My SQL is limited and I have inherited the schema so please go easy!
The upper tables are populated, the lower section is to be completed.
The customer wants a simple reference, C_SCAFFOLD_DOMAIN_COMBO, for every C_SEQUENCE_RESULT of the same TYPE having the same C_PROTEIN_REGIONs (only ever two) of the same REGION_NAME.
My intention is to read each C_SEQUENCE_RESULT getting the (2) C_PROTEIN_REGION.SEQUENCEs with their REGION_NAME using a cursor.
I can then check if they are referenced by a C_SCAFFOLD_DOMAIN_COMBO already.
If so, then simply add the correct C_SCAFFOLD_DOMAIN_NAME FK to C_SEQUENCE_RESULT.
If not, create a new C_SCAFFOLD_DOMAIN_NAME entry with the appropriate C_PROTEIN_REGION refs and add the FK to C_SEQUENCE_RESULT.
My SQL query returns two results for each C_SEQUENCE_RESULT e.g.
REGION_NAME------SEQUENCE
Loop 1------ABCDEFG
Loop 2------HIJKLMN
Running as a simple query and can INSERT INTO a temp table and get the values. As a cursor I don’t seem to be able.
How can I read the data returned above using a cursor?
Thanks
Related
I have an Azure SQL database, and my records inside table Spiderfood_RITMData in that database includes 13 different fields. Lots of stuff. I have confirmed in SQL-SMS that the records have data in each field.
There are way more items in the database than PowerApps can see using LOOKUP (1600-9000 records or more). However, I know FOR A FACT that there is only ONE record that has any given value in the NUMBER column. It's not a primary key, but it is unique in the table.
In PowerApps, I am trying to pull that field so that I can eventually parse out the individual items.
So, the commands I'm trying are:
ClearCollect(MLE_test1, Filter('Spiderfood_RITMData', "RITM2170467" in Number));
ClearCollect(MLE_test2, Search('Spiderfood_RITMData',"RITM2170467", "Number"));
However, the Collection results for MLE_test1 and MLE_test2 both are empty EXCEPT for the value of NUMBER. Say what?!
I'm trying to use the examples posted on https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/maker/canvas-apps/functions/function-filter-lookup but I am honestly getting baffled by this.
How should I be formatting this call such that I can pull the whole record?
Big picture explanation: I need to do a lot of data LOOKUPS into my table Spiderfood_RITMData table, but it has way more than 2000 rows, and PowerApps will not perform the Lookup correctly. So my presumably smart idea is to create a MUCH SMALLER "version" of Spiderfood_RITMData as a local collection, using a more delegateable function (such as FILTER or IN). If I filter by all records containing the values of NUMBER, then I go from, say a 10,000-record SQL table to a 10-record Collection. And I can do LOOKUPS against that collection for the rest of the function (uh, I think -- I'm still trying to experiment accordingly). Please let me know if this is crazy or not.
LookUp is just used to get one record, instead try this:
ClearCollect(MLE_test1, Filter('Spiderfood_RITMData', "RITM2170467" = Number));
This gets a collection with all the items where Number is = to "RITM2170467"
Collections are limited to only 2000 records in each collections.
I had same issue. Go to App settings. Under Upcoming Features make sure Explicit column selection is turned off. Hope this does it for you.
I have problems with my records within my database, so I have a template with about 260,000 records and for each record they have 3 identification columns to determine what time period the record is from and location: one for year, one for month, and one for region. Then the information for identifying the specific item is TagName, and Description. The Problem I am having is when someone entered data into this database they entered different description for the same device, I know this because the tag name is the same. Can I write code that will go through the data base find the items with the same tag name and use one of the descriptions to replace the ones that are different to have a more uniform database. Also some devices do not have tag names so we would want to avoid the "" Case.
Also moving forward into the future I have added more columns to the database to allow for more information to be retrieved, is there a way that I can back fill the data to older records once I know that they have the same tag name and Description once the database is cleaned up? Thanks in advance for the information it is much appreciated.
I assume that this will have to be done with VBA of some sort to modify records by looking for the first record with that description and using a variable to assign that description to all the other items with the same tag name? I just am not sure of the correct VBA syntax to go about this. I assume a similar method would be used for the backfilling process?
Your question is rather broad and multifaceted, so I'll answer key parts in steps:
The Problem I am having is when someone entered data into this
database they entered different description for the same device, I
know this because the tag name is the same.
While you could fix up those inconsistencies easily enough with a bit of SQL code, it would be better to avoid those inconsistencies being possible in the first place:
Create a new table, let's call it 'Tags', with TagName and TagDescription fields, and with TagName set as the primary key. Ensure both fields have their Required setting to True and Allow Zero Length to False.
Populate this new table with all possible tags - you can do this with a one-off 'append query' in Access jargon (INSERT INTO statement in SQL).
Delete the tag description column from the main table.
Go into the Relationships view and add a one-to-many relation between the two tables, linking the TagName field in the main table to the TagName field in the Tags table.
As required, create a query that aggregates data from the two tables.
Also some devices do not have tag names so we would want to avoid the
"" Case.
In Access, the concept of an empty string ("") is different from the concept of a true blank or 'null'. As such, it would be a good idea to replace all empty strings (if there are any) with nulls -
UPDATE MyTable SET TagName = Null WHERE TagName = '';
You can then set the TagName field's Allow Zero Length property to False in the table designer.
Also moving forward into the future I have added more columns to the
database to allow for more information to be retrieved
Think less in terms of more columns than more tables.
I assume that this will have to be done with VBA of some sort to modify records
Either VBA, SQL, or the Access query designers (which create SQL code behind the scenes). In terms of being able to crunch through data the quickest, SQL is best, though pure VBA (and in particular, using the DAO object library) can be easier to understand and follow.
I need to set up a new company for automated data import. The utility has provided the data in a spreadsheet. (Image 1)
Based on this data, I need to create a stored procedure that will identify the correct meter, if it exists, and perform either an insert or update to the monthly data table. For automated utility data import, I want to make sure I restrict everything to a particular utility company.
The steps are the following ( I am having a hard time converting this to SQL)
1- I just want a script that identify the correct meter to see if it exists, basically check the Meter# column in the excel with the MeterNumber column in the Meters table.
2- The next step is perform either an insert or update to the MonthlyData table. This is a screen shot of all its columns.
3- Then I just want to make sure that I am restricting everything to the particular company which in this case Site1 since 2 different companies might have the same meter#. The UtilityCompany table contains 3 columns: ID, Name, UtilityType
I honestly do not know from where to get started, would anybody help me with the script? Thank you
You will want to:
perform a Bulk Insert operation to take your data from the excel file into a staging table.
write a query to select ALL rows for the corresponding utility company (notice I didn't see iterate over each row...). This select could be an update where you update an additional column to mark the row as an INSERT, or an UPDATE.
Then the last step (2 parts), retrieve all of the rows that were marked as INSERT, and insert those into your table. Then grab all rows that were marked with an UPDATE, and update their corresponding values based on your matching criteria.
This is with respect to search of a text in a table
Table_Name:
Details
Columns:
Fname,Mname,Lname,NName
This table contains nearly one lakh records
We are using Oracle forms for some querying option
The user input one name the form searches the table for the name and based on the name either(Fname/Mname/Lname/NName) in which column its is present further actions are proceeeded.
The search is taking a long time since we have huge amount of data present in the table.
I tried with Functional indexes for the table but t did not work its also taking more time
Later i tried with something like this
concatenated all the names into one name and put it into a cursor.
Using the cursor output i tried with Instring but it is hanging
I also tried with searching for building a dynamic cursor but it did not work.
My database is Oracle
Can u help me to out to find an effective solution or please help me if i have missed something.
Thanks
First of all, 1 lakh (100,000) records is not in itself a large table.
The problem I can see is the query appears to be doing an OR against the Fname/Mname/Lname/NName columns.
This means the query will be doing at least one full-table scan to obtain the results.
You may wish to use debug to obtain the query it is firing against the database and attempt to tune this at the SQL prompt using auto trace.
You may need to clarify if the search is also doing something like a LIKE against these columns rather than an EQUALS. As a LIKE will impact the query further and affect indexes.
Certainly the use of INSTR will disable indexes on your searched column.
It is not clear if what your block is based on ie. table, view, query, procedure
You may want to try using the hint on the block properties of the form FIRST_ROWS.
I am creating an upate trigger. I have a situation where I need to test a condition on a table column, without actually knowing what the exact column name is. The trigger is generic and can applied to any table, with varying columns.
Pseudo-code:
// define a cursor that loops through all columns in "MyTable"
Define cursor C1 for (select COLS from SYSCAT.TABLES where TABS="MyTable")
FOR
// take the next column from the cursor
#temp_var = C1.COLS
// DELETED and INSERTED are tables that also contain the same columns as "MyTable" table.
if(DELETED.#temp_var <> INSERTED.#temp_var)
THEN
...
The above statement if(DELETED.#temp_var <> ... does of course not work, but maybe you can see what I am trying to do? So I would want it to be during runtime e.g. if(DELETED.MyColumn <>... where "MyColumn"is a column in"MyTable"and also inINSERTEDandDELETED columns. Note that because this method should be generic, I do not know beforehand what columns the table has (depends on the specific table in use).
Any ideas on how to build the if-statement dynamically like that?
In DB2 SQL you cannot refer to columns dynamically. So, you won't be able to do that using only SQL. You could possibly call an external procedure written in another language from within the trigger. Or, you could rethink your overall design for what you are trying to do. I don't see any other options.