I am new to learning Documentum and we came across this query being run by the system that we are looking at how to potentially speed up:
SELECT ALL dm_document.r_object_id
FROM dm_document_sp dm_document
WHERE (
dm_document.object_name = :"SYS_B_0"
AND dm_document.r_object_id IN (
SELECT r_object_id
FROM dm_sysobject_r
WHERE i_folder_id = :"SYS_B_1"
)
)
AND (
dm_document.i_has_folder = :"SYS_B_2"
AND dm_document.i_is_deleted = :"SYS_B_3"
)
We looked at adding an index or using a SQL profile. However, the index would be somewhat large and will continue to grow. The SQL profile also would need to be re-examined periodically.
We thought it would be better to look at re-writing the SQL itself. Is there a way to override the system to use custom SQL (i.e. SQL written by the developers) for specific queries that Documentum auto-generates?
Unfortunately there is no way how to alter the default Documentum behavior of translation of DQL into result SQL.
But you can directly execute SQL in your custom applications, jobs, BOFs, components, etc using JDBC. For other than SELECT queries can be also used DQL EXECUTE statement like this:
EXECUTE exec_sql WITH query = 'sql_query'
Another option is to register specific *_s or *_r tables and access them directly in DQL. For example you can register dm_sysobject_s like this:
REGISTER TABLE dm_dbo.dm_sysobject_s ("r_object_id" CHAR(16))
And then you can use it in DQL:
SELECT object_name FROM dm_sysobject_s
And you can also normally join the registered table with Documentum types in DQL, for example:
SELECT object_name FROM dm_sysobject_s s, dmi_queue_item q WHERE s.r_object_id = q.item_id
But keep in mind that this is not recommended approach by Documentum to directly access their internal tables but when you really need to speed up your application then you have to use alternative ways.
Anyway I would recommend to use indexes at first and if it is not suficent then you can continue with steps described above.
Related
Hello for demonstration purposes I trimmed out my actual sql query.
I have a SQL query
SELECT *
FROM dbdev.training.courses
where dbdev is my DEV database table name. When I migrate to TEST env, I want my query to dynamically change to
SELECT *
FROM dbtest.training.courses
I tried using input parameters like {env: p('db_name')} and using in the query as
SELECT * FROM :env.training.courses
or
SELECT * FROM (:env).training.courses
but none of them worked. I don't want my SQL query in properties file.
Can you please suggest a way to write my SQL query dynamically based on environment?
The only alternative way is to deploy separate jars for different environments with different code.
You can set the value of the property to a variable and then use the variable with string interpolation.
Warning: creating dynamic SQL queries using any kind of string manipulation may expose your application to SQL injection security vulnerabilities.
Example:
#['SELECT * FROM $(vars.database default "dbtest").training.courses']
Actually, you can do a completely dynamic or partially dynamic query using the MuleSoft DB connector.
Please see this repo:
https://github.com/TheComputerClassroom/dynamicSQLGETandPATCH
Also, I'm about to post an update that allows joins.
At a high level, this is a "Query Builder" where the code that builds the query is written in DataWeave 2. I'm working on another version that allows joins between entities, too.
If you have questions, feel free to reply.
One way to do it is :
Create a variable before DB Connector:
getTableName - ${env}.training.courses
Write SQL Query :
Select * from $(getTableName);
tl;dr: Hibernate automatically generates SQL table aliases in its queries like jurisdicti4_ or this_. Here's an example query:
SELECT
this_.id AS id2_6_3_,
this_.a_table_column AS a_table_column3_6_3_,
jurisdicti4_.b_table_column AS b_table_column4_6_3_,
FROM
app_table_a this_
LEFT OUTER JOIN jurisdiction jurisdicti4_ ON this_.jurisdiction = jurisdicti4_.name
WHERE
this_.a_table_column = ?
I'm using the Hibernate Criteria API to add some hints that need reference the SQL aliases in the query, so I need to know how to either:
specify the SQL table aliases Hibernate will use in its queries (e.g. tell it to use juris instead of jurisdicti4_ for jurisdiction, or
get hibernate to tell me the exact SQL table alias it will use for a particular table or entity (e.g. be told the alias in the query for jurisdiction will be jurisdicti4_.
Full story:
I've inherited a Java app with an Oracle DB that uses Hibernate 4.3.8 and the Hibernate Criteria API to generate some complicated search queries. It recently ran into a severe SQL performance problem that will require us to start to include hints these queries. However, we use Oracle, and its index hints are in the form of:
/*+ index (TABLE_ALIAS INDEX_NAME) */
I've successfully added the needed hints using Criteria.addHint(...), however I've had to hardcode the Hibernate-generated TABLE_ALIAS in the hint string. I'm concerned that over time, the aliases may change, so I want to either control how they're generated or be able to retrieve their values to use when adding the SQL hint.
Edit: This website describes the Hibernate SQL alias generation process: https://prismoskills.appspot.com/lessons/Hibernate/Chapter_23_-_Hibernate_alias_names.jsp
I've found that I have partial control of the SQL aliases when I programmatically set up the join like this: criteria.createAlias(associationPath, alias). The alias value I pass seems to be used as the first part of the SQL alias for the table. However, Hibernate appends some kind of generated table ID integer to that, so I'd get something like myalias4_ in the generated SQL. Also, this only seems to work in joins I setup myself in the criteria. Hibernate will often add its own based on the mappings, and I'm not sure how get this same level of partial control over those.
The following query was working fine with EF core 2 but EF core 3 would throw error!
I even could add some include after this query in EF core 2 which I let go now.
query:
// just to have an Id
var id = Guid.NewGuid();
var resutl = Context.Parties.FromSqlInterpolated($#"WITH mainOffice AS
(SELECT * FROM Parties as o1 WHERE (Discriminator = N'Office')
AND (Id = '{id}')
UNION ALL SELECT o.* FROM Parties AS o INNER JOIN mainOffice AS m
ON m.Id = o.ParentOfficeId)
SELECT * FROM mainOffice as f").ToList();
The error it produces is as follows:
FromSqlRaw or FromSqlInterpolated was called with non-composable SQL
and with a query composing over it. Consider calling AsEnumerable
after the FromSqlRaw or FromSqlInterpolated method to perform the
composition on the client side.
Knowing the following information might help:
Table "Parties" is a table per hierarchy
I tried to run the query both from the root type DbSet and the type I am interested for
No success with nether FromSqlRaw nor FromSqlInterpolated
Adding 'AsEnumerable' did not help too
Did I forget any thing? What am I doing wrong?
What does 'non-composable SQL' mean? Does it mean EF core is trying to interpret query?
I don't have the answer, but I know the reason now.
The reason this error is being generated is similar to this issue:
FromSql method when used with stored procedure cannot be composed
In my case weather or not I use any method, because the table I am trying to query is containing some different type (Table per hierarchy), my query will always be warped inside a select query to limit discriminators. Even though I write the query from the root, the wrapper select query is generated with all possible discriminators.
So it means I can only run queries that can be placed as sub query. My query can not, store procedures can not ...
I found a workaround for this issue,
You can create a view in database and a query type in your model and then run your query against this view (note that the way you do that has been changed from ef 2 to 3 as it is explained here)
So in this way inheritance and discriminators are not problems any more and query can be run.
Maybe related?
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/what-is-new/ef-core-3.0/breaking-changes#linq-queries-are-no-longer-evaluated-on-the-client
Efcore 2 implicity performed linq to objects on parts of a query that it could not transform to sql. This functionality was removed in efcore 3.
Say I have written a Create Table script in a query window and run it. So the table got created. Now, where is this script file being generated (system table). I mean if I do a
select * from sys.syscomments
I will get the script for stored procedure or function in the "Text" column. Likewise any way of getting the same for table or view?
Any DMV etc...
Thanks in advance
I'm not sure where the script is stored, but if you're looking to be able to view the scripted language to create the table, in SQL2008 R2 (and I'm pretty sure SQL2008) SSMS can generate the script on the fly. Just select your Table (or View, SP, etc...) and right click. From the context menu, choose Script Table as Create To (or whatever other modification you choose from the list). Then you have a choice of output locations-the New Query Editor Window is probably easiest to see your results. From there you have the base language for that table's creation and you can modify or save it from there.
below query is also works for views
select * from sys.syscomments
For getting script of tables , you have to
Right Click on database >> tasks >> Generate Scripts >> choose objects (select tables)
I think that is the possible way of getting table scripts.
For views you can use the column VIEW_DEFINITION in:
SELECT *
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.VIEWS
I don't think there is an equivalent for tables because tables don't require a stored definition because the table itself is the definition. If you need to copy table structures then the best method is probably to use:
SELECT *
INTO NewTable
FROM OldTable
WHERE 0 = 1
You could try generating your own scripts using the system views and creating dynamic SQL, something like this would get you started
This does not create constraints, and there maybe things I've missed, or cause it to break but the general gist is there. You could also do this outside of SQL as demonstrated quite nicely In this Answer.
HOWEVER I should add I do not condone the use of these methods. There are few scenarios I can think of where it would be necessary to programatically copy a tables structure in this fashion. If it is necessary to copy structures as a one off you'd be better off doing this using the generate script functions that are built into SSMS.
is there a way to actually query the database in a such a way to search for a particular value in every table across the whole database ?
Something like a file search in Eclipse, it searches accross the whole worspace and project ?
Sorry about that .. its MS SQL 2005
SQL Workbench/J has a built in tool and command to do that.
It's JDBC based and should also work with SQL Server.
You will need to use the LIKE operator, and search through each field separately. i.e.
SELECT * FROM <table name>
WHERE (<field name1> LIKE '%<search value>%') OR
(<field name2> LIKE '%<search value>%') OR
... etc.
This isn't a quick way though.
I think the best way would be to
1) programatically generate the query and run it
2) use a GUI tool for the SQL server you are using which provides this functionality.
In mysql you can use union operator like
(SELECT * from table A where name = 'abc') UNION (SELECT * from
table B where middlename = 'pqr')
and so on
use full text search for efficency
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/fulltext-search.html
Well, your best bet is to write a procedure to do this. But to give you some pointers you can use the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.Tables to get a list of all the tables in a given database and INFORMATION_SCHEMA.Columns to get a list of all columns. These tables also give you the datatype of columns. So you will need a few loops on these tables to do the magic.
It should be mentioned most RDBMSs nowadays support these schemas.
In phpmyadmin, go to your database, reach the search tab.
Here you will be able to select all of your tables and search through your entire db in one time.