How to render a custom component into a map's marker popup? - vuejs2

I am using a Vue plugin component Timeago, and i want to show a timeago time in the content of a map plugin. A super-simplified example to illustrate the usage would be something like:
let popup = L.responsivePopup().setContent(`
<h1>Hello world</h1>
<p>A thing happened <Timeago datetime="${datetime}"></Timeago></p>
`);
L.marker([lat, lon]).bindPopup(popup).addTo(this.map);
According to this answer, and Vue's documentation, i should be able to compile this using Vue.compile(), but i am not understanding the concept.
First, there is no explanation on what a "full build" is. How can i tell if what i have is a "full build"? Searching for "vuejs full build" doesn't return anything that is being referred to as literally that phrase, even though they use it in the documentation there. All i know is that when i try to call Vue.compile() with having imported import Vue from 'vue', it complains saying:
TypeError: vue__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_6__.default.compile is not a function
So i don't know where to go from there.
And then second thing is (assuming the first thing gets sorted), will i have to make my HTML hold an empty div with a specific id, wait for it to render, and then call the Vue.compile() on it, since the sample code there runs with .mount() on an element id? Because that seems a little "incorrect", having seemingly an extra step. Or is that the only way to make this scenario work?
If there is an alternative simpler wait of making this work, like getting the Timeago component to just return the rendered string only, such as 2 hours ago that i can incorporate into my string literal, that would work for me as well. Either way is fine.

Vue has differents build of it's package, full means that package can compile templates and and run it. All build types can be found here https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/installation.html#Explanation-of-Different-Builds
Vue.compile allows you to use render functions, which allow you to manipulate DOM and create elements in a programmatic way. Here you can find Vue documentation about it https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/render-function.html
About the issue you are facing, you can create a vue component and put that popup inside it, this component when render will render the timeago component.
<template>
<h1>Hello world</h1>
<p>A thing happened <Timeago datetime="${datetime}"></Timeago></p>
</template>
import Timego from './Timeago.vue'
export default {
components: {
Timeago
},
props: {
datetime: String
}
}

Related

Stencil js: update DOM element outside the component

I'm in the process of migrating some legacy pages to web components using StencilJS, so I'm in a situation where some elements are already handled with StencilJS, some are not, and migrating everything will take quite some time.
In this context I need to be able to update the contents of a target div not managed with StencilJS from a StencilJS component. This div is in a totally different branch of the DOM and it's impossible to move it into the component without rethinking the entire page.
So from my component I need to be able to do something like this:
render() {
const target = document.getElementById(this.targetDiv);
if (target) {
target.innerHTML = jsxToString(this.renderDivContents()) // obviously this doesn't work
}
}
renderDivContents() {
return (<p>Some JSX stuff</p>)
}
So, in other words I need to compile the JSX template immediately into a string. I'm not sure how to do that with StencilJS and if it is even possible. I'm under the impression that there is a way to achieve that because it looks very similar to what we do in tests, but all the resources I find on the topic are for JSX with React and does not really help with StencilJS
If this is not the correct approach, what do you suggest? I know injecting HTML into a DOM element is not ideal, but I'm just trying to find a temporary solution to be able to release my changes gradually.
PS: I know I can also use an overlay approach (generate a div into the component and give it the same position and size than the target div), but this sounds even uglier than innerHTML. This is not the answer I expect.

How to Export Vue component and reuse it in any html page passing parameters?

I'm new to Vue 3 and I just created my first real life Vue project.
I would like to use and distribute this component (and it's subcomponents) to be used in any html page.
It's easy, right?
<div id="app"></div>
<script src="/js/chunk-vendors.99a5942c.js"></script>
<script src="/js/app.042d60b5.js"></script>
But how can I pass parameters to the main component when reusing it in some ordinary html page?
Parameters can be passed and read as globals:
<div id="app"></div>
<script>
window.myNamespace = { foo: 1 };
</script>
...
Or be passed as attributes and read from app element:
<div id="app" data-foo="1"></div>
...
This is suitable when Vue application is used as a sub-application (widget). For framework-agnostic reusable components, web components have to be used.
So I'm not sure what you're specific use case is, but if you're interested in making a multi-page app (MPA), then I suggest taking a look at the answer posted here.
What you would be doing here is actually mounting an instance of the Vue App itself onto an element every html page, and then pass props to that and it's children. Vue itself doesn't really support passing props to the root instance using element attributes, and it isn't the recommended way of using the framework, but if you are still interested in going down this route, I suggest taking a look at this answer here.
What I would suggest doing instead is taking a look at creating components, and passing those around. You can make separate files for each, and render them all in the main page, no need to create other pages. If that's something you're interested in, I suggest taking a look at routes or the making your project a multi-page app (MPA) instead of a single-page app (SPA) although the same concept would still apply, passing components to your main instance and building your app that way.
For passing parameters to components in Vue 3 I would suggest taking a look at the props page on the documentation here for more details.
I hope this is helpful! I tried my best to be thorough, I do suggest reading through the full documentation however!

How to get rid of Mismatching childNodes vs. VNodes in NuxtJs [duplicate]

I am using Nuxt.js / Vuejs for my app, and I keep facing this error in different places:
The client-side rendered virtual DOM tree is not matching server-rendered content.
This is likely caused by incorrect HTML markup, for example nesting block-level elements inside <p>, or missing <tbody>.
Bailing hydration and performing full client-side render.
I would like to understand what is the best way to debug this error? Is their a way I can record/get the virtual DOM tree for client and server so I could compare and find where the error lies?
Mine is a large application and manually verifying is difficult.
Partial answer: with Chrome DevTools, you can localize the issue and see exactly what element caused the issue. Do the following (I did that with Nuxt 5.6.0 and Chrome 64.0.3282.186)
Show DevTools in Chrome (F12)
Load the page that causes "the client-side rendered virtual DOM tree..." warning.
Scroll to the warning in DevTools console.
Click at the source location hyperlink of the warning (in my case it was vue.runtime.esm.js:574).
Set a breakpoint there (left-clicking at line number in the source code browser).
Make the same warning to appear again. I'm not saying it is always possible, but in my case I simply reloaded the page. If there are many warnings, you can check the message by moving a mouse over msg variable.
When you found your message and stopped on a breakpoint, look at the call stack. Click one frame down to call to "patch" to open its source. Hover mouse over hydrate function call 4 lines above the execution line in patch. Hyperlink to the source of hydrate would open.
In the hydrate function, move about 15 lines from the start and set a breakpoint where false is returned after assertNodeMatch returned false. Set the breakpoint there and remove all other breakpoints.
Make the same warning to happen again. Now, when breakpoint is hit, execution should stop in the hydrate function. Switch to DevTools console and evaluate elm and then vnode. Here elm seem to be a server-rendered DOM element while vnode is a virtual DOM node. Elm is printed as HTML so you can figure out where the error happened.
For me this error happened cuz get Array list in AsyncData and rendered <tr> tags by v-for, i put v-for codes in <client-only> blocks and problem solved
This error can be really painfull to debug. In order to quickly get the element causing an issue edit node_modules/vue/dist/vue.esm.js and add the following lines :
// Search for this line:
function hydrate (elm, vnode, insertedVnodeQueue, inVPre) {
var i;
var tag = vnode.tag;
var data = vnode.data;
var children = vnode.children;
inVPre = inVPre || (data && data.pre);
vnode.elm = elm;
// Add the following lines:
console.log('elm', elm)
console.log('vnode', vnode)
console.log('inVpre', inVPre)
// ...
You will get in the console the failing node.
There are a lot of ways of fixing this issue, but most of them are not actual fixes, just hacky band-aids. To note a few:
wrap it into <client-only> tags, beware of some important details tho
using a v-show instead of a v-if
trying to hack some lifecycles
etc...
I highly recommend reading this gorgeous article written by Alexander Lichter
https://blog.lichter.io/posts/vue-hydration-error/
He'll explain you that you should diagnose why this happens and fix the actual issue.
Basically each time something is different from what was generated on the server and what is available when done hydrating on the client will cause this error.
Some of which are:
invalid HTML (having a block element inside of a <p>, same goes for an a tag nested into another, etc...)
3rd party scripts messing around with your components
different state on server vs client
any random is risky (new Date() for example)
any page related to authentication
I highly recommend reading the article to understand in Alexandre's own words how to handle this kind of issue. If you're in a hurry you could always use one band-aid fix but try to actually fix the issue for the best performance and to keep the code clean.
I had the same issue as of nuxt version 2.14.0 while implementing vue-particles package. The fix was to surround the tags with no-ssr and it fixed the issue.
EDIT:
Updated variant of the solution (if Nuxt version is above 2.9.0)
<client-only>
<vue-particles>
</vue-particles>
</client-only>
Old solution:
<no-ssr>
<vue-particles>
</vue-particles>
</no-ssr>
Thanks to budden73's answer, I did a little improvement on the debug process.
Open dev tool
click on the warn message, and click on the first line of the warn message, you will be directed to the Sources panel, with a file name vue.runtime.esm.js?xxxx
ctrl+f to search the above file for assertNodeMatch, not the function, but like:
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') {
if (!assertNodeMatch(elm, vnode, inVPre)) {
return false
}
}
Add a break point at the line return false
Refresh the page, and the breakpoint will be triggered.
At the right side of the Sources panel, Under Scope->Local, click on the elm element, you will be directed back to the Elements panel.
The above element is the client side rendered element, compare with your code to see the difference.
If you can't find the source of the bug, the brutal way to fix it is using nuxt's <client-only> tag.
Another likely brutal way is described here. Add an isHydrate variable which default is false, set to true in mounted hook, and render the element after the variable set to true.
For Nuxt version above 2.10 it doesn't need to install nothing, just use the default component <client-only> as mentioned https://nuxtjs.org/api/components-client-only/.
Check the previous warning:
In "nuxt": "^2.12.2", You can spot the cause easily from the previous warning.
In my case:
Incorrect
<nuxt-link to="/game42day">
<a>Game For Today</a>
</nuxt-link>
Correct:
<nuxt-link to="/game42day">
Game For Today
</nuxt-link>
If you're rendering a component conditionally with v-if, then you have two options to solve the problem:
The first one is wrapping the element in <no-ssr></no-ssr> tag.
The second approach is replacing v-if with v-show, here is the link to Vue docs.
Turns out, in my case, I had HTML comment tags , which was causing this stupid, annoying error. Took me too long to figure it out but in case it helps someone.
In my case I had to change this:
<v-expansion-panel-header v-text="name" />
to this:
<v-expansion-panel-header>{{ name }}</v-expansion-panel-header>
I also get many errors due to this problem. I list two cases I often encounter, hope can help you.
With vuetify button, when you create a common component, you should use: <v-btn>{{text}}</v-btn>. Example:
<template>
<v-btn
:width="width"
:color="color"
:class="[rounded ? 'rounded-pill' : 'rounded-lg',textColor]"
v-on:click="onClick"
elevation="0"
:outlined="outlined"
:type="type"
:name="name"
:form="form"
:disabled="disabled"
v-bind="$attrs"
>{{ text }}</v-btn>
</template>
Don't use v-html with <p> tag.
Not use: <p v-html='html'></p>.
Use: <div v-html='html'></div>.
Besides, if you use <client-only></client-only>, this problem is definitely solved, but if you need to SEO page or show google ads, it is not good solution.
Ok this is going to sound silly. I tried a bunch of different solutions for about 15 mins such as restarting the server and deleting the .nuxt directory but I was too lazy to use #budden73's big brain solution. What ended up working for me was simply restarting my computer, give it a shot.
What I have found so far from observation is that when you are using third party packages like jQuery (specially), they sometimes inject html tags into the dom. So Vue/Nuxt looses track of the dom tree and starts complaining.
I was having the same problem and after a while I removed all jQuery and replaced jQuery functionality with Vuejs and those error were all gone.
See here for an example of how to deal with integrations (e.g. Google Analytics or FB Pixel) that modify the DOM. Basically create a plugin and exclude from SSR.
https://nuxtjs.org/faq/ga
What about:
extend (config, ctx) {
config.resolve.symlinks = false
}
See this [Vue warn]: The client-side rendered virtual DOM tree is not matching server-rendered content ( Nuxt / Vue / lerna monorepo )
Now that you found the code causing the problem, the first thing you should do is to verify that your markup (possibly coming from an API) is valid. Code like <p><p>Text</p></p> is not valid because a p element doesn’t allow other block elements (like a paragraph tag) inside.
Be aware, that tags are not allowed to have block level elements like <div> or <p> as children. These <span> tags are used default tag for Vue’s transitions though. You can change that though via <Transition tag="div">.
Check if have used any block-level element inside the inline element.
for example: inside , inside
If you have used an HTML table make sure you have used the tag
In my case, I changed my codes from
<p v-html="$md.render(post.content)"></p>
to
<p>{{ $md.render(post.content) }}</p>
In my case this problem was caused by markdownit module, I solved it by changing the html markup used with v-html. I was with <p> at the beginning and I ended with <div>.
I have some <p> in my v-html render (with $md.render()) so take care if you have same problems with different markups.

Access dom element with vuejs and vuetify in v-tabs

I have a div tag with an 'id="meet"' into v-tabs.
I need to access the node of this tag after I click a tab. I am using
let node=document.querySelector("#meet").
My problem is that it always returns "null". Here is the codepen: https://codepen.io/luizalves/pen/WNrepxz
What is wrong here?
There is no guarantee that after $nextTick you will see DOM element immediately.
<div id="meet"></div>
<button #click="onTest">test</button>
...
methods: {
onTest () {
let node=document.querySelector("#meet");
console.log('meet here',node)
},
After you clicked test you'll see in a console:
"meet here" "<div id='meet'></div>"
You can try to extract this div with an unique id into a separate component and inside it you can use mounted hook to know that it exists in DOM
Of course, according to vuetify docs, you may add eager prop to v-tab-item component, and that's it, but...possibly you are doing something wrong.
It's not a good idea to always add this prop because you are losing one of the vuetify 2.X advantages - lazy loading. This may lead to big performance problems if there are many elements on the tab.
Maybe it would be better if you will work directly with reactive variables (like variables in v-model directive), not DOM objects.

Basic custom element does not seem to work

I'm trying to create a standard user status widget for my Aurelia app, and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. As a starting point I followed the docs, but my results aren't what they tell me to expect and I'm not getting errors either in build nor in the browser.
Relevant files are as follows:
<!-- nav-bar.html -->
<template bindable='router'>
<require from="./user-status "></require>
<!-- various nav buttons -->
<p class="navbar-collapse collapse navbar-text">
Test <user-status></user-status>
</p>
user-status.html
<template>
${status}
</template>
user-status.js
export default class UserStatusCustomElement {
constructor() {
this.status = 'Be sure to drink your Ovaltine!';
}
}
if I change the require in nav-bar.html to look for ./user-status.html it appears to have an effect (additional aurelia-looking attributes are added to the user-status element in the rendered html) but does not render the message (one assumes b/c it's not picking up the class and rendering as an html-only thing). If I leave as-is, it doesn't error but those attributes are not added and nothing is rendered, even static text.
I played around with your code and found that removing default from the user-status.js module fixed the problem. I suspect the reason has something to do with how Aurelia utilizes module-loaders (System.js, webpack, ...) when importing modules. Unfortunately I don't know enough about the internals of Aurelia to give a more in-depth answer.