I maintain a private repository but want to make one file publicly available.
GitHub documentation states that the CURL command below can retrieve a file:
curl -u username:token https://api.github.com/user
But I would like to provide access through a URL. E.g.
https://username:token#raw.githubusercontent.com/me/repo/master/README.md
This always return a 404. Am I missing something?
From "How can I download a single raw file from a private github repo using the command line?", you wouldneed to use a PAT (Personnal Access Token) without the username:
curl -s https://$TOKEN#raw.githubusercontent.com/....
But I would not recommend making that token visible in any way: it would give access to that file and the rest of the repository.
Putting that file in a separate location (be it a separate public repository, or any other online text storage service) would be safer.
For those of you wondering the "why" on 404 vs 401, it's basically a security measure on GitHub's part to output 404 instead of 401: https://docs.github.com/en/github-ae#latest/rest/overview/other-authentication-methods#basic-authentication
For those wondering why we get a 404 in the browser while cURL gives us a success response, you might've assumed that providing the username and password in the URL like https://username:password#somesite.com would pass the credentials along in the initial request. That is not the case - the browser steps in and sees if the page you are requesting returns a WWW-Authenticate response header, and only then does it send your credentials. In the case of your GitHub url, the resource doesn't send back a WWW-Authenticate. If it did return WWW-Authenticate, then you obviously wouldn't run into this problem.
And then there's cURL. cURL assumes Basic Authentication by default and automatically sets the Authorization header to your username and password (either from the url like my previous example, or set through CLI options like in your example), and it sends it regardless of whether or not the server returns a WWW-Authenticate response header.
Unfortunately for us, there's no way to force the browser to send it with the initial request. As to why GitHub doesn't send a WWW-Authenticate response header, it's probably because they don't want to promote the least secure way of authentication - they no longer allow account passwords to be sent this way, after all. However, they do realize its ease of use and have mitigated some of its weaker points by allowing users to use oAuth access token, GitHub App installation access token, or Personal Access Token in its place that can limit its scope of access. So really, it's the browser that is following standards, and GitHub allowing a form of Basic Authentication with some alterations, and cURL immediately passing our credentials into the Authorization header. I believe the below is what's happening behind your requests:
cURL sends a request along with Authorization header → GitHub: "Well, I didn't ask, but yeah, your creds check out" → GitHub: Authorized and redirects to resource
Browser sends request and waits for WWW-Authenticate response before handing credentials → GitHub: "Umm, you don't have permission to access this resource but I can't let you know whether it actually exists") → GitHub: Returns 404 (instead of 401 with WWW-Authenticate header) stopping the browser short from receiving the WWW-Authenticate header response and sending out an Authorization header with the credentials on hand.
Related
I have created an app (backend and frontend) that is mainly used on a Windows intranet. I'm using Kerberos authentication to do SSO so that anyone logged in to Windows domain is automatically authenticated to the server. To do this I set up Kerberos SPN for server and configured browsers etc and is all working fine in the normal scenario. My problem is that I need to continue if the user is not authenticated (ie connects from outside the Windows domain or does not have their browser configured correctly).
In summary there are two scenarios:
if authenticated OK continue with authorization granted for their ID [currently works]
if not authenticated continue with no (public) authorization [does not work]
In the first case the HTTP requests/responses are:
a. frontend: initial HTTP request
b. backend: no auth found so return 401 unauthorized with WWW-Authenticate:Negotiate header
c. frontend: re-sends request with Authorization header -> decoded to get the login ID
In the 2nd case:
a. frontend: initial HTTP request
b. backend: no auth found so return 401 with WWW-Authenticate:Negotiate (and error text in the body)
c. frontend: browser stops (displaying the body of the response as text to the user)
This is the crux of the problem I need to somehow avoid the browser just completely bombing (as at step c above).
Solutions I have tried:
display a message to the user about how to adjust browser settings to allow SSO to work in the body of the 401 response message. This is pretty ugly looking and does not work for connections from outisde the domain
Tried a 301 redirect in stead of 401 unauthorized response, but the browser does not like this.
Tried a redirect using javascript in the 401 response body, but it is not executed.
Have the backend send 401 but with WWW-Authenticate:Negotiate,Basic. But this display an unneeded login/password dialog and still fails if they don't login.
What I really need is an None option, ie: WWW-Authenticate:Negotiate,None then continue with no auth if the subsequent frontend request indicate "None" was used.
Of course, there isn't a "None" option. :(
It seems that this should be a fairly typical scenario but I have been researching this to no avail for 3 days now. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
If the browser is connecting from outside the intranet then just continue. That is do not send the 401 response at all (no auth). You should be able to tell from the IP address where they connect from.
Another option is to redirect using JS in a page in the 401 body. As mentioned above I think you need to include Content-type: text/html or Content-type: text/javascript.
I'm attempting to interact with the Google Sheets API and running into an inexplicable problem that I'm finally reaching out to see how anyone else may have tackled it. Put simply, I can use the in-page API Explorer tool with only the https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly OAuth2 scope at https://developers.google.com/sheets/api/reference/rest/v4/spreadsheets/get to query my spreadsheet (just the spreadsheet ID, leaving all other fields to empty defaults) and I'll see the 200 with the response in the bottom as expected.
Of course, I can't re-use the same access token that tool uses, but if provision an access code for the same user for my own app (same scope), and make the same GET request to https://sheets.googleapis.com/v4/spreadsheets/<spreadsheetId> in Postman (again, no other fields populated), substituting the access token into the Authentication header with Bearer <accessToken>, I get a 404.
I know the file is there - I've triple checked that I'm using the same spreadsheet ID across either request and I'm consistently getting a 404 (not a 401 or 403) indicating that my access token does authenticate.
I've tried broadening my OAuth2 scopes to include the full range listed on the API Explorer:
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.file
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.readonly
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly
Of course, I don't want to have to use all those scopes for my purposes - I'd like to use the most narrow scope possible, but I also wanted to rule out that it wasn't failing to work for some scoping scenario. No difference - still a 404 every time I make the request in Postman. I've tried issuing multiple access tokens now, using accounts.google.com to invalidate the tokens for my app between re-issuances, but to no avail.
To be clear, the Google Sheets API has been enabled for my app.
In hopes that someone else has experienced the same inability to query Google's v4 REST API despite using valid access tokens, could you share how you managed to do it?
I appreciate it!
Update:
So I've been playing around with the OAuth 2.0 Playground shared in the comments and found that the authorization endpoint I was using was identical, but the token endpoint differed. This doesn't seem to matter since I used the custom option to use the alternate endpoint and the Playground was still able to work without issue just like the API Explorer.
Using the custom entries, I also entered my own app's client ID and client secret (after registering the playground redirect URI), minimizing the differences between what I'm doing in Postman and in the various Google tools. Again, my GET request to the spreadsheet works without issue.
Just to be clear, here's what I've been doing in the Playground:
In Step 1, I've specified the https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly scope to authorize. I click the Authorize APIs button and log in with the user account.
It returns with the authorization code, so I exchange that code for the tokens via a POST to the token endpoint.
I then make a GET request to https://sheets.googleapis.com/v4/spreadsheets/<spreadsheetId> with no additional headers and it works without issue - 200 OK and all the data I'm expecting to see.
Here my approach in Postman:
Make a GET request to:
https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth?access_type=offline&response_type=code&redirect_uri=https://<myDomain>/oauthResp&client_id=<appClientId>&scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly&state=abc123
Receive a response similar to the following in my browser on the redirect (since the domain intentionally 404s).
https:///oauthResp?state=abc123&code=zyx098&scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly
Make a POST request to: https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v4/token with a body of:
client_id=<appClientId>
client_secret=<appClientSecret>
redirect_uri=https://<myDomain>/oauthResp
grant_type=authorization_code
Receive a response similar to:
{
"access_token": "abc123",
"expires_in": 3599,
"refresh_token": "zyx098",
"scope": "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/spreadsheets.readonly",
"token_type": "Bearer"
}
Make a GET request to https://sheets.googleapis.com/v4/spreadsheets/<spreadsheetId> with a 'Content-Type' header of application/json and an 'Authorization' header of Bearer abc123 (per the access token above).
Unlike the API Explorer and the OAuth 2.0 Playground, this yields a 404 - exactly the issue I've been experiencing for no obvious reason.
Further, if I simply take the fresh access token from the Playground and drop that into Postman, I get the same 404.
Any other ideas?
I am trying to build a frontend that for certain functionality needs to communicate with a Jenkins backend. In my frontend I want the user to be able to log in with the Jenkins credentials (username and password, using Kerberos) and have these passed to my Jenkins server, upon which I'd like to retrieve the token that can be used to make further API calls to the Jenkins server without disclosing the password in each request.
I know that to be able to make Jenkins API calls I need to use HTTP Basic auth, and it will accept both user:token and user:password. I want to avoid sending the password in each request though.
I also know that I can find my token by going to the Jenkins webpage, log in with my password, go to my profile page and find the token there. I can then base64 encode that into a functioning HTTP basic authentication header. This works fine.
However, I can't seem to find a decent way to programmatically authenticate using the password, trading the password for the token. The best I've been able to accomplish is to do a GET to said profile page at https://<JENKINS_HOST>/me/configure using the user:password basic auth header and then parse the resulting HTML for the api token, which obviously doesn't feel very robust:
$ curl -v --silent https://<USER:PASS#JENKINS_HOST>/me/configure 2>1
| sed -n 's/.*apiToken" value="\([^"]*\).*/\1/p'
<TOKEN>
What I expected/hoped to find was an API endpoint for authentication which would accept user/password and return the token in JSON format. For most Jenkins pages, the JSON API equivalent is found by simply appending /api/json to the URL, however /me/configure/api/json just throws a 404 at me. Does anyone know if there's such a way? All the docs I've found so far just tells you to go to the /me/configure webpage and look it up manually, which doesn't really make sense for a client wanting to pass along authentication.
Jenkins user API tokens are not exposed via the API.
I would just take the API token once manually from Jenkins and hardcode that (rather than hardcoding your password), since the API token never changes unless you explicitly reset it.
Alternatively, you could authenticate with your username and password and store the resulting value from the Set-Cookie header. Sending the cookie value in subsequent API calls would work as expected.
When I try to call:
https://sonar.mydomain.com/api/resources?resource=com.mydomain.project:MY&metrics=ncloc&format=json
I get
{"err_code":401,"err_msg":"Unauthorized"}
How do I pass my credentials?
According to the newest documentation said: SonarQube now support two way authentication:
User Token
This is the recommended way. Token is sent via the login field of HTTP basic authentication, this way will be more safety, without any password. For more information about how to generate a token, please visit this page User Token. Use curl send request like this:
curl -u THIS_IS_MY_TOKEN: https://sonarqube.com/api/user_tokens/search
# note that the colon after the token is required in curl to set an empty password
HTTP Basic Access
Login and password are sent via the standard HTTP Basic fields:
curl -u MY_LOGIN:MY_PASSWORD https://sonarqube.com/api/user_tokens/search
According to the documentation SonarQube uses basic authentication. Try:
curl -u admin:SuPeRsEcReT "https://sonar.mydomain.com/api/resources?resource=com.mydomain.project:MY&metrics=ncloc&format=json"
Obviously the mechanism for passing these credentials is dependent on how you are invoking the API.
This should also work from the web browser. Try logging into the Webui, your browser will normally cache the credentials.
This happens because authentication data does not include in your api call. This is how I solved it.
1.First install a rest client "Postman" to your browser.
2.Open it and put your API call url under "Normal" tab.
3.Go to "Basic Auth" tab and put username,password then click refresh headers.
4.Come back to "Normal" tab. You'll see a header named "Authorization" in header list.
5.Now click "send" button to view results.
6.If you are using 3rd party application, add "Authorization" header to your call with the value generated by postman.
I'm writing a REST-ish API service the provides the ability to interact with the end user's data in other 3rd party services (themselves REST APIs) via OAuth. A common example might be publishing data from my service to a third-party service such as Facebook or Twitter.
Suppose, for example, I perform an OAuth dance with the end user and Facebook, resulting in some short-term access token that my service can use to interact with the user's Facebook account. If that access token expires and the user attempts to use my service to publish to Facebook, what sort of error do I return to the user?
401 doesn't seem quite right to me; it seems that 401 would apply to the user's auth state with MY service. 403 seems much more appropriate, but also quite generic.
401 is the way to go. Two excerpts from the RFC2616 which defines the HTTP protocol:
Section 10.4.2 (about 401):
If the request already included Authorization credentials, then the 401
response indicates that authorization has been refused for those
credentials.
This seems to be appropriate for expired tokens. There are authentication credentials, but they're refused, so the user agent must re-authenticate.
Section 10.4.4 (about 403):
The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated.
This should be used when the resource can't be accessed despite the user credentials. Could be a website/API that works only on US being hit by a asian IP or a webpage that has been declared harmful and was deactivated (so the content WAS found, but the server is denying serving it).
On OAuth2, the recommended workflow depends on how the token is being passed. If passed by the Authorization header, the server may return a 401. When passed via query string parameter, the most appropriate response is a 400 Bad Request (unfortunately, the most generic one HTTP has). This is defined by section 5.2 of the OAuth2 spec https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-26
There's nothing wrong with being generic, and it sounds like a 403 status would be relevant - there is nothing stopping you from providing a more human readable version that elaborates in a bit more detail why.
I think the following is a comprehensive list if you have some level of ambition when it comes to error responses.
400 Bad Request
For requests that are malformed, for example if a parameter requires an int between 0-9 and 11 has been sent. You can return this, and in the response body specify parameter x requires a value between 0 and 9
401 Unauthorized
Used only for authorization issues. The signature may be wrong, the nonce may have been used before, the timestamp that was sent is not within an acceptable time window, again, use the response body to specify more exactly why you respond with this. For the sake of clarify use this only for OAuth related errors.
403 Forbidden
Expressly to signify that an operation that is well formed, and authorized, is not possible at all (either right now, or ever). Take for example if a resource has been locked for editing by another user: use the response body to say something along the lines of Another person is editing this right now, you'll have to wait mmkay?.
403 Forbidden can also have to do with trying to reach resources. Say for example that a user has access to a resource /resource/101212/properties.json but not to /resource/999/properties.json, then you can simply state: Forbidden due to access rights in the response body.
404 Not Found
The requested resource does not exist. Or the URL simply does not successfully map to an API in your service. Specify in response body.
405 Method Not Allowed
This is to represent that the API can not be called with for example GET but another method must be used. When this is returned also you MUST return the extra response header Allow: POST, PUT, etc.