Currently hazelcast is using cloud discovery for communication.
So if there are 4 kubernetes pods and each of them is having in-memory hazelcast. whenever hazelcast cache is updated in one of the pod, it gets updated in one of the other pod. but in case both of these pods get downscaled and get terminated, the data which is only in these 2 pods is lost. Can we have something like redis where we can provide server, port of the hazelcast cluster and it will be independent of kubernetes pod
Please check the following Blog Post ("Scale without Data Loss!" section) to read how to scale Hazelcast cluster on Kubernetes to avoid data loss.
Also, you can check the official README of hazelcast/hazelcast-kubernetes plugin. There is a section dedicated to scaling there.
Related
I have a service, that runs on run on kubernetes, uses Apache Ignite to store some data for processing, runs in replication mode with native persistence enabled. How to rightly mount the volume so the data is persisted the disk? Please note, this question is not related to mounting volumes in Kubernetes, rather the configuration/method to enable persistence in service running with embedded Ignite server in Kubernetes.
Note: The application may run multiple replicas.
Edit: As volumes (pvc) cannot be shared by multiple pods, only pod runs successfully, and other pods are in pending state.
The stateless means the system does not have dependency during its start or execution, but only be as stateless as possible. So, as the need itself is persistence, the Ignite has to be deployed as stateful using the StatefulSet. The StatefulSet will automatically provision separate volumes & mount it to every pod.
Checkout out Ignite guides for mounting K8 on AWS, GKE, and Azure
For a large online application, use k8s to run it. The scale maybe daily activity user 500,000.
The application inside k8s need messaging feature - Pub/Sub, there are these options:
Kafka
RabbitMQ
Redis
Kafka
It needs zookeeper and good to run on os depends on disk I/O. So if install it into k8s cluster, how? The performance will be worse?
And, if keep Kafka outside of the k8s cluster, connect Kafka from application inside the k8s cluster, how about that performance? They are in the different layer, won't be slow?
RabbitMQ
It's slow than Kafka, but for a daily activity user 500,000 application, is it good enough? If so, maybe it's a good choice.
Redis
It's another option. Maybe the most simple one. But from the internet I got that it will lose message sometimes. If true, that's terrible.
So, the most important thing is, use Kafka(also with zookeeper) on k8s, good or not in this use case?
Yes, running Kafka on Kubernetes is great. Check out this example: https://github.com/Yolean/kubernetes-kafka. It includes ZooKeeper and Kafka as StatefulSets.
PS. Running any of the services in your question on Kubernetes will be pleasant. You can Google the name of the service and "kubernetes" and find example manifests. Many examples here: https://github.com/kubernetes/charts.
For Kafka, you can find some suggestion here. Kubernetes 1.7+ supports local persistent volume, which may be good for Kafka deployment.
You can also take a look to the following project :
https://github.com/EnMasseProject/barnabas
It's about running Kafka on Kubernetes and OpenShift as well. It provides deploying with StatefulSets with persistent volumes or just in memory (for developing or just testing purpose). It provides deploying for Kafka Connect and Prometheus metrics as well.
Another simple configuration of Kafka/Zookeeper on Kubernetes in DigitalOcean with external access:
https://github.com/StanislavKo/k8s_digitalocean_kafka
You can connect to Kafka from outside of AWS/DO/GCE by regular binary protocol. Connection is PLAINTEXT or SASL_PLAINTEXT (user/password).
Kafka cluster is StatefulSet, so you can scale cluster easily.
I am currently setting up an infrastructure for an App in AWS. App is written in Django and is using Redis for some transactions. High availability is key for this application and I am having a hard time trying to get my head around how to configure Redis for High availability.
Application level changes are not an option.
Ideally I would like to have a redis setup, to which I can write and read and replicate and scale when required.
Current Setup is a Redis Fail-over scenario with HAProxy --> Redis Master --> Replica Slave.
Could someone guide me understand various options ? and how to scale redis for high availability !
Use AWS ElastiCache Redis Cluster with Multi-AZ. They provides automatic fail-over. It provides endpoint to access master node.
If master goes down AWS route your endpoint to another node. everything happens automatically, you don't have to do anything.
Just make sure that if you are doing DNS to IP caching in your application, its set to 60 seconds or so instead of default.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonElastiCache/latest/UserGuide/AutoFailover.html
Thanks,
KS
I want to create (2) broker clusters connected by network of brokers in JBoss Fuse 6.2; each cluster has 2 master/slave pairs.
It's a small cluster, so we don't intend to use Fabric/Zookeeper; everything will be statically configured, no auto discovery.
Questions
Is it possible to use fabric profiles to build the topology, but
avoid using fabric at runtime?
Can we use Git, or something similar, for centrally managing container config files, again, without fabric?
We tried creating profiles using fabric:mq-create, but the command is not available unless a fabric is first created, which defeats the purpose.
No fabric profiles requires using fabric. You can use git to store files, but you cannot have JBoss Fuse automatic use it such as it does with fabric. You would need to use git manually.
The AMQ broker in JBoss Fuse is just standard Apache ActiveMQ so you can configure it manually/static as a network of brokers. It just not very easy to do if you haven't done that before.
See the JBoss A-MQ documentation as that covers the broker: http://www.jboss.org/products/amq/overview/
for example at: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_A-MQ/6.2/html/Using_Networks_of_Brokers/index.html
The Spring XD documentation (http://docs.spring.io/spring-xd/docs/1.0.0.RC1/reference/html/) recommends Zookeeper to be run in ensemble so that Zookeeper is highly available. There is not lot of details about Redis about high availability.
If I were to run 2 XD admin instances and say 4 Container instances, I see 3 options
should I run a Redis instance in each server that runs container or admin? In that case does the Distributed runtime work properly with different Redis instances handling transport of different modules?
OR
should I run 1 Redis instance in a separate server and configure all XD instances to talk to this instance? In this case 1 instance of Redis is not highly available
OR
should I configure Redis cluster or Redis Sentinel high availability? I am not sure how XD or any other client will connect to a cluster or HA.
Thanks
I would suggest that you run a single Redis instance, there are some settings for persistence that you can change that may meet your requirements.
http://redis.io/topics/persistence
We will be adding support for Redis Sentinal, certainly in the Spring XD 1.1 release, but possibly in a maintenance release depending on what library changes we need to pick up. Spring Data Redis and Spring Boot have recent updates to support Redis Sentinal.
If you are using Redis as a message transport and want higher guarantees, I would switch to using Rabbit HA configuration of the MessageBus.
Cheers,
Mark