This is a pretty straightforward LEFT OUTER JOIN, but I get zero returned rows:
SELECT All_varieties.*,variety_join.*
FROM All_varieties LEFT JOIN
variety_join
ON All_varieties.varietyID = variety_join.varietyID
WHERE (variety_join.sourceID = Null);
However, I am using a query All_varieties
SELECT plant.plantName, plant.plantGenus, plant.plantSpecies, variety.varietyLatin, variety.varietyEnglish, variety.varietyID
FROM plant LEFT JOIN
variety
ON plant.plantID = variety.plantID;
Is the problem maybe with the query All_varieties?
TABLES:
It should be variety_join.sourceID is null instead of variety_join.sourceID = Null
SELECT All_varieties.*,variety_join.*
FROM All_varieties LEFT JOIN
variety_join
ON All_varieties.varietyID = variety_join.varietyID
WHERE variety_join.sourceID is Null
Related
My current query show the data from the table called "Buque" and has some references from another tables. The problem is when i execute the query it never shows the result because it consumes too much memory i guess.
The current query i have
select buq.buq_codigo, tbu.tbu_codigo, tbu.tbu_nombre, pai.pai_codigo, pai.pai_nombre,
pue.pto_codigo, pue.pto_nombre, lin.lin_codigo, lin.lin_nombre, tra.tra_codigo,
tra.tra_nombre, buq.buq_nombre, buq.buq_des, buq.num_trb, buq.num_eslora,
buq.max_tons, buq.reg_lloyd, buq.buq_codigo1, buq.codigo_omi,
case buq.buq_estado when 'A' then 'Activo' else 'Inactivo' end as buq_estado
from publico.mae_buque as buq, publico.mae_tipbuque as tbu, publico.mae_pais as pai,
publico.mae_puerto as pue, publico.mae_linea as lin, publico.mae_trafico as tra
where buq.tbu_codigo = tbu.tbu_codigo or
buq.pai_codigo = pai.pai_codigo or
buq.pto_codigo = pue.pto_codigo or
buq.lin_codigo = lin.lin_codigo or
buq.tra_codigo = tra.tra_codigo
I also tried with inner joins but the problem is it returns me the data that meets the conditions of the joins. In other words, if the join has data to compare, returns the name, if not, show the null data.
The query must return me 611 records, with inner joins returns 68 records.
Concerning your desired result, use left outer joins, which fill up any non-existing rows of the right hand side table with null-values;
Concerning the out of memory issue, note that you used or to connect your tables; this actually leads to the fact that almost every record of the involved tables is connected to almost every other record (almost a cross join / cartesian product); This can get very large if you connect 6 tables...
select buq.buq_codigo, tbu.tbu_codigo, tbu.tbu_nombre, pai.pai_codigo, pai.pai_nombre,
pue.pto_codigo, pue.pto_nombre, lin.lin_codigo, lin.lin_nombre, tra.tra_codigo,
tra.tra_nombre, buq.buq_nombre, buq.buq_des, buq.num_trb, buq.num_eslora,
buq.max_tons, buq.reg_lloyd, buq.buq_codigo1, buq.codigo_omi,
case buq.buq_estado when 'A' then 'Activo' else 'Inactivo' end as buq_estado
from publico.mae_buque as buq
left outer join publico.mae_tipbuque as tbu on buq.tbu_codigo = tbu.tbu_codigo
left outer join publico.mae_pais as pai on (buq.pai_codigo = pai.pai_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_puerto as pue on (buq.pto_codigo = pue.pto_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_linea as lin on (buq.lin_codigo = lin.lin_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_trafico as tra on (buq.tra_codigo = tra.tra_codigo)
You have to use left outer join:
select *
from
publico.mae_buque as buq
left outer join publico.mae_tipbuque as tbu on (buq.tbu_codigo = tbu.tbu_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_pais as pai on (buq.pai_codigo = pai.pai_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_puerto as pue on (buq.pto_codigo = pue.pto_codigo )
left outer join publico.mae_linea as lin on (buq.lin_codigo = lin.lin_codigo)
left outer join publico.mae_trafico as tra on (buq.tra_codigo = tra.tra_codigo);
I have encountered very strange behavior of my query and I wasted a lot of time to understand what causes it, in vane. So I am asking for your help.
SELECT count(*) FROM main_table
LEFT JOIN front_table ON front_table.pk = main_table.fk_front_table
LEFT JOIN info_table ON info_table.pk = front_table.fk_info_table
LEFT JOIN key_table ON key_table.pk = COALESCE(info_table.fk_key_table, front_table.fk_key_table_1, front_table.fk_key_table_2)
LEFT JOIN side_table ON side_table.fk_front_table = front_table.pk
WHERE side_table.pk = (SELECT MAX(pk) FROM side_table WHERE fk_front_table = front_table.pk)
OR side_table.pk IS NULL
Seems like a simple join query, with coalesce, I've used this technique before(not too many times) and it worked right.
In this query I don't ever get nulls for side_table.pk. If I remove coalesce or just don't use key_table, then the query returns rows with many null side_table.pk, but if I add coalesce join, I can't get those nulls.
It seems key_table and side_table don't have anything in common, but the result is so weird.
Also, when I don't use side_table and WHERE clause, the count(*) result with coalesce and without differs, but I can't see any pattern in rows missing, it seems random!
Real query:
SELECT ECHANGE.EXC_AUTO_KEY, STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY FROM EXCHANGE
LEFT JOIN WO_BOM ON WO_BOM.WOB_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.WOB_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN VIEW_WO_SUB ON VIEW_WO_SUB.WOO_AUTO_KEY = WO_BOM.WOO_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK stock3 ON stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.STM_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK stock2 ON stock2.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.ORIG_STM
LEFT JOIN CONSIGNMENT_CODES con2 ON con2.CNC_AUTO_KEY = stock2.CNC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN CONSIGNMENT_CODES con3 ON con3.CNC_AUTO_KEY = stock3.CNC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN CI_UTL ON CI_UTL.CUT_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.CUT_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN PART_CONDITION_CODES pcc2 ON pcc2.PCC_AUTO_KEY = stock2.PCC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN PART_CONDITION_CODES pcc3 ON pcc3.PCC_AUTO_KEY = stock3.PCC_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN STOCK_RESERVATIONS ON STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STM_AUTO_KEY = stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh2 ON wh2.WHS_AUTO_KEY = stock2.WHS_ORIGINAL
LEFT JOIN SM_HISTORY ON (SM_HISTORY.STM_AUTO_KEY = EXCHANGE.ORIG_STM AND SM_HISTORY.WOB_REF = EXCHANGE.WOB_AUTO_KEY)
LEFT JOIN RC_DETAIL ON stock3.RCD_AUTO_KEY = RC_DETAIL.RCD_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN RC_HEADER ON RC_HEADER.RCH_AUTO_KEY = RC_DETAIL.RCH_AUTO_KEY
LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh3 ON wh3.WHS_AUTO_KEY = COALESCE(RC_DETAIL.WHS_AUTO_KEY, stock3.WHS_ORIGINAL, stock3.WHS_AUTO_KEY)
WHERE STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY = (SELECT MAX(STR_AUTO_KEY) FROM STOCK_RESERVATIONS WHERE STM_AUTO_KEY = stock3.STM_AUTO_KEY)
OR STOCK_RESERVATIONS.STR_AUTO_KEY IS NULL
Removing LEFT JOIN WAREHOUSE wh3 gives me about unique EXC_AUTO_KEY values with a lot of NULL STR_AUTO_KEY, while leaving this row removes all NULL STR_AUTO_KEY.
I recreated simple tables with numbers with the same structure and query works without any problems o.0
I have a feeling COALESCE is acting as a REQUIRED flag for the joined table, hence shooting the LEFT JOIN to become an INNER JOIN.
Try this:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM main_table
LEFT JOIN front_table ON front_table.pk = main_table.fk_front_table
LEFT JOIN info_table ON info_table.pk = front_table.fk_info_table
LEFT JOIN key_table ON key_table.pk = NVL(info_table.fk_key_table, NVL(front_table.fk_key_table_1, front_table.fk_key_table_2))
LEFT JOIN (SELECT fk_, MAX(pk) as pk FROM side_table GROUP BY fk_) st ON st.fk_ = front_table.pk
NVL might behave just the same though...
I undertood what was the problem (not entirely though): there is a LEFT JOIN VIEW_WO_SUB in original query, 3rd line. It causes this query to act in a weird way.
When I replaced the view with the other table which contained the information I needed, the query started returning right results.
Basically, with this view join, NVL, COALESCE or CASE join with combination of certain arguments did not work along with OR clause in WHERE subquery, all rest was fine. ALthough, I could get the query to work with this view join, by changing the order of joined tables, I had to place table participating in where subquery to the bottom.
Can anyone tell me why this sql query is returning this result.
SELECT
M.MatterNumber_Id, M.MatterNumber, M.MatterName,
ISNULL(MP.Role_Cd, 'No Primary') AS PrimaryRole,
ISNULL(E.Name, 'No Primary') AS PrimaryName,
ISNULL(C.CommNumber, 'l.w#abc.ca;m.j#abc.com') AS Email
FROM
Matter M
LEFT OUTER JOIN
MatterPlayer MP ON M.MatterNumber_Id = MP.MatterNumber_Id AND
MP.Role_Cd IN ('Primary Lawyer', 'Primary Staff Member') AND
MP.EndDate IS NULL
LEFT OUTER JOIN
Entity E on MP.Entity_EID = E.Entity_EID
LEFT OUTER JOIN Communication C on MP.Entity_EID = C.Entity_EID AND
C.CommunicationType_Cd = 'Email'
LEFT OUTER JOIN
MatterExposure ME on M.MatterNumber_Id = ME.MatterNumber_Id AND
ME.AssessedDate > '7/10/2014' AND
ME.Currency_CD IS NOT NULL
WHERE
M.MatterStatus_Cd = 'Active' AND
ME.AssessedDate IS NULL AND
M.Matter_Cd in
(SELECT
rpl.Type_CD
FROM
RuleProfile_Tabs rpt
INNER JOIN
RuleProfile_LookupCode rpl ON rpt.RuleProfile_ID = rpl.RuleProfile_ID
WHERE
tab_id = 1034 AND Caption LIKE 'Reportable Matter%')
ORDER BY
Email, M.MatterName
But When i see the results I check one of the records returned and it should not have been returned.
One of the results returned:
Bailey, Richard
In the db i check the values in the tables it should not have been returned because Currency_CD is null and in the sql it states currency_cd is not null. Also the assessed date is AFTER 7/10/2014
Table Values:
MatterStatus_CD:
Active
AssessedDate:
7/24/2014
Currency_CD:
NULL
EndDate:
NULL
Where clauses are used for filtering, not the join clause. Every JOIN should have an ON. Here's a head start.
Select M.MatterNumber_Id, M.MatterNumber, M.MatterName,
IsNull(MP.Role_Cd, 'No Primary') as PrimaryRole,
IsNull(E.Name, 'No Primary') as PrimaryName,
IsNull(C.CommNumber, 'l.w#abc.ca;m.j#abc.com') as Email
From Matter M
Left Outer Join MatterPlayer MP on M.MatterNumber_Id = MP.MatterNumber_Id
Left Outer Join Entity E on MP.Entity_EID = E.Entity_EID
Left Outer Join Communication C on MP.Entity_EID = C.Entity_EID
Left Outer Join MatterExposure ME on M.MatterNumber_Id = ME.MatterNumber_Id
Where M.MatterStatus_Cd = 'Active'
AND ME.AssessedDate is Null
and M.Matter_Cd in (select rpl.Type_CD
from RuleProfile_Tabs rpt
inner join RuleProfile_LookupCode rpl on rpt.RuleProfile_ID = rpl.RuleProfile_ID
where tab_id = 1034 AND Caption like 'Reportable Matter%')
and MP.Role_Cd In ('Primary Lawyer', 'Primary Staff Member')
and MP.EndDate is Null
and ME.AssessedDate > '7/10/2014'
and ME.Currency_CD IS NOT NULL
and C.CommunicationType_Cd = 'Email'
Order by Email, M.MatterName
You are LEFT JOINing MatterExposure onto Matter. Your Me.Currency_CD IS NOT NULL criteria in the LEFT JOIN's ON statement is only saying, "don't join to records where Currency_CD is null..." but because this is a left join, none of your Matter table's records are lost in the join. So when you ask for Currency_CD you will get NULL.
To remove records from your query where Currency_CD is null in the MatterExposure table you will either need to specify Currency_CD IS NOT NULL in your where statement (instead of your join) or will need to use an INNER JOIN to your MatterExposure table.
It is because this join is a LEFT OUTER JOIN. If you want to enforce this join make it an inner join. Or move that check to the WHERE clause.
I want to join two table CUSTMR and DEPRMNT.
My needed is: LEFT OUTER JOIN OF two or more Tables with subquery inside the LEFT OUTER JOIN as shown below:
Table: CUSTMR , DEPRMNT
Query as:
SELECT
cs.CUSID
,dp.DEPID
FROM
CUSTMR cs
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
SELECT
dp.DEPID
,dp.DEPNAME
FROM
DEPRMNT dp
WHERE
dp.DEPADDRESS = 'TOKYO'
)
ON (
dp.DEPID = cs.CUSID
AND cs.CUSTNAME = dp.DEPNAME
)
WHERE
cs.CUSID != ''
Here the subquery is:
SELECT
dp.DEPID, dp.DEPNAME
FROM
DEPRMNT dp
WHERE
dp.DEPADDRESS = 'TOKYO'
Is it possible to write such subquery inside LEFT OUTER JOIN?
I am getting an error when running this query on my DB2 database.
You need the "correlation id" (the "AS SS" thingy) on the sub-select to reference the fields in the "ON" condition. The id's assigned inside the sub select are not usable in the join.
SELECT
cs.CUSID
,dp.DEPID
FROM
CUSTMR cs
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
SELECT
DEPID
,DEPNAME
FROM
DEPRMNT
WHERE
dp.DEPADDRESS = 'TOKYO'
) ss
ON (
ss.DEPID = cs.CUSID
AND ss.DEPNAME = cs.CUSTNAME
)
WHERE
cs.CUSID != ''
I think you don't have to use sub query in this scenario.You can directly left outer join the DEPRMNT table .
While using Left Outer Join ,don't use columns in the RHS table of the join in the where condition, you ll get wrong output
Below is my query using a left join that works as expected. What I want to do is add another table filter this query ever further but having trouble doing so. I will call this new table table_3 and want to add where table_3.rwykey = runways_updatable.rwykey. Any help would be very much appreciated.
SELECT *
FROM RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE
LEFT JOIN TURN_UPDATABLE
ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = TURN_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY
WHERE RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.ICAO = 'ICAO'
AND (RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.TORA > 4000 OR LDA > 0)
AND (TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE IS NULL OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = ''
OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = '')
'*************EDIT To CLARIFY *****************
Here is the other statement that inner join i would like to use and I would like to combine these 2 statements.
SELECT *
FROM RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE A, RUNWAYS_TABLE B
WHERE A.RWYKEY = B.RWYKEY
'***What I have so far as advice taken below, but getting syntax error
SELECT RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.*, TURN_UPDATABLE.*, AIRPORT_RUNWAYS_SELECTED.*
FROM RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE
INNER JOIN AIRPORT_RUNWAYS_SELECTED
ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = AIRPORT_RUNWAYS_SELECTED.RWYKEY
LEFT JOIN TURN_UPDATABLE
ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = TURN_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY
NOTE: If i comment out the inner join and leave the left join or vice versa, it works but when I have both of joins in the query, thats when im getting the syntax error.
I always come across this question when searching for how to make LEFT JOIN depend on a further INNER JOIN. Here is an example for what I am searching when I am searching for "using LEFT JOIN and INNER JOIN in the same query":
SELECT *
FROM foo f1
LEFT JOIN (bar b1
INNER JOIN baz b2 ON b2.id = b1.baz_id
) ON
b1.id = f1.bar_id
In this example, b1 will only be included if b2 is also found.
Remember that filtering a right-side table in left join should be done in join itself.
select *
from table1
left join table2
on table1.FK_table2 = table2.id
and table2.class = 'HIGH'
I finally figured it out. Thanks for all your help!!!
SELECT * FROM
(AIRPORT_RUNWAYS_SELECTED
INNER JOIN RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE
ON AIRPORT_RUNWAYS_SELECTED.RWYKEY = RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY)
LEFT JOIN TURN_UPDATABLE ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = TURN_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY
Add your INNER_JOIN before your LEFT JOIN:
SELECT *
FROM runways_updatable ru
INNER JOIN table_3 t3 ON ru.rwykey = t3.rwykey
LEFT JOIN turn_updatable tu
ON ru.rwykey = tu.rwykey
AND (tu.airline_code IS NULL OR tu.airline_code = '' OR tu.airline_code = '')
WHERE ru.icao = 'ICAO'
AND (ru.tora > 4000 OR ru.lda > 0)
If you LEFT JOIN before your INNER JOIN, then you will not get results from table_3 if there is no matching row in turn_updatable. It's possible this is what you want, but since your join condition for table_3 only references runways_updatable, I would assume that you want a result from table_3, even if there isn't a matching row in turn_updatable.
EDIT:
As #NikolaMarkovinović pointed out, you should filter your LEFT JOIN in the join condition itself, as you see above. Otherwise, you will not get results from the left-side table (runways_updatable) if that condition isn't met in the right-side table (turn_updatable).
EDIT 2: OP mentioned this is actually Access, and not MySQL
In Access, perhaps it's a difference in the table aliases. Try this instead:
SELECT [ru].*, [tu].*, [ars].*
FROM [runways_updatable] AS [ru]
INNER JOIN [airport_runways_selected] AS [ars] ON [ru].rwykey = [ars].rwykey
LEFT JOIN [turn_updatable] AS [tu]
ON [ru].rwykey = [tu].rwykey
AND ([tu].airline_code IS NULL OR [tu].airline_code = '' OR [tu].airline_code = '')
WHERE [ru].icao = 'ICAO'
AND ([ru].tora > 4000 OR [ru].lda > 0)
If it is just an inner join that you want to add, then do this. You can add as many joins as you want in the same query. Please update your answer if this is not what you want, though
SELECT *
FROM RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE
LEFT JOIN TURN_UPDATABLE
ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = TURN_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY
INNER JOIN table_3
ON table_3.rwykey = runways_updatable.rwykey
WHERE RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.ICAO = 'ICAO'
AND (RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.TORA > 4000 OR LDA > 0)
AND (TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE IS NULL OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = ''
OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = '')
I am not really sure what you want. But maybe something like this:
SELECT RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.*, TURN_UPDATABLE.*
FROM RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE
JOIN table_3
ON table_3.rwykey = runways_updatable.rwykey
LEFT JOIN TURN_UPDATABLE
ON RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY = TURN_UPDATABLE.RWYKEY
WHERE RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.ICAO = 'ICAO'
AND (RUNWAYS_UPDATABLE.TORA > 4000 OR LDA > 0)
AND (TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE IS NULL OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = ''
OR TURN_UPDATABLE.AIRLINE_CODE = '')
For Postgres, query planner does not guarantee order of execution of join. To Guarantee one can use #Gajus solution but the problem arises if there are Where condition for inner join table's column(s). Either one would to require to carefully add the where clauses in the respective Join condition or otherwise it is better to use subquery the inner join part, and left join the output.