I'm trying to check if a multi-line string exists in a file using common bash commands (grep, awk, ...).
I want to have a file with a few lines, plain lines, not patterns, that should exists in another file and create a command (sequence) that checks if it does. If grep could accept arbitrary multiline patterns, I'd do it with something similar to
grep "`cat contentfile`" targetfile
As with grep I'd like to be able to check the exit code from the command. I'm not really interested in the output. Actually no output would be preferred since then I don't have to pipe to /dev/null.
I've searched for hints, but can't come up with a search that gives any good hits. There's How can I search for a multiline pattern in a file?, but that is about pattern matching.
I've found pcre2grep, but need to use "standard" *nix tools.
Example:
contentfile:
line 3
line 4
line 5
targetfile:
line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
line 6
This should match and return 0 since the sequence of lines in the content file is found (in the exact same order) in the target file.
EDIT: Sorry for not being clear about the "pattern" vs. "string" comparison and the "output" vs. "exit code" in the previous versions of this question.
You didn't say if you wanted a regexp match or string match and we can't tell since you named your search file "patternfile" and a "pattern" could mean anything and at one point you imply you want to do a string match (check if a multi-line _string_ exists) but then you're using grep and pcregpre with no stated args for string rather than regexp matches.
In any case, these will do whatever it is you want using any awk (which includes POSIX standard awk and you said you wanted to use standard UNIX tools) in any shell on every UNIX box:
For a regexp match:
$ cat tst.awk
NR==FNR { pat = pat $0 ORS; next }
{ tgt = tgt $0 ORS }
END {
while ( match(tgt,pat) ) {
printf "%s", substr(tgt,RSTART,RLENGTH)
tgt = substr(tgt,RSTART+RLENGTH)
}
}
$ awk -f tst.awk patternfile targetfile
line 3
line 4
line 5
For a string match:
$ cat tst.awk
NR==FNR { pat = pat $0 ORS; next }
{ tgt = tgt $0 ORS }
END {
lgth = length(pat)
while ( beg = index(tgt,pat) ) {
printf "%s", substr(tgt,beg,lgth)
tgt = substr(tgt,beg+lgth)
}
}
$ awk -f tst.awk patternfile targetfile
line 3
line 4
line 5
Having said that, with GNU awk you could do the following if you're OK with a regexp match and backslash interpretation of the patternfile contents (so \t is treated as a literal tab):
$ awk -v RS="$(cat patternfile)" 'RT!=""{print RT}' targetfile
line 3
line 4
line 5
or with GNU grep:
$ grep -zo "$(cat patternfile)" targetfile | tr '\0' '\n'
line 3
line 4
line 5
There are many other options depending on what kind of match you're really trying to do and which tools versions you have available.
EDIT: Since OP needs outcome of command in form of true or false(yes or no), so edited command in that manner now(created and tested in GNU awk).
awk -v message="yes" 'FNR==NR{a[$0];next} ($0 in a){if((FNR-1)==prev){b[++k]=$0} else {delete b;k=""}} {prev=FNR}; END{if(length(b)>0){print message}}' patternfile targetfile
Could you please try following, tested with given samples and it should print all continuous lines from pattern file if they are coming in same order in target file(count should be at least 2 for continuous lines in this code).
awk '
FNR==NR{
a[$0]
next
}
($0 in a){
if((FNR-1)==prev){
b[++k]=$0
}
else{
delete b
k=""
}
}
{
prev=FNR
}
END{
for(j=1;j<=k;j++){
print b[j]
}
}' patternfile targetfile
Explanation: Adding explanation for above code here.
awk ' ##Starting awk program here.
FNR==NR{ ##FNR==NR will be TRUE when first Input_file is being read.
a[$0] ##Creating an array a with index $0.
next ##next will skip all further statements from here.
}
($0 in a){ ##Statements from here will will be executed when 2nd Input_file is being read, checking if current line is present in array a.
if((FNR-1)==prev){ ##Checking condition if prev variable is equal to FNR-1 value then do following.
b[++k]=$0 ##Creating an array named b whose index is variable k whose value is increment by 1 each time it comes here.
}
else{ ##Mentioning else condition here.
delete b ##Deleting array b here.
k="" ##Nullifying k here.
}
}
{
prev=FNR ##Setting prev value as FNR value here.
}
END{ ##Starting END section of this awk program here.
for(j=1;j<=k;j++){ ##Starting a for loop here.
print b[j] ##Printing value of array b whose index is variable j here.
}
}' patternfile targetfile ##mentioning Input_file names here.
another solution in awk:
echo $(awk 'FNR==NR{ a[$0]; next}{ x=($0 in a)?x+1:0 }x==length(a){ print "OK" }' patternfile targetfile )
This returns "OK" if there is a match.
a one-liner:
$ if [ $(diff --left-column -y patternfile targetfile | grep '(' -A1 -B1 | tail -n +2 | head -n -1 | wc -l) == $(cat patternfile | wc -l) ]; then echo "ok"; else echo "error"; fi
explanation:
first is to compare the two files using diff:
diff --left-column -y patternfile targetfile
> line 1
> line 2
line 3 (
line 4 (
line 5 (
> line 6
then filter to show only interesting lines, which are the lines the '(', plus extra 1-line before, and after match, to check if lines in patternfile match without a break.
diff --left-column -y patternfile targetfile | grep '(' -A1 -B1
> line 2
line 3 (
line 4 (
line 5 (
> line 6
Then leave out the first, and last line:
diff --left-column -y patternfile targetfile | grep '(' -A1 -B1 | tail -n +2 | head -n -1
line 3 (
line 4 (
line 5 (
add some code to check if the number of lines match the number of lines in the patternfile:
if [ $(diff --left-column -y patternfile targetfile | grep '(' -A1 -B1 | tail -n +2 | head -n -1 | grep '(' | wc -l) == $(cat patternfile | wc -l) ]; then echo "ok"; else echo "error"; fi
ok
to use this with a return-code, a script could be created like this:
#!/bin/bash
patternfile=$1
targetfile=$2
if [ $(diff --left-column -y $patternfile $targetfile | grep '(' -A1 -B1 | tail -n +2 | head -n -1 | grep '(' | wc -l) == $(cat $patternfile | wc -l) ];
then
exit 0;
else
exit 1;
fi
The test (when above script is named comparepatterns):
$ comparepatterns patternfile targgetfile
echo $?
0
The easiest way to do this is to use a sliding window. First you read the pattern file, followed by file to search.
(FNR==NR) { a[FNR]=$0; n=FNR; next }
{ b[FNR]=$0 }
(FNR >= n) { for(i=1; i<=n;++i) if (a[i] != b[FNR-n+i]) { delete b[FNR-n+1]; next}}
{ print "match at", FNR-n+1}
{ r=1}
END{ exit !r}
which you call as
awk -f script.awk patternFile searchFile
Following up on a comment from Cyrus, who pointed to How to know if a text file is a subset of another, the following Python one-liner does the trick
python -c "content=open('content').read(); target=open('target').read(); exit(0 if content in target else 1);"
Unless you're talking about 10 GB+, here's an awk-based solution that's fast and clean :
mawk '{ exit NF==NR }' RS='^$' FS="${multiline_pattern}"
The pattern exists only in the file "${m2p}"
which is embedded within multi-file pipeline of 1st test,
but not 2nd one
This solution, for now, doesn't auto handle instances where regex meta-character escaping is needed. Alter it as you see fit.
Unless the pattern occurs far too often, it might even save time to do it all at once instead of having to check line-by-line, including saving lines along the way in some temp pattern space.
NR is always 1 there since RS is forced to the tail end of the input. NF is larger than 1 only when the pattern is found. By evaluating exit NF == NR, it inverts the match, thus matching structure of posix exit codes.
% echo; ( time ( \
\
echo "\n\n multi-line-pattern :: \n\n " \
"-------------\n${multiline_pattern}\n" \
" -----------\n\n " \
"$( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" "${m2p}" \
"${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}" | pvE0 \
\
| mawk2 '{ exit NF == NR
}' RS = '^$' \
FS = "${multiline_pattern}" \
\
) exit code : ${?} " ) ) | ecp
in0: 3.10GiB 0:00:01 [2.89GiB/s] [2.89GiB/s] [ <=> ]
( echo ; ) 0.77s user 1.74s system 110% cpu 2.281 total
multi-line-pattern ::
-------------
77138=1159=M
77138=1196=M
77138=1251=M
77138=1252=M
77138=4951=M
77138=16740=M
77138=71501=M
-----------
exit code : 0
% echo; ( time ( \
\
echo "\n\n multi-line-pattern :: \n\n " \
"-------------\n${multiline_pattern}\n" \
" -----------\n\n " \
"$( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" \
"${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}" | pvE0 \
\
| mawk2 '{ exit NF == NR
}' RS = '^$' \
FS = "${multiline_pattern}" \
\
) exit code : ${?} " ) ) | ecp
in0: 2.95GiB 0:00:01 [2.92GiB/s] [2.92GiB/s] [ <=> ]
( echo ; ) 0.64s user 1.65s system 110% cpu 2.074 total
multi-line-pattern ::
-------------
77138=1159=M
77138=1196=M
77138=1251=M
77138=1252=M
77138=4951=M
77138=16740=M
77138=71501=M
-----------
exit code : 1
If your pattern is the full file, then something like this - even when using the full file as a single gigantic 153 MB pattern, it finished in less than 2.4 secs against ~3 GB input.
echo
( time ( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" "${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}" | pvE0 \
\
| mawk2 -v pattern_file="${m2p}" '
BEGIN {
RS = "^$"
getline FS < pattern_file
close(pattern_file)
} END {
exit NF == NR }' ; echo "\n\n exit code :: $?\n\n" ))|ecp;
du -csh "${m2p}" ;
( time ( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" \
"${m2p}" "${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}" | pvE0 \
\
| mawk2 -v pattern_file="${m2p}" '
BEGIN {
RS = "^$"
getline FS < pattern_file
close(pattern_file)
} END {
exit NF == NR }' ; echo "\n\n exit code :: $?\n\n" ))|ecp;
in0: 2.95GiB 0:00:01 [2.58GiB/s] [2.58GiB/s] [ <=> ]
( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" "${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}" | pvE 0.)
0.82s user 1.71s system 111% cpu 2.260 total
exit code :: 1
153M /Users/************/m2map_main.txt
153M total
in0: 3.10GiB 0:00:01 [2.56GiB/s] [2.56GiB/s] [ <=> ]
( nice gcat "${m2m}" "${m3m}" "${m3l}" "${m2p}" "${m3r}" "${m3supp}" "${m3t}")
0.83s user 1.79s system 112% cpu 2.339 total
exit code :: 0
Found a portable solution using patch command. The idea is to create a diff/patch in remove direction and check if it could be applied to the source file. Sadly there is no option for a dry-run (in my old patch version). So we've to do the patch and remove the temporary files.
The shell part around is optimized for my ksh usage:
file_in_file() {
typeset -r vtmp=/tmp/${0%.sh}.$$.tmp
typeset -r vbasefile=$1
typeset -r vcheckfile=$2
typeset -ir vlines=$(wc -l < "$vcheckfile")
{ echo "1,${vlines}d0"; sed 's/^/< /' "$vcheckfile"; } |
patch -fns -F0 -o "$vtmp" "$vbasefile" >/dev/null 2>&1
typeset -ir vrc=$?
rm -f "$vtmp"*
return $vrc
}
Explanation:
set variables for local usage (on newer bash you should use declare instead)
count lines of input file
create a patch/diff file in-memory (the line with the curly brackets)
use patch with strict settings patch -F0
cleanup (also eventually created reject files: rm -f "$vtmp"*)
return RC of patch
Related
EDIT
As my original question wasn't clear. Here is a better version:
When executing the following from bash on a xterm-256color terminal:
(echo -ne "[0/3] one<RS>"; sleep 2; echo -ne "[1/3] two<RS>"; sleep 2; echo -ne "[2/3] three<RS>"; sleep 2; echo -en "[3/3] The end.") | gawk 'BEGIN { RS="<RS>"; ORS="" } /\[/ { printf("X%sY\n", $0); fflush(); next }'
using a multi-character RS value "<RS>" then this does was I expect: each line, ending with <RS>, is printed immediately. Most notably the [0/3] one is printed immediately, and also between [2/3] three and [3/3] The end. there is a delay. Everything is printed one line at a time, precisely as it was generated by the bash script: immediately being flushed.
However, when putting a [ (square bracket open) in the RS sequence, each output line gets delayed until the next record was received. For example:
(echo -ne "[0/3] one<R[S>"; sleep 2; echo -ne "[1/3] two<R[S>"; sleep 2; echo -ne "[2/3] three<R[S>"; sleep 2; echo -en "[3/3] The end.") | gawk 'BEGIN { RS="<R[[]S>"; ORS="" } /\[/ { printf("X%sY\n", $0); fflush(); next }'
I tried using \0133 instead of [[], but that doesn't seem to work.
OLD POST:
When executing the following from bash on a xterm-256color terminal:
(echo -ne "\r[0/2] hello\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -ne "\r[1/2] world\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -en "\r[2/2] The end.\n") | gawk 'BEGIN { RS="\033[[]K"; ORS="" } /^\r\[/ { printf("X%sY", $0); fflush(stdout); next }'
I see:
...2 second delay...
[0/2] helloY
...2 second delay...
[2/2] The end.
Y
All on one line. The X[1/2] worldY is also written, but immediately overwritten by the [2/2] The end.
Apparently, upon receiving the first string, [0/2] hello\e[K, gawk is not flushing the output; either the RS is not doing what I expect it to do, or the fflush is not working. Upon receiving the second string (after a 2 second delay) the hello string is received and/or flushed - but the second string is -again- not flushed. It must have been received however, or else the /^\r\[/ would not have triggered (gawk prints something upon receiving the second (world) line).
What I'd expect is to see:
[0/2] helloY
...2 second delay...
[1/2] worldY
...2 second delay...
[2/2] The end.
Y
all on one line (except that last Y), where the X is never visible because it is followed by a carriage return and a [ which overwrites it.
Am I doing something wrong? How can I get awk to show all the three records?
Why not try it without all the control chars first and once you have that working THEN add back the \rs, once you have that working THEN and back escape sequences (or vice-versa)?
As you can see if you just remove the \rs, the RS is behaving as it should and the fflush() is behaving as it should, and awk IS printing all 3 records:
$ (echo -ne "[0/2] hello\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -ne "[1/2] world\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -en "[2/2] The end.\n") | gawk 'BEGIN { RS="\033[[]K"; ORS="" } /\[/ { printf("X%sY\n", $0); fflush(); next }'
X[0/2] helloY
X[1/2] worldY
X[2/2] The end.
Y
You can also see that with your original script by piping it to cat -v to print the \rs as ^M:
$ (echo -ne "\r[0/2] hello\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -ne "\r[1/2] world\e[K"; sleep 2; echo -en "\r[2/2] The end.\n") | gawk 'BEGIN { RS="\033[[]K"; ORS="" } /^\r\[/ { printf("X%sY", $0); fflush(stdout); next }' | cat -v
X^M[0/2] helloYX^M[1/2] worldYX^M[2/2] The end.
Y
I changed fflush(stdout) to fflush() in the first script because the stdout arg you're passing is an uninitialized, and so null, variable which does nothing beyond what the default without args does - flush all open output files and pipes. If you ONLY wanted stdout flushed that'd be fflush("/dev/stdout") with gawk.
it has nothing to do with the fflush() - carriage return, \015 aka \r, does exactly what the name suggests in the terminal screen (think what it does on a typewriter)
simply "returning" the position marker to start of line, without actually moving to a new line; overwriting existing chars as new ones are being printed out
that said, \r can sometimes be leveraged to your advantage to create neatly formatted output while still being counted only as 1 single line by cat -n :
gfactor 12991671785233443057 | mawk NF=NF OFS='\f\r\t' | gcat -n
1 12991671785233443057: 3 7 17 31 67 127 257 8191 65537
….becomes…
1 12991671785233443057:
3
7
17
31
67
127
257
8191
65537
The backspace \b is more fun in that sense :
gfactor 12991671785233443057 | mawk NF=NF OFS='\f\b\b' | gcat -n
1 12991671785233443057:
3
7
17
31
67
127
257
8191
65537
I have a text file with following content:
...
LogLevelMax=-1
Id=keyboard-setup.service
LogLevelMax=-1
Id= networkd-dispatcher.service
LogLevelMax=-1
Id=systemd-remote-fs.service
LogLevelMax=-1
Id=systemd-journal-flush.service
LogLevelMax=-1
Id=some-other.service
...
I want to save them into an associative array, being key 'Id', value 'LogLevelMax'.
Between each "entity" there are exactly 2 new lines. Between LogLevelMax and Id there is exactly one new line.
First, I try to replace 2 empty lines with a character '#':
cat file.txt | tr "\n\n" "#". But it replaces all new lines with '#', not only exactly 2 new lines.
How can I do it in bash with sed, awk, regex or bash functions?
Thanks.
With awk:
parse.awk
BEGIN {
RS=""
FS=" *[\n=] *"
}
# Copy references into the h associative array
{ h[$4] = $2 }
# Print collected key/value pairs
END {
for (k in h)
print k " -> " h[k]
}
Run it e.g. like this:
awk -f parse.awk infile | column -t
Output:
networkd-dispatcher.service -> -1
keyboard-setup.service -> -1
systemd-remote-fs.service -> -1
systemd-journal-flush.service -> -1
some-other.service -> -1
With bash:
declare -A array
while IFS='=' read -r a b; do
if [[ "$a" == "Id" ]]; then
array+=(["$b"]="$c")
fi
c="$b"
done < file
And then:
$ for k in "${!array[#]}"; do printf '%s : %s\n' "$k" "${array[$k]}"; done
systemd-journal-flush.service : -1
keyboard-setup.service : -1
systemd-remote-fs.service : -1
networkd-dispatcher.service : -1
some-other.service : -1
I would use awk and Bash this way:
declare -A aarr
while read -r key val; do
aarr["$key"]="$val"
done < <(awk '{print $4, $2}' RS='\n\n' FS="[[:space:]]*[=\n][[:space:]]*" file)
Result:
$ declare -p aarr
declare -A aarr=([systemd-journal-flush.service]="-1" [keyboard-setup.service]="-1" [systemd-remote-fs.service]="-1" [networkd-dispatcher.service]="-1" [some-other.service]="-1" )
If it is possible that there are white spaces in the fields, you can do this instead:
while IFS=# read -r key val; do
aarr["$key"]="$val"
done < <(awk '{print $4 "#" $2}' RS= FS="[[:space:]]*[=\n][[:space:]]*" file)
Where # is a delimiter that is not in your fields.
gawk 'BEGIN { FS="|"; OFS="|" }NR ==1 {print} NR >=2 {cmd1="echo -n "$2" | base64 -w 0";cmd1 | getline d1;close(cmd1); print $1,d1 }' dummy2.txt
input:
id|dummy
1|subhashree:1;user=phn
2|subha:2;user=phn
Expected output:
id|dummy
1|c3ViaGFzaHJlZToxO3VzZXI9cGhuCg==
2|c3ViaGE6Mjt1c2VyPXBobgo=
output produced by script:
id|dummy
1|subhashree:1
2|subha:2
I have understood that the double quote around $2 is causing the issue. It does not work hence not encoding the string properly and just stripping off the string after semi colon.Because it does work inside semicolon and gives proper output in terminal.
echo "subhashree:1;user=phn" | base64
c3ViaGFzaHJlZToxO3VzZXI9cGhuCg==
[root#DERATVIV04 encode]# echo "subha:2;user=phn" | base64
c3ViaGE6Mjt1c2VyPXBobgo=
I have tried with different variation with single and double quote inside awk but it does not work.Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Your existing cmd1 producing
echo -n subhashree:1;user=phn | base64 -w 0
^ semicolon is there
So if you execute below would produce
$ echo -n subhashree:1;user=phn | base64 -w 0
subhashree:1
With quotes
$ echo -n 'subhashree:1;user=phn' | base64 -w 0
c3ViaGFzaHJlZToxO3VzZXI9cGhu
Solution is just to use quotes before echo -n '<your-string>' | base64 -w 0
$ cat file
id|dummy
1|subhashree:1;user=phn
2|subha:2;user=phn
$ gawk -v q="'" 'BEGIN { FS="|"; OFS="|" }NR ==1 {print} NR >=2 {cmd1="echo -n " q $2 q" | base64 -w 0"; cmd1 | getline d1;close(cmd1); print $1,d1 }' file
id|dummy
1|c3ViaGFzaHJlZToxO3VzZXI9cGhu
2|c3ViaGE6Mjt1c2VyPXBobg==
It can be simplified as below
gawk -v q="'" 'BEGIN {
FS=OFS="|"
}
NR==1{
print;
next
}
{
cmd1="echo -n " q $2 q" | base64 -w 0";
print ((cmd1 | getline d1)>0)? $1 OFS d1 : $0;
close(cmd1);
}
' file
Based on Ed Morton recommendation http://awk.freeshell.org/AllAboutGetline
if/while ( (getline var < file) > 0)
if/while ( (command | getline var) > 0)
if/while ( (command |& getline var) > 0)
The problem is because of lack of quotes, when trying to run the echo command in shell context. What you are trying to do is basically converted into
echo -n subhashree:1;user=phn | base64 -w 0
which the shell has executed as two commands separated by ; i.e. user=phn | base64 -w 0 means an assignment followed by a pipeline, which would be empty because the assignment would not produce any result over standard input for base64 for encode. The other segment subhashree:1 is just echoed out, which is stored in your getline variable d1.
The right approach fixing your problem should be using quotes
echo -n "subhashree:1;user=phn" | base64 -w 0
When you said, you were using quotes to $2, that is not actually right, the quotes are actually used in the context of awk to concatenate the cmd string i.e. "echo -n ", $2 and " | base64 -w 0" are just joined together. The proposed double quotes need to be in the context of the shell.
SO with that and few other fixes, your awk command should be below. Added gsub() to remove trailing spaces, which were present in your input shown. Also used printf over echo.
awk -v FS="|" '
BEGIN {
OFS = FS
}
NR == 1 {
print
}
NR >= 2 {
gsub(/[[:space:]]+/, "", $2)
cmd = "printf \"%s\" \"" $2 "\" | base64 -w 0"
if ((cmd | getline result) > 0) {
$2 = result
}
close(cmd)
print
}
' file
So with the command above, your command is executed as below, which would produce the right result.
printf "%s" "subhashree:1;user=phn" | base64 -w 0
You already got answers explaining how to use awk for this but you should also consider not using awk for this. The tool to sequence calls to other commands (e.g. bas64) is a shell, not awk. What you're trying to do in terms of calls is:
shell { awk { loop_on_input { shell { base64 } } } }
whereas if you call base64 directly from shell it'd just be:
shell { loop_on_input { base64 } }
Note that the awk command is spawning a new subshell once per line of input while the direct call from shell isn't.
For example:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
file='dummy2.txt'
head -n 1 "$file"
while IFS='|' read -r id dummy; do
printf '%s|%s\n' "$id" "$(base64 -w 0 <<<"$dummy")"
done < <(tail -n +2 "$file")
Here's the difference in execution speed for an input file that has each of your data lines duplicated 100 times created by awk -v n=100 'NR==1{print; next} {for (i=1;i<=n;i++) print}' dummy2.txt > file100
$ ./tst.sh file100
Awk:
real 0m23.247s
user 0m3.755s
sys 0m10.966s
Shell:
real 0m14.512s
user 0m1.530s
sys 0m4.776s
The above timing was produced by running this command (both awk scripts posted in answers will have about the same timeing so I just picked one at random):
#!/usr/bin/env bash
doawk() {
local file="$1"
gawk -v q="'" 'BEGIN {
FS=OFS="|"
}
NR==1{
print;
next
}
{
cmd1="echo -n " q $2 q" | base64 -w 0";
print ((cmd1 | getline d1)>0)? $1 OFS d1 : $0;
close(cmd1);
}
' "$file"
}
doshell() {
local file="$1"
head -n 1 "$file"
while IFS='|' read -r id dummy; do
printf '%s|%s\n' "$id" "$(base64 -w 0 <<<"$dummy")"
done < <(tail -n +2 "$file")
}
# Use 3rd-run timing to eliminate cache-ing as a factor
doawk "$1" >/dev/null
doawk "$1" >/dev/null
echo "Awk:"
time doawk "$1" >/dev/null
echo ""
doshell "$1" >/dev/null
doshell "$1" >/dev/null
echo "Shell:"
time doshell "$1" >/dev/null
I want to merge some rows in a file so that the lines should contain 22 fields seperated by ~.
Input file looks like this.
200269~7414~0027001~VALTD~OM3500~963~~~~716~423~2523~Y~UN~~2423~223~~~~A~200423
2269~744~2701~VALD~3500~93~~~~76~423~223~Y~
UN~~243~223~~~~A~200123
209~7414~7001~VALD~OM30~963~~~
~76~23~2523~Y~UN~~223~223~~~~A~123
and So on
First line looks fine. 2nd and 3rd line needs to be merged so that it becomes a line with 22 fields. 4th,5th and 6th line should be merged and so on.
Expected output:
200269~7414~0027001~VALTD~OM3500~963~~~~716~423~2523~Y~UN~~2423~223~~~~A~200423
2269~744~2701~VALD~3500~93~~~~76~423~223~Y~UN~~243~223~~~~A~200123
209~7414~7001~VALD~OM30~963~~~~76~23~2523~Y~UN~~223~223~~~~A~123
The file has 10 GB data but the code I wrote (used while loop) is taking too much time to execute . How to solve this problem using awk/sed command?
Code Used:
IFS=$'\n'
set -f
while read line
do
count_tild=`echo $line | grep -o '~' | wc -l`
if [ $count_tild == 21 ]
then
echo $line
else
checkLine
fi
done < file.txt
function checkLine
{
current_line=$line
read line1
next_line=$line1
new_line=`echo "$current_line$next_line"`
count_tild_mod=`echo $new_line | grep -o '~' | wc -l`
if [ $count_tild_mod == 21 ]
then
echo "$new_line"
else
line=$new_line
checkLine
fi
}
Using only the shell for this is slow, error-prone, and frustrating. Try Awk instead.
awk -F '~' 'NF==1 { next } # Hack; see below
NF<22 {
for(i=1; i<=NF; i++) f[++a]=$i }
a==22 {
for(i=1; i<=a; ++i) printf "%s%s", f[i], (i==22 ? "\n" : "~")
a=0 }
NF==22
END {
if(a) for(i=1; i<=a; i++) printf "%s%s", f[i], (i==a ? "\n" : "~") }' file.txt>file.new
This assumes that consecutive lines with too few fields will always add up to exactly 22 when you merge them. You might want to check this assumption (or perhaps accept this answer and ask a new question with more and better details). Or maybe just add something like
a>22 {
print FILENAME ":" FNR ": Too many fields " a >"/dev/stderr"
exit 1 }
The NF==1 block is a hack to bypass the weirdness of the completely empty line 5 in your sample.
Your attempt contained multiple errors and inefficiencies; for a start, try http://shellcheck.net/ to diagnose many of them.
$ cat tst.awk
BEGIN { FS="~" }
{
sub(/^[0-9]+\./,"")
gsub(/[[:space:]]+/,"")
$0 = prev $0
if ( NF == 22 ) {
print ++cnt "." $0
prev = ""
}
else {
prev = $0
}
}
$ awk -f tst.awk file
1.200269~7414~0027001~VALTD~OM3500~963~~~~716~423~2523~Y~UN~~2423~223~~~~A~200423
2.2269~744~2701~VALD~3500~93~~~~76~423~223~Y~UN~~243~223~~~~A~200123
3.209~7414~7001~VALD~OM30~963~~~~76~23~2523~Y~UN~~223~223~~~~A~123
The assumption above is that you never have more than 22 fields on 1 line nor do you exceed 22 in any concatenation of the contiguous lines that are each less than 22 fields, just like you show in your sample input.
You can try this awk
awk '
BEGIN {
FS=OFS="~"
}
{
while(NF<22) {
if(NF==0)
break
a=$0
getline
$0=a$0
}
if(NF!=0)
print
}
' infile
or this sed
sed -E '
:A
s/((.*~){21})([^~]*)/\1\3/
tB
N
bA
:B
s/\n//g
' infile
Usually a gawk script processes each line of its stdin. Is it possible to instead specify a system command in the script use the process each line from output of the command in the rest of the script?
For example consider the following simple interaction:
$ { echo "abc"; echo "def"; } | gawk '{print NR ":" $0; }'
1:abc
2:def
I would like to get the same output without using pipe, specifying instead the echo commands as a system command.
I can of course use the pipe but that would force me to either use two different scripts or specify the gawk script inside the bash script and I am trying to avoid that.
UPDATE
The previous example is not quite representative of my usecase, this is somewhat closer:
$ { echo "abc"; echo "def"; } | gawk '/d/ {print NR ":" $0; }'
2:def
UPDATE 2
A shell script parallel would be as follows. Without the exec line the script would read from stdin; with the exec it would use the command that line as input:
/tmp> cat t.sh
#!/bin/bash
exec 0< <(echo abc; echo def)
while read l; do
echo "line:" $l
done
/tmp> ./t.sh
line: abc
line: def
From all of your comments, it sounds like what you want is:
$ cat tst.awk
BEGIN {
if ( ("mktemp" | getline file) > 0 ) {
system("(echo abc; echo def) > " file)
ARGV[ARGC++] = file
}
close("mktemp")
}
{ print FILENAME, NR, $0 }
END {
if (file!="") {
system("rm -f \"" file "\"")
}
}
$ awk -f tst.awk
/tmp/tmp.ooAfgMNetB 1 abc
/tmp/tmp.ooAfgMNetB 2 def
but honestly, I wouldn't do it. You're munging what the shell is good at (creating/destroying files and processes) with what awk is good at (manipulating text).
I believe what you're looking for is getline:
awk '{ while ( ("echo abc; echo def" | getline line) > 0){ print line} }' <<< ''
abc
def
Adjusting the answer to you second example:
awk '{ while ( ("echo abc; echo def" | getline line) > 0){ counter++; if ( line ~ /d/){print counter":"line} } }' <<< ''
2:def
Let's break it down:
awk '{
cmd = "echo abc; echo def"
# line below will create a line variable containing the ouptut of cmd
while ( ( cmd | getline line) > 0){
# we need a counter because NR will not work for us
counter++;
# if the line contais the letter d
if ( line ~ /d/){
print counter":"line
}
}
}' <<< ''
2:def