How do I add a color column to the following dataframe so that color='green' if Set == 'Z', and color='red' otherwise?
Type Set
1 A Z
2 B Z
3 B X
4 C Y
If you only have two choices to select from:
df['color'] = np.where(df['Set']=='Z', 'green', 'red')
For example,
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({'Type':list('ABBC'), 'Set':list('ZZXY')})
df['color'] = np.where(df['Set']=='Z', 'green', 'red')
print(df)
yields
Set Type color
0 Z A green
1 Z B green
2 X B red
3 Y C red
If you have more than two conditions then use np.select. For example, if you want color to be
yellow when (df['Set'] == 'Z') & (df['Type'] == 'A')
otherwise blue when (df['Set'] == 'Z') & (df['Type'] == 'B')
otherwise purple when (df['Type'] == 'B')
otherwise black,
then use
df = pd.DataFrame({'Type':list('ABBC'), 'Set':list('ZZXY')})
conditions = [
(df['Set'] == 'Z') & (df['Type'] == 'A'),
(df['Set'] == 'Z') & (df['Type'] == 'B'),
(df['Type'] == 'B')]
choices = ['yellow', 'blue', 'purple']
df['color'] = np.select(conditions, choices, default='black')
print(df)
which yields
Set Type color
0 Z A yellow
1 Z B blue
2 X B purple
3 Y C black
List comprehension is another way to create another column conditionally. If you are working with object dtypes in columns, like in your example, list comprehensions typically outperform most other methods.
Example list comprehension:
df['color'] = ['red' if x == 'Z' else 'green' for x in df['Set']]
%timeit tests:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({'Type':list('ABBC'), 'Set':list('ZZXY')})
%timeit df['color'] = ['red' if x == 'Z' else 'green' for x in df['Set']]
%timeit df['color'] = np.where(df['Set']=='Z', 'green', 'red')
%timeit df['color'] = df.Set.map( lambda x: 'red' if x == 'Z' else 'green')
1000 loops, best of 3: 239 µs per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 523 µs per loop
1000 loops, best of 3: 263 µs per loop
The following is slower than the approaches timed here, but we can compute the extra column based on the contents of more than one column, and more than two values can be computed for the extra column.
Simple example using just the "Set" column:
def set_color(row):
if row["Set"] == "Z":
return "red"
else:
return "green"
df = df.assign(color=df.apply(set_color, axis=1))
print(df)
Set Type color
0 Z A red
1 Z B red
2 X B green
3 Y C green
Example with more colours and more columns taken into account:
def set_color(row):
if row["Set"] == "Z":
return "red"
elif row["Type"] == "C":
return "blue"
else:
return "green"
df = df.assign(color=df.apply(set_color, axis=1))
print(df)
Set Type color
0 Z A red
1 Z B red
2 X B green
3 Y C blue
Edit (21/06/2019): Using plydata
It is also possible to use plydata to do this kind of things (this seems even slower than using assign and apply, though).
from plydata import define, if_else
Simple if_else:
df = define(df, color=if_else('Set=="Z"', '"red"', '"green"'))
print(df)
Set Type color
0 Z A red
1 Z B red
2 X B green
3 Y C green
Nested if_else:
df = define(df, color=if_else(
'Set=="Z"',
'"red"',
if_else('Type=="C"', '"green"', '"blue"')))
print(df)
Set Type color
0 Z A red
1 Z B red
2 X B blue
3 Y C green
Another way in which this could be achieved is
df['color'] = df.Set.map( lambda x: 'red' if x == 'Z' else 'green')
Here's yet another way to skin this cat, using a dictionary to map new values onto the keys in the list:
def map_values(row, values_dict):
return values_dict[row]
values_dict = {'A': 1, 'B': 2, 'C': 3, 'D': 4}
df = pd.DataFrame({'INDICATOR': ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'], 'VALUE': [10, 9, 8, 7]})
df['NEW_VALUE'] = df['INDICATOR'].apply(map_values, args = (values_dict,))
What's it look like:
df
Out[2]:
INDICATOR VALUE NEW_VALUE
0 A 10 1
1 B 9 2
2 C 8 3
3 D 7 4
This approach can be very powerful when you have many ifelse-type statements to make (i.e. many unique values to replace).
And of course you could always do this:
df['NEW_VALUE'] = df['INDICATOR'].map(values_dict)
But that approach is more than three times as slow as the apply approach from above, on my machine.
And you could also do this, using dict.get:
df['NEW_VALUE'] = [values_dict.get(v, None) for v in df['INDICATOR']]
You can simply use the powerful .loc method and use one condition or several depending on your need (tested with pandas=1.0.5).
Code Summary:
df=pd.DataFrame(dict(Type='A B B C'.split(), Set='Z Z X Y'.split()))
df['Color'] = "red"
df.loc[(df['Set']=="Z"), 'Color'] = "green"
#practice!
df.loc[(df['Set']=="Z")&(df['Type']=="B")|(df['Type']=="C"), 'Color'] = "purple"
Explanation:
df=pd.DataFrame(dict(Type='A B B C'.split(), Set='Z Z X Y'.split()))
# df so far:
Type Set
0 A Z
1 B Z
2 B X
3 C Y
add a 'color' column and set all values to "red"
df['Color'] = "red"
Apply your single condition:
df.loc[(df['Set']=="Z"), 'Color'] = "green"
# df:
Type Set Color
0 A Z green
1 B Z green
2 B X red
3 C Y red
or multiple conditions if you want:
df.loc[(df['Set']=="Z")&(df['Type']=="B")|(df['Type']=="C"), 'Color'] = "purple"
You can read on Pandas logical operators and conditional selection here:
Logical operators for boolean indexing in Pandas
You can use pandas methods where and mask:
df['color'] = 'green'
df['color'] = df['color'].where(df['Set']=='Z', other='red')
# Replace values where the condition is False
or
df['color'] = 'red'
df['color'] = df['color'].mask(df['Set']=='Z', other='green')
# Replace values where the condition is True
Alternatively, you can use the method transform with a lambda function:
df['color'] = df['Set'].transform(lambda x: 'green' if x == 'Z' else 'red')
Output:
Type Set color
1 A Z green
2 B Z green
3 B X red
4 C Y red
Performance comparison from #chai:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
df = pd.DataFrame({'Type':list('ABBC')*1000000, 'Set':list('ZZXY')*1000000})
%timeit df['color1'] = 'red'; df['color1'].where(df['Set']=='Z','green')
%timeit df['color2'] = ['red' if x == 'Z' else 'green' for x in df['Set']]
%timeit df['color3'] = np.where(df['Set']=='Z', 'red', 'green')
%timeit df['color4'] = df.Set.map(lambda x: 'red' if x == 'Z' else 'green')
397 ms ± 101 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
976 ms ± 241 ms per loop
673 ms ± 139 ms per loop
796 ms ± 182 ms per loop
if you have only 2 choices, use np.where()
df = pd.DataFrame({'A':range(3)})
df['B'] = np.where(df.A>2, 'yes', 'no')
if you have over 2 choices, maybe apply() could work
input
arr = pd.DataFrame({'A':list('abc'), 'B':range(3), 'C':range(3,6), 'D':range(6, 9)})
and arr is
A B C D
0 a 0 3 6
1 b 1 4 7
2 c 2 5 8
if you want the column E tobe if arr.A =='a' then arr.B elif arr.A=='b' then arr.C elif arr.A == 'c' then arr.D else something_else
arr['E'] = arr.apply(lambda x: x['B'] if x['A']=='a' else(x['C'] if x['A']=='b' else(x['D'] if x['A']=='c' else 1234)), axis=1)
and finally the arr is
A B C D E
0 a 0 3 6 0
1 b 1 4 7 4
2 c 2 5 8 8
One liner with .apply() method is following:
df['color'] = df['Set'].apply(lambda set_: 'green' if set_=='Z' else 'red')
After that, df data frame looks like this:
>>> print(df)
Type Set color
0 A Z green
1 B Z green
2 B X red
3 C Y red
The case_when function from pyjanitor is a wrapper around pd.Series.mask and offers a chainable/convenient form for multiple conditions:
For a single condition:
df.case_when(
df.col1 == "Z", # condition
"green", # value if True
"red", # value if False
column_name = "color"
)
Type Set color
1 A Z green
2 B Z green
3 B X red
4 C Y red
For multiple conditions:
df.case_when(
df.Set.eq('Z') & df.Type.eq('A'), 'yellow', # condition, result
df.Set.eq('Z') & df.Type.eq('B'), 'blue', # condition, result
df.Type.eq('B'), 'purple', # condition, result
'black', # default if none of the conditions evaluate to True
column_name = 'color'
)
Type Set color
1 A Z yellow
2 B Z blue
3 B X purple
4 C Y black
More examples can be found here
If you're working with massive data, a memoized approach would be best:
# First create a dictionary of manually stored values
color_dict = {'Z':'red'}
# Second, build a dictionary of "other" values
color_dict_other = {x:'green' for x in df['Set'].unique() if x not in color_dict.keys()}
# Next, merge the two
color_dict.update(color_dict_other)
# Finally, map it to your column
df['color'] = df['Set'].map(color_dict)
This approach will be fastest when you have many repeated values. My general rule of thumb is to memoize when: data_size > 10**4 & n_distinct < data_size/4
E.x. Memoize in a case 10,000 rows with 2,500 or fewer distinct values.
A Less verbose approach using np.select:
a = np.array([['A','Z'],['B','Z'],['B','X'],['C','Y']])
df = pd.DataFrame(a,columns=['Type','Set'])
conditions = [
df['Set'] == 'Z'
]
outputs = [
'Green'
]
# conditions Z is Green, Red Otherwise.
res = np.select(conditions, outputs, 'Red')
res
array(['Green', 'Green', 'Red', 'Red'], dtype='<U5')
df.insert(2, 'new_column',res)
df
Type Set new_column
0 A Z Green
1 B Z Green
2 B X Red
3 C Y Red
df.to_numpy()
array([['A', 'Z', 'Green'],
['B', 'Z', 'Green'],
['B', 'X', 'Red'],
['C', 'Y', 'Red']], dtype=object)
%%timeit conditions = [df['Set'] == 'Z']
outputs = ['Green']
np.select(conditions, outputs, 'Red')
134 µs ± 9.71 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)
df2 = pd.DataFrame({'Type':list('ABBC')*1000000, 'Set':list('ZZXY')*1000000})
%%timeit conditions = [df2['Set'] == 'Z']
outputs = ['Green']
np.select(conditions, outputs, 'Red')
188 ms ± 26.5 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
Here is an easy one-liner you can use when you have one or several conditions:
df['color'] = np.select(condlist=[df['Set']=="Z", df['Set']=="Y"], choicelist=["green", "yellow"], default="red")
Easy and good to go!
See more here: https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.select.html
Hello I am obliged to downgrade Pandas versioon to '0.24.2'
As a result, the function pd.NamedAgg is not recognizable anymore.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
agg_cols = ['A', 'B', 'C']
agg_df = df.groupby(agg_cols).agg(
max_foo=pd.NamedAgg(column='Foo', aggfunc=np.max),
min_foo=pd.NamedAgg(column='Foo', aggfunc=np.min)
).reset_index()
Can you help me please change my code to make it compliant with the version 0.24.2??
Thank you a lot.
Sample:
agg_df = df.groupby(agg_cols)['Foo'].agg(
[('max_foo', np.max),('min_foo', np.min)]
).reset_index()
df = pd.DataFrame({
'A':list('a')*6,
'B':[4,5,4,5,5,4],
'C':[7]*6,
'Foo':[1,3,5,7,1,0],
'E':[5,3,6,9,2,4],
'F':list('aaabbb')
})
agg_cols = ['A', 'B', 'C']
agg_df = df.groupby(agg_cols).agg(
max_foo=pd.NamedAgg(column='Foo', aggfunc=np.max),
min_foo=pd.NamedAgg(column='Foo', aggfunc=np.min)
).reset_index()
print (agg_df)
A B C max_foo min_foo
0 a 4 7 5 0
1 a 5 7 7 1
Because there is only one column Foo for processing add column Foo after groupby and pass tuples with new columns names with aggregate functions:
agg_df = df.groupby(agg_cols)['Foo'].agg(
[('max_foo', np.max),('min_foo', np.min)]
).reset_index()
print (agg_df)
A B C max_foo min_foo
0 a 4 7 5 0
1 a 5 7 7 1
Another idea is pass dictionary of lists of aggregate functions:
agg_df = df.groupby(agg_cols).agg({'Foo':['max', 'min']})
agg_df.columns = [f'{b}_{a}' for a, b in agg_df.columns]
agg_df = agg_df.reset_index()
print (agg_df)
A B C max_foo min_foo
0 a 4 7 5 0
1 a 5 7 7 1
I have a dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame({'Event1':['Music', 'Poetry', 'Theatre', 'Comedy'],
'Event2':[Poetry, Music, Dance, Theater]})
I need to create a new column called 'Val' that has the index of the element from Event 2 as it occurs in Event1. For example Val would be
'Val':[1,0,NaN,2].
Here's a way you can do:
Solution 1
import numpy as np
df['val'] = df['Event2'].apply(lambda x: np.where(x == df['Event1'])[0][0])
print(df)
Event1 Event2 val
0 Music Poetry 1
1 Poetry Music 0
2 Theatre Comedy 3
3 Comedy Theatre 2
Solution 2
df = pd.DataFrame({'Event1':['Music', 'Poetry', 'Theater', 'Comedy'], 'Event2':['Poetry', 'Music', 'Dance', 'Theater']})
df['val'] = (df['Event2']
.apply(lambda x: np.argwhere(x == df['Event1']))
.apply(lambda x: x[0][0] if len(x)>0 else x)
)
df['val'] = pd.to_numeric(df['val'], errors='coerce')
print(df)
Event1 Event2 val
0 Music Poetry 1.0
1 Poetry Music 0.0
2 Theater Dance NaN
3 Comedy Theater 2.0
I've got this long algebra formula that I need to apply to a dataframe:
def experience_mod(A, B, C, D, T, W):
E = (T-A)
F = (C-D)
xmod = (A + B + (E*W) + ((1-W)*F))/(D + B + (F*W) + ((1-W)*F))
return xmod
A = loss['actual_primary_losses']
B = loss['ballast']
C = loss['ExpectedLosses']
D = loss['ExpectedPrimaryLosses']
T = loss['ActualIncurred']
W = loss['weight']
How would I write this to calculate the experience_mod() for every row?
something like this?
loss['ExperienceRating'] = loss.apply(experience_mod(A,B,C,D,T,W) axis = 0)
Pandas and the underlying library, numpy, it's using, support vectorized operations, so given two dataframes A and B, operations like A + B, A - B etc are valid.
Your code works fine, you need to apply the function to the columns directly and assign the results back to the new column ExperienceRating,
Here's a working example:
In [1]: import pandas as pd
In [2]: import numpy as np
In [3]: df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(6,6), columns=list('ABCDTW'))
In [4]: df
Out[4]:
A B C D T W
0 0.049617 0.082861 2.289549 -0.783082 -0.691990 -0.071152
1 0.722605 0.209683 -0.347372 0.254951 0.468615 -0.132794
2 -0.301469 -1.849026 -0.334381 -0.365116 -0.238384 -1.999025
3 -0.554925 -0.859044 -0.637079 -1.040336 0.627027 -0.955889
4 -2.024621 -0.539384 0.006734 0.117628 -0.215070 -0.661466
5 1.942926 -0.433067 -1.034814 -0.292179 0.744039 0.233953
In [5]: def experience_mod(A, B, C, D, T, W):
...: E = (T-A)
...: F = (C-D)
...:
...: xmod = (A + B + (E*W) + ((1-W)*F))/(D + B + (F*W) + ((1-W)*F))
...:
...: return xmod
...:
In [6]: experience_mod(df["A"], df["B"], df["C"], df["D"], df["T"], df["W"])
Out[6]:
0 1.465387
1 -2.060483
2 1.000469
3 1.173070
4 7.406756
5 -0.449957
dtype: float64
In [7]: df['ExperienceRating'] = experience_mod(df["A"], df["B"], df["C"], df["D"], df["T"], df["W"])
In [8]: df
Out[8]:
A B C D T W ExperienceRating
0 0.049617 0.082861 2.289549 -0.783082 -0.691990 -0.071152 1.465387
1 0.722605 0.209683 -0.347372 0.254951 0.468615 -0.132794 -2.060483
2 -0.301469 -1.849026 -0.334381 -0.365116 -0.238384 -1.999025 1.000469
3 -0.554925 -0.859044 -0.637079 -1.040336 0.627027 -0.955889 1.173070
4 -2.024621 -0.539384 0.006734 0.117628 -0.215070 -0.661466 7.406756
5 1.942926 -0.433067 -1.034814 -0.292179 0.744039 0.233953 -0.449957
Sorry if this question has been asked before, but I did not find it here nor somewhere else:
I want to fill some of the fields of a column with tuples. Currently I would have to resort to:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({'a': [1,2,3,4]})
df['b'] = ''
df['b'] = df['b'].astype(object)
mytuple = ('x','y')
for l in df[df.a % 2 == 0].index:
df.set_value(l, 'b', mytuple)
with df being (which is what I want)
a b
0 1
1 2 (x, y)
2 3
3 4 (x, y)
This does not look very elegant to me and probably not very efficient. Instead of the loop, I would prefer something like
df.loc[df.a % 2 == 0, 'b'] = np.array([mytuple] * sum(df.a % 2 == 0), dtype=tuple)
which (of course) does not work. How can I improve my above method by using slicing?
In [57]: df.loc[df.a % 2 == 0, 'b'] = pd.Series([mytuple] * len(df.loc[df.a % 2 == 0])).values
In [58]: df
Out[58]:
a b
0 1
1 2 (x, y)
2 3
3 4 (x, y)