow is this, and I've yet to find radically simpler options:
Set-Up a VM or buy a machine with the corresponding OS. I used Spot VMs in Azure for this.
Manually test the scenarios you care about in each VM before you ship
If you have a lot of cases that rely on the OS, then you should be able to further optimize this by using an automated test runner like Spectron.
From experience, what I've realized is that most of the iterations I do happen more on the UI than the underlying functions with the cross-platform capabilities. And if your code has good separation (e.g. contextIsolation:true, nodeIntegration:false), it should be pretty obvious when you need to do an entire "cross-platform" test vs just UI tests.
I'm not familiar with a lot of large-scale electron testing frameworks, I do know that ToDesktop handles package building and generating binaries to perform a smoke test and verify things open across different operating systems.
It depends.
The answer depends on what you are building, so it makes sense to figure out what you actually want to build. Some questions you might ask yourself:
Do I need a database?
Do I need authentication?
Do I need portability?
Do I need speed to market?
Do I want to pick a language I'm familiar in?
These are all good questions and there are dozens more we all ask ourselves. However, back to your original question.
Electron is a fine choice
Yes, there are alternatives. But Electron is used for Visual Studio Code, Facebook Messenger, Microsoft Teams and Figma. Choosing Electron means there are other developers making apps and there are proven apps in the market so you don't have to worry about a dead ecosystem.
Electron is easy to onboard if you know web technologies, think js, html and css. If you know these, you can transfer your web dev knowledge and make a cross-platform app. You don't have to worry about learning each OS since the UI is the webpage which will look mostly* the same between each OS. (*some very minor differences, but essentially the same).
Cross-platform deployment is easy
There are a few ways of bringing your app to multiple platforms, I happen to be most familiar with electron-builder, but the other two solutions work as well.
Many templates to start with
I am biased, since I'm the author of secure-electron-template which is one of the many templates you can choose from when starting an app. However, I recently reviewed all Electron templates and found that only 4 do not have serious security vulnerabilities.
The Electron framework frequently is updated, and over the course of the past few years there has been a shift in the way Electron apps are made. Some earlier frameworks didn't have good secure defaults which some of the older Electron templates inherited and thus, aren't as secure as new frameworks that follow security guidelines.
If you decide on Electron, give my template a try. It's got a number of features I'm building out in order to help the community with features they might want (ie. internationalization (i18n), saving local data, custom context menus, page routing, e2e unit testing, and how one can use license key validation, to name a few things).
This may be a too broad question but how would you develop a simple web-based IDE/editor? For a lecture I was thinking of a simple editor where you could enter some sort of code, press compile and then display the results, error messages etc. in some way.
Does anyone knows some examples (with source code maybe), or any suggestions on how to do this conceptually?
Or you could try http://codepad.org/
You might also be interested in taking a look at the very new Eclipse Orion project, in particular the architecture overview: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Orion/Architecture
Koding provides a framework for you to develop html5 applications with access to a real Ubuntu VM with Root. The idea for this post, being that you can develop an IDE that works with Client and Server languages, without having to deal with security of giving people access to machines that you are hosting. Security is hard with machines and avoiding exploits
I spoke to the boss of a major music software company a few years ago. He told me that if they were going to start again from the ground up, they might look at WebKit for their UI. This totally surprised me. But I'm wondering if other folks are thinking and acting this way. Is webkit working its way in to truly non-web software?
RealPlayer, iTunes, and many other applications are using it, so are some non-"web" apps such as desktop widget programs:
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/Applications%20using%20WebKit
Designing "web-apps" with HTML/Webkit UI is beneficial for Mobile users, since many devices have Webkit built in. Even if it is currently only used on a PC, you would have the possibility of hosting it on the web or local network later, with less work to convert it.
Gwibber, a Gnome twitter client that ships with Ubuntu, uses WebKit for displaying timelines (although it uses normal GTK+ widgets for the surrounding UI).
I would consider WebKit a viable option for many pieces of UI, particularly if the program shell exposes appropriate hooks into the surrounding platform to do things like launch a real browser or hook in to system notifications. You run the serious risk, however, of building an application that doesn't fit well in the UI conventions of the user's operating system.
It's not WebKit, but building a UI on a rendering engine is essentially what Mozilla does - Firefox, Thunderbird, etc. are built in XUL rendered with Gecko.
Anything you can do on webkit can be wrapped as an application easily with PhoneGap or other tools.
For example, store.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com could be wrapped as an OSX app, an Android app, and still act as a regular website very easily.
Also: https://products.sel.sony.com/opensource/source_webkit.shtml
I use windows XP and R for my desktop use. And a shared hosting account (at some company) for my web hosting needs.
I wish to create an R web application and I understand that one such way is by using R with Apache through RApache , but since my current shared hosting plan doesn't allow me to install RApache I am a bit stuck.
So... (and here's my question) what would be the easiest/fastest/cost-effective way to get started?
Buying a more expensive hosting package ?
Hosting the thing myself? (on windows ?!)
switch to some other hosting company that permits the use of RApache?
Any suggestion will be most helpful.
Self-hosting is an option if you insist on using RApache. This might be easier than you think. Here's a link to a blog post i read a month ago before i decided to buy the hardware and server my own files. i just watched this seven minute YouTube video tutorial entitled "R Web Application–'Hello World' using RApache" I believe this was just posted today.
In seven minutes, the author walks through building a "hello world" Site using RApache then walks through a more ambitious example, building a user-input form to collect inputs then deliver them to a particular R function--pretty much a exemplary slice of what i suspect most people would want to use RApache for.
A second option is using a web framework. My recommendation here is Django. Why? It's written in Python so you can access R functionality via the python bindings (RPy2). Second, if you are not an experienced web developer, Django is in many ways, a great framework to begin with because it's truly a "full-stack" solution--it works more or less out of the box. In addition, there is a substantial and growing body of quality step-by-setp tutorials, code snippets, and even packaged django Sites, to learn from.
it seems they provide a VMWare image to get up and running quickly.
I suggest you download VMWare player and try the image. Since RApache isn't available for Windows, this is the most simple way, I guess. I wouldn't use that for hosting, but I would first try whether this stack is actually the right thing for your app. Also, this allows you testing things locally.
Doug,
Should I read your suggestion as saying that a Django app can call the RPy2 functionality without RApache? If so, that sounds like a solution for folks on shared hosting who can't install the RAPache module.
I'm a C programmer and a total newbie to Flash/video/web world. Don't know where/how to start, and so would greatly appreciate your initial help.
Question
If I need to host flash videos off of my website (instead of embedding YouTube links on my webpages),
AND
If I need to provide player API like YouTube's that can be used, say, for supporting chromeless player versions customizable via this custom API of mine...
THEN
What do I need to do essentially...?
Write a custom Flash video player?
If yes, how? I mean, using which Adobe products / tools / SDKs / language(s)?
Is there anything free/opensource available for doing this? Especially, for Linux platform?
Write a new browser (firefox) plugin for users visiting my site?
Not sure how my custom Flash video player will get to the user visiting my site for the first time?
Any books, resources that cover this problem well?
Does the Flash content need to hosted off of a Windows server only?
Currently lost. Thanks in advance,
/SD
Flash has video playback support built-in, so all you need to do is use the Flash authoring environment or Flex to compile a .SWF file that uses the video API, with some buttons to stop and start the stream, volume, seeking, anything else you want your player to do.
Many people have already done this for you, in a way you can easily use from simple HTML. See eg. OSFLV, Flowplayer, JW...
Write a new browser (firefox) plugin for users visiting my site? Does the Flash content need to hosted off of a Windows server only?
Lord no! Flash video would never have taken off if it was just another custom-server+custom-plugin piece of unpleasantness. Though special streaming servers are possible, for the most part it's just an FLV file sitting on a web server.
(FLV is the video format supported by the Flash video playing functions. There are many, many tools you can use to convert other formats to it; I use Avidemux.)
If you are planning to use a "Progressive Download" approach, then your FLV files can be hosted on a Windows or a Linux box. Be aware that:
it is no as efficient as true
streaming.
you may not use it for live events
nor only for stored video files.
it cannot automatically detect the
end user's connection speed.
it is not possible to jump ahead to
another part while it's downloaded.
the video file will be saved on the
end user's computer.
If you are planning to use a "Streaming" approach then you can either buy and use Adobe's solution (Flash Media Server, available on both Windows and Linux box) or sign up for a hosted solution. On this page you will find recommended providers by Adobe. I personally have been using Influxis's hosting with success for a couple of years already.
You can also write your own streaming server but that would be a lot of hard work. If you are interested in that, I would recommend you have a look a Red5 which is an open source Flash Server written in Java.