UPDATE: the interceptor is indeed called. However, if I set a breakpoint in the intercepting method, the breakpoint is not triggered (although the method is indeed called). If I set the breakpoint in a method called from the interceptor, then it is triggered (because the breakpoint was not triggered in the first case, this is what made me think initially that the interceptor was not called)
I am trying to use ByteBuddy in order to implement a proxy a class for tracking all changes on an Entity as follows:
public class EntityProxyGenerator{
public static <T extends Entity> T createProxy(T entity) throws NoSuchMethodException, InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException,
InvocationTargetException {
EntityChangesInterceptor interceptor = new EntityChangesInterceptor(entity);
_class = entity.getClass();
Class Proxy =
new ByteBuddy()
.subclass(_class)
.method(ElementMatchers.isSetter())
.intercept(MethodDelegation.to(interceptor))
.make()
.load(EntityProxyGenerator.class.getClassLoader())
.getLoaded();
return (T) Proxy.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance();
}
}
And EntityChangesInterceptor is implemented as follows:
public class EntityChangesInterceptor<T extends Entity> {
private final T original;
public EntityChangesInterceptor(T original) {
this.original = original;
}
public boolean isValueObject(Object object) {
Class<?> class_ = object.getClass();
if (class_ == String.class
|| class_ == Integer.class
|| class_ == Double.class
|| class_ == Timestamp.class
|| class_ == Instant.class) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
boolean isPropertyGetter(Method method, Object[] args) {
return method.getName().startsWith("get") && args.length == 0;
}
boolean isPropertySetter(Method method, Object[] args) {
return method.getName().startsWith("set") && args.length == 1;
}
#RuntimeType
public Object intercept(#Origin Method method, #AllArguments Object[] args) throws Throwable {
try {
if (isPropertySetter(method, args)) {
if (isValueObject(args[0])) {
String propertyName = method.getName().substring(3);
String getter = "get" + propertyName;
Object oldValue = MethodUtils.invokeMethod(original, getter, null);
Object newValue = args[0];
ValueChange valueChange = new ValueChange(propertyName, oldValue, newValue);
Object callResult = method.invoke(original, args);
original.addPropertyChange(valueChange);
return callResult;
}
}
return method.invoke(original, args);
} finally {
// do your completion logic here
}
}
}
The proxy is created correctly, however whenever I try to call a setter on the proxy class, EntityChangesInterceptor.intercept is never called.
If I change the proxy class implementation so that it intercepts getters as follows, then everything works fine:
Class Proxy = new ByteBuddy()
.subclass(_class)
.method(ElementMatchers.isGetter()) // note isGetter() instead of isSetter()
.intercept(MethodDelegation.to(interceptor))
.make()
.load(EntityProxyGenerator.class.getClassLoader())
.getLoaded();
Making isValueObject private does the trick.
Related
This might be a duplicate. But I cannot find a solution to my Problem.
I have a class
public class MyResponse implements Serializable {
private boolean isSuccess;
public boolean isSuccess() {
return isSuccess;
}
public void setSuccess(boolean isSuccess) {
this.isSuccess = isSuccess;
}
}
Getters and setters are generated by Eclipse.
In another class, I set the value to true, and write it as a JSON string.
System.out.println(new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(myResponse));
In JSON, the key is coming as {"success": true}.
I want the key as isSuccess itself. Is Jackson using the setter method while serializing? How do I make the key the field name itself?
This is a slightly late answer, but may be useful for anyone else coming to this page.
A simple solution to changing the name that Jackson will use for when serializing to JSON is to use the #JsonProperty annotation, so your example would become:
public class MyResponse implements Serializable {
private boolean isSuccess;
#JsonProperty(value="isSuccess")
public boolean isSuccess() {
return isSuccess;
}
public void setSuccess(boolean isSuccess) {
this.isSuccess = isSuccess;
}
}
This would then be serialised to JSON as {"isSuccess":true}, but has the advantage of not having to modify your getter method name.
Note that in this case you could also write the annotation as #JsonProperty("isSuccess") as it only has the single value element
I recently ran into this issue and this is what I found. Jackson will inspect any class that you pass to it for getters and setters, and use those methods for serialization and deserialization. What follows "get", "is" and "set" in those methods will be used as the key for the JSON field ("isValid" for getIsValid and setIsValid).
public class JacksonExample {
private boolean isValid = false;
public boolean getIsValid() {
return isValid;
}
public void setIsValid(boolean isValid) {
this.isValid = isValid;
}
}
Similarly "isSuccess" will become "success", unless renamed to "isIsSuccess" or "getIsSuccess"
Read more here: http://www.citrine.io/blog/2015/5/20/jackson-json-processor
Using both annotations below, forces the output JSON to include is_xxx:
#get:JsonProperty("is_something")
#param:JsonProperty("is_something")
When you are using Kotlin and data classes:
data class Dto(
#get:JsonProperty("isSuccess") val isSuccess: Boolean
)
You might need to add #param:JsonProperty("isSuccess") if you are going to deserialize JSON as well.
EDIT: If you are using swagger-annotations to generate documentation, the property will be marked as readOnly when using #get:JsonProperty. In order to solve this, you can do:
#JsonAutoDetect(isGetterVisibility = JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.NONE)
data class Dto(
#field:JsonProperty(value = "isSuccess") val isSuccess: Boolean
)
You can configure your ObjectMapper as follows:
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new PropertyNamingStrategy() {
#Override
public String nameForGetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName)
{
if(method.hasReturnType() && (method.getRawReturnType() == Boolean.class || method.getRawReturnType() == boolean.class)
&& method.getName().startsWith("is")) {
return method.getName();
}
return super.nameForGetterMethod(config, method, defaultName);
}
});
I didn't want to mess with some custom naming strategies, nor re-creating some accessors.
The less code, the happier I am.
This did the trick for us :
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonIgnoreProperties;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
#JsonIgnoreProperties({"success", "deleted"}) // <- Prevents serialization duplicates
public class MyResponse {
private String id;
private #JsonProperty("isSuccess") boolean isSuccess; // <- Forces field name
private #JsonProperty("isDeleted") boolean isDeleted;
}
Building upon Utkarsh's answer..
Getter names minus get/is is used as the JSON name.
public class Example{
private String radcliffe;
public getHarryPotter(){
return radcliffe;
}
}
is stored as { "harryPotter" : "whateverYouGaveHere" }
For Deserialization, Jackson checks against both the setter and the field name.
For the Json String { "word1" : "example" }, both the below are valid.
public class Example{
private String word1;
public setword2( String pqr){
this.word1 = pqr;
}
}
public class Example2{
private String word2;
public setWord1(String pqr){
this.word2 = pqr ;
}
}
A more interesting question is which order Jackson considers for deserialization. If i try to deserialize { "word1" : "myName" } with
public class Example3{
private String word1;
private String word2;
public setWord1( String parameter){
this.word2 = parameter ;
}
}
I did not test the above case, but it would be interesting to see the values of word1 & word2 ...
Note: I used drastically different names to emphasize which fields are required to be same.
You can change primitive boolean to java.lang.Boolean (+ use #JsonPropery)
#JsonProperty("isA")
private Boolean isA = false;
public Boolean getA() {
return this.isA;
}
public void setA(Boolean a) {
this.isA = a;
}
Worked excellent for me.
If you are interested in handling 3rd party classes not under your control (like #edmundpie mentioned in a comment) then you add Mixin classes to your ObjectMapper where the property/field names should match the ones from your 3rd party class:
public class MyStack32270422 {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ObjectMapper om3rdParty = new ObjectMapper();
om3rdParty .addMixIn(My3rdPartyResponse.class, MixinMyResponse.class);
// add further mixins if required
String jsonString = om3rdParty.writeValueAsString(new My3rdPartyResponse());
System.out.println(jsonString);
}
}
class MixinMyResponse {
// add all jackson annotations here you want to be used when handling My3rdPartyResponse classes
#JsonProperty("isSuccess")
private boolean isSuccess;
}
class My3rdPartyResponse{
private boolean isSuccess = true;
// getter and setter here if desired
}
Basically you add all your Jackson annotations to your Mixin classes as if you would own the class. In my opinion quite a nice solution as you don't have to mess around with checking method names starting with "is.." and so on.
there is another method for this problem.
just define a new sub-class extends PropertyNamingStrategy and pass it to ObjectMapper instance.
here is a code snippet may be help more:
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new PropertyNamingStrategy() {
#Override
public String nameForGetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName) {
String input = defaultName;
if(method.getName().startsWith("is")){
input = method.getName();
}
//copy from LowerCaseWithUnderscoresStrategy
if (input == null) return input; // garbage in, garbage out
int length = input.length();
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder(length * 2);
int resultLength = 0;
boolean wasPrevTranslated = false;
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
{
char c = input.charAt(i);
if (i > 0 || c != '_') // skip first starting underscore
{
if (Character.isUpperCase(c))
{
if (!wasPrevTranslated && resultLength > 0 && result.charAt(resultLength - 1) != '_')
{
result.append('_');
resultLength++;
}
c = Character.toLowerCase(c);
wasPrevTranslated = true;
}
else
{
wasPrevTranslated = false;
}
result.append(c);
resultLength++;
}
}
return resultLength > 0 ? result.toString() : input;
}
});
The accepted answer won't work for my case.
In my case, the class is not owned by me. The problematic class comes from 3rd party dependencies, so I can't just add #JsonProperty annotation in it.
To solve it, inspired by #burak answer above, I created a custom PropertyNamingStrategy as follow:
mapper.setPropertyNamingStrategy(new PropertyNamingStrategy() {
#Override
public String nameForSetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName)
{
if (method.getParameterCount() == 1 &&
(method.getRawParameterType(0) == Boolean.class || method.getRawParameterType(0) == boolean.class) &&
method.getName().startsWith("set")) {
Class<?> containingClass = method.getDeclaringClass();
String potentialFieldName = "is" + method.getName().substring(3);
try {
containingClass.getDeclaredField(potentialFieldName);
return potentialFieldName;
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
// do nothing and fall through
}
}
return super.nameForSetterMethod(config, method, defaultName);
}
#Override
public String nameForGetterMethod(MapperConfig<?> config, AnnotatedMethod method, String defaultName)
{
if(method.hasReturnType() && (method.getRawReturnType() == Boolean.class || method.getRawReturnType() == boolean.class)
&& method.getName().startsWith("is")) {
Class<?> containingClass = method.getDeclaringClass();
String potentialFieldName = method.getName();
try {
containingClass.getDeclaredField(potentialFieldName);
return potentialFieldName;
} catch (NoSuchFieldException e) {
// do nothing and fall through
}
}
return super.nameForGetterMethod(config, method, defaultName);
}
});
Basically what this does is, before serializing and deserializing, it checks in the target/source class which property name is present in the class, whether it is isEnabled or enabled property.
Based on that, the mapper will serialize and deserialize to the property name that is exist.
I have a web interface with a lot of data grids that allow the user passing a search criteria to the server.
I don't want to actually build an explicit method that will handle each grid individually, so I thought to allow passing JSON criteria from the client to the server.
This code
string res = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(Restrictions.Eq("id", "1"));
will return will return {"PropertyName":"id","Value":"1"} which is exactly what I wanted to pass from the client - perfect.
but this code with or statement:
string res = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(Restrictions.Or(Restrictions.Eq("id", "1"),Restrictions.Eq("id", "2")))
will return {}
What is the way to convert JSON into a Criteria and back in nHibernate.
To be more accurate, I have something like this in the client, and I want my server to support it. I can serialize the client ui to json.
Thanks
The empty json serialization happens because newtonsoft can only serialize public fields.
The code below will serialize all fields of a class regardless of its visibility.
public class MyContractResolver : DefaultContractResolver
{
protected override IList<JsonProperty> CreateProperties(Type type, MemberSerialization memberSerialization)
{
var props = type.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance)
.Select(p => base.CreateProperty(p, memberSerialization))
.Union(type.GetFields(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance)
.Select(f => base.CreateProperty(f, memberSerialization)))
.ToList();
props.ForEach(p => { p.Writable = true; p.Readable = true; });
return props;
}
}
...
var myOrs = Restrictions.Or(Restrictions.Eq("id", "1"), Restrictions.Eq("id", "2"));
var settings = new JsonSerializerSettings()
{
ContractResolver = new MyContractResolver()
};
string json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(myOrs, settings);
Now to deserialize this json we have a problem, the NHibernate classes are either abstract or don't have a public empty constructor.
You will need to create a custom class to deserialize.
public class MyConverter : JsonConverter
{
public override void WriteJson(JsonWriter writer, object value, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
throw new NotImplementedException("Not implemented yet");
}
public override object ReadJson(JsonReader reader, Type objectType, object existingValue, JsonSerializer serializer)
{
JObject obj = JObject.Load(reader);
if (obj.Value<string>("Op") == "or")
{
var leftJObject = obj["LeftHandSide"];
var rightJObject = obj["RightHandSide"];
var left = new SimpleExpression(leftJObject.Value<string>("PropertyName"), GetJTokenValue(leftJObject["Value"]), leftJObject.Value<string>("Op"));
var right = new SimpleExpression(rightJObject.Value<string>("PropertyName"), GetJTokenValue(rightJObject["Value"]), rightJObject.Value<string>("Op"));
return Restrictions.Or(left, right);
}
//TODO: The rest of the restrictions
return null;
}
public override bool CanWrite
{
get { return false; }
}
public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)
{
return true;
}
private object GetJTokenValue(JToken token)
{
if (token.Type == JTokenType.String)
{
return token.Value<string>();
}
else if (token.Type == JTokenType.Integer)
{
return token.Value<Int32>();
}
//TODO: The rest of the types
return null;
}
}
...
var result = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<AbstractCriterion>(json, new MyConverter());
I have an existing application that I am modifying to use Autofac Property Injection. It seems regardless of which method I use to register my types with properties, the properties are always null unless they have public setters. With other IoC containers (e.g. Structuremap) it's possible to scope the setter internal and make it available using the InternalsVisibleTo attribute on the assembly. This would seem nice to restrict clients from modifying the assignment.
Is this possible with Autofac? Or is there another approach when working with property injection to keep the assignments secure?
I've tried using reflection with PropertiesAutoWired() as well as resolving .WithParameter() from my WebApi Global.asax - specifying the specific parameter to be set with no success as an internal setter.
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("MyWebAPI.dll")]
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("Autofac.dll")]
[assembly: InternalsVisibleTo("Autofac.Configuration.dll")]
namespace My.Namespace
{
public class BaseContext
{
public MyPublicClass _dbHelper { get; internal set; }
public BaseContext()
{
}
protected string DbConnectionString
{
get
{
return _dbHelper.DbConn; //<-Always null unless setter is public
}
}
}
}
You cannot inject internal setters with autofac, because the AutowiringPropertyInjector class is only looking for public properties (see source).
However a logic in the AutowiringPropertyInjector is very simple so you can create your own version which does injection for non public properties:
public static class AutowiringNonPublicPropertyInjector
{
public static void InjectProperties(IComponentContext context,
object instance, bool overrideSetValues)
{
if (context == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("context");
if (instance == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("instance");
foreach (
PropertyInfo propertyInfo in
//BindingFlags.NonPublic flag added for non public properties
instance.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance |
BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.NonPublic))
{
Type propertyType = propertyInfo.PropertyType;
if ((!propertyType.IsValueType || propertyType.IsEnum) &&
(propertyInfo.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0 &&
context.IsRegistered(propertyType)))
{
//Changed to GetAccessors(true) to return non public accessors
MethodInfo[] accessors = propertyInfo.GetAccessors(true);
if ((accessors.Length != 1 ||
!(accessors[0].ReturnType != typeof (void))) &&
(overrideSetValues || accessors.Length != 2 ||
propertyInfo.GetValue(instance, null) == null))
{
object obj = context.Resolve(propertyType);
propertyInfo.SetValue(instance, obj, null);
}
}
}
}
}
And now you can use this class in the OnActivated event
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterType<MyPublicClass>();
builder.RegisterType<BaseContext>()
.OnActivated(args =>
AutowiringNonPublicPropertyInjector
.InjectProperties(args.Context, args.Instance, true));
However the above listed solution now injects all kind of properties so even private and protected ones so you may need to extend it with some additional checks to make sure that you will only inject the properties what you would expect.
I'm using a solution like this:
builder.RegisterType<MyPublicClass>();
builder.RegisterType<BaseContext>()
.OnActivating(CustomPropertiesHandler);
With a handler like this:
//If OnActivated: Autofac.Core.IActivatedEventArgs
public void CustomPropertiesHandler<T>(Autofac.Core.IActivatingEventArgs<T> e)
{
var props = e.Instance.GetType()
.GetTypeInfo().DeclaredProperties //Also "private prop" with "public set"
.Where(pi => pi.CanWrite) //Has a set accessor.
//.Where(pi => pi.SetMethod.IsPrivate) //set accessor is private
.Where(pi => e.Context.IsRegistered(pi.PropertyType)); //Type is resolvable
foreach (var prop in props)
prop.SetValue(e.Instance, e.Context.Resolve(prop.PropertyType), null);
}
Since both IActivatingEventArgs and IActivatedEventArgs has instance and context, you might want to use wrapping methods that uses those parameters on CustomPropertiesHandler instead.
Also we can write #nemesv implementation as an extension method.
public static class AutofacExtensions
{
public static void InjectProperties(IComponentContext context, object instance, bool overrideSetValues)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (instance == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(instance));
}
foreach (var propertyInfo in instance.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance |
BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.NonPublic))
{
var propertyType = propertyInfo.PropertyType;
if ((!propertyType.IsValueType || propertyType.IsEnum) && (propertyInfo.GetIndexParameters().Length == 0) && context.IsRegistered(propertyType))
{
var accessors = propertyInfo.GetAccessors(true);
if (((accessors.Length != 1) ||
!(accessors[0].ReturnType != typeof(void))) &&
(overrideSetValues || (accessors.Length != 2) ||
(propertyInfo.GetValue(instance, null) == null)))
{
var obj = context.Resolve(propertyType);
propertyInfo.SetValue(instance, obj, null);
}
}
}
}
public static IRegistrationBuilder<TLimit, TActivatorData, TRegistrationStyle> InjectPropertiesAsAutowired<TLimit, TActivatorData, TRegistrationStyle>(
this IRegistrationBuilder<TLimit, TActivatorData, TRegistrationStyle> registration)
{
return registration.OnActivated(args => InjectProperties(args.Context, args.Instance, true));
}
To Use;
protected override void Load(ContainerBuilder builder)
{
builder.RegisterType<StartupConfiguration>().As<IStartupConfiguration>().AsSelf().InjectPropertiesAsAutowired().AsImplementedInterfaces().SingleInstance();
}
Current version of Autofac defined optional IPropertySelector parameter for PropertiesAutowired which is used to filter out injectable properties.
default implementation for IPropertySelector is DefaultPropertySelector, which filters non public properties.
public virtual bool InjectProperty(PropertyInfo propertyInfo, object instance)
{
if (!propertyInfo.CanWrite || propertyInfo.SetMethod?.IsPublic != true)
{
return false;
}
....
}
define custom IPropertySelector which allows injection to non public properties
public class AccessRightInvariantPropertySelector : DefaultPropertySelector
{
public AccessRightInvariantPropertySelector(bool preserveSetValues) : base(preserveSetValues)
{ }
public override bool InjectProperty(PropertyInfo propertyInfo, object instance)
{
if (!propertyInfo.CanWrite)
{
return false;
}
if (!PreserveSetValues || !propertyInfo.CanRead)
{
return true;
}
try
{
return propertyInfo.GetValue(instance, null) == null;
}
catch
{
// Issue #799: If getting the property value throws an exception
// then assume it's set and skip it.
return false;
}
}
}
Use
builder.RegisterType<AppService>()
.AsImplementedInterfaces()
.PropertiesAutowired(new AccessRightInvariantPropertySelector(true));
Alternatively
Install
PM> Install-Package Autofac.Core.NonPublicProperty
Use
builder.RegisterType<AppService>()
.AsImplementedInterfaces()
.AutoWireNonPublicProperties();
Considering this IronPython script
def SensorEvent(d):
print d
print d.Message
... how do I access properties of d?
First line of the SensorEvent method successfully prints
{ Message = blah blubb }
however second line throws an exception:
'<>f_anonymousType[str]' object has no attribute 'Message'
Explanation
d is an instance of an anonymous type provided by an invoke from a C# method. I'm invoking it like this:
public static async void ExecutePyFunc(string name, dynamic data)
{
try
{
var f = strategyScope.GetVariable<Action<object>>(name);
if (f != null)
{
await Task.Run(() => f((object)data));
}
}
catch (Exception x)
{
StaticLog("[Callback Exception] Fehler beim Ausführen einer Python Funktion: {0}", x.Message);
}
}
d is a dictionary. Access it like so:
d['Message']
My solution using DynamicObject: I've introduced a class that converts an anonymous type into a known type by copying its properties via reflection (I don't need anything but the properties but it could probably be enhanced for use with fields, methods, functions as well).
Here's what I've come up with:
public class IronPythonKnownType : DynamicObject
{
public IronPythonKnownType(dynamic obj)
{
var properties = obj.GetType().GetProperties();
foreach (PropertyInfo prop in properties)
{
var val = prop.GetValue(obj);
this.Set(prop.Name, val);
}
}
private Dictionary<string, object> _dict = new Dictionary<string, object>();
public override bool TryGetMember(GetMemberBinder binder, out object result)
{
if (_dict.ContainsKey(binder.Name))
{
result = _dict[binder.Name];
return true;
}
return base.TryGetMember(binder, out result);
}
private void Set(string name, object value)
{
_dict[name] = value;
}
public override bool TrySetMember(SetMemberBinder binder, object value)
{
_dict[binder.Name] = value;
return true;
}
}
which effectively converts the anonymous object into something IronPython can handle.
Now I can do that:
def Blubb(a):
print a.Message
without getting the mentioned exception.
I'm wanting to have a simple duck typing example in C# using dynamic objects. It would seem to me, that a dynamic object should have HasValue/HasProperty/HasMethod methods with a single string parameter for the name of the value, property, or method you are looking for before trying to run against it. I'm trying to avoid try/catch blocks, and deeper reflection if possible. It just seems to be a common practice for duck typing in dynamic languages (JS, Ruby, Python etc.) that is to test for a property/method before trying to use it, then falling back to a default, or throwing a controlled exception. The example below is basically what I want to accomplish.
If the methods described above don't exist, does anyone have premade extension methods for dynamic that will do this?
Example: In JavaScript I can test for a method on an object fairly easily.
//JavaScript
function quack(duck) {
if (duck && typeof duck.quack === "function") {
return duck.quack();
}
return null; //nothing to return, not a duck
}
How would I do the same in C#?
//C# 4
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
//how do I test that the duck is not null,
//and has a quack method?
//if it doesn't quack, return null
}
If you have control over all of the object types that you will be using dynamically, another option would be to force them to inherit from a subclass of the DynamicObject class that is tailored to not fail when a method that does not exist is invoked:
A quick and dirty version would look like this:
public class DynamicAnimal : DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvokeMember(InvokeMemberBinder binder, object[] args, out object result)
{
bool success = base.TryInvokeMember(binder, args, out result);
// If the method didn't exist, ensure the result is null
if (!success) result = null;
// Always return true to avoid Exceptions being raised
return true;
}
}
You could then do the following:
public class Duck : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Quack()
{
return "QUACK!";
}
}
public class Cow : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Moo()
{
return "Mooooo!";
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var duck = new Duck();
var cow = new Cow();
Console.WriteLine("Can a duck quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(duck));
Console.WriteLine("Can a cow quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(cow));
Console.ReadKey();
}
public static string DoQuack(dynamic animal)
{
string result = animal.Quack();
return result ?? "... silence ...";
}
}
And your output would be:
Can a duck quack?
QUACK!
Can a cow quack?
... silence ...
Edit: I should note that this is the tip of the iceberg if you are able to use this approach and build on DynamicObject. You could write methods like bool HasMember(string memberName) if you so desired.
Try this:
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
//...
public dynamic Quack(dynamic duck, int i)
{
Object obj = duck as Object;
if (duck != null)
{
//check if object has method Quack()
MethodInfo method = obj.GetType().GetMethods().
FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == "Quack");
//if yes
if (method != null)
{
//invoke and return value
return method.Invoke((object)duck, null);
}
}
return null;
}
Or this (uses only dynamic):
public static dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
//invoke and return value
return duck.Quack();
}
//thrown if method call failed
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
return null;
}
}
Implementation of the HasProperty method for every IDynamicMetaObjectProvider WITHOUT throwing RuntimeBinderException.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Dynamic;
using Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
namespace DynamicCheckPropertyExistence
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
dynamic testDynamicObject = new ExpandoObject();
testDynamicObject.Name = "Testovaci vlastnost";
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Name"));
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Id"));
Console.ReadLine();
}
private static bool HasProperty(IDynamicMetaObjectProvider dynamicProvider, string name)
{
var defaultBinder = Binder.GetMember(CSharpBinderFlags.None, name, typeof(Program),
new[]
{
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(
CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null)
}) as GetMemberBinder;
var callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>.Create(new NoThrowGetBinderMember(name, false, defaultBinder));
var result = callSite.Target(callSite, dynamicProvider);
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(result, NoThrowExpressionVisitor.DUMMY_RESULT))
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
class NoThrowGetBinderMember : GetMemberBinder
{
private GetMemberBinder m_innerBinder;
public NoThrowGetBinderMember(string name, bool ignoreCase, GetMemberBinder innerBinder) : base(name, ignoreCase)
{
m_innerBinder = innerBinder;
}
public override DynamicMetaObject FallbackGetMember(DynamicMetaObject target, DynamicMetaObject errorSuggestion)
{
var retMetaObject = m_innerBinder.Bind(target, new DynamicMetaObject[] {});
var noThrowVisitor = new NoThrowExpressionVisitor();
var resultExpression = noThrowVisitor.Visit(retMetaObject.Expression);
var finalMetaObject = new DynamicMetaObject(resultExpression, retMetaObject.Restrictions);
return finalMetaObject;
}
}
class NoThrowExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
public static readonly object DUMMY_RESULT = new DummyBindingResult();
public NoThrowExpressionVisitor()
{
}
protected override Expression VisitConditional(ConditionalExpression node)
{
if (node.IfFalse.NodeType != ExpressionType.Throw)
{
return base.VisitConditional(node);
}
Expression<Func<Object>> dummyFalseResult = () => DUMMY_RESULT;
var invokeDummyFalseResult = Expression.Invoke(dummyFalseResult, null);
return Expression.Condition(node.Test, node.IfTrue, invokeDummyFalseResult);
}
private class DummyBindingResult {}
}
}
impromptu-interface seems to be a nice Interface mapper for dynamic objects... It's a bit more work than I was hoping for, but seems to be the cleanest implementation of the examples presented... Keeping Simon's answer as correct, since it is still the closest to what I wanted, but the Impromptu interface methods are really nice.
The shortest path would be to invoke it, and handle the exception if the method does not exist. I come from Python where such method is common in duck-typing, but I don't know if it is widely used in C#4...
I haven't tested myself since I don't have VC 2010 on my machine
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
return duck.Quack();
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{ return null; }
}
Have not see a correct answer here, MS provides an example now with casting to a dictionary
dynamic employee = new ExpandoObject();
employee.Name = "John Smith";
employee.Age = 33;
foreach (var property in (IDictionary<String, Object>)employee)
{
Console.WriteLine(property.Key + ": " + property.Value);
}
// This code example produces the following output:
// Name: John Smith
// Age: 33