How do I get a connection string in a .net core standard class library from the configuration file in a .net core 2.0 web app? - asp.net-core

I have .net core standard class library which is essentially a DAL with several class methods that return collections and objects from a database. The connection string is in the appsettings.json file of the ASP.net 2 core web app. I also want to access this class library from a console app project where the configuration file with the connection string will be present in that console app project.
This was simple in .net prior to .net core. The DAL class library would just access the web.config from a web project and an app.config from a console application as it the library is referenced in both the web app and console apps. But it doesn't seem like this is at all possible.
I'm looking for the simple solution in .net core to get a connection string from web app or console app as the case may be.

Where you're probably going wrong is that you want to access configuration from your class library, but then you want to leak details specifically about the caller (That it will have a web.config).
But what if you decide in your Web Application you want to use Azure Key Vault or another secrets mechanism? Does your class library need to then change it's entire implementation to use Key Vault? And then does that mean your console application also has no option but to use Key Vault too?
So the solution is to use dependency inversion. Put simply, let's say I have code like the following :
interface IMyRepositoryConfiguration
{
string ConnectionString {get;}
}
class MyRepositoryConfiguration : IMyRepositoryConfiguration
{
public string ConnectionString {get;set;}
}
class MyRepository
{
private readonly IMyRepositoryConfiguration _myRepositoryConfiguration;
public MyRepository(IMyRepositoryConfiguration myRepositoryConfiguration)
{
_myRepositoryConfiguration = myRepositoryConfiguration;
}
}
Now in my startup.cs I can do something like :
services.AddSingleton<IMyRepositoryConfiguration>(new MyRepositoryConfiguration {//Set connection string from app settings etc});
And now my class library doesn't need to know exactly how those configuration strings are stored or how they are fetched. Just that if I request an instance of IMyRepositoryConfiguration, that it will have the value in there.
Alternatively of course, you can use the Options class too, but personally I prefer POCOs. More info here : https://dotnetcoretutorials.com/2016/12/26/custom-configuration-sections-asp-net-core/

It is very much possible to access "connection strings" or other configuration data easily in .Net core without much additional effort.
Just that the configuration system has evolved (into something much better) & we have to make allowances for this as well (& follow recommended practices).
In your case as you are accessing the connection string value in a standard library (intended to be reused), you should not make assumptions as how the configuration values will be "fed" to your class. What this means is you should not write code to read a connection string directly from a config file - instead rely on the dependency injection mechanism to provide you with the required configuration - regardless of how it has been made available to your app.
One way to do this is to "require" an IConfiguration object to be injected into your class constructor & then use the GetValue method to retrieve the value for the appropriate key, like so:
public class IndexModel : PageModel
{
public IndexModel(IConfiguration config)
{
_config = config;
}
public int NumberConfig { get; private set; }
public void OnGet()
{
NumberConfig = _config.GetValue<int>("NumberKey", 99);
}
}
In .net core, before the app is configured and started, a "host" is configured and launched. The host is responsible for app startup and lifetime management. Both the app and the host are configured using various "configuration providers". Host configuration key-value pairs become part of the app's global configuration.
Configuration sources are read in the order that their configuration providers are specified at startup.
.Net core supports various "providers". Read this article for complete information on this topic.

Related

Random ASP.NET Core Identity Logouts in production

I have an ASP.NET Core MVC web application that uses Identity to handle user account Authentication and Authorization. When running the app on my local IIS express everything was working properly. After deploying the app to a shared web server I started to notice that the logged-in user accounts would get logged out at seemingly random intervals. Through experimentation, I was able to determine that the log-outs were occurring whether the account was active or idle. They were occuring at no recuring time interval and completely unrelated to any expiry time that I set on my cookies. The logouts were occuring on every view in the web app so I couldn't pin the issue to any particular controller. Also I use the same Database for the published and the local testing version of the app and therefore the same user accounts. I anyone has an idea where to start looking for a solution it would be greatly appreciated.
I posted this question because there is a great answer that 90% solves the issue Here however of the multiple forums that I have been scouring over the last few days there are none with an accepted answer. I am posting this answer to address this. The underlying cause of the issue is that IIS application pool is being reset or recyling and on a shared host with multiple applications using it this can be happening fairly frequently. As is suggested in the above link Data Protection has to be used to persist the keys if IIS application pool recycles. Here is the code offered in the original answer.
services.AddDataProtection()
.PersistKeysToFileSystem(new System.IO.DirectoryInfo("SOME WHERE IN STORAGE"))
//.ProtectKeysWithCertificate(new X509Certificate2());
.SetDefaultKeyLifetime(TimeSpan.FromDays(90));
This code is to be added in ConfigureServices in Startup.cs
As my application is being hosted on a shared server using .PersistKeysToFileSystem was not an option so instead I persisted the keys using DbContext like this:
services.AddDataProtection().PersistKeysToDbContext<MyKeysContext>()
.SetDefaultKeyLifetime(TimeSpan.FromDays(90));
Based on This article here I build MyKeysContext as follows.
// Add a DbContext to store your Database Keys
services.AddDbContext<MyKeysContext>(options =>
options.UseSqlServer(
Configuration.GetConnectionString("MyKeysConnection")));
In ConfigureServices in Startup.cs and then created a class called MyKeysContext as follows:
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using WebApp1.Data;
namespace WebApp1
{
public class MyKeysContext : DbContext, IDataProtectionKeyContext
{
// A recommended constructor overload when using EF Core
// with dependency injection.
public MyKeysContext(DbContextOptions<MyKeysContext> options)
: base(options) { }
// This maps to the table that stores keys.
public DbSet<DataProtectionKey> DataProtectionKeys { get; set; }
}
}
I created the database on my Host this will probably be different so I have omitted this step. then I applied the migrations to the database like this.
Add-Migration AddDataProtectionKeys -Context MyKeysContext
Update-Database -Context MyKeysContext

appsettings.json and Class libraries that use ConfigurationManager.AppSettings

I'm working on migrating an existing ASP.NET MVC app to ASP.NET Core. The solution has several class libraries (providing data access, services, etc). Many of those class libraries make use of the static ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["..."] way of getting the config from the web.config file.
With the ASP.NET Core app, though, there is no web.config file and it appears ConfigurationManager can't read appsettings.json.
I really like the new configuration system in ASP.NET Core, and am making use of it within the web app.
But is there a "simple" way to migrate these class libraries without having to rewrite them to use the new configuration system? Any basic replacement for the static ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["..."] calls that'll read appsettings.json? (note: we'll eventually rewrite them, but we'd rather do this one piece at a time)
If you're using .NET Standard 2.0 you can add a reference to the System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager NuGet package to get access to appSettings.
You can add an app.Config file (not web.Config) to your ASP.NET Core project to store the appSettings. This will be copied to the output folder and renamed as AppName.dll.config during the project build.
Disclaimer: I didn't try this with a class library, but this worked in LinqPad:
void Main()
{
var config = new Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ConfigurationBuilder()
.AddInMemoryCollection(new Dictionary<string, string>
{
["test"] = "test",
["test2:test"] = "test2"
})
.Build();
foreach (var pair in config.AsEnumerable())
{
// Skips the (test2 = null) pair
if (pair.Value != null)
{
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Set(pair.Key, pair.Value);
}
}
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["test"].Dump();
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["test2:test"].Dump();
}
You could put something like this in your initialization code.
It sets all of the values available to the System.Configuration app setting collection.

How to use settings in business/domain layer in ASP.NET Core?

I see that the preferred way to use settings is to use Options pattern, and inject IOptions<T> object in class where I want to use settings.
Is there any other solution how to make this work in Business/Domain layer where I don't want to reference ASP.NET Core specific DLL like the one with IOptions<T> infrastructure?
You can use IConfiguration too. This technology is evolving fast, and the best practices are constantly changing. Take for example the docs on Configuration for 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 and 3.0
As of today, you could sensibly build ASP.NET Core apps in any of these versions.
Hitting the middle ground, say 2.1, look at the configuration docs and take some time to understand the many different ways of using this.
In 2.1, you can use appSettings.json to control settings for different deployments and different layers.
The default scaffolding adds CreateWebHostBuilder:
public static IWebHostBuilder CreateWebHostBuilder(string[] args) =>
WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
.UseStartup<Startup>();
Under the covers this calls calls AddJsonFile twice, once for appsettings.json and again for appsettings.{Environment}.json.
Add an appsettings.Production.json file to you project, and you'll get the benefits.
Then the respective appSettings file will be used based on an ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT value that can be added to project properties (or Azure Web App | Application Settings) as needed. If not supplied it will default to Production
To read Configuration in in .Net Core:
//Sample appsettings.json
{
"Logging": {
"LogLevel": {
"Default": "Warning"
}
},
"AllowedHosts": "*",
"UserId": "sa",
"UserPassword": "123",
"ServerName": "abc"``
}
Step 2 :
Download NuGet packages
-Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration,Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.FileExtensions
,Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json
Add Class(name class whatever you want)
static class AppSettings
{
public static IConfiguration Settings { get; }
static AppSettings()
{
Settings = new ConfigurationBuilder().SetBasePath(Directory.GetCurrentDirectory()).AddJsonFile("appsettings.json").Build();
}
}
In Business, logic read as:
string strUserID= AppSettings.Settings["DbUserId"].ToString()
#CsharpBeginner, I believe I share your concern.
Our domain/use case layer should not know about the way configuration is injected. Therefore, I believe we should not depend on framework solutions as IOptions.
I guess the only ways to solve this are:
to inject the configuration class itself (T in your case) without using IOptions or
to use some sort of custom IOptions interface together with a custom implementation (outside of domain) which in turn uses Microsoft’s IOptions to pass on the configuration class.

Ninject 3, WCF Service and parameterized constructor

I have a WCF Service hosted in IIS. This solution is composed of 2 projects: Service and Data. Service depends on Data, like so:
Service -> Data
I've been trying to invert the dependency, like so:
Service <- Data
Which is quite a headache using WCF, since the WCF service constructor must be parameter-less (by default).
I hear it's possible to inject the dependency using Ninject and its WCF extension, so I tried to integrate it to my solution, but it's still not clear to me in which project should be the related files and references? What I did is :
Download Ninject using NuGet
Add Ninject to both my Data and Service projects (that created the NinjectWebCommon file in the App_Start folder of the Service Project
Create a IDataProxy interface in my Service project
Implement the interface in my Data project
Add a IDataProxy argument to the WCF service constructor
Added the factory configuration in the .svc file markup
Up to that point, I'm pretty sure I'm doing it right. Now the shaky part :
I created a DataInjectionModule in my data project with this code :
namespace Data
{
public class DataInjectionModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<IResolutionRoot>().ToConstant(Kernel);
Bind<ServiceHost>().To<NinjectServiceHost>();
Bind<IDataProxy>().To<DataProxy>();
}
}
}
I finally tried to register the service in the NinjectWebCommon files (of both projects to be sure) like that :
/// <summary>
/// Load your modules or register your services here!
/// </summary>
/// <param name="kernel">The kernel.</param>
private static void RegisterServices(IKernel kernel)
{
kernel.Bind<IService>().To<Service>()
.WithConstructorArgument("IDataProxy", context => context.Kernel.Get<IDataProxy>());
}
When I try to start my service, I still get this :
The service type provided could not be loaded as a service because it does not have a default (parameter-less) constructor. To fix the problem, add a default constructor to the type, or pass an instance of the type to the host.
I have a feeling that the problem resides in the fact that I did not bind my DataInjectionModule in the kernel, but if I try to do so, I must add a dependency from Service to Data, which is what I'm trying to avoid.
General expert advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Please check your point 6: "Added the factory configuration in the .svc file markup."
Have you done it properly?
The *.svc file should have this code:
Factory="Ninject.Extensions.Wcf.NinjectServiceHostFactory"

Is there an Azure Websites functionality equivalent to Azure Web Roles RoleEntryPoint

I want to run some code from a library before Application_Start and i was wondering if that is possible using just Azure websites or if I have to purchase an Azure Web Role instance and use RoleEntryPoint?
Have you tried using the WebActivator NuGet package? Have a look on GitHub for further details but the basics of it are simply adding an attribute and an initialisation method to your application. For example:
using System;
[assembly: WebActivator.PreApplicationStartMethod(typeof(MyApp.Bootstrapper), "PreStart")]
namespace MyApp {
public static class Bootstrapper {
public static void PreStart() {
// Add your start logic here
}
}
}
The code in PreStart will run before Application_Start.
There are other attributes you can use for doing things on shutdown (ApplicationShutdownMethodAttribute) and for post startup (PostApplicationStartMethodAttribute).