I'm trying to integrate a vue project that I built with the vue cli into an existing .net app. I'm very new to vue, so I'm trying to follow guides and such, but am left with lots of questions.
While trying to compile this, I found that the vue cli-service node module has the following for setting the main.js file located in it's base.js file.
webpackConfig
.mode('development')
.context(api.service.context)
.entry('app')
.add('./src/main.js')
.end()
.output
.path(api.resolve(options.outputDir))
.filename(isLegacyBundle ? '[name]-legacy.js' : '[name].js')
.publicPath(options.publicPath)
I need to override this since my .net app doesn't have a src directory and the usage of this vue app won't follow that path structure. I'm not seeing a way to do it in my vue.config.js file. I would expect that if I can override it, that would be the spot.
I could overwrite the base.js file where this exists, but when a co-worker runs npm install, they would get the default value rather than what I have. The only option I see there is checking in all the node modules to git which we really don't want to do.
For anyone in a similar situation, I found what worked for me. It's not the ideal solution due to the fact that it forces you to build into a js folder. That resulted in the file being put in Scripts\build\vue\js. Would be nice to be able to just dump it in the vue folder, but at least this works. Code below.
vue.config.js
module.exports = {
publicPath : "/",
outputDir: "Scripts/build/vue", //where to put the files
// Modify Webpack config
// https://cli.vuejs.org/config/#chainwebpack
chainWebpack: config => {
// Not naming bundle 'app'
config.entryPoints.delete('app'); //removes what base.js added
},
// Overriding webpack config
configureWebpack: {
// Naming bundle 'bundleName'
entry: {
quote: './Scripts/Quote/index.js' //where to get the main vue app js file
},
optimization: {
splitChunks: false
}
},
filenameHashing: false,
pages: {
quoteApp: { //by using pages, it allowed me to name the output file quoteApp.js
entry: './Scripts/Quote/index.js',
filename: 'index.html'
}
}
}
Related
In one of my projects, I build a nice vue3 component that could be useful to several other projects. So I decided to publish it as an NPM package and share it with everyone.
I wrote the isolate component, build it and publish BUT I use Tailwind css to make the style.
When I publish and install the component everything is working BUT without the beauty of the css part.
I tried several configurations and alternative tools to generate the package that automatically add the tailwind as an inner dependency to my package.
Does someone have experience with this? how can build/bundle my component by adding the tailwind CSS instructions into it?
You're almost there
Since you've got your component working, the majority of the part has been done.
For configuring the styling of the component you need to identify the Tailwind CSS classes being used by your Vue component package and retain them in the final CSS that is generated by the Tailwind engine in your project.
Follow below steps in the project where you want to use your tailwind vue component package.
For Tailwind CSS V3
// tailwind.config.js
module.exports = [
//...
content: [
"./index.html",
"./src/**/*.{vue,js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
"./node_modules/package-name/**/*.{vue,js,ts,jsx,tsx}" // Add this line
// Replace "package-name" with the name of the dependency package
],
//...
]
For Tailwind CSS V2
// tailwind.config.js
module.exports = [
//...
purge: {
//...
content: [
"./index.html",
"./src/**/*.{vue,js,ts,jsx,tsx}",
"./node_modules/package-name/**/*.{vue,js,ts,jsx,tsx}" // Add this line
// Replace "package-name" with the name of the dependency package
],
//...
//...
}
]
The content property in the tailwind.config.js file defines file path pattern that the tailwind engine should look into, for generating the final CSS file.
For Pro users
You may also try to automate the above setup by writing an install script for your npm package to add this configuration to the tailwind.config.js file
References
Tailwind Docs - 3rd party integration
It's a bit difficult for someone to answer your question as you've not really shared the source code, but thankfully (and a bit incorrectly), you've published the src directory to npm.
The core issue here is that when you're building a component library, you are running npm run build:npm which translates to vue-cli-service build --target lib --name getjvNumPad src/index.js.
The index.js reads as follows:
import component from './components/numeric-pad.vue'
// Declare install function executed by Vue.use()
export function install (Vue) {
if (install.installed) return
install.installed = true
Vue.component('getjv-num-pad', component)
}
// Create module definition for Vue.use()
const plugin = {
install
}
// Auto-install when vue is found (eg. in browser via <script> tag)
let GlobalVue = null
if (typeof window !== 'undefined') {
GlobalVue = window.Vue
} else if (typeof global !== 'undefined') {
GlobalVue = global.Vue
}
if (GlobalVue) {
GlobalVue.use(plugin)
}
// To allow use as module (npm/webpack/etc.) export component
export default component
There is no mention of importing any CSS, hence no CSS included in the built version.
The simplest solution would be to include the index.css import in your index.js or the src/components/numeric-pad.vue file under the <style> section.
Lastly, I'm a bit rusty on how components are built, but you might find that Vue outputs the CSS as a separate file. In that case, you would also need to update your package.json to include an exports field.
I have a VUE2 project and in the public folder I created an iframe.html file that will be loaded in an iframe.
That iframe will also load a javascript.js file that I want encoded/uglified upon "npm run build" but I also want to be able to access it during dev.
How could I proceed?
Should this js file be placed inside the /src/assets/ folder and referenced from the iframe.html file? If yes, any advice?
Or should it stay in the public folder and upod the dist folder being built, encode it with something.
Any solution is welcome, thanks in advance!
Edit: Here are further details of how I use the iframe.
First, I'm referencing the .vue file in the router like so:
{
path: "/pages/:id/edit",
name: "edit",
component: () => import("../views/Edit.vue"),
},
Next, in the Edit.vue file, I add the iframe like so (note how it's referencing iframe.html that is in the public directory):
<iframe
id="iframe"
ref="iframe"
src="iframe.html"
/>
Next, in the iframe.html it's just normal html code, with this part including the javascript.js file (that actually is in the public folder as well for now)
<script src="javascript.js"></script>
You can explicitly include the .js file in your Webpack config by adding a rule for UglifyJsPlugin:
npm i -D uglifyjs-webpack-plugin
const UglifyJsPlugin = require('uglifyjs-webpack-plugin');
...
module.exports = {
optimization: {
minimizer: [
new UglifyJsPlugin({
include: /\/regex-for-file/,
minimize: true
})
]
}
...
};
In Vue.config.js, this might look like:
configureWebpack: {
plugins : [
new webpack.optimize.UglifyJsPlugin({
uglifyOptions: {
include: /\/regex-for-file/,
minimize: true
}
)}
]
}
Another option is to use uglify-es; this would allow you to get even more explicit by specifying from where to copy the file during build (assuming you might want the file located outside of src/):
npm i -D uglify-es // CopyWebpackPlugin ships w/ Vue's Webpack conf by default
const UglifyJS = require('uglify-es');
const { resolve } = require('path');
const resolveAbs = (dir) => resolve(__dirname, dir);
new CopyWebpackPlugin([
{
from: resolveAbs('../external'),
to: config.build.assetsSubDirectory
},
{
from: resolveAbs('../src/custom-build-path'),
to: config.build.assetsServerDirectory,
transform: (content, path) => UglifyJS.minify(content.toString()).code;
}
]),
To be able to access it during dev, you can include the path of the js file (relative to your Vue src directory) using the resolve.alias option in the config (so you don't need to deal with possibly ridiculous relative paths in your project). Finally, you can look into webpack's HTML plugin docs for info on importing an external index.html file if needed
I would recommend not putting it in static; by default it will not be minified and built if placed in that directory.
Update/edit: Sorry, I saw a 'uglify' and just assumed you wanted uglify js. As long as the script is in your Vue project directory (or otherwise specified in the Webpack config) the file should be minified during build. Vue has pretty smart defaults for Webpack; assuming the iframe is being referenced somewhere in the app i.e. the dependency graph it will be built.
I have the following code
<a href="../../assets/all-work/proto/pdf-test.pdf" download>Download</a>
It's inside a vue component which is located in src/components/Home/Proto.vue and the file is located in src/assets/all-work/proto/pdf-test.pdf, when I click download it downloads something completely illegible, why's that and how could I fix it?
I'm going to assume you're using Vue CLI.
The default configuration generated by the Vue CLI has special handling for images. To get the same thing working for PDFs you need to configure it yourself.
Firstly, you'll need to explicitly use require on your href:
<a :href="require('../../assets/all-work/proto/pdf-test.pdf')" download>Download</a>
In some scenarios, such as the src attribute of an <img>, the wrapping with require is performed automatically. For an <a href> it isn't.
You'll then run into a Webpack loader error because Webpack has no idea what to do with a .pdf file.
To fix that you'll need to configure a file-loader in vue.config.js:
module.exports = {
chainWebpack (config) {
config.module.rule('pdf')
.test(/\.pdf$/)
.use('file-loader')
.loader('file-loader')
}
}
If you don't already have a vue.config.js file then you'll need to create one. It goes at the top level, next to your package.json.
If you do already have a vue.config.js then you'll need to merge the chainWebpack property in, alongside your existing configuration.
By default the file will be renamed to a hash based on its content. It you want to retain the original file name you can configure that instead:
chainWebpack (config) {
config.module.rule('pdf')
.test(/\.pdf$/)
.use('file-loader')
.loader('file-loader')
.options({
name: '[name].[ext]'
})
}
More details on the name option can be found at:
https://webpack.js.org/loaders/file-loader/#name
My app used to work fine until I updated VueJS this morning. Now when I build, it shows the following error:
Error: Conflict: Multiple assets emit to the same filename img/default-contractor-logo.0346290f.svg
There's only one file like this in the repo.
Here's my vue.config.js:
module.exports = {
baseUrl: '/my/',
outputDir: 'dist/my',
css: {
loaderOptions: {
sass: {
data: `
#import "#/scss/_variables.scss";
#import "#/scss/_mixins.scss";
#import "#/scss/_fonts.scss";
`
}
}
},
devServer: {
disableHostCheck: true
}
};
I tried webpack fixes recommended in similar cases, but non helped.
I had the same error when importing SVG files using dynamically generated path in the require statement:
const url = require("../assets/svg/#{value}");
<img src={{url}} />
In this case file-loader processes all SVG files and saves them to the output path. My file-loader options were:
{
loader: "file-loader",
options: { name: "[name].[ext]" }
}
The folders structure has duplicate file names, something like this:
assets
|__ one
|____ file.svg
|__ two
|____ file.svg
In this case file-loader saves both file.svg files to the same output file: build/assets/file.svg - hence the warning.
I managed to fix it by adding [path] to the name option:
{
loader: "file-loader",
options: { name: "[path][name].[ext]" }
}
The answer by #ischenkodv is definitely correct, but because of my inexperience with webpack, I needed a little more context to use the information to fix the problem.
For the benefit of anyone else in the same situation, I'm adding the following details which I hope will be useful.
This section of the Vue.js documentation was particularly helpul:
VueJS - Modifying Options of a Loader
For the TL;DR fix, here is the relevant chunk of my vue.config.js:
// vue.config.js
module.exports = {
// ---snip---
chainWebpack: config =>
{
config.module
.rule('svg')
.test(/\.svg$/)
.use('file-loader')
.tap(options =>
{
return { name: "[path][name].[ext]" };
});
}
// ---snip---
};
In my project it was the flag-icon-css NPM package that was causing the Multiple assets emit to the same filename conflict errors. The above update to the vue.config.js file resolved the problem for me.
I suspect that the regular expression in the test could be tightened up to target just the items in the flag-icon-css package rather than matching all SVG files, but I haven't bothered since it's not causing any adverse effects so far.
I am having hard times wrapping my mind around new CLI and configuration.
In the official documentation, I couldn't really find anything about CSS and how to add it as an entry point and not import it directly into an component or main.js file.
I realized that some JS files are being chunked into separate file, from main.js and the rest gets compiled where supposed to - into the app.js.
I was wondering, how does it know in the background what should be stored as "vendor" for the JS, but when I try to import some "vendor" SASS files into main.js it does not and it merges all within a single app.css file.
Can anyone tell me, how does one create/modify the vue.config.js and tell the bundler that I also want app.scss to be an entry point and vendor.scss to be another entry point.
I am unsure what are best practices for such purpose, but I always did it this way with my own webpack config...
Partial example below:
entry: {
vendor: [
'./styles/vendor.scss',
'./scripts/vendor.js'
],
app: [
'./styles/app.scss',
'./scripts/app.js'
]
}
EDIT #1
I think I got the first one...
"How does it know what should be chunked in "vendor" files?
Whatever gets imported from node_modules, it is being chunked.
What I did not figure out yet is... What if I am having my personal assets/styles/vendor directory where I #import those SASS files from NPM and do some modifications of variables or whatever.
Importing this file to main.js does not get chunked in this case... So there must be a way to tell bundler that I want everything within that directory or everything within vendor.scss file where everything is being imported, to be chunked out.
EDIT #2
I figured I can use WebPack's magical comments to import the main vendor SCSS file, such as:
import(/* webpackChunkName: "vendor" */ './assets/styles/vendor.scss')
I don't have a problem with this, but apparently the bundler does. It generates an empty vendor.[hash].js file as well.
EDIT #3
I did further research and learned that there's a command vue inspect which would output the webpack configuration.
So when making tweaks to vue.config.js, we can look a the output with this command if there's a bug or something is not working as expected.
Further more, I learned that if we specify entry directly in our vue.config.js file, that we will get an error that entry cannot be specified within our configuration file.
The following is forbidden to do so, but it's what I actually want to achieve...
// vue.config.js
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: [
'./src/main.js',
'./src/assets/styles/app.scss'
],
vendor: [
'./src/assets/styles/vendor.scss'
]
}
}
The actual proper way to do this will be an answer to my own question...
The way to achieve this is by using WebPack's Chain API.
However, if I did everything correctly, I still see a problem of generated vendor.[hash].js file with some WebPack module boilerplate. This JS file is also being injected to the index.html template.
Which leads to the same outcome as the attempt of my EDIT #2, except that we're no longer importing our Sass files within main.js
To modify entry points for my purpose of this question, we can do it the following way:
// vue.config.js
module.exports = {
chainWebpack: config => {
config
.entry('app')
.add('./src/assets/styles/app.scss')
.end()
.entry('vendor')
.add('./src/assets/styles/vendor.scss')
.end()
}
}
Note
We're not specifying the app entry JS file, which would be main.js by default, because we're not overriding the current entry point. Instead, we're extending it, so everything works as expected.
UPDATE
Until WebPack resolves this in future major releases, I found a great package - fqborges/webpack-fix-style-only-entries. It solves this issue that I was having and I'd suggest you to use it.
Final configuration would look like this:
const FixStyleOnlyEntries = require('webpack-fix-style-only-entries')
module.exports = {
chainWebpack: config => {
config
.entry('app')
.add('./src/assets/styles/app.scss')
.end()
.entry('vendor')
.add('./src/assets/styles/vendor.scss')
.end()
},
configureWebpack: {
plugins: [
new FixStyleOnlyEntries()
]
}
}
UPDATE #2
After further investigation and use of such configuration for projects, I realized that I had to use !important in styles where I had a need to override anything vendor related.
This is simply because WebPack will inject app, before vendor (both JS and CSS) and it will cause such issue.
Even if we modify the configuration from above and move app entry, below the vendor entry, it will still fail. Reason being, because we're modifying the entry point which already exists by default within vue-cli config. We're adding more entries to the app and we're adding new vendor entry.
To fix this issue of ordering, we must delete the app entirely and then create it ourselves.
const FixStyleOnlyEntries = require('webpack-fix-style-only-entries')
module.exports = {
chainWebpack: config => {
config.entryPoints.delete('app')
config
.entry('vendor')
.add('./src/assets/styles/vendor.scss')
.end()
.entry('app')
.add('./src/main.js')
.add('./src/assets/styles/app.scss')
.end()
},
configureWebpack: {
plugins: [
new FixStyleOnlyEntries()
]
}
}