I'm trying to use HangFire to call an action method on a class. From the code below, the action method works correctly if called outside of HangFire, but throws an exception when using HangFire. I also tried using Invoke() as stated by other similar posts.
Expression body should be of type
'MethodCallExpression'(Parameter'methodCall')'
I'd like to figure out how to have HangFire execute this type of method if possible.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var a = new ActionTest();
// Calling this method prints out Hello World correctly
a.DoAction();
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.UseSqlServerStorage(#"Data Source=(localdb)\MSSQLLocalDB;Initial Catalog=Test;Integrated Security=True");
// Call this method from HangFire produces exception: Expression body should be of type 'MethodCallExpression'(Parameter'methodCall')'
BackgroundJob.Enqueue<ActionTest>(a => a.DoAction());
}
}
public class ActionTest
{
public ActionTest()
{
DoAction = WriteHello;
}
public Action DoAction;
public void WriteHello()
{
Console.WriteLine("Hello World");
}
}
I don't see any other way than wrapping the call to DoAction in a genuine method :
public class ActionTest
{
public ActionTest()
{
DoAction = WriteHello;
}
public Action DoAction;
public void InvokeAction()
{
DoAction();
}
public void WriteHello()
{
Console.WriteLine("Hello World");
}
}
then
BackgroundJob.Enqueue<ActionTest>(a => a.InvokeAction());
Related
I am trying to implement Rest Assured framework with cucumber
I am facing a weird scenario that I have defined all my step definitions of my feature file then also I am getting error as below when I run my feature file:-
Step undefined
You can implement this step and 3 other step(s) using the snippet(s) below:
#Given("I create new service by using create service API data")
public void i_create_new_service_by_using_create_service_api_data() {
// Write code here that turns the phrase above into concrete actions
throw new io.cucumber.java.PendingException();
}
and When I run the same from Junit Testrunner then I get error as below :-
INFO net.serenitybdd.rest.decorators.request.RequestSpecificationDecorated - No BaseStepListener, POST /services not registered.
In my framework I am defining basepackage containing base class file which is as below :-
public class TestBase {
public static Properties propertyConfig = new Properties();
public static FileInputStream fis;
public static Response response;
public static RequestSpecification requestSpecification;
public static void loadPreConfigs(){
try {
fis = new FileInputStream("./src/test/resources/ConfigurationURLs/config.properties");
try {
propertyConfig.load(fis);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
RestAssured.baseURI=propertyConfig.getProperty("BaseURI");
}
}
Then I have a ApiCall package which contains all class files which have request specification and respective response storing rest API calls
The APICall file is given below:-
public class PostRequestCall extends TestBase {
private static String productVal;
public static int getProductVal() {
return Integer.parseInt(productVal);
}
public static void setProductVal(String productVal) {
PostRequestCall.productVal= productVal;
}
public RequestSpecification definePostRequest(){
requestSpecification= SerenityRest.given();
requestSpecification.contentType(ContentType.JSON);
return requestSpecification;
}
public Response CreateService(String serviceName){
JSONObject jsonObject=new JSONObject();
jsonObject.put("name",serviceName);
response=definePostRequest().body(jsonObject).post(propertyConfig.getProperty("createService"));
return response;
}
}
Then I have step file which are the class file in which I define the steps of serenity given below:
public class PostRequestSteps {
PostRequestCall postRequestCall=new PostRequestCall();
#Step
public RequestSpecification setPostSpecification(){
TestBase.requestSpecification=postRequestCall.definePostRequest();
return TestBase.requestSpecification;
}
#Step
public Response setPostRequestCall(String serviceName){
TestBase.response=postRequestCall.CreateService(serviceName);
return TestBase.response;
}
}
And I have defined a package which contains all the step definition classes one such class is as below :-
public class PostRequest_StepDefinitions {
String serviceID;
#Steps
PostRequestSteps postRequestSteps=new PostRequestSteps();
#Before
public void setUp() {
TestBase.loadPreConfigs();
}
#Given("I create new service by using create service API data")
public void i_create_new_service_by_using_create_service_api_data() {
postRequestSteps.setPostSpecification();
}
#When("I provide valid name {string} for service creation")
public void i_provide_valid_name_for_service_creation(String serviceName) {
TestBase.response=postRequestSteps.setPostRequestCall(serviceName);
}
#And("I save the id of created service")
public void i_save_the_id_of_created_service() {
serviceID=TestBase.response.jsonPath().get("id").toString();
PostRequestCall.setProductVal(serviceID);
}
#Then("I validate status code {int}")
public void i_validate_status_code(int statusCode) {
Assert.assertEquals(TestBase.response.getStatusCode(),statusCode);
}
The Junit Runner file and feature files are below
I was wondering if with MethodDecorator it's possible to have the passed parameter during the OnException... that would be great since if I can catch an exception I can also have the passed parameter values
Consider this piece of code
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Worker worker = new Worker();
worker.DoWork(6);
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method | AttributeTargets.Constructor | AttributeTargets.Assembly | AttributeTargets.Module)]
public class LoggableAttribute : Attribute, IMethodDecorator
{
public void OnEntry(System.Reflection.MethodBase method)
{
var args = method.GetParameters();
var arguments = method.GetGenericArguments();
}
public void OnExit(System.Reflection.MethodBase method)
{
}
public void OnException(System.Reflection.MethodBase method, Exception exception)
{
}
}
and
public class Worker
{
[Loggable]
public void DoWork(int i )
{
}
}
I wish to have 6 on the OnEntry/Nor OnException
Thanks
I know this is an old question, but in case someone stumbles upon this like I did, you can add an Init method and capture the argument values there.
e.g:
public class LoggableAttribute : Attribute, IMethodDecorator
{
private object[] arguments;
public void Init(object instance, MethodBase method, object[] args) {
this.arguments = args;
}
public void OnEntry()
{
// this.arguments[0] would be 6 when calling worker.DoWork(6);
}
}
Check out the example on https://github.com/Fody/MethodDecorator
I am trying to mock static method using powermock.
Below is my code:
public class Helper{
public static User getLoggedInUser(HttpServletRequest request) throws NotFoundException {
String access = request.getHeader("Authorization");
if(access == null || access.isEmpty()) {
throw new Exception("Access is null");
}
User user = new User();
return user;
}
}
And this is the controller function from where i am calling the static method getUser:
#RequestMapping(value = "user/userInfo/{Id}", method = RequestMethod.GET, headers = "Accept=application/json")
public #ResponseBody
ResultDTO getUser(#PathVariable("Id") Integer Id, HttpServletRequest request) throws NotFoundException, UnauthorizedException {
Integer userID = -1;
User user = Helper.getLoggedInUser(request);
if(user != null){
userID = user.getUserId();
}
//do something
}
And this is my test class:
//#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
//#PrepareForTest(Helper.class)
public class CustomerControllerNGTest {
#InjectMocks
private userController instance = new PaymentCustomerController();
public PaymentCustomerControllerNGTest() {
}
#BeforeClass
public void setUpClass() throws Exception {
}
#AfterClass
public static void tearDownClass() throws Exception {
}
#BeforeMethod
public void setUpMethod() throws Exception {
try{
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}catch(Exception ex){
System.out.println(ex.getMessage());
}
try{
mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.standaloneSetup(instance).build();
// mockMvc = MockMvcBuilders.webAppContextSetup(wac).build();
}catch(Exception ex){
System.out.println(ex.getMessage());
}
}
#AfterMethod
public void tearDownMethod() throws Exception {
}
#Test
public void testGetUserInfo() throws Exception {
User user = new User();
user.setUserId(1234);
HttpServletRequest request = mock(HttpServletRequest.class);
//this is for the static method
PowerMockito.mockStatic(Helper.class);
**PowerMockito.when(Helper.getLoggedInUser(request)).thenReturn(user);**
//do something
}
}
Now whenever i am executing the test case, and whenever it is executing the lone marked with bold, it is going inside the static method and throwing the exception "Access is null" rather than mocking the method , it is executing the method. Any idea?
I also tried by uncommenting these lines:
//#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
//#PrepareForTest(Helper.class)
but still same exception.
Thanks
Try to uncomment:
//#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
//#PrepareForTest(Helper.class)
and use
Mockito.when(Helper.getLoggedInUser(request)).thenReturn(user);
I wrote blog post on topic, that contain links to working examples on GitHub. These use TestNg instead of JUnit, but this shouldn't matter.
EDIT
I would suggest to always use latest combination of Mockito and PowerMock available. Older combinations were often pretty buggy with confusing errors. Current latest combination is Mockito 1.9.5-rc1+, PowerMock 1.5+. Pre-1.5 versions of PowerMock wasn't Java7 compliant.
I am developing a (hopefully) RESTful API using ServiceStack.
I noticed that most of my services look the same, for example, a GET method will look something like this:
try
{
Validate();
GetData();
return Response();
}
catch (Exception)
{
//TODO: Log the exception
throw; //rethrow
}
lets say I got 20 resources, 20 request DTOs, so I got about 20 services of the same template more or less...
I tried to make a generic or abstract Service so I can create inheriting services which just implement the relevant behavior but I got stuck because the request DTOs weren't as needed for serialization.
Is there any way to do it?
EDIT:
an Example for what I'm trying to do:
public abstract class MyService<TResponse,TRequest> : Service
{
protected abstract TResponse InnerGet();
protected abstract void InnerDelete();
public TResponse Get(TRequest request)
{
//General Code Here.
TResponse response = InnerGet();
//General Code Here.
return response;
}
public void Delete(TRequest request)
{
//General Code Here.
InnerDelete();
//General Code Here.
}
}
public class AccountService : MyService<Accounts, Account>
{
protected override Accounts InnerGet()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();//Get the data from BL
}
protected override void InnerDelete()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
To do this in the New API we've introduced the concept of a IServiceRunner that decouples the execution of your service from the implementation of it.
To add your own Service Hooks you just need to override the default Service Runner in your AppHost from its default implementation:
public virtual IServiceRunner<TRequest> CreateServiceRunner<TRequest>(ActionContext actionContext)
{
return new ServiceRunner<TRequest>(this, actionContext); //Cached per Service Action
}
With your own:
public override IServiceRunner<TRequest> CreateServiceRunner<TRequest>(ActionContext actionContext)
{
return new MyServiceRunner<TRequest>(this, actionContext); //Cached per Service Action
}
Where MyServiceRunner is just a custom class implementing the custom hooks you're interested in, e.g:
public class MyServiceRunner<T> : ServiceRunner<T> {
public override void OnBeforeExecute(IRequestContext requestContext, TRequest request) {
// Called just before any Action is executed
}
public override object OnAfterExecute(IRequestContext requestContext, object response) {
// Called just after any Action is executed, you can modify the response returned here as well
}
public override object HandleException(IRequestContext requestContext, TRequest request, Exception ex) {
// Called whenever an exception is thrown in your Services Action
}
}
Also for more fine-grained Error Handling options check out the Error Handling wiki page.
My solution was to add an additional layer where I can handle Logic per entity:
Base Logic Sample:
public interface IEntity
{
long Id { get; set; }
}
public interface IReadOnlyLogic<Entity> where Entity : class, IEntity
{
List<Entity> GetAll();
Entity GetById(long Id);
}
public abstract class ReadOnlyLogic<Entity> : IReadOnlyLogic<Entity> where Entity : class, IEntity, new()
{
public IDbConnection Db { get; set; }
#region HOOKS
protected SqlExpression<Entity> OnGetList(SqlExpression<Entity> query) { return query; }
protected SqlExpression<Entity> OnGetSingle(SqlExpression<Entity> query) { return OnGetList(query); }
#endregion
public List<Entity> GetAll()
{
var query = OnGetList(Db.From<Entity>());
return Db.Select(query);
}
public Entity GetById(long id)
{
var query = OnGetSingle(Db.From<Entity>())
.Where(e => e.Id == id);
var entity = Db.Single(query);
return entity;
}
}
Then we can use hooks like:
public interface IHello : IReadOnlyLogic<Hello> { }
public class HelloLogic : ReadOnlyLogic<Hello>, IHello
{
protected override SqlExpression<Hello> OnGetList(SqlExpression<Hello> query)
{
return query.Where(h => h.Name == "Something");
}
}
Finally our service only calls our logic:
public class MyServices : Service
{
IHello helloLogic;
public object Get()
{
return helloLogic.GetAll();
}
}
I'm trying to get hold of an object from another application using WCF. With built in classes it works fine but I run into probems when trying to return a custom interface type from the WCF operation.
Whether I include the interface in both applications separately, or specif it as a shared assembly, I get the same result: a CommunicationException with the message "There was an error reading from the pipe: Unrecognized error 109".
The interface looks like this:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IBase {
int IntTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
String StringTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
IOther OtherTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
}
[ServiceContract]
public interface IOther {
String StringTest {
[OperationContract]
get;
}
}
My server looks like this:
public partial class MainWindow : Window {
private Base fb;
private ServiceHost host;
public MainWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
fb = new Base();
host = new ServiceHost(fb, new Uri[] { new Uri("net.pipe://localhost") });
host.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IBase), new NetNamedPipeBinding(),
"PipeReverse");
host.Open();
}
private void Window_Closing(object sender, CancelEventArgs e) {
host.Close();
}
}
And here is my implementation of the interface:
[Serializable]
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode=InstanceContextMode.Single)]
public class Base : MarshalByRefObject, IBase {
public int IntTest {
get { return 4; }
}
public string StringTest {
get { return "A string from Base"; }
}
public IOther OtherTest {
get { return new Other(); }
}
}
[Serializable]
[DataContract]
public class Other : MarshalByRefObject, IOther {
[DataMember]
public string StringTest {
get { return "A string from Other"; }
}
}
The client looks like this:
public partial class Form1 : Form {
IBase obj;
public Form1() {
InitializeComponent();
ChannelFactory<IBase> pipeFactory = new ChannelFactory<IBase>(
new NetNamedPipeBinding(), new EndpointAddress(
"net.pipe://localhost/PipeReverse"));
obj = pipeFactory.CreateChannel();
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
Console.WriteLine("Returns: " + obj.StringTest + " " +
obj.StringTest.Length);
Console.WriteLine("Returns: " + obj.IntTest);
Console.WriteLine(obj.OtherTest);
}
}
Everything works like a charm except this line:
Console.WriteLine(obj.OtherTest);
It give me a CommunicationException with the message "There was an error reading from the pipe: Unrecognized error 109". As far as I can tell that is a broken pipe due to a faulted state but I can't figure out why, or more importantly how to fix it. Any ideas?
I have no config file as everthing is done in the code above so I don't know how to turn on tracing, otherwise I would have included that too.
The returned property OtherTest needs to be a concrete type and not an interface, otherwise the serialization will not work.
This is typically a serialization error. Look to the [KnownType] attribute. The easiest way to test this out is to invoke the DataContractSerializer directly. You can use its WriteObject and ReadObject methods to get the true serialization errors. You can also inspect the stream(FileStream usually) to make sure you type serializes correctly.