I already implemented a new pseudo instruction to X86 isa in order to improve sha256 algorithm running time.
now I want to set a delay time for this new pseudo instruction but I don't know how to do it.
I already tried using speed function in implementing pseudo function in pseudo_inst.cc, but it is not working and number of ticks remains the same!
I actually run the execFile generated from compiling c file by command below:
~/gem5$ ./build/X86/gem5.opt cofigs/sample/Simple.py -c /home/myname/execFile
Related
While looking for how to do Simpoint analysis I found out that you need to run the following command for generating basic block vectors as the first step
% build/ARM/gem5.opt configs/example/se.py --simpoint-profile --simpoint-interval 10000000 --cpu-type=AtomicSimpleCPU --fastmem
but in the latest version of gem5, I see that the fastmem and its related code has been removed. Could someone tell me the significance of fastmem and would it matter if we generated the bbv without --fastmem?
I am attached to a running proces using dbx on AIX. There is a bug in the program, the offset in the opcode below is 0x9b8, but should be 0xbe8:
(dbx) listi 0x100001b14
0x100001b14 (..........+0x34) e88109b8 ld r4,0x9b8(r1)
I am able to fix that using the command below:
(dbx) assign 0x100001b14 = 0xe8810be8
but that affects only the running process and its memory. How can I change the on disk binary? I am not able to locate the pattern e88109b8 in the binary file,
otherwise I would use e.g. dd utility to patch it.
Best regards,
Pavel Filipensky
I want to execute one shell command (gcore $pid) at the end of pin tool.
In order to complete this goal, I try to modify the itrace pin tool and do one simple shell command first. I add one statement system("ls > /tmp/test") at the starting of Fini function. Then compile the pin tool again.
Run the pin tool - itrace:
../../../pin -t obj-intel64/itrace.so -- /bin/ls
But there does not exist file - "/tmp/test".
the libc function system() is not yet implemented in PinCRT.
Please use popen() (which is implemented) instead.
source.
THIS WORKED (see comment in the code)
I am new to MPI and still learning it. I am actually trying to write a code in Fortran to read data from same set of files (already generated) on each processor at same time and perform different computations in different processors. For which I decided to use,
program...
use mpi
implicit none
.
.
.
call mpi_file_open(mpi_comm_world,filename_i,mpi_mode_rdonly,mpi_info_null,i,ierr)
to start with the program. Now, each processor calls a subroutine in which I am trying to use normal fortran command to open files, open(i,*)...(since I don't use mpi in subroutine).
First, I am not confident about this idea itself. Next, it gives this error,
_open(mpi_comm_world,filename_i,mpi_mode_rdonly,mpi_status_ignore,i,ierr) (1)
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'mpi_file_open'
at (1)
Please give your suggestions and comments.
The thing I am trying to do is very long because of subroutine, I would just include a prototype code, if this is solved, my problem will be solved. The code below gives the same error as said before. Please give your suggestions. Thanks.
program hello
use mpi
integer::ierr,num_procs,my_id,i,j,no
call MPI_INIT(ierr)
call MPI_COMM_RANK (MPI_COMM_WORLD,my_id,ierr)
call MPI_COMM_SIZE (MPI_COMM_WORLD,num_size,ierr)
open(4,file='hella') !CHANGING THIS LINE
do i=1,num_size
if(i-1 .eq. my_id)print*,"In",my_id
if(i-1 .eq. my_id)then
read(4,*)no
print*,no
endif
enddo
call mpi_finalize(ierr)
end program hello
I have a program which performs a useful task. Now I want to produce the plain-text source code when the compiled executable runs, in addition to performing the original task. This is not a quine, but is probably related.
This capability would be useful in general, but my specific program is written in Fortran 90 and uses Mako Templates. When compiled it has access to the original source code files, but I want to be able to ensure that the source exists when a user runs the executable.
Is this possible to accomplish?
Here is an example of a simple Fortran 90 which does a simple task.
program exampl
implicit none
write(*,*) 'this is my useful output'
end program exampl
Can this program be modified such that it performs the same task (outputs a string when compiled) and outputs a Fortran 90 text file containing the source?
Thanks in advance
It's been so long since I have touched Fortran (and I've never dealt with Fortran 90) that I'm not certain but I see a basic approach that should work so long as the language supports string literals in the code.
Include your entire program inside itself in a block of literals. Obviously you can't include the literals within this, instead you need some sort of token that tells your program to include the block of literals.
Obviously this means you have two copies of the source, one inside the other. As this is ugly I wouldn't do it that way, but rather store your source with the include_me token in it and run it through a program that builds the nested files before you compile it. Note that this program will share a decent amount of code with the routine that recreates the code from the block of literals. If you're going to go this route I would also make the program spit out the source for this program so whoever is trying to modify the files doesn't need to deal with the two copies.
My original program (see question) is edited: add an include statement
Call this file "exampl.f90"
program exampl
implicit none
write(*,*) "this is my useful output"
open(unit=2,file="exampl_out.f90")
include "exampl_source.f90"
close(2)
end program exampl
Then another program (written in Python in this case) reads that source
import os
f=open('exampl.f90') # read in exampl.f90
g=open('exampl_source.f90','w') # and replace each line with write(*,*) 'line'
for line in f:
#print 'write(2,*) \''+line.rstrip()+'\'\n',
g.write('write(2,*) \''+line.rstrip()+'\'\n')
f.close
g.close
# then complie exampl.f90 (which includes exampl_source.f90)
os.system('gfortran exampl.f90')
os.system('/bin/rm exampl_source.f90')
Running this python script produces an executable. When the executable is run, it performs the original task AND prints the source code.