I my Angular application, I use NGXLogger, but the loggername is always the same
[app-app-module.js:2740]
regardless of where the logging takes place.
If would expect the logger name to reflect the module name that has the log.debug('x')
import { NGXLogger } from 'ngx-logger';
constructor (private logger: NGXLogger)
{
_log = logger;
}
In order to see a "clear" component name you need to set enableSourceMaps to true in logger config
Be careful, for this to work you need to generate source maps when building
More info in the doc : https://github.com/dbfannin/ngx-logger/blob/master/docs/features.md
Related
I have cases, where I want to configure services based on objects which are registered in the dependency injection container.
For example I have the following registration for WS Federation:
authenticationBuilder.AddWsFederation((options) =>{
options.MetadataAddress = "...";
options.Wtrealm = "...";
options.[...]=...
});
My goal in the above case is to use a configuration object, which is available via the DI container to configure the WsFederation-middleware.
It looks to me that IPostConfigureOptions<> is the way to go, but until now, I have not found a way to accomplish this.
How can this be done, or is it not possible?
See https://andrewlock.net/simplifying-dependency-injection-for-iconfigureoptions-with-the-configureoptions-helper/ for the I(Post)ConfigureOptions<T> way, but I find that way too cumbersome.
I generally use this pattern:
// Get my custom config section
var fooSettingsSection = configuration.GetSection("Foo");
// Parse it to my custom section's settings class
var fooSettings = fooSettingsSection.Get<FooSettings>()
?? throw new ArgumentException("Foo not configured");
// Register it for services who ask for an IOptions<FooSettings>
services.Configure<FooSettings>(fooSettings);
// Use the settings instance
services.AddSomeOtherService(options => {
ServiceFoo = fooSettings.ServiceFoo;
})
A little more explicit, but you have all your configuration and DI code in one place.
Of course this bypasses the I(Post)ConfigureOptions<T> entirely, so if there's other code that uses those interfaces to modify the FooSettings afterwards, my code won't notice it as it's reading directly from the configuration file. Given I control FooSettings and its users, that's no problem for me.
This should be the approach if you do want to use that interface:
First, register your custom config section that you want to pull the settings from:
var fooSettingsSection = configuration.GetSection("Foo");
services.Configure<FooSettings>(fooSettingsSection);
Then, create an options configurer:
public class ConfigureWSFedFromFooSettingsOptions
: IPostConfigureOptions<Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.WsFederation.WsFederationOptions>
{
private readonly FooSettings _fooSettings;
public ConfigureWSFedFromFooSettingsOptions(IOptions<FooSettings> fooSettings)
{
_fooSettings = fooSettings.Value;
}
public void Configure(WsFederationOptions options)
{
options.MetadataAddress = _fooSettings.WsFedMetadataAddress;
options.Wtrealm = _fooSettings.WsFedWtRealm;
}
}
And finally link the stuff together:
services.AddTransient<IPostConfigureOptions<WsFederationOptions>, ConfigureWSFedFromFooSettingsOptions>();
The configurer will get your IOptions<FooSettings> injected, instantiated from the appsettings, and then be used to further configure the WsFederationOptions.
I've been building an asp.net core website, using the asp.net boilerplate template. As of now, I've been storing all of the settings in the appsettings.json file. As the application gets bigger, I'm thinking I should start storing some settings via ABP's SettingProvider and ISettingStore.
My question is, does anyone have, or know of, a sample application that show's how to implement ISettingStore and storing the settings in the database?
The only post I could find so far is this, but the link hikalkan supplies is broken.
Thanks for any help,
Joe
ABP stores settings on memory with default values. When you insert a new setting value into database, then it reads from database and overrides the default value. So basically when database has no settings then it means all the settings are on default values. Setting values are stored in AbpSettings table.
To start using settings mechanism. Create your own SettingProvider inherited from SettingProvider. Initialize it in your module (eg:
ModuleZeroSampleProjectApplicationModule).
As SettingProvider is automatically registed to dependency injection; You can inject ISettingManager wherever you want.
public class MySettingProvider : SettingProvider
{
public override IEnumerable<SettingDefinition> GetSettingDefinitions(SettingDefinitionProviderContext context)
{
return new[]
{
new SettingDefinition(
"SmtpServerAddress",
"127.0.0.1"
),
new SettingDefinition(
"PassiveUsersCanNotLogin",
"true",
scopes: SettingScopes.Application | SettingScopes.Tenant
),
new SettingDefinition(
"SiteColorPreference",
"red",
scopes: SettingScopes.User,
isVisibleToClients: true
)
};
}
}
In application services and controllers you don't need to inject ISettingManager
(because there's already property injected) and you can directly use SettingManager property. Forexample :
//Getting a boolean value (async call)
var value1 = await SettingManager.GetSettingValueAsync<bool>("PassiveUsersCanNotLogin");
And for the other classes (like Domain Services) can inject ISettingManager
public class UserEmailer : ITransientDependency
{
private readonly ISettingManager _settingManager;
public UserEmailer(ISettingManager settingManager)
{
_settingManager = settingManager;
}
[UnitOfWork]
public virtual async Task TestMethod()
{
var settingValue = _settingManager.GetSettingValueForUser("SmtpServerAddress", tenantAdmin.TenantId, tenantAdmin.Id);
}
}
Note: To modify a setting you can use these methods in SettingManager ChangeSettingForApplicationAsync, ChangeSettingForTenantAsync and ChangeSettingForUserAsync
Trying to set a HazelCast cluster with tcp-ip enabled on a standalone process.
My class looks like this
public class Person implements Serializable{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
int personId;
String name;
Person(){};
//getters and setters
}
Hazelcast is loaded as
final Config config = createNewConfig(mapName);
HazelcastInstance node = Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(config);`
Config createNewConfig(mapName){
final PersonStore personStore = new PersonStore();
XmlConfigBuilder configBuilder = new XmlConfigBuilder();
Config config = configBuilder.build();
config.setClassLoader(LoadAll.class.getClassLoader());
MapConfig mapConfig = config.getMapConfig(mapName);
MapStoreConfig mapStoreConfig = new MapStoreConfig();
mapStoreConfig.setImplementation(personStore);
return config;
}
and my myhazelcast config has this
<tcp-ip enabled="true">
<member>machine-1</member>
<member>machine-2</member>
</tcp-ip>
Do I need to populate this tag in my xml?
I get this error when a second instance is brought up
com.hazelcast.nio.serialization.HazelcastSerializationException: No DataSerializerFactory registered for namespace: 0
2275 at com.hazelcast.nio.serialization.DataSerializer.read(DataSerializer.java:98)
2276 at com.hazelcast.nio.serialization.DataSerializer.read(DataSerializer.java:39)
2277 at com.hazelcast.nio.serialization.StreamSerializerAdapter.read(StreamSerializerAdapter.java:41)
2278 at com.hazelcast.nio.serialization.SerializationServiceImpl.toObject(SerializationServiceImpl.java:276)
Any help is highly appericiated.
Solved my problem, I had a pom.xml with hazelcast-wm so I did not have actual hazelcast jar in my bundled jar. Including that fixed my issue.
Note that this same "No DataSerializerFactory registered for namespace: 0" error message can also occur in an OSGi environment when you're attempting to use more than one Hazelcast instance within the same VM, but initializing the instances from different bundles. The reason being that the com.hazelcast.util.ServiceLoader.findHighestReachableClassLoader() method will sometimes pick the wrong class loader during Hazelcast initialization (as it won't always pick the class loader you set on the config), and then it ends up with an empty list of DataSerializerFactory instances (hence causing the error message that it can't find the requested factory with id 0). The following shows a way to work around that problem by taking advantage of Java's context class loader:
private HazelcastInstance createHazelcastInstance() {
// Use the following if you're only using the Hazelcast data serializers
final ClassLoader classLoader = Hazelcast.class.getClassLoader();
// Use the following if you have custom data serializers that you need
// final ClassLoader classLoader = this.getClass().getClassLoader();
final com.hazelcast.config.Config config = new com.hazelcast.config.Config();
config.setClassLoader(classLoader);
final ClassLoader previousContextClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
try {
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(classLoader);
return Hazelcast.newHazelcastInstance(config);
} finally {
if(previousContextClassLoader != null) {
Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(previousContextClassLoader);
}
}
}
I'm using spring boot as it removes all the boring stuff and let's me focus on my code, but all the test examples use junit and I want to use cucumber?
Can someone point me in the right direction to get cucumber and spring to start things up, do all the auto config and wiring and let my step definitions use auto wired beans to do stuff?
Try to use the following on your step definition class:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = YourBootApplication.class,
loader = SpringApplicationContextLoader.class)
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
public class MySteps {
//...
}
Also make sure you have the cucumber-spring module on your classpath.
Jake - my final code had the following annotations in a superclass that each cucumber step definition class extended, This gives access to web based mocks, adds in various scopes for testing, and bootstraps Spring boot only once.
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {MySpringConfiguration.class}, loader = SpringApplicationContextLoader.class)
#WebAppConfiguration
#TestExecutionListeners({WebContextTestExecutionListener.class,ServletTestExecutionListener.class})
where WebContextTestExecutionListener is:
public class WebContextTestExecutionListener extends
AbstractTestExecutionListener {
#Override
public void prepareTestInstance(TestContext testContext) throws Exception {
if (testContext.getApplicationContext() instanceof GenericApplicationContext) {
GenericApplicationContext context = (GenericApplicationContext) testContext.getApplicationContext();
ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory = context
.getBeanFactory();
Scope requestScope = new RequestScope();
beanFactory.registerScope("request", requestScope);
Scope sessionScope = new SessionScope();
beanFactory.registerScope("session", sessionScope);
}
}
}
My approach is quite simple. In a Before hook (in env.groovy as I am using Cucumber-JVM for Groovy), do the following.
package com.example.hooks
import static cucumber.api.groovy.Hooks.Before
import static org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.exit
import static org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication.run
def context
Before {
if (!context) {
context = run Application
context.addShutdownHook {
exit context
}
}
}
Thanks to #PaulNUK, I found a set of annotations that will work.
I posted the answer in my question here
My StepDefs class required the annotations:
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = DemoApplication.class, loader = SpringApplicationContextLoader.class)
#WebAppConfiguration
#IntegrationTest
There is also a repository with source code in answer I linked.
I have an Eclipse plug-in with a checkbox in the plug-in's preference page.
This checkbox is used for enabling and disabling an editor, which is being launched from this plug-in.
However, the problem is, I would also like to be able to enable and disable this 'editor-launch' from another plug-in, by having actions which change the value of the checkbox in the above mentioned preference page.
Here's the problem, how do I access that local preference store from another plug-in?
I've tried things like..
View myView = (View) PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getActiveWorkbenchWindow().getActivePage().findView("ViewID");
But this 'myView' always seems to be null.. And also, what would I do with the view since it's the Plug-in I want.
Platform.getBundle('bundleName')...
Same here, want the Plugin, not the bundle corresponding to is.
No matter what I try nothing seems to work.
Does anyone have any ideas?
There are two ways of doing this:
Please refer to http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/EclipsePreferences/article.html#preferences_pluginaccess
Using .getPluginPreferences(). For example, there is a plugin class "com.xxx.TestPlugin" which extends org.eclipse.ui.plugin.AbstractUIPlugin.Plugin, in order to get access to the preferences of TestPlugin. The plugin code could be below:
public class TestPlugin extends AbstractUIPlugin {
private static TestPlugin plugin;
public static final String PREF_TEST = "test_preference";
/**
* The constructor.
*/
public TestPlugin() {
plugin = this;
}
/**
* This method is called upon plug-in activation
*/
public void start(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
super.start(context);
}
/**
* This method is called when the plug-in is stopped
*/
public void stop(BundleContext context) throws Exception {
super.stop(context);
plugin = null;
}
/**
* Returns the shared instance.
*/
public static TestPlugin getDefault() {
return plugin;
}
}
To access the preference of TestPlugin, the code could be:
TestPlugin.getDefault().getPluginPreferences().getDefaultBoolean(TestPlugin.PREF_TEST);
Or have a look at this answer: Writing Eclipse plugin to modify Editor Preferences
This thread recommend the use of a Service tracker:
ServiceTracker tracker = new ServiceTracker(ToolkitPlugin.getDefault().getBundle().getBundleContext(),
IProxyService.class.getName(), null);
tracker.open();
proxyService = (IProxyService) tracker.getService();
proxyService.addProxyChangeListener(this);
This may work.
Prefs stores are found per plugin. This is one way to get a prefs store for the plugin whose activator class is ActivatorA.
IPreferenceStore store = ActivatorA.getDefault().getPreferenceStore();
If you want another plugin to refer to the same store, perhaps you could expose some api on ActivatorA for it to get there, e.g.
public IPreferenceStore getSharedPrefs() {
return ActivatorA.getDefault().getPreferenceStore();
}
The second plugin would find the shared store by doing this
IPreferenceStore sharedPrefs = ActivatorA.getSharedPrefs();
Good luck.