Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
The Blazor server-side template structure is a little confusing to me.
/Data for Model and Controllers?
Does anyone have any opinions or suggestion for structuring/renaming folders for a Blazor server-side app?
New to .NET Core and design patterns so any advice greatly appreciated.
And please, only those that have built with Blazor server-side templates.
I've been wondering the same thing...
You could remove /Data and use /Models /Controllers for starters.
Not sure about /Pages /Shared and how moving them would effect the app.
but could try.
/Models
/Controllers
/Views
/Pages
/Shared
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it possible to publish vb window form application online which can be run like a website?
If yes? Is there a website which I can publish it?
Thank you very much.
No, its not possible to publish it on a website.
You need to convert your code to another language like ASP.net.
The reason why you can't use vb.net desktop appliction on a website is that a webbrowser can't understand the code you have written.
It is not possible. You can't run an executable file to a website. You can create a .ta file (HTML application).
Once you have published your project it will be in .exe. Since your application is not web-based, it is not possible.
However, you could create a Web Application Project (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa983453(v=vs.90).aspx). You can publish the Web application to a local or shared folder, to an FTP site, or to a Web site that you access by using a URL.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building a website from scratch.
It seems desirable to me to have the "canonical" url be "http://example.com" rather than the older-style "http://www.example.com". My rationale is that shorter is easier to type, especially on mobile.
However, I see some large sites that do not do this. For instance, if you navigate to "http://zillow.com", you will be redirected to "www.zillow.com".
What is the reason for this?
Does lopping off the www come back to bite you when you go to register an SSL cert? (wildcard vs. single subdomain?)
Is it for compatibility with older browsers/devices/libraries/plugins?
More importantly, is lopping off the www kosher with regards to web standards?
As far as I can tell from this website, it makes no difference which way you format your URL. It's simply a matter of preference. Many websites will redirect from example.com or example.com/index.html to the www.example.com version. There isn't a general standard, although many websites will use a shorter URL and redirects for a more user-friendly feel.
Hope this helps!
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
modules.zendframework.com is the "App Store" / "Market Place" for Zend Framework 2 and provides already more than 200 modules to download. I thought, everything I need to publish my module there is a GitHub account. But now I cannot find out, how to "upload"/"share" my module there.
At this moment only modules published in GitHub are supported
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I am facing an unique issue (possibly) on my Local Mediawiki. It's been installed on Windows XP (XAMPP server, Mediawiki 1.19.1). I have installed this as a - private wiki and added few stable extensions (like Cite, TitleKey etc.).
The problem is this wiki shows properly in my pc (localhost server) using the default vector skin but other cant view it properly. The page style/format is not appearing at all. I have tried to use monobook skin but that didnt help. Neither I am using short URL (as mentioned in the attached link) nor I have done much changes in LocalSettings.php. I am attaching a snap for more clarity. Any help would be much appreciated.
Stackoverflow answers
Image Snapshot
It worked after I changed the $wgServer in LocalSettings.php from localhost to machine Static IP. Possibly the domain name was misconfigured [as suggested by #Tgr]
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I've looked all over and can't really find much of anything. I need three basic things:
Good API reference
Some sort of a tutorial
Good architectural overview
I have the module source code and am going through it - but I really don't have much of any context for most of the things its doing.
Any suggestions?
Here is the list of links about apache module development that I found useful:
Apache Tutor
Apache Modules Development and Debugging
libapr(apache portable runtime) programming tutorial
The Apache Modules Book: Application Development with Apache
Mailing list archives
Apache at WebÞing
Writing portable C code with APR
Apache Modeling Project
You can also download the apache source code and experiment with mod_example.