We can assign a label to an address either using getnewaddress or setlabel.
getnewaddress ( "label" "address_type" )
setlabel "address" "label"
For sending bitcoins we have two functions sendtoaddress and setndmany, both don't concern themselves with labels.
sendtoaddress "address" amount ( "comment" "comment_to" subtractfeefromamount replaceable conf_target "estimate_mode" )
sendmany "" {"address":amount} ( minconf "comment" ["address",...] replaceable conf_target "estimate_mode" )
and we have getreceivedbylabel and getreceivedbyaddress:
getreceivedbylabel "label" ( minconf )
getreceivedbyaddress "address" ( minconf )
My educated guess is that send* functions will debit the amount from any address in wallet they see fit, and credit the return back to any address they want.
Is that correct?
and how does that impact getreceivedbylabel & getreceivedbyaddress?
With sendtoaddress and sendmay you can try sending bitcoin to provided address(es). But propagation of transaction may take some time based on exchange network and fee you suggest. So you need a mechanism for checking current state of your transaction and here is why you should use getreceivedbylabel or getreceivedbyaddress
Related
I am using cloud google vision API to extract text from Aadhaar and PAN. How can I get exact user details like name, father's name, and address?
Raw Data
ଭାରତ ସରକାର
Government of India
ଜିତ୍ୟାନନ୍ଦ ଖେମୁକୁ
NITYANANDA KHEMUDU
ପିତା : ସୀତାରାମ ଖେମୁକୁ
Father: Sitaram Khemudu
ଜନ୍ମ ତାରିଖ / DOB : 01.07.1999
ପୁରୁଷ / Male
ମୋ ଆଧାର, ମୋ ପରିଚୟ
I have built 5-6 OCR till date like aadhar, pan, ITR, Driving Linces etc., using google cloud vision API, I think you are looking for response like
{"pan_card_no":"ECXXXXXX123",
"name":"fshksj"
}
to get such response you need to built your own logic, here are some logic's i can share with you
Perform OCR on your document using Google_cloud_vision API and store that response into one array (Goggle gives logic line by line)
Like in above case if you want to grab DOB first you can build logic like i) if "DOB" in (list of item) then grab the numeric values
To get the name what you can do is dropping the unnecessary items from list by if using if condition like (if "India" in i) or (if i.isdigit()) then drop it likewise you can drop the unnesseary items from main list to get the Name
to grab the Address what you can do is, 95% of the time address come with pincode at last, so what you can do is treat pincode as a last index of address and look of "Address" kind of keyword then add all the elements from "Add keyword index" to "pincode index" ( this can be easily done in list) to validate whether the pincode is valid or not you can use library like Pyzipin
There are multiple conditions that you can use, above are the very basic one i mentioned, if you need any specific logic then then you can ask me
I have a message coming from a topic through MQTT.
I need change the name os the columns of the message.
The original message:
{
"timestamp": 1645722065088,
"Heart Rate Measurement": 24550,
"Energy Expended": 1900,
"RR-Interval": 1
}
I need to take just timestamp and Heart Rate inside of a rule:
SELECT "Heart Rate Measurement"as heartrate, timestamp as date FROM
'pulsewave/heart_rate'
The timestamp is easy to get but the "Heart Rate Measurement" is not
I ended up getting the following:
{
"heartrate": "Heart Rate Measurement",
"date": 1645722065088
}
any tips to get the message inside of the Heart Rate Measurement? When i set without the quotes it doesnt accept
The rule works for the timestamp attribute but not Heart Rate Measurement as the AWS IoT SQL syntax doesn't support spaces in attribute names.
From https://docs.aws.amazon.com/iot/latest/developerguide/iot-sql-reference.html
Attribute names with spaces in them can't be used as field names in the SQL statement. While the incoming payload can have attribute names with spaces in them, such names can't be used in the SQL statement. They will, however, be passed through to the outgoing payload if you use a wildcard (*) field name specification.
An alternate approach is to implement a lambda that projects your JSON payload to an equivalent without the spaces.
I am trying to achieve flattening a table into an array (or structure). My implementation is in SAP ABAP; however, I believe the question is code agnostic. I am wondering if there is an algorithm I'm not aware of or simple solution for what I'm trying to achieve. I will accept any language or pseudocode as an acceptable answer.
I am selecting from a "User Restrictions" (i.e., lt_restrictions) table stored on a database, e.g.:
This is needed for an SAP BSP MVC web app. When the app loads, I am doing user authorization checks to populate a "User Roles" (i.e., mt_user_roles) local table/array (i.e., attribute on an MVC model class).
The authorization checks involve routine ABAP -- using IF statements to conditionally populate the "User Roles" table, e.g.:
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'PROGRAM_MANAGER_AUTH' ID 'xxx' FIELD 'yyy'.
IF ( sy-subrc = 0 ).
APPEND VALUE #( low = 'program_manager' ) TO me->mt_user_roles.
ENDIF.
If the user has both e.g., program manager AND entry user authorizations, this "User Roles" table/array would look like this:
With the two tables above, if the user has program manager and entry user roles, the only restriction is convert; therefore, I need to populate a "Restriction List" (i.e., ms_restrictions) like the following:
Otherwise, if the user has e.g., only the entry user role:
...
...there are 2 restrictions (release AND convert), so I would need to populate a "Restriction List" (i.e., ms_restrictions) like this:
I feel like there is a standard algorithm I could use or perhaps this could be done with SQL in a SELECT statement with my database table WHERE restriction = NULL (e.g., WHERE save = ' ') or using a SELECT ... WHERE x IN clause, perhaps, if the "Restrictions List" was a RANGE table?
I should mention, I already have an undesirable, partial solution which involves looping through the database table and having several IF statements for each restriction condition. "Restriction List" is named ms_restrictions, it is a class attribute ABAP STRUCTURE type (for ABAP newbies, this is basically a 1-D sized array):
LOOP AT lt_restrictions INTO DATA(ls_restriction).
LOOP AT mt_user_roles INTO DATA(ls_user_role).
"Check save restriction
IF (
ls_restriction-role = ls_user_role-role AND
ls_user_role = 'save'
).
ms_restrictions-save = 'x'.
ENDIF.
"Check release restriction
IF (
ls_restriction-role = ls_user_role-role AND
ls_user_role = 'release'
).
ms_restrictions-release = 'x'.
ENDIF.
"Check other restrictions
"......
ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
The problem with the solution above is I have to write an IF statement for each restriction. More so, it doesn't take into account whether there are conflicts between 2 or more role restrictions, e.g., program manager has only 1 restriction while entry user has 2. My logic above could be extended to take this into account with -- well -- even more IF statements :-( .. I'm wondering if there's a different approach I can take?
Also, I should mention. The resulting "Restrictions List", i.e., mt_restrictions, is needed in my view for disabling HTML buttons, e.g.:
<button value = 'Save' disabled = '//model/mt_restrictions-save' />
<button value = 'Release' disabled = '//model/mt_restrictions-release' />
<button value = 'Convert' disabled = '//model/mt_restrictions-convert' />
<button ... />
A solution I came up with involves using ABAP <FIELD-SYMBOL>s data-types and an OpenSQL FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SELECT statement addition.
By using <FIELD-SYMBOL>s, you can avoid any hardcoded attribute and/or structure component names. Now, the restriction rules can grow without having to future modify any code.
By using FOR ALL ENTRIES IN, you can sync your Roles table with your Restrictions table. Adding this clause allows you to SELECT from your transparent Role/Restrictions database table INTO a table, only including the roles applicable from the roles found in the AUTH-CHECK (because mt_user_roles populates a new row for each true AUTH-CHECK).
The method is_standard_user( ) is where the AUTH-CHECKs occur. If it equals ABAP_TRUE, then all restrictions are applied -- assuming the ms_restrictions structure components' values all default to ABAP_TRUE.
Dynamically looping through each structure component of ms_restrictions, you can READ the restrictions table for corresponding value. If value equals SPACE, then this means the current row doesn't have a restriction. So mark the structure component value to SPACE (because it may have been marked ABAP_TRUE in a prior iteration) -- this addresses the "conflicting roles issue".
"perform authorization checks
IF ( NOT me->is_standard_user( ) ).
"see if roles found
IF ( lines( me->mt_user_roles ) > 0 ).
"find pertaining restrictions for roles found in auth checks
SELECT
*
FROM
zmm_apr_roles
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN "select only rows applicable to auth-check
#me->mt_user_roles
WHERE
role = #me->mt_user_roles-role
INTO TABLE
#DATA(lt_restrictions).
"dynamically populate restriction list from multi-role restriction table
DATA: lr_descr_struc TYPE REF TO data.
DATA: lo_structdescr TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr.
CREATE DATA lr_descr_struc LIKE ms_restrictions.
lo_structdescr ?= cl_abap_structdescr=>describe_by_data_ref( p_data_ref = lr_descr_struc ).
LOOP AT lo_structdescr->components ASSIGNING FIELD-SYMBOL(<lv_component>).
ASSIGN COMPONENT <lv_component>-name OF STRUCTURE ms_restrictions TO FIELD-SYMBOL(<lv_field>).
IF ( <lv_field> IS ASSIGNED ).
"non-restricted value overwrites restricted value
READ TABLE lt_restrictions WITH KEY (<lv_component>-name) = space TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS.
IF ( sy-subrc = 0 ).
<lv_field> = space.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
To add a new restriction, all that needs to be done is:
add new roles to zmm_apr_roles and the corresponding data-dictionary components
add new restrictions to corresponding components of ms_restrictions
I'm trying to figure out which BAPI/FM I could use to search amounts confirmed based on search criteria of date (+time if possible) and workcenter confirmed where was confirmed...
I would be using BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETDETAIL which contains these informations, but according to BAPI guide I can only load in the data of confirmation number+confirmation counter.
Therefore the option would be to run BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETLIST (but I can only input the production order range or confirmation number range), then filter what includes the workcenter and date I need and from those pick up confirmation number+counter and run it through BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GETDETAIL.
but this procedure of getting list of everything without data being filtered on serverside is extemly timeconsuming and out of SAP Gui I have timeout error... therefore I need any BAPI/FM which I could input the workcenter where was confirmed and date, and have the data filtered already...
Any ideas how to do that?
As far as I know there is no such standard FM, so your only choice is custom development.
I would suggest you MCPK transaction were this info is exposed in a handy form, but as I see that your requirement is to receive this info externally this is not appropriate for you.
The confirmations reside in AFRU table and workcenters are in CRHD, so to find confirmed quantities by workcenter you should join these tables, or use a view u_15673 where this info is linked:
TYPES: BEGIN OF prod_orders,
rueck TYPE afru-rueck, "confirmation number
rmzhl TYPE afru-rmzhl," confirmation counter
gmnga TYPE afru-gmnga, " quantity
arbid TYPE crhd-arbpl, " workcenter
END OF prod_orders.
DATA: orders TYPE TABLE OF prod_orders.
SELECT *
FROM u_15673
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE orders
WHERE isdd >= '20180101' AND isdz <= '163000'.
To pull this externally, you must create RFC-enabled FM or use RFC_READ_TABLE and fetch this view with parameters, here is the sample.
Another approach is to use RFC_ABAP_INSTALL_AND_RUN. You must create an ABAP program that uses WRITE for output the results as a standard list to screen.
Send the lines of this program to RFC_ABAP_INSTALL_AND_RUN to PROGRAM parameter and the code will be executed on the remote system and this FM will return screen results as the lines of table WRITES.
Possible sample based on MCPK tcode to send to RFC_ABAP_INSTALL_AND_RUN:
CLEAR lwa_selection.
lwa_selection-selname = 'SL_SPTAG'.
lwa_selection-sign = 'I'.
lwa_selection-option = 'BT'.
lwa_selection-low = '20180101'.
lwa_selection-high = '20201231'.
APPEND lwa_selection TO li_selection.
CLEAR lwa_selection.
lwa_selection-selname = 'SL_ARBPL'.
lwa_selection-sign = 'I'.
lwa_selection-option = 'EQ'.
lwa_selection-low = '10400001'.
APPEND lwa_selection TO li_selection.
SUBMIT rmcf0200 WITH SELECTION-TABLE li_selection
with par_stat = abap_true
EXPORTING LIST TO MEMORY
AND RETURN.
DATA: xlist TYPE TABLE OF abaplist.
DATA: xtext TYPE TABLE OF char200.
CALL FUNCTION 'LIST_FROM_MEMORY'
TABLES
listobject = xlist.
CALL FUNCTION 'LIST_TO_TXT'
EXPORTING
list_index = -1
TABLES
listtxt = xtext
listobject = xlist.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
LOOP AT xtext ASSIGNING FIELD-SYMBOL(<text>).
WRITE <xtext>.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
However, this approach is not flexible because MCPK standard layout is a bit different than you want, and is not easy to adjust programmatically.
Because of that I recommend to stick to the RFC_READ_TABLE approach.
From a logical perspective it sometime doesn't make sense, for example, to add an Address before you add a Customer.
db.define_table('address',
Field('line1','string', required=True),
Field('line2','string'),
Field('suburb','string', required=True),
Field('post_code','integer'),
Field('email','string')
)
db.address.post_code.requires = IS_INT_IN_RANGE(0000, 9999)
db.address.email.requires = IS_EMAIL()
db.define_table('customer',
Field('name', 'string', required=True, unique=True),
Field('locations', 'list:reference db.address', required=True),
Field('comment', 'string')
) # quick aside: how would I ensure there isn't another customer with same name+location?
db.address.requires = IS_IN_DB(db, db.address, '%(line1)s' + ', ' + '%(suburb)s', multiple=True)
So if I could generate one form that allows you to create a customer, complete with address, the management would become much more logical.
However it would still be useful to be able to pick from records already in the db, but to just have an "Add" button—rolling down with javascript—which will open by default if field is empty (and .requires not to be).
How would I generate this nested CRUD?
Thanks for all suggestions
I believe that this topic in the official book covers it somewhat:
http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/7#One-form-for-multiple-tables
Basically, you have to use sqlform.factory. Your controller will call the insert on the address first, then get that ID for the address, and then using that ID, call the insert on the customer.
That handles your adds, but not a dropdown, unfortunately. You would need to write your own html as far as that's concerned. No automatic CRUD.