I want to check if user is already like the post. I get an array with users who liked the post but I don't know how to hide button if logged in username exists in the likes array. Heres the code part:
<span v-for="like in b.likes">
{{like}} // {"username": "Gohanas" } { "username": "Zlotte" }
</span>
<button class="likeButton" #click="like(b._id)">LIKE</button>
Since Zlotte exists in here I want to hide LIKE button. How can I do that ?
Here is an example for this, just replace the Zlotte with current use username:
<button
v-if="!b.likes.find(u => u.username === 'Zlotte')"
class="likeButton"
#click="like(b._id)"
>
LIKE
</button>
I think the best way to solve this is by creating a computed with this code in it:
return b.likes.filter(({ username }) => username === <here the variable for the current username>).length;
More readable variant:
return b.likes.filter((like) => {
return like.username === <here the variable for the current username>;
}).length;
I'm not sure of the structure of b, so I'm not sure if you have the current users' name available in there.
If you have added the computed, you can use it in the template to v-if or v-show the button:
<button class="likeButton" #click="like(b._id)" v-if="<name of the computed here>">LIKE</button>
Related
So from the backend I get a array of objects that look kind of like this
ItemsToAdd
{
Page: MemberPage
Feature: Search
Text: "Something to explain said feature"
}
So i match these values to enums in the frontend and then on for example the memberpage i do this check
private get itemsForPageFeatures(): ItemsToAdd[] {
return this.items.filter(
(f) =>
f.page== Pages.MemberPage &&
f.feature != null
);
}
What we get from the backend will change a lot over time and is only the same for weeks at most. So I would like to avoid to have to add the components in the template as it will become dead code fast and will become a huge thing to have to just go around and delete dead code. So preferably i would like to add it using a function and then for example for the search feature i would have a ref on the parent like
<SearchBox :ref="Features.Search" />
and in code just add elements where the ItemsToAdd objects Feature property match the ref
is this possible in Vue? things like appendChild and so on doesn't work in Vue but that is the closest thing i can think of to kind of what I want. This function would basically just loop through the itemsForPageFeatures and add the features belonging to the page it is run on.
For another example how the template looks
<template>
<div class="container-fluid mt-3">
<div
class="d-flex flex-row justify-content-between flex-wrap align-items-center"
>
<div class="d-align-self-end">
<SearchBox :ref="Features.Search" />
</div>
</div>
<MessagesFilter
:ref="Features.MessagesFilter"
/>
<DataChart
:ref="Features.DataChart"
/>
So say we got an answer from backend where it contains an object that has a feature property DataChart and another one with Search so now i would want components to be added under the DataChart component and the SearchBox component but not the messagesFilter one as we didnt get that from the backend. But then next week we change in backend so we no longer want to display the Search feature component under searchbox. so we only get the object with DataChart so then it should only render the DataChart one. So the solution would have to work without having to make changes to the frontend everytime we change what we want to display as the backend will only be database configs that dont require releases.
Closest i can come up with is this function that does not work for Vue as appendChild doesnt work there but to help with kind of what i imagine. So the component to be generated is known and will always be the same type of component. It is where it is to be placed that is the dynamic part.
private showTextBoxes() {
this.itemsForPageFeatures.forEach((element) => {
let el = this.$createElement(NewMinorFeatureTextBox, {
props: {
item: element,
},
});
var ref = `${element.feature}`
this.$refs.ref.appendChild(el);
});
}
You can use dynamic components for it. use it like this:
<component v-for="item in itemsForPageFeatures" :is="getComponent(item.Feature)" :key="item.Feature"/>
also inside your script:
export default {
data() {
return {
items: [
{
Page: "MemberPage",
Feature: "Search",
Text: "Something to explain said feature"
}
]
};
},
computed: {
itemsForPageFeatures() {
return this.items.filter(
f =>
f.Page === "MemberPage" &&
f.Feature != null
);
}
},
methods: {
getComponent(feature) {
switch (feature) {
case "Search":
return "search-box";
default:
return "";
}
}
}
};
I am using vuejs3 and I want to make a filter. When user click to the link I want to append the url and push it to browser address bar for now. Later I will do ajax request to update page with product list.
So far I am able to send parameters to URL, but only one item from one group.From first color group I want user to select only one but from second size group I want user to select multiple.
I want this type of URL: localhost:8080/product?color=red&size=medium&size=large
<template>
<div class="products">
<div class="multi_filters">
<h1>Multi Filter By Color</h1>
Red color
Blue color
</div>
<div class="single_filter">
<h1>Multi Size</h1>
Medium
Large
</div>
</div>
</template>
<script>
export default {
data() {
return {
filters:{},
selectedFilters:{}
}
},
methods:{
activateFilter(key,value){
this.selectedFilters = Object.assign({},this.selectedFilters,{[key]:value})
console.log(this.selectedFilters)
this.$router.replace({
query: {
...this.selectedFilters
}
})
}
}
}
</script>
You are expecting size to be an array, this post will helps.
Submitting multi-value form fields, i.e. submitting arrays through GET/POST vars, can be done several different ways, as a standard is not necessarily spelled out.
Three possible ways to send multi-value fields or arrays would be:
?cars[]=Saab&cars[]=Audi (Best way- PHP reads this into an array)
?cars=Saab&cars=Audi (Bad way- PHP will only register last value)
?cars=Saab,Audi (Haven't tried this)
I want to keep the value of a variable identical with the content of a textarea.
I don't want to use v-bind or v-model, because I have already bound the textarea with another value.
This is a notebook app, and the textarea is used to display the content of a note, so it has been bound using v-bind with a note object, like
<textarea cols="30" rows="3" v-bind:value="note"></textarea>
Now, I want to add the "edit note" functionality. So when the content of the textarea changes, I want to store its value into a variable, and when the "submit" button is clicked, I pass the value of the variable, which contains the new content of the note, to backend to update the note.
My question is, how to store the textarea's content into the variable after each time the content changes?
I think I cannot use v-model because this way the note will be changed right after the content of the textarea is modified (though not sent to backend), but this is not what I want. What I want is the note to be changed only after the "submit" button is clicked. Thus, I cannot use v-model
Should I use v-on:change? If so, how to get the content of the textarea?
Like,
<textarea v-on:change="updateTheVariable(I need to get the content of the textarea here)"> ... </textarea>
methods: {
updateTheVariable(content of the textarea) {
this.variable = content of the textarea
}
}
Thanks
I'm assuming this thing only shows up when you click some kind of edit button which is why you don't want to alter note so try something like this instead
<button type="button" v-if="!editMode" #click="editNote">Edit</button>
<form v-if="editMode" #submit="handleSubmit">
<fieldset :disabled="saving">
<textarea v-model="editingNote"></textarea>
<button type="submit">Edit</button>
</fieldset>
</form>
export default {
data: () => ({
note: 'whatever', // maybe it's a prop, maybe assigned later, doesn't matter
editMode: false,
editingNote: null, // this will be used to bind the edited value
saving: false
}),
methods: {
editNote () {
this.editingNote = this.note
this.editMode = true
this.saving = false
},
async handleSubmit () {
this.saving = true // disables form inputs and buttons
await axios.post('/notes/update', { note: this.editingNote}) // just an example
this.note = this.editingNote // or maybe use data from the response ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
// or if it's a prop, this.$emit('updated', this.editingNote)
this.editMode = false
}
}
}
As #Phil indicated in a deleted post, the right way to do it is
<textarea #input="updateTheVariable($event.target.value)"></textarea>
.
.
.
methods:{
updateTheVariable(value){
this.variable = value
}
}
Background: I'm trying to create a form using Aurelia. I have a person object that I would like to be able to fill in data for. If the user knows some identifying information about the person's family, they can enter it in an input and a select box will be displayed to allow the user to select the individual from that family for this particular form. The form will then fill in any information it knows about that individual into input fields allowing the user to overwrite any of the information if necessary. The form also allows them to clear the selected person if they want to choose another one.
Most of the functionality seems to work as expected, but when I try to allow the user to clear out the selected person, I'm seeing some behavior that I wouldn't have expected.
I have created a GistRun. The bottom pane is working as I would expect, after the user gets data, selects a person and then clears their selection, they are provided with the select element again. If you uncomment the input element, you will see that the user now has to click the clear action twice before they see the select element again. Why?
How can I update the application so that the user will only need to clear out the person once and the select box will appear again to allow the user to make another selection?
If you have an Aurelia application, you should be able to reproduce this by replacing the app.html with the following:
<template>
<select value.bind="val2" if.bind="opts2 && !val2">
<option repeat.for="opt of opts2" model.bind="opt">${opt.firstName}</option>
</select>
<div if.bind="!opts2 || val2">
<span>${val2.firstName}</span>
<button click.delegate="clearVal2()" if.bind="val2">Clear</button>
</div>
<button click.delegate="getOpts2()">Get</button>
<div>${val2.blah}</div>
<!--<input type="text" value.bind="val2.blah"/>-->
</template>
An the app.js with this:
export class App {
opts2;
val2;
getOpts2(){
this.opts2 = [
undefined,
{
blah: 1,
firstName: 'foo',
address: {
line1: '123 Main St.'
}
},
{
blah: 2,
firstName: 'bar',
address: {
line1: '456 Other Wy.'
}
}
];
}
clearVal2(){
this.val2 = null;
}
}
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
UPDATE
If I put the input in a custom element and bind to that, things seem to work as expected. The values that I'm putting into my form though aren't in one location that I could utilize a custom element for. I have updated the Gist with an example.
How can I achieve the same functionality without the need for a custom element?
In all honesty I'm not sure why, but if you add if.bind="val2"on the input element, it clears the value and the select button returns.
<input type="text" if.bind="val2" value.bind="val2.blah"/>
Hope this (slightly) helps
Give that you are allowing the user to either select a value from the list or create a completely new entry, I would tend towards separating the value selected in the list and the data backing up the text boxes. Whenever the value of the select changes, I would set the value of the object backing the text boxes to the value of the select. The way I chose to do this in my sample code is to use the observable decorator on the value the select is bound to.
Here's an example: https://gist.run?id=e4b594eaa452b47d9b3984e7f9b04109
app.html
<template>
<div>
<select value.bind="val" if.bind="opts && !val">
<option repeat.for="opt of opts" model.bind="opt">${opt.firstName}</option>
</select>
<button click.delegate="getOpts()">Get</button>
</div>
<div if.bind="!opts || person">
<span>First Name: ${person.firstName}</span>
<button click.delegate="resetForm()" if.bind="val">Clear Selection</button>
</div>
Address: <input type="text" value.bind="person.address.line1" />
<hr />
val
<pre><code>
${toJSON(val)}
</code></pre>
person
<pre><code>
${toJSON(person)}
</code></pre>
</template>
app.js
import {observable} from 'aurelia-framework';
export class App {
#observable val = null;
person = {};
getOpts(){
this.opts = [
null,
{
blah: 1,
firstName: 'foo',
address: {
line1: '123 Main St.'
}
},
{
blah: 2,
firstName: 'bar',
address: {
line1: '456 Other Wy.'
}
}
];
}
valChanged() {
this.person = this.val;
console.log("set person");
}
resetForm(){
this.val = null;
console.log("reset val");
}
toJSON(value) {
if(!(value === false) && !value) {
return '';
}
return JSON.stringify(value);
}
}
You can see something interesting is happening when I reset the form. Aurelia is creating the properties necessary for bindings to person (namely person.address.line1 when we set person = null. But it doesn't create a firstName property, b/c that property isn't being bound until person stops being falsey.
Another option here is to simply use the with attribute to scope the input.
https://gist.run/?id=7b9d230f7d3c6dc8c13cefdd7be50c7f
<template>
<template with.bind="val.address">
<input value.bind="line1" />
</template>
</template>
Although I agree that mixing the logic of selections and inputs like that is probably not the best idea :)
Neither works this one:
$formTemplateModal.modal('show');
$('#form_template_name').focus();
nor a more complicated one:
$formTemplateModal.modal('show').promise().done(function() {
// #todo: does not work.
$('#form_template_name').focus();
});
field $('#form_template_name') is a input[type=text] and it surely exists and it belongs to $formTemplateModal.
The shown is changed in bootstrap 3 ,
Try this if it could help
$('#myModal').on('shown.bs.modal', function () {
$('#textareaID').focus();
})
this is more easier try using the autofocus in your tag .
<textarea id="textareaID" autofocus="" ></textarea>