I am currently using an existing Keras implementation of a certain model and I would like to study the effects of different multiplication implementations on its computational speed and accuracy.
Is there a simple way to replace the Keras (TensorFlow) multiplication that is used in its Dense and Conv (and other pre-existing) layers with a custom one?
The idea is also to see the difference between training with normal multiplication + testing with custom multiplication and doing both with the custom multiplication.
So I'm looking for a solution that's something like:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.__mul__ = custom_mult
and will replace all multiplication operations in Keras's default layers with my own implementation.
Related
Goal
I want to compare different types of RNN tflite-micro models, built using tensorflow, on a microcontroller based on their accuracy, model size and inference time. I have also created my own custom RNN cell that I want to compare with the LSTM cell, GRU cell, and SimpleRNN cell. I create the tensorflow model using tf.keras.layers.RNN(Cell(...)).
Problem
I have successfully deployed a keras LSTM-RNN using tf.keras.layers.LSTM(...) but when I create the same model using tf.keras.layers.RNN(tf.keras.layers.LSTMCell(...)) and deploy it to the microcontroller, then it does not work. I trained both networks on a batch size of 64, but then I copy the weights and biases to a model where the batch_size is fixed to 1 as tflite-micro does not support dynamic batch sizes.
When the keras LSTM layer is converted to a tflite model it creates a fused operator called UnidirectionalSequenceLSTM but the network created with an RNN layer using the LSTMCell does not have that UnidirectionalSequenceLSTM operator, instead it has a reshape and while operator. The first network has only 1 subgraph but the second has 3 subgraphs.
When I run that second model on the microcontroller, two things go wrong:
the interpreter returns the same result for different inputs
the interpreter fails on some inputs reporting an error with the while loop saying that int32 is not supported (which is in the while operator, and can't be quantized to int8)
LSTM tflite-model vizualized with Netron
RNN(LSTMCell) tflite-model vizualized with Netron
Bad solution (10x model size)
I figured out that by unrolling the second network I can successfully deploy it and get correct results on the microcontroller. However, that increases the model size 10x which is really bad as we are trying to deploy the model on a resource constrained device.
Better solution?
I have explained the problem using the example of the LSTM layer (works) and LSTM cell in an RNN layer (does not work), but I want to be able to deploy a model using the GRU cell, SimpleRNN cell, and of course the custom cell that I have created. And all those have the same problem as the network created with the LSTM cell.
What can I do?
Do I have to create a special fused operator? Maybe even one for each cell I want to compare? How would I do that?
Can I use the interface into the conversion infrastructure for user-defined RNN implementations mentioned here: https://www.tensorflow.org/lite/models/convert/rnn. How I understand the documentation, is that this would only work for user-defined LSTM implementations, not user-defined RNN implemenations like the title suggests.
I a trying to implement backprop in numpy by defining a function that performs some kind operation given an input, weight matrix and bias, and returns the output with the backward function, which can be used to update weights.
Currently this is my code , however I think there are some bugs in the derivation, as the gradients for the W1 matrix are too large. Here is a pytorch implementation for the same thing as a reference torch.
Any help is appreciated.
Is it possible to define a graph in native TensorFlow and then convert this graph to a Keras model?
My intention is simply combining (for me) the best of the two worlds.
I really like the Keras model API for prototyping and new experiments, i.e. using the awesome multi_gpu_model(model, gpus=4) for training with multiple GPUs, saving/loading weights or whole models with oneliners, all the convenience functions like .fit(), .predict(), and others.
However, I prefer to define my model in native TensorFlow. Context managers in TF are awesome and, in my opinion, it is much easier to implement stuff like GANs with them:
with tf.variable_scope("Generator"):
# define some layers
with tf.variable_scope("Discriminator"):
# define some layers
# model losses
G_train_op = ...AdamOptimizer(...)
.minimize(gloss,
var_list=tf.get_collection(tf.GraphKeys.GLOBAL_VARIABLES,
scope="Generator")
D_train_op = ...AdamOptimizer(...)
.minimize(dloss,
var_list=tf.get_collection(tf.GraphKeys.GLOBAL_VARIABLES,
scope="Discriminator")
Another bonus is structuring the graph this way. In TensorBoard debugging complicated native Keras models are hell since they are not structured at all. With heavy use of variable scopes in native TF you can "disentangle" the graph and look at a very structured version of a complicated model for debugging.
By utilizing this I can directly setup custom loss function and do not have to freeze anything in every training iteration since TF will only update the weights in the correct scope, which is (at least in my opinion) far easier than the Keras solution to loop over all the existing layers and set .trainable = False.
TL;DR:
Long story short: I like the direct access to everything in TF, but most of the time a simple Keras model is sufficient for training, inference, ... later on. The model API is much easier and more convenient in Keras.
Hence, I would prefer to set up a graph in native TF and convert it to Keras for training, evaluation, and so on. Is there any way to do this?
I don't think it is possible to create a generic automated converter for any TF graph, that will come up with a meaningful set of layers, with proper namings etc. Just because graphs are more flexible than a sequence of Keras layers.
However, you can wrap your model with the Lambda layer. Build your model inside a function, wrap it with Lambda and you have it in Keras:
def model_fn(x):
layer_1 = tf.layers.dense(x, 100)
layer_2 = tf.layers.dense(layer_1, 100)
out_layer = tf.layers.dense(layer_2, num_classes)
return out_layer
model.add(Lambda(model_fn))
That is what sometimes happens when you use multi_gpu_model: You come up with three layers: Input, model, and Output.
Keras Apologetics
However, integration between TensorFlow and Keras can be much more tighter and meaningful. See this tutorial for use cases.
For instance, variable scopes can be used pretty much like in TensorFlow:
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, 20, 64))
with tf.name_scope('block1'):
y = LSTM(32, name='mylstm')(x)
The same for manual device placement:
with tf.device('/gpu:0'):
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, 20, 64))
y = LSTM(32)(x) # all ops / variables in the LSTM layer will live on GPU:0
Custom losses are discussed here: Keras: clean implementation for multiple outputs and custom loss functions?
This is how my model defined in Keras looks in Tensorboard:
So, Keras is indeed only a simplified frontend to TensorFlow so you can mix them quite flexibly. I would recommend you to inspect source code of Keras model zoo for clever solutions and patterns that allows you to build complex models using clean API of Keras.
You can insert TensorFlow code directly into your Keras model or training pipeline! Since mid-2017, Keras has fully adopted and integrated into TensorFlow. This article goes into more detail.
This means that your TensorFlow model is already a Keras model and vice versa. You can develop in Keras and switch to TensorFlow whenever you need to. TensorFlow code will work with Keras APIs, including Keras APIs for training, inference and saving your model.
I have been using tensorflow to train deep NN acoustic models for speech recognition for a while. The loss function I use is Cross Entropy and the NN models performe very well. Now I want to change the loss function to a more complex one named MMI (Maximum Mutual Information) which is also a classical criterion used in speech recognition domain. I put one paper here which describes this loss function in case that you have interests.
When using this special loss function, the derivatives of the loss function w.r.t. the activations of output layer can be computed by some special algorithms defined in Hidden Markov Model scenario. It means that I can compute the derivatives of the loss function w.r.t. the activations of output layer by myself rather than just write out the loss function and leave Tensorflow to calculate the derivatives automatically.
But based on my poor experiences, I don't know how to backprob the derivatives which I calculate by myself. Is there any way to do this without touching Tensorflow C++ source code?
Probably yes if all the computation involved use existing tensorflow functions.
You just have to set up the chain of operations that compute the gradients from the current variables.
Then you just use tf.assign_add() to the variables with your gradients multiplied by minus the learning rate.
You are thus mimicking what happens in the background in TF usually.
EDIT: If calculations are made in numpy for instance for the gradients you can use.
#perform numpy calculations
a=f(output_npy,variables_npy)
grad_from_user=tf.placeholder(tf.float32, a.shape)
grad_update=tf.assign_add(variables_tf,-lr*grad_from_user)
#and then
sess.run(grad_update,feed_dict={grad_from_user:a,...})
After training a network using Keras:
I want to access the final trained weights of the network in some order.
I want to know the neuron activation values for every input passed. For example, after training, if I pass X as my input to the network, I want to know the neuron activation values for that X for every neuron in the network.
Does Keras provide API access to these things? I want to do further analysis based on the neuron activation values.
Update : I know I can do this using Theano purely, but Theano requires more low-level coding. And, since Keras is built on top of Theano, I think there could be a way to do this?
If Keras can't do this, then among Tensorflow and Caffe , which can? Keras is the easiest to use, followed by Tensorflow/Caffe, but I don't know which of these provide the network access I need. The last option for me would be to drop down to Theano, but I think it'd be more time-consuming to build a deep CNN with Theano..
This is covered in the Keras FAQ, you basically want to compute the activations for each layer, so you can do it with this code:
from keras import backend as K
#The layer number
n = 3
# with a Sequential model
get_nth_layer_output = K.function([model.layers[0].input],
[model.layers[n].output])
layer_output = get_nth_layer_output([X])[0]
Unfortunately you would need to compile and run a function for each layer, but this should be straightforward.
To get the weights, you can call get_weights() on any layer.
nth_weights = model.layers[n].get_weights()