By adding a customized action that clones an object, i want to add a flash message after clone is done.
use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Session\Session;
$session = new Session();
$session->getFlashBag()->add('success', 'Message');
or
public function __construct(SessionInterface $session)
{
$this->session = $session;
}
$this->session->getFlashBag()->add('success', 'Message');
Related
I've following code, this was copied from one of questions here on SOF,
private void showMyMessage() {
ApplicationManager.getApplication().invokeLater(() -> {
com.intellij.notification.Notification notification = GROUP_DISPLAY_ID_INFO
.createNotification("<html>TLogin failed", " Go to Settings to setup login data!</html>",
NotificationType.ERROR,
new NotificationListener.UrlOpeningListener(true));
Project[] projects = ProjectManager.getInstance().getOpenProjects();
Notifications.Bus.notify(notification, projects[0]);
});
}
I would like to have a link instead text "LINK!!!", what can you suggest ?
I think that I need to create action and add this action to my group GROUP_DISPLAY_ID_INFO, but this group is not in xml it's just in code exists.
If take my code above as an example, need to add right after new
NotificationListener.UrlOpeningListener(true))
addAction(new NotificationAction("Settings") {
#Override
public void actionPerformed (#NotNull AnActionEvent anActionEvent,
#NotNull Notification notification){
DataContext dataContext = anActionEvent.getDataContext();
Project project = PlatformDataKeys.PROJECT.getData(dataContext)
ShowSettingsUtil.getInstance().showSettingsDialog(project,
YOURCLASS.class);
}
Where yourclass.class is a class which implements Configurable interface
And now on click on Settings you will see opened settings window (yourclass.class)
private static void showMyMessage(String LINK) {
ApplicationManager.getApplication().invokeLater(() -> {
Notification notification = GROUP_DISPLAY_ID_INFO
.createNotification("<html>TLogin failed", " Go to Settings to setup login data!</html>",
NotificationType.ERROR,
new NotificationListener.UrlOpeningListener(true));
Project[] projects = ProjectManager.getInstance().getOpenProjects();
Notifications.Bus.notify(notification, projects[0]);
});
}
Just replace the link as a parameter, and use it like showMyMessage("http://google.com")
Also you don't need to config the group display id in xml, just write the id in code.
I have an MVC 4 application that sends out multiple emails. For example, I have an email template for submitting an order, a template for cancelling an order, etc...
I have an Email Service with multiple methods. My controller calls the Send method which looks like this:
public virtual void Send(List<string> recipients, string subject, string template, object data)
{
...
string html = GetContent(template, data);
...
}
The Send method calls GetContent, which is the method causing the problem:
private string GetContent(string template, object data)
{
string path = Path.Combine(BaseTemplatePath, string.Format("{0}{1}", template, ".html.cshtml"));
string content = File.ReadAllText(path);
return Engine.Razor.RunCompile(content, "htmlTemplate", null, data);
}
I am receiving the error:
The same key was already used for another template!
In my GetContent method should I add a new parameter for the TemplateKey and use that variable instead of always using htmlTemplate? Then the new order email template could have newOrderKey and CancelOrderKey for the email template being used to cancel an order?
Explanation
This happens because you use the same template key ("htmlTemplate") for multiple different templates.
Note that the way you currently have implemented GetContent you will run into multiple problems:
Even if you use a unique key, for example the template variable, you will trigger the exception when the templates are edited on disk.
Performance: You are reading the template file every time even when the template is already cached.
Solution:
Implement the ITemplateManager interface to manage your templates:
public class MyTemplateManager : ITemplateManager
{
private readonly string baseTemplatePath;
public MyTemplateManager(string basePath) {
baseTemplatePath = basePath;
}
public ITemplateSource Resolve(ITemplateKey key)
{
string template = key.Name;
string path = Path.Combine(baseTemplatePath, string.Format("{0}{1}", template, ".html.cshtml"));
string content = File.ReadAllText(path);
return new LoadedTemplateSource(content, path);
}
public ITemplateKey GetKey(string name, ResolveType resolveType, ITemplateKey context)
{
return new NameOnlyTemplateKey(name, resolveType, context);
}
public void AddDynamic(ITemplateKey key, ITemplateSource source)
{
throw new NotImplementedException("dynamic templates are not supported!");
}
}
Setup on startup:
var config = new TemplateServiceConfiguration();
config.Debug = true;
config.TemplateManager = new MyTemplateManager(BaseTemplatePath);
Engine.Razor = RazorEngineService.Create(config);
And use it:
// You don't really need this method anymore.
private string GetContent(string template, object data)
{
return Engine.Razor.RunCompile(template, null, data);
}
RazorEngine will now fix all the problems mentioned above internally. Notice how it is perfectly fine to use the name of the template as key, if in your scenario the name is all you need to identify a template (otherwise you cannot use NameOnlyTemplateKey and need to provide your own implementation).
Hope this helps.
(Disclaimer: Contributor of RazorEngine)
This is the action method where I save user input and then redirect to the view mode:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult SaveDocumentCitizen(DocumentCitizen documentCitizen)
{
DocumentCitizenRepository repository = new DocumentCitizenRepository();
repository.SaveDocument(documentCitizen);
return RedirectToAction(actionName: "ViewDocumentCitizen", routeValues: new RouteValueDictionary(documentCitizen));
}
And here's the ViewDocumentCitizen action method:
public ActionResult ViewDocumentCitizen(DocumentCitizen doc)// The Attachment value is null here
{
DocumentCitizenRepository repository = new DocumentCitizenRepository();
DocumentCitizen docCitizen = repository.UpdateTextualValues(doc.DocID);
return View(viewName: "DocumentCitizen", model: docCitizen);
}
The DocumentCitizen model has the following property:
public byte[] Attachment{get;set;}
I choose a file then submit the form and then when I debug the SaveDocumentCitizen method I can see that the Attachment is not null. But it gets set to null as soon as it's passed to the ViewDocumentCitizen method. What do I have to do to have the file property value persisted through redirection?
I think the problem is parameter name in RouteData and in Action method are not equal . Try to modify your SaveDocumentCitizen action
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult SaveDocumentCitizen(DocumentCitizen documentCitizen)
{
DocumentCitizenRepository repository = new DocumentCitizenRepository();
repository.SaveDocument(documentCitizen);
return RedirectToAction(actionName: "ViewDocumentCitizen", routeValues: new RouteValueDictionary(new RouteValueDictionary(new Dictionary<string, object> {{"doc", documentCitizen}})));
}
Or better
return RedirectToAction(actionName: "ViewDocumentCitizen", routeValues: new { doc = documentCitizen});
This should help to your ModelBinder to recognize parameter by name
EDIT:
From MSDN "Controller.RedirectToAction "
Returns an HTTP 302 response to the browser, which causes the browser to make a GET request to the specified action.
Get method has a length limit, read more HERE
But .Net Framework ready for everything, and they created ControllerBase.TempData property read more on MSDN
Hope it will help you
I am trying to adapt the MvcSiteMapProvider to create the breadcrumb based on some Information stored in a database.
The answer in this post sounded promising so i implemented my own SiteMapNodeProvider. But then i didnt know how to wire things up so the newly implemented SiteMapNodeProvider is used instead of the static xml file ("Mvc.sitemap").
As i am using SimpleInjector in my project, i called the setup method in my already existent Injection-initialization code.
public static void Initialize()
{
Injection.Global = new Container();
InitializeContainer(Injection.Global);
Injection.Global.RegisterMvcControllers(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
Injection.Global.RegisterMvcAttributeFilterProvider();
Injection.Global.Verify();
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new SimpleInjectorDependencyResolver(Injection.Global));
}
private static void InitializeContainer(Container container)
{
// Setup configuration of DI
MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer.SetUp(container);
//... register some other stuff for my project here ...
}
The MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer class got created by the package: 'Mvcsitemapprovider.mvc4.di.simpleinjector/4.4.5'
Does anybody know what to do to make my project use the newly created SiteMapNodeProvider?
I couldnt find any documentation about this in the official docu...
edit: i tried what you suggested (even removed the old DI stuff and only used the one from the nuget-package) but still i am getting errors...
here is what i have in my MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer
public static void SetUp(Container container)
{
bool securityTrimmingEnabled = false;
bool enableLocalization = true;
string absoluteFileName = HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/Mvc.sitemap");
TimeSpan absoluteCacheExpiration = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5);
string[] includeAssembliesForScan = new string[] { "testsitemap" };
// Extension to allow resolution of arrays by GetAllInstances (natively based on IEnumerable).
// source from: https://simpleinjector.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=CollectionRegistrationExtensions
AllowToResolveArraysAndLists(container);
var currentAssembly = typeof(MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer).Assembly;
var siteMapProviderAssembly = typeof(SiteMaps).Assembly;
var allAssemblies = new Assembly[] { currentAssembly, siteMapProviderAssembly };
var excludeTypes = new Type[]
{
typeof (SiteMapNodeVisibilityProviderStrategy),
typeof (SiteMapXmlReservedAttributeNameProvider),
typeof (SiteMapBuilderSetStrategy),
typeof (ControllerTypeResolverFactory),
// Added 2013-06-28 by eric-b to avoid default singleton registration:
typeof(XmlSiteMapController),
// Added 2013-06-28 by eric-b for SimpleInjector.Verify method:
typeof(PreservedRouteParameterCollection),
typeof(MvcResolver),
typeof(MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMap),
typeof(MetaRobotsValueCollection),
typeof(RoleCollection),
typeof(SiteMapPluginProvider),
typeof(ControllerTypeResolver),
typeof(RouteValueDictionary),
typeof(AttributeDictionary)
,typeof(SiteMapNodeCreator)
};
var multipleImplementationTypes = new Type[]
{
typeof (ISiteMapNodeUrlResolver),
typeof (ISiteMapNodeVisibilityProvider),
typeof (IDynamicNodeProvider)
};
// Single implementations of interface with matching name (minus the "I").
CommonConventions.RegisterDefaultConventions(
(interfaceType, implementationType) => container.RegisterSingle(interfaceType, implementationType),
new Assembly[] { siteMapProviderAssembly },
allAssemblies,
excludeTypes,
string.Empty);
// Multiple implementations of strategy based extension points
CommonConventions.RegisterAllImplementationsOfInterfaceSingle(
(interfaceType, implementationTypes) => container.RegisterAll(interfaceType, implementationTypes),
multipleImplementationTypes,
allAssemblies,
new Type[0],
"^Composite");
container.Register<XmlSiteMapController>();
// Visibility Providers
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapNodeVisibilityProviderStrategy>(() =>
new SiteMapNodeVisibilityProviderStrategy(
container.GetAllInstances
<ISiteMapNodeVisibilityProvider>().
ToArray(), string.Empty));
// Pass in the global controllerBuilder reference
container.RegisterSingle<ControllerBuilder>(() => ControllerBuilder.Current);
container.RegisterSingle<IControllerBuilder, ControllerBuilderAdaptor>();
container.RegisterSingle<IBuildManager, BuildManagerAdaptor>();
container.RegisterSingle<IControllerTypeResolverFactory>(() =>
new ControllerTypeResolverFactory(new string[0],
container.GetInstance
<IControllerBuilder
>(),
container.GetInstance
<IBuildManager>()));
// Configure Security
container.RegisterAll<IAclModule>(typeof(AuthorizeAttributeAclModule), typeof(XmlRolesAclModule));
container.RegisterSingle<IAclModule>(() => new CompositeAclModule(container.GetAllInstances<IAclModule>().ToArray()));
// Setup cache
container.RegisterSingle<System.Runtime.Caching.ObjectCache>(() => System.Runtime.Caching.MemoryCache.Default);
container.RegisterSingleOpenGeneric(typeof(ICacheProvider<>), typeof(RuntimeCacheProvider<>));
container.RegisterSingle<ICacheDependency>(() => new RuntimeFileCacheDependency(absoluteFileName));
container.RegisterSingle<ICacheDetails>(() => new CacheDetails(absoluteCacheExpiration, TimeSpan.MinValue, container.GetInstance<ICacheDependency>()));
// Configure the visitors
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapNodeVisitor, UrlResolvingSiteMapNodeVisitor>();
// Prepare for the sitemap node providers
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapXmlReservedAttributeNameProvider>(
() => new SiteMapXmlReservedAttributeNameProvider(new string[0]));
container.RegisterSingle<IXmlSource>(() => new FileXmlSource(absoluteFileName));
// Register the sitemap node providers
container.RegisterSingle<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>(() => container.GetInstance<XmlSiteMapNodeProviderFactory>()
.Create(container.GetInstance<IXmlSource>()));
container.RegisterSingle<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider>(() => container.GetInstance<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProviderFactory>()
.Create(includeAssembliesForScan));
// Register your custom sitemap node provider
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapNodeProvider, CustomSiteMapNodeProvider>();
// Register the collection of sitemap node providers (including the custom one)
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapBuilder>(() => container.GetInstance<SiteMapBuilderFactory>()
.Create(new CompositeSiteMapNodeProvider(
container.GetInstance<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>(),
container.GetInstance<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider>(),
container.GetInstance<CustomSiteMapNodeProvider>())));
container.RegisterAll<ISiteMapBuilderSet>(ResolveISiteMapBuilderSets(container, securityTrimmingEnabled, enableLocalization));
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapBuilderSetStrategy>(() => new SiteMapBuilderSetStrategy(container.GetAllInstances<ISiteMapBuilderSet>().ToArray()));
}
private static IEnumerable<ISiteMapBuilderSet> ResolveISiteMapBuilderSets(Container container, bool securityTrimmingEnabled, bool enableLocalization)
{
yield return new SiteMapBuilderSet(
"default",
securityTrimmingEnabled,
enableLocalization,
container.GetInstance<ISiteMapBuilder>(),
container.GetInstance<ICacheDetails>());
}
private static void AllowToResolveArraysAndLists(Container container)
{
container.ResolveUnregisteredType += (sender, e) =>
{
var serviceType = e.UnregisteredServiceType;
if (serviceType.IsArray)
{
RegisterArrayResolver(e, container,
serviceType.GetElementType());
}
else if (serviceType.IsGenericType &&
serviceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IList<>))
{
RegisterArrayResolver(e, container,
serviceType.GetGenericArguments()[0]);
}
};
}
private static void RegisterArrayResolver(UnregisteredTypeEventArgs e, Container container, Type elementType)
{
var producer = container.GetRegistration(typeof(IEnumerable<>)
.MakeGenericType(elementType));
var enumerableExpression = producer.BuildExpression();
var arrayMethod = typeof(Enumerable).GetMethod("ToArray")
.MakeGenericMethod(elementType);
var arrayExpression = Expression.Call(arrayMethod, enumerableExpression);
e.Register(arrayExpression);
}
}
but still i get the following exception:
No registration for type DynamicSiteMapNodeBuilder could be found and
an implicit registration could not be made. The constructor of the
type DynamicSiteMapNodeBuilder contains the parameter of type
ISiteMapNodeCreator with name 'siteMapNodeCreator' that is not
registered. Please ensure ISiteMapNodeCreator is registered in the
container, or change the constructor of DynamicSiteMapNodeBuilder.
First of all, to integrate with an existing DI setup, you should install MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4.DI.SimpleInjector.Modules instead of MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4.DI.SimpleInjector. You can downgrade by running this command from package manager console:
PM> Uninstall-Package -Id MvcSiteMapProvider.MVC4.DI.SimpleInjector
Be sure NOT to uninstall any dependencies. This will ensure that you don't have 2 sets of DI initialization code in your project - there should only be 1 for the entire application.
Next, you need to wire up for DI as well as some other initialization code required by MvcSiteMapProvider. The readme file contains instructions how to do this. Here is how you would do it with your existing configuration.
public static void Initialize()
{
Injection.Global = new Container();
InitializeContainer(Injection.Global);
Injection.Global.RegisterMvcControllers(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
Injection.Global.RegisterMvcAttributeFilterProvider();
Injection.Global.Verify();
DependencyResolver.SetResolver(new SimpleInjectorDependencyResolver(Injection.Global));
}
private static void InitializeContainer(Container container)
{
// Setup configuration of DI (required)
MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer.SetUp(container);
// Setup global sitemap loader (required)
MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps.Loader = container.GetInstance<ISiteMapLoader>();
// Check all configured .sitemap files to ensure they follow the XSD for MvcSiteMapProvider (optional)
var validator = container.GetInstance<ISiteMapXmlValidator>();
validator.ValidateXml(HostingEnvironment.MapPath("~/Mvc.sitemap"));
// Register the Sitemaps routes for search engines (optional)
XmlSiteMapController.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes); // NOTE: You can put this in your RouteConfig.cs file if desired.
//... register some other stuff for your project here ...
}
If the /sitemap.xml endpoint doesn't work, you may also need to add this line to register the XmlSiteMapController:
Injection.Global.RegisterMvcControllers(typeof(MvcSiteMapProvider.SiteMaps).Assembly);
To implement ISiteMapNodeProvider, there is an example here: MvcSiteMapProvider ISiteMapBuilder in conjunction with IDynamicNodeProvider.
To register your custom ISiteMapNodeProvider, you just need to ensure it gets added to the constructor of SiteMapBuilder. You can also exclude the existing SiteMapNodeProviders from the code below depending on your needs.
// Register the sitemap node providers
container.RegisterSingle<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>(() => container.GetInstance<XmlSiteMapNodeProviderFactory>()
.Create(container.GetInstance<IXmlSource>()));
container.RegisterSingle<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider>(() => container.GetInstance<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProviderFactory>()
.Create(includeAssembliesForScan));
// Register your custom sitemap node provider
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapNodeProvider, CustomSiteMapNodeProvider>();
// Register the collection of sitemap node providers (including the custom one)
container.RegisterSingle<ISiteMapBuilder>(() => container.GetInstance<SiteMapBuilderFactory>()
.Create(new CompositeSiteMapNodeProvider(
container.GetInstance<XmlSiteMapNodeProvider>(),
container.GetInstance<ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider>(),
container.GetInstance<CustomSiteMapNodeProvider>())));
Do note that IDynamicNodeProvider (which is documented) does almost exactly the same thing as ISiteMapNodeProvider, so you could use that option instead. There are 3 main differences:
With IDynamicNodeProvider, you must create a "template" node that defines the dynamicNodeProvider attribute, and the template node itself won't be included in the SiteMap, so it must be used in conjunction with a ISiteMapNodeProvider implementation that processes the dynamic nodes (the built-in ISiteMapNodeProviders do this automatically).
IDynamicNodeProvider doesn't need to be part of the DI setup because it is already processed by both XmlSiteMapNodeProvider and ReflectionSiteMapNodeProvider.
With ISiteMapNodeProvider, you are working directly with the ISiteMapNode object, with IDynamicNodeProvider you are working with an abstraction (DynamicNodeProvider) and there is a conversion that happens automatically.
About SimpleInjector.Verify
If you want Verify() to work, you need to add the following to the excludeTypes array in the MvcSiteMapProviderContainerInitializer.
typeof(SiteMapNodeCreator),
typeof(DynamicSiteMapNodeBuilder)
I have added them to the module and will be in the next version of the Nuget package, but these modules do not update so you have to do it manually.
Note that the Verify() method tries to create an instance of everything that is registered with the container - including objects that never get created by the container in the real world. Therefore, if you use the Verify() method you have to be more diligent that something is not accidentally registered. This makes convention-based registration more difficult to do.
Is there a way to disable event firing when doing a list item update from the Managed Client Object Model?
In the server model, I do the below. However, I cannot find a way of doing the same on the Managed Client ObjectModel:
class DisabledEventsScope : SPItemEventReceiver, IDisposable
{ // Boolean to hold the original value of the EventFiringEnabled property
bool _originalValue;
public DisabledEventsScope()
{
// Save off the original value of EventFiringEnabled
_originalValue = base.EventFiringEnabled;
// Set EventFiringEnabled to false to disable it
base.EventFiringEnabled = false;
}
public void Dispose()
{
// Set EventFiringEnabled back to its original value
base.EventFiringEnabled = _originalValue;
}
}
using (DisabledEventsScope scope = new DisabledEventsScope())
{
// State-changing operation occurs here.
spItem.Update();
}
Thanks in advance.
You can not do it in client object model, see the MSDN documentation on the SP.List object: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee554951. But you can develop custom web service which will be called from a client side and disable events' firing.