This question already has answers here:
Combining the results of two SQL queries as separate columns
(4 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I am trying to query two different columns from two different table where I could count the number of certain column. I could do it in two separate query but I think it would create a slowdown in the future. What I want is a single query where I could display both of those counts in a single query only.
I tried using two separated select statements but I think is not good, I also tried using Union All, but the results are not what I expected.
upload_monitoring (12 Columns)
upm_FileName | upm_Status
----------------+--------------
Monitoring_0608 | Distributed
Monitoring_0607 | Distributed
Monitoring_0606 | Distributed
Monitoring_0605 | Uploaded
(100 rows)
distribute_monitoring (7 Columns)
dist_ProductName | dist_Status
-------------------+--------------
Monitoring_0608 | Pending
Monitoring_0607 | Pending
Monitoring_0606 | Pending
Monitoring_0605 | Touched
(100 rows)
I tried with these:
$query2 = "
SELECT
COUNT(upm_Status) AS total_DistItems
FROM
upload_monitoring
WHERE
upm_Status = 'Distributed'
AND
upm_FileName = '$upm_FileName'
";
$result2 = mysqli_query($connection, $query2);
$fetchResult2 = mysqli_fetch_assoc($result2);
$total_DistItems = $fetchResult2['total_DistItems'];
$query3 = "
SELECT
COUNT(dist_Status) AS total_PendItems
FROM
distribute_monitoring
WHERE
dist_Status = 'Pending'
AND
dist_Product = '$upm_FileName'
";
$result3 = mysqli_query($connection, $query3);
$fetchResult3 = mysqli_fetch_assoc($result3);
$total_PendItems = $fetchResult3['total_PendItems'];
I also tried with these one
$query2 = "
SELECT
upm_Status,
COUNT(upm_Status) AS total_DistItems
FROM
upload_monitoring
WHERE
upm_Status = 'Distributed'
AND
upm_FileName = '$upm_FileName'
UNION ALL
SELECT
dist_Status,
COUNT(dist_Status) AS total_PendItems
FROM
distribute_monitoring
WHERE
dist_Status = 'Pending'
AND
dist_Product = '$upm_FileName'
";
$result2 = mysqli_query($connection, $query2);
however the result is
upm_Status | total_DistItems
------------+--------------
Distributed | 34
Pending | 12
What I expect the result to be is like this one.
upm_Status | total_DistItems | dist_Status | total_PendItems
------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------
Distributed | 34 | Pending | 12
Here is one method:
SELECT u.*, d.*
FROM (SELECT 'Distributed' as upm_Status,
COUNT(*) AS total_DistItems
FROM upload_monitoring
WHERE upm_Status = 'Distributed' AND
upm_FileName = ?
) u CROSS JOIN
(SELECT 'Pending' as dist_Status, COUNT(dist_Status) AS total_PendItems
FROM distribute_monitoring
WHERE dist_Status = 'Pending' AND
dist_Product = ?
) d;
Note that I replaced the $upm_filename with ?. This indicates that you should be using parameters to pass values into the query, rather than munging the query string with such values. Your method puts you at risk for unexpected syntax errors and SQL injection attacks.
Related
I have created a Kusto query that allows me to return all our database park. The query only takes 10 lines of code:
Resources
| join kind=inner (
resourcecontainers
| where type == 'microsoft.resources/subscriptions'
| project subscriptionId, subscriptionName = name)
on subscriptionId
| where subscriptionName in~ ('Subscription1','Subscription2')
| where type =~ 'microsoft.sql/servers/databases'
| where name != 'master'
| project subscriptionName, resourceGroup, name, type, location,sku.tier, properties.requestedServiceObjectiveName, tags.customerCode
By contract we are supposed to give only 4 Azure SQL Database per customer but sometimes developers take a copy of them and they rename it _old or _backup and suddenly a customer can have 5 or 6 databases.
This increase the overall costs of the Cloud and I would like to have a list of all customers that have more than 4 databases.
In order to do so I can use the tag tags.customerCode which has the 3 letters identifier for each customer.
The code should work like this: if a customer is called ABC and there are 4 Azure SQL Databases with tags.customerCode ABC the query should return nothing. If there are 5 or 6 databases with tags.customerCode ABC the query should return all of them.
Not sure if Kusto can be that flexible.
Here is a possible solution.
It should be noted that Azure resource graph supports only a limited subset of KQL.
resourcecontainers
| where type == 'microsoft.resources/subscriptions'
//and name in~ ('Subscription1','Subscription2')
| project subscriptionId, subscriptionName = name
| join kind=inner
(
resources
| where type =~ 'microsoft.sql/servers/databases'
and name != 'master'
)
on subscriptionId
| project subscriptionId, subscriptionName, resourceGroup, name, type, location
,tier = sku.tier
,requestedServiceObjectiveName = properties.requestedServiceObjectiveName
,customerCode = tostring(tags.customerCode)
| summarize dbs = count(), details = make_list(pack_all()) by customerCode
| where dbs > 4
| mv-expand with_itemindex=db_seq ['details']
| project customerCode
,dbs
,db_seq = db_seq + 1
,subscriptionId = details.subscriptionId
,subscriptionName = details.subscriptionName
,resourceGroup = details.resourceGroup
,name = details.name
,type = details.type
,location = details.location
,tier = details.tier
,requestedServiceObjectiveName = details.requestedServiceObjectiveName
I have the following SQL query:
SELECT TOP 3 accounts.username
,COUNT(accounts.username) AS count
FROM relationships
JOIN accounts ON relationships.account = accounts.id
WHERE relationships.following = 4
AND relationships.account IN (
SELECT relationships.following
FROM relationships
WHERE relationships.account = 8
);
I want to return the total count of accounts.username and the first 3 accounts.username (in no particular order). Unfortunately accounts.username and COUNT(accounts.username) cannot coexist. The query works fine removing one of the them. I don't want to send the request twice with different select bodies. The count column could span to 1000+ so I would prefer to calculate it in SQL rather in code.
The current query returns the error Column 'accounts.username' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause. which has not led me anywhere and this is different to other questions as I do not want to use the 'group by' clause. Is there a way to do this with FOR JSON AUTO?
The desired output could be:
+-------+----------+
| count | username |
+-------+----------+
| 1551 | simon1 |
| 1551 | simon2 |
| 1551 | simon3 |
+-------+----------+
or
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| JSON_F52E2B61-18A1-11d1-B105-00805F49916B |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| [{"count": 1551, "usernames": ["simon1", "simon2", "simon3"]}] |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
If you want to display the total count of rows that satisfy the filter conditions (and where username is not null) in an additional column in your resultset, then you could use window functions:
SELECT TOP 3
a.username,
COUNT(a.username) OVER() AS cnt
FROM relationships r
JOIN accounts a ON r.account = a.id
WHERE
r.following = 4
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM relationships t1 WHERE r1.account = 8 AND r1.following = r.account
)
;
Side notes:
if username is not nullable, use COUNT(*) rather than COUNT(a.username): this is more efficient since it does not require the database to check every value for nullity
table aliases make the query easier to write, read and maintain
I usually prefer EXISTS over IN (but here this is mostly a matter of taste, as both techniques should work fine for your use case)
I am working on a school assignment that has downright stumped me for days. The task is to, using a view (VAvailableGolfers), populate a list box with Golfers who are not tied to a given event/year selected from a combo box. Here is the data in the tables:
The expected output on the form, then, would be:
2015 shows Goldstein available
2016 shows no one available
2017 shows both Goldstein and Everett available
so, in other words, where there isn't a record in TGolferEventYears for a golfer for a particular year
I have tried left joins, full outer joins, exists, not in, not exists, etc and I cannot seem to nail down the SQL to make it happen.
Here is the VB Form and the SQL backing it. I cannot figure out what to code in the view:
"SELECT intGolferID, strLastName FROM vAvailableGolfers WHERE intEventYearID = " & cboEvents.SelectedValue.ToString
Here is the view, which I know isn't giving correct output:
select tg.intGolferID, strLastName, intEventYearID
from TGolferEventYears TGEY, TGolfers TG
Where tgey.intGolferID = tg.intGolferID
and intEventYearID not IN
(select intEventYearID
from TEventYears
where intEventYearID not in
(select intEventYearID
from TGolferEventYears))
Appreciate any help
I usually approach this type of question by using a cross join to generate all possibly combination and then a left join/where to filter out the ones that already exist:
select g.intGolferID, g.strLastName, ey.intEventYearID
from TEventYears ey cross join
TGolfers g left join
TGolferEventYears gey
on gey.intGolferID = g.intGolferID and
gey.intEventYearID = ey.intEventYearID
where gey.intGolferID is null;
Try this query:
SELECT tg.intGolferID, strLastName, tey.intEventYearID, tey.intEventYear
FROM TGolfers tg, TEventYears tey
WHERE tg.intGolferID NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT tgey.intGolferID
FROM TGolferEventYears tgey
WHERE tgey.intEventYearID = tey.intEventYearID
)
Explanation
Since you are trying to get combinations of data that is not in TGolferEventYears, you cannot use it in your outer-most SELECT as any of its columns would be NULL. Therefore, you need to SELECT FROM the tables that are the sources of that data, and going through each joined record, filter out the combinations that are in TGolferEventYears.
Main query
Select the data you need:
SELECT tg.intGolferID, strLastName, tey.intEventYearID, tey.intEventYear
...from TGolfers, cross join with TEventYears:
FROM TGolfers tg, TEventYears tey
...where the golfer ID does not exist in the following collection:
WHERE tg.intGolferID NOT IN ( ... )
Subquery
Select unique golfer IDs:
SELECT DISTINCT tgey.intGolferID
...from TGolferEventYears:
FROM TGolferEventYears tgey
...where the year is the current year of the outer query:
WHERE tgey.intEventYearID = tey.intEventYearID
Result
+-------------+-------------+----------------+--------------+
| intGolferID | strLastName | intEventYearID | intEventYear |
+-------------+-------------+----------------+--------------+
| 1 | Goldstein | 1 | 2015 |
| 1 | Goldstein | 3 | 2017 |
| 2 | Everett | 3 | 2017 |
+-------------+-------------+----------------+--------------+
I'm a little stuck here. I'm trying to modify a returned View based on a condition. I'm fairly green on SQL and am having a bit of difficultly with the returned result. Heres a partial component of the view I wrote:
WITH A AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY fkidContract,fkidTemplateItem ORDER BY bStdActive DESC, dtdateplanned ASC) AS RANK,
tblWorkItems.fkidContract AS ContractNo,
....
FROM tblWorkItems
WHERE fkidTemplateItem IN
(2895,2905,2915,2907,2908,
2909,3047,2930,2923,2969,
2968,2919,2935,2936,2927,
2970,2979)
AND ...
)
SELECT * FROM A WHERE RANK = 1
The return result is similar to the following:
ContractNo| ItemNumber | Planned | Complete
001 | 100 | 01/01/1900 | 02/01/1900
001 | 101 | 03/04/1900 | 02/01/1901
001 | 102 | 03/06/1901 | 02/08/1900
002 | 100 | 01/03/1911 | 02/08/1913
This gives me the results I expect, but due a nightmare crystal report I need to alter this view slightly. I want to take this returned result set and modify an existing column with a value pulled from the same table and the same Contract relationship, something like the following:
UPDATE A
SET A.Completed = ( SELECT R.Completed
FROM myTable R
INNER JOIN A
ON A.ContractNo = R.ContractNo
WHERE A.ItemNumber = 100 AND R.ItemNumber = 101
)
What I'm trying to do is modify the "Completed Date" of one task and make it the complete date of another task if they both share the same ContractNo field value.
I'm not sure about the ItemNumber relationships between A and R (perhaps it was just for testing...), but it seems like you don't really want to UPDATE anything, but you want to use a different value under some circumstances. So, maybe you just want to change the non-cte part of your query to something like:
SELECT A.ContractNo, A.ItemNumber, A.Planned,
COALESCE(R.Completed,A.Completed) as Completed
FROM A
LEFT OUTER JOIN myTable R
ON A.ContractNo = R.ContractNo
AND A.ItemNumber = 100 AND R.ItemNumber = 101 -- I'm not sure about this part
WHERE A.Rank = 1
So it turns out that actually reading the vendor documentation helps :)
SELECT
column1,
column2 =
case
when date > 1999 then 'some value'
when date < 1999 then 'other value'
else 'back to the future'
end
FROM ....
For reference, the total query did a triple inner join over ~5 million records and this case statement was surprisingly performant.
I suggest that this gets closed as a duplicate.
I have a query I need to perform to show search results for a project. What needs to happen, I need to sort the results by the "horsesActiveDate" and this applies to all of them except for any ad with the adtypesID=7. Those results are sorted by date but they must always result after all other ads.
So I will have all my ads in the result set be ordered by the Active Date AND adtypesID != 7. After that, I need all adtypesID=7 to be sorted by Active Date and appended at the bottom of all the results.
I'm hoping to put this in one query instead of two and appending them together in PHP. The way the code is written, I have to find a way to get it all in one query.
So here is my original query which has worked great until I had to ad the adtypesID=7 which has different sorting requirements.
This is the query that exists now that doesn't take into account the adtypesID for sorting.
SELECT
horses.horsesID,
horsesDescription,
horsesActiveDate,
adtypesID,
states.statesName,
horses_images.himagesPath
FROM horses
LEFT JOIN states ON horses.statesID = states.statesID
LEFT JOIN horses_images ON horses_images.himagesDefault = 1 AND horses_images.horsesID = horses.horsesID AND horses_images.himagesPath != ''
WHERE
horses.horsesStud = 0
AND horses.horsesSold = 0
AND horses.horsesID IN
(
SELECT DISTINCT horses.horsesID
FROM horses
LEFT JOIN horses_featured ON horses_featured.horsesID = horses.horsesID
WHERE horses.horsesActive = 1
)
ORDER BY adtypesID, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
My first thought was to do two queries where one looked for all the ads that did not contain adtypesID=7 and sort those as the query does, then run a second query to find only those ads with adtypesID=7 and sort those by date. Then take those two results and append them to each other. Since I need to get this all into one query, I can't use a php function to do that.
Is there a way to merge the two query results one after the other in mysql? Is there a better way to run this query that will accomplish this sorting?
The Ideal Results would be as below (I modified the column names so they would be shorter):
ID | Description | ActiveDate | adtypesID | statesName | himagesPath
___________________________________________________________________________
3 | Ad Text | 06-01-2010 | 3 | OK | image.jpg
2 | Ad Text | 05-31-2010 | 2 | LA | image1.jpg
9 | Ad Text | 03-01-2010 | 4 | OK | image3.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 06-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 05-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
6 | Ad Text | 04-01-2010 | 7 | OK | image5.jpg
Any help that can be provided will be greatly appreciated!
I am not sure about the exact syntax in MySQL, but something like
ORDER BY case when adtypesID = 7 then 2 else 1 end ASC, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
would work in many other SQL dielects.
Note that most SQL dialects allow the order by to not only be a column, but an expression.
This should work:
ORDER BY (adtypesID = 7) ASC, horses.horsesActiveDate DESC
Use a Union to append two queries together, like this:
SELECT whatever FROM wherever ORDER BY something AND adtypesID!=7
UNION
SELECT another FROM somewhere ORDER BY whocares AND adtypesID=7
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/union.html
I re-wrote your query as:
SELECT h.horsesID,
h.horsesDescription,
h.horsesActiveDate,
adtypesID,
s.statesName,
hi.himagesPath
FROM HORSES h
LEFT JOIN STATES s ON s.stateid = h.statesID
LEFT JOIN HORSES_IMAGES hi ON hi.horsesID = h.horsesID
AND hi.himagesDefault = 1
AND hi.himagesPath != ''
LEFT JOIN HORSES_FEATURED hf ON hf.horsesID = h.horsesID
WHERE h.horsesStud = 0
AND h.horsesSold = 0
AND h.horsesActive = 1
ORDER BY (adtypesID = 7) ASC, h.horsesActiveDate DESC
The IN subquery, using a LEFT JOIN and such, will mean that any horse record whose horsesActive value is 1 will be returned - regardless if they have an associated HORSES_FEATURED record. I leave it to you for checking your data to decide if it should really be an INNER JOIN. Likewise for the STATES table relationship...