Spring Data JPA does not persist the oneToMany list - sql

I am creating a new project and using Spring Data JPA to create some REST endpoints.
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>2.1.6.RELEASE</version>
<relativePath/> <!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>
I am able to put and persist to my primary class (customer), which works as long as the json file does not have any oneToMany data. However, when posting to customer, if there is oneToMany data I am getting errors.
The errors relate to the foreign key being null when trying to persist. I am not sure how Spring Data JPA should be using the annotation to let hibernate know what the value of the foreign key should be.
I have looked at numerous bi-directional OneToMany examples, as well as examples for creating foreign keys and have tried a number of modifications without success.
I also tried to use the spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=update to help create and update the database schema without any luck.
The customer
#Entity
#Table(name="customer")
#EntityListeners(AuditingEntityListener.class)
public class Customer extends Auditable<String> {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name="id")
private int id;
#Column(name="first_name")
private String firstName;
#Column(name="last_name")
private String lastName;
#OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy="customer", cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
private List<EmailAddress> emailAddresses;
.......
The emails
#Table(name="email_address")
#EntityListeners(AuditingEntityListener.class)
public class EmailAddress extends Auditable<String> {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Column(name="id")
private int id;
#Column(name="email_type")
private byte emailType;
#Column(name="email")
private String email;
#ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
#JoinColumn(name="customer_id")
#JsonIgnore
private Customer customer;
.....
The postman json test
{
"id": 1,
"firstName": "Bobby",
"lastName": "Smith",
"emailAddresses": [
{
"id": 1,
"emailType": 1,
"email": "bobby#bobby.com",
},
{
"id": 2,
"emailType": 1,
"email": "bobby#gmail.com",
}
]
}
BTW, I have confirmed that within the customer controller, that the emails are included in the request body of customer.
The customer controller
#PutMapping("/customers")
public Customer updateCustomer(#RequestBody Customer theCustomer) {
System.out.println("****email count "+theCustomer.getEmailAddresses().size());
for(EmailAddress index: theCustomer.getEmailAddresses()) {
System.out.println(index.toString());
}
customerService.save(theCustomer);
return theCustomer;
}
The customer service
#Override
public void save(Customer theCustomer) {
//Validate the input
if(theCustomer == null) {
throw new CustomerNotFoundException("Did not find the Customer, was null...");
}
customerRepository.save(theCustomer);
}
MySQL Script
--
-- Table structure for table `customer`
--
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `customer`;
CREATE TABLE `customer` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`first_name` varchar(24) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
`last_name` varchar(24) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=6 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin COMMENT='Primary Customer Table';
--
-- Table structure for table `email_address`
--
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `email_address`;
CREATE TABLE `email_address` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`email_type` tinyint(4) unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'email type',
`email` varchar(128) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL COMMENT 'email address',
`customer_id` int(11) NOT NULL COMMENT 'foreign key',
INDEX par_ind (customer_id),
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `email` (`email`),
KEY FK_EMAIL_CUSTOMER_idx (customer_id),
CONSTRAINT FK_EMAIL_CUSTOMER FOREIGN KEY (customer_id) REFERENCES customer (id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=9 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin COMMENT='email addresses';
Postman Complaint
{
"status": 400,
"message": "could not execute statement; SQL [n/a]; constraint [null]; nested exception is org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException: could not execute statement",
"timeStamp": 1566840491483
}
Console Complaint
****email count 2
EmailAddress [id=1, type=1, email=bobby#bobby.com]
EmailAddress [id=2, type=1, email=bobby#gmail.com]
2019-08-28 17:33:07.625 WARN 8669 --- [nio-8080-exec-2] o.h.engine.jdbc.spi.SqlExceptionHelper : SQL Error: 1048, SQLState: 23000
2019-08-28 17:33:07.626 ERROR 8669 --- [nio-8080-exec-2] o.h.engine.jdbc.spi.SqlExceptionHelper : Column 'customer_id' cannot be null
2019-08-28 17:33:07.629 ERROR 8669 --- [nio-8080-exec-2] o.h.i.ExceptionMapperStandardImpl : HHH000346: Error during managed flush [org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException: could not execute statement]
2019-08-28 17:33:07.735 WARN 8669 --- [nio-8080-exec-2] .m.m.a.ExceptionHandlerExceptionResolver : Resolved [org.springframework.dao.DataIntegrityViolationException: could not execute statement; SQL [n/a]; constraint [null]; nested exception is org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException: could not execute statement]
Therefore, with a post or put, I am not sure why the Spring Data JPA save does not satisfy the foreign key constraint for entities with oneToMany relationships. I am guessing it is either some missing annotations or something wrong with my sql script. Not sure why the update data does not persist to the email_address table. Does the emailAddress entity require some type of getter/setter for customer_id?

public class Customer extends Auditable<String> {
#OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy="customer", cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
private List<EmailAddress> emailAddresses;
}
public class EmailAddress extends Auditable<String> {
#ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
#JoinColumn(name="customer_id")
private Customer customer;
}
The mappedBy here means that the relationship between Customer and EmailAddress (i.e. the value of customer_id in customer table ) are determined by EmailAdress#cutomer but not Customer#emailAdresses.
What you are trying to show it just the content of Customer#emailAddress which will be ignored by Hibernate when deciding which DB values to be updated/inserted for this relationship. So you have to make sure EmailAddress#customer are set correctly.
For example , you can have the following method to add an email address to a Customer
public class Customer {
#OneToMany(fetch=FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy="customer", cascade={CascadeType.ALL})
private List<EmailAddress> emailAddresses;
public void addEmailAddress(EmailAddress email){
//As said Hibernate will ignore it when persist this relationship.
//Add it mainly for the consistency of this relationship for both side in the Java instance
this.emailAddresses.add(email);
email.setCustomer(this);
}
}
And always call addEmailAddress() to add an email for a customer. You can apply the same idea for updating an email address for a customer.

Related

How can we assign a field of user table say id that is primary key, to another table as a primary key? using hibernate

See I dont want any mapping but what I want is just a simple thing that is....
I have two Entity
Tasks(taskid,taskname.....,userId)
User_Credentials(userId,password)
So What I want is userId of User Credentials used as a foreign key in Task table.
So when I fire an api to save the task I have to also pass the all details of user Credentials That I dont want.
{
"taskName": "Test",
"taskStatus": "Open",
"taskDueDate": "2022-04-15",
"taskCreatedDate": "2022-04-10",
"taskDescription": "Demo",
"taskPriority": "High",
"isTaskActive": "Yes",
"userCredentials":{
"associateId":"108",
"password":"something#9122"
}
}
What I want is
{
"taskName": "Test",
"taskStatus": "Open",
"taskDueDate": "2022-04-15",
"taskCreatedDate": "2022-04-10",
"taskDescription": "Demo",
"taskPriority": "High",
"isTaskActive": "Yes",
"userCredentials":"108"
}
That I want to post and if userCredentials id 108 is not in User Credentials Table so it pop up an error and if it is there it will save just like a foreign key concept.
So please tell me ho to do that.
You can use ElementCollection to achieve this.
In Tasks entity
#Id
#Column(name = "task_id")
private Integer id;
#ElementCollection
#CollectionTable(name = "task_user", joinColumns = #JoinColumn(name = "task_id", nullable = false))
#Column(name = "user_id", nullable = false)
private List<Integer> userCredentials;
In UserCredentials entity
#Id
#Column(name = "user_id")
private Integer id;
UserCredentials is an independent entity with no mapping with Tasks. You will now be able to pass UserCredentials like this userCredentials: [108] in the Tasks.
Add the following in your application.yml to generate the create.sql script with ddl commands for all the entities. ddl-auto: validate will restrict hibernate from creating the tables on its own.
spring:
jpa:
hibernate:
ddl-auto: validate
properties:
javax:
persistence:
schema-generation:
create-source: metadata
scripts:
action: create
create-target: create.sql
generate-ddl: true
The following is the ddl command to add foreign key constraints for tables user_credentials and tasks. Execute it alongwith the create.sql in any DB client.
CREATE TABLE "task_user"
( "user_id" integer ,
"task_id" integer,
PRIMARY KEY ("user_id","task_id"),
CONSTRAINT user_id_fkey
FOREIGN KEY ("user_id") REFERENCES "user_credentials" ("user_id"),
CONSTRAINT task_id_fkey
FOREIGN KEY ("task_id") REFERENCES "tasks" ("task_id")
);
Note: The create.sql already has a task_user create command but it needs to be replaced with the above command.

The command dal:create:schema does not create foreign keys

Given the following example for an Entity-Definition, there is a foreign key defined. As a developer and database engineer i would expect that the command dal:create:schema would also create the expected foreign keys. But this is not the case.
return new FieldCollection([
(new IdField('id', 'id'))->addFlags(new PrimaryKey(), new Required()),
(new LongTextField('comment', 'name'))->addFlags(new Required()),
(new FkField('order_id', 'orderId', OrderDefinition::class))->addFlags(new Required()),
new OneToOneAssociationField('order', 'order_id', 'id', OrderDefinition::class, false),
new CreatedAtField(),
new UpdatedAtField()
]);
Instead this is the result:
CREATE TABLE `order_refund` (
`id` BINARY(16) NOT NULL,
`comment` LONGTEXT NOT NULL,
`order_id` BINARY(16) NOT NULL,
`created_at` DATETIME(3) NOT NULL,
`updated_at` DATETIME(3) NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_unicode_ci;
However, it seems like that ManyToOneAssociations will add foreign keys. Is there something missing in the entity definition?
The command you mentioned is using the SchemaGenerator which has a method to generate Foreign keys:
\Shopware\Core\Framework\DataAbstractionLayer\SchemaGenerator::generateForeignKeys
Looking at this method it seems to work only fields of the type ManyToOneAssociationField
private function generateForeignKeys(EntityDefinition $definition): string
{
$fields = $definition->getFields()->filter(
function (Field $field) {
if (!$field instanceof ManyToOneAssociationField) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
);
I also think it is a shortcoming of this function that it does not generate foreign keys for fields of the type OneToOneAssociationField. Maybe you can try to adjust this filtering and see if it works and make a pull request on GitHub for the benefit of yourself and other developers?

JPA/Hibernate not using all fields in composite primary key

I have a many-to-one relationship as below (I have removed columns that do not contribute to this discussion):
#Entity
#SecondaryTable(name = "RecordValue", pkJoinColumns = {
#PrimaryKeyJoinColumn(name = "RECORD_ID", referencedColumnName = "RECORD_ID") })
Class Record {
#Id
#Column(name = "RECORD_ID")
long recordId;
#OneToMany(mappedBy="key")
Set<RecordValue> values;
}
#Entity
class RecordValue {
#EmbeddedId
RecordValuePK pk;
#Column
long value;
#ManyToOne
#MapsId("recordId")
private Record key;
}
#Embeddable
class RecordValuePK {
#Column(name = "RECORD_ID")
#JoinColumn(referencedColumnName = "RECORD_ID", foreignKey = #ForeignKey(name = "FK_RECORD"))
long recordId;
#Column(name = "COLLECTION_DATE")
LocalDate collectionDate;
}
When hibernate creates tables, the RecordValue table has primary key consisting of only RECORD_ID and NOT COLLECTION_DATE.
What could be the problem?
Hibernate debug log shows the following:
DEBUG - Forcing column [collection_date] to be non-null as it is part of the primary key for table [recordvalue]
DEBUG - Forcing column [key_record_id] to be non-null as it is part of the primary key for table [recordvalue]
DEBUG - Forcing column [record_id] to be non-null as it is part of the primary key for table [recordvalue]
.
.
Hibernate:
create table Record (
RECORD_ID bigint not null,
primary key (RECORD_ID)
)
Hibernate:
create table RecordValue (
COLLECTION_DATE date not null,
VALUE bigint not null,
key_RECORD_ID bigint not null,
RECORD_ID bigint not null,
primary key (RECORD_ID)
)
Removing the #SecondaryTable specification has resolved this issue. The #SecondaryTable specification was forcing both tables to have the same the primary key. The found this solution after reading this blog:
https://antoniogoncalves.org/2008/05/20/primary-and-secondary-table-with-jpa.

Hibernate sets map-key to null during 'update'

Imagine you have
#EqualsAndHashcode(of = "id")
class AnAggregate {
private int id;
private Map<String, AValueObject> childrenByValueA;
void replaceChild(AValueObject childToReplace) {
childrenByValueA.put(childToReplace.getValueA(), childToReplace);
}
}
AValueObject should be a VO, but because of the nature of relational DB, it has a dummy ID:
#EqualsAndHashcode(exclude = "aDummyID")
class AValueObject {
private int aDummyID;
private String valueA;
private String valueB;
}
now, take a look at the part of xml mapping for AnAggregate class:
<map name="childrenByValueA" fetch="select" batch-size="666">
<key column="aggregate_id"/>
<map-key type="string" column="value_a"/>
<one-to-many class="AValueObject"/>
</map>
Now, when I create tables as follows:
create table an_aggregate (
aggregate_id bigint,
primary key (metric_id)
);
crate table a_value_object (
vo_id bigint,
aggregate_id bigint,
value_a varchar(255),
value_b varchar(255),
primary_key (vo_id);
);
alter table a_value_object add constraint a_fk foreign key (aggregate_id) references an_aggregate;
everything seems to work.
But if I declare:
value_a varchar(255) **not null**
then I have an integrity violation during the update operation.
Let's assume we have anAggregate - (1)
and aValueObject (1, 1, value_a, value_b)
and we want to replace that row with (_, 1, modified_value_a, modified_value_b)
It turns out, that hibernate tries to do stuff in the following order:
insert into a_value_object values (2, 1, modified_value_a,
modified_value_b)
update a_value_object set aggregate_id=null, value_a=null, where aggregate_id=1 and vo_id=1
delete from a_value_object where vo_id=1
and fail during the second step, because it violates the 'not null' constraint on 'value_a'.
Question(s):
How to overcome this? Why is hibernate executing stuff in such a strange order? Why does it try to null-out fields it shouldn't?

creating extension not working: Table does not exist

I'm new in typo3 CMS and I'm now creating a new extension but I always get the following error when I try to execute query from repository.
1247602160: Table 'hr.tx_hr_domain_model_job' doesn't exist
this is my controller
<?php
namespace Hr\Hr\Controller;
class HrController extends \TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Mvc\Controller\ActionController
{
protected $jobsRepository;
protected $objectManager;
public function initializeAction()
{
parent::initializeAction();
$this->objectManager = \TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility::makeInstance('TYPO3\\CMS\\Extbase\\Object\\ObjectManager');
$this->jobsRepository = $this->objectManager->get('Hr\\Hr\\Domain\\Repository\\JobRepository');
}
/**
* jobs list
*
* #return void
*/
public function listAction()
{
$this->view->assign('jobs', $this->jobsRepository->findAll());
}
}
and this is job repository class
<?php
namespace Hr\Hr\Domain\Repository;
class JobRepository extends \TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Persistence\Repository
{
}
this is the content of ext_tables.sql file
#
# Table structure for table 'tx_hr_job'
#
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `tx_hr_job` (
`JobId` int(10) NOT NULL,
`Kunde` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Titel` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Ort` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Volltext` text NOT NULL,
`Bundesland` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Region` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Branche` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Berufsgruppe` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Stellenart` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
`Datum` date NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`JobId`)
);
any help?
By convention the table name should be tx_hr_domain_model_job, alternatively you can use table mapping, but it could be tricky.
Use the extension_builder for kickstarting your ext - it's great tool for creating basic models, you can do it just with drag'n'drop - also relations, etc.
What's more important it will create all required pieces of code, models, repositories TCA configs etc so you'll see what's the most valid approach.