When I start omzsh I get this :
[oh-my-zsh] plugin 'docker,' not found
my .zshrc looks like this :
plugins=(
docker,
docker-compose,
git
)
It's confusing, either write :
plugins=(
docker
docker-compose
git
)
or
plugins=(docker docker-compose git)
but not
plugins=(
docker,
docker-compose,
git
)
or
plugins=(docker, docker-compose, git)
The reason is that , is a valid character for a file. You could have a plugin called docker, or even one called ,.
Related
I am experimenting with Skaffold and IntelliJ to develop directly in Kubernetes, but I am having trouble with maven, when IntelliJ try to initialize the environment following erroer occurs in
Running "bash -c curl --fail --show-error --silent --location --retry 3
https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk11-binaries/releases/download/jdk-11.0.10%2B9/OpenJDK11U-
jdk_x64_linux_hotspot_11.0.10_9.tar.gz | tar xz --directory /layers/google.java.runtime/java --
strip-components=1"
[builder] Done "bash -c curl --fail --show-error --silent --location --retry..." (59.3720683s)
[builder] === Java - Maven (google.java.maven#0.9.0) ===
[builder] Installing Maven v3.6.3
[builder] Running "/layers/google.java.maven/maven/bin/mvn clean package --batch-mode -DskipTests --
quiet"
[builder] [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
The problem is, some of my Spring Boot Application dependencies are defined in our Nexus Repository and that is defined mirror in my maven settings.xml and this process does not know that mirror configuration and I can't find a way to configure that for skaffold.
I try set settings.xml in skaffold.yml as following
apiVersion: skaffold/v2beta11
kind: Config
build:
artifacts:
- image: myproject/myapp
jib:
args:
- --settings=C:\maven\conf\settings.xml
tagPolicy:
sha256: {}
Anybody had any idea how to let 'google.java.maven' to use my mirror configuration?
Thx for answers...
Skaffold supports three builders work out of the box for Java apps: Jib, Buildpacks, and Docker. The Jib builder will be easiest for your needs.
Jib builds run on your host machine (vs within a containerized environment). Because Skaffold's Jib builder just invokes Maven or Gradle directly, they use your account settings with no additional configuration required (specifically your $HOME/.m2/settings.xml and your artifact cache in $HOME/.m2/repository). Your skaffold.yaml above just needs a small indentation tweak and it should all work:
apiVersion: skaffold/v2beta11
kind: Config
build:
artifacts:
- image: myproject/myapp
jib: {}
tagPolicy:
sha256: {}
You can see a working example in the Skaffold examples.
Docker and Buildpacks builds are run within a container: that is, the source is copied into the container. As a result, you can't reference files outside of the build context, like your $HOME/.m2/settings.xml. You could create a model settings.xml within your source directory and reference that file, and then use environment variables or build-arguments to pass in usernames and passwords. But it becomes quite involved.
We have an open issue to allow mounting directories as volumes for the Buildpacks builder, and we should be able to do the same for the Docker builder. That functionality would make it easier to support your situation if you really wanted to use Buildpacks or Docker.
After installing Intellij Idea using flatpak on Clear Linux I'm not able to make it run svn executable.
I added ---filesystem=host to flatpak permissions and tried to set executable path to /run/host/usr/bin/svn but with no luck (path is available/exists, though Intellij keeps complain)
svn command is normally available from system terminal.
When I try to run /run/host/usr/bin/svn command via Intellij Idea built-in terminal, I've got error that library is not available:
sh-5.0$ /run/host/usr/bin/svn
/run/host/usr/bin/svn: error while loading shared libraries: libsvn_client-1.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I also tried set flatpak-spawn. Following command works perfectly fine in Intellij Idea built-in terminal:
/usr/bin/flatpak-spawn --host /usr/bin/svn, though when set as path to svn executable still gives me Intellij Idea error:
"The path to Subversion executable is probably wrong"
Could anybody please help with making it work?
TLDR: You probably need to add the path to svn into your IntelliJ terminal Path.
Details:
It looks like you are having a path issue. I had a similar problem running kubectl running PyCharm installed from a flatpak on Pop_Os.
If I try to run kubectl I see the following:
I have kubectl installed in /usr/local/bin. This is a screenshot from my 'normal' terminal.
In the PyCharm terminal this location is mounting under /run/host/usr/local/bin/.
If I look at my path in the PyCharm terminal, it is not there.
So I'll add the /run/host/usr/local/bin/ to my path and I can then run kubectl:
To make sure this comes up all the time, I need to add the PATH to the Terminal settings:
I can now execute any of the commands in my /usr/local/bin dir.
I found a really ugly solution for dealing with SVN with the JetBrains family, which does actually answer the question. But in a very roundabout way. Unfortunately Alex Nelson's solution didn't work for me.
You would think the Flatpak would come with a valid SVN, since it's actually part of the expected requirements for the program...
When in the terminal, you can run
cd ..
/usr/bin/flatpak-spawn --host vim ./svn
Then press i to go into input mode, then paste the following in the opened text file (Basically what it does is create an executable which passes it to the flatpak-spawn invocation):
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/flatpak-spawn --host /usr/bin/svn $#
Save and quit from vim (ESC, then :wq!). Make it executable:
chmod +x svn
Then in IntelliJ's menu, set the "path to svn" to
/home/<yourusername>/IdeaProjects/svn
It's worked for everything I've tried... Hope this helps out anyone else who was struggling with this.
I am using a similar solution to caluga.
#!/bin/sh
cd
exec /usr/bin/env -- flatpak-spawn --host /usr/bin/env -- svn "$#"
exec makes it replace the wrapper script process so the wrapper script process can end.
I'm using /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash as bash features are not needed.
using /usr/bin/env, but maybe not necessary if PATH is set up right.
remember to quote "$#" in case there are spaces in arguments.
I am putting it in ~/.local/bin and referencing it with its absolute path in the IntelliJ settings (Settings -> Version Control -> Subversion -> Path to Subversion executable).
I also was running into problems with IntelliJ saying that /app/idea-IC path does not exist. Figured that something outside the flatpak (i.e. svn or env) was trying to change directory to the working directory from where the wrapper script was invoked (inside the flatpak). Using cd allows the wrapper script to change to a directory that exists both inside the flatpak and on the host.
Fedora Silverblue or toolbox users might want to use dev tools inside their toolbox, in which case you can do:
#!/bin/sh
cd
exec /usr/bin/env -- flatpak-spawn --host toolbox run svn "$#"
I am using mvn for build and deploy my code in tomcat. I am using command for build clean install -DskipTests -DskipJangarooApp -pl :studio-webapp -am -T 4C where studio-webapp is my module name.
And after build i use tomcat:run command like this :
tomcat7:run -Dinstallation.host=192.168.252.100
where 192.168.252.100 is my host machine IP. This process is running well.
But the problem is when I change any java class in my IntelliJ I again run buil command then run. And its taking so much time. So that I want to apply tomcat configuration in IntelliJ but i am not able to find any option of "-Dinstallation.host" in this screen
Gitlab provides a .gitlab-ci.yml template for building and publishing images to its own registry (click "new file" in one of your project, select .gitlab-ci.yml and docker). The file looks like this and it works out of the box :)
# This file is a template, and might need editing before it works on your project.
# Official docker image.
image: docker:latest
services:
- docker:dind
before_script:
- docker login -u "$CI_REGISTRY_USER" -p "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD" $CI_REGISTRY
build-master:
stage: build
script:
- docker build --pull -t "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE" .
- docker push "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE"
only:
- master
build:
stage: build
script:
- docker build --pull -t "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG" .
- docker push "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG"
except:
- master
But by default, this will publish to gitlab's registry. How can we publish to docker hub instead?
No need to change that .gitlab-ci.yml at all, we only need to add/replace the environment variables in project's pipeline settings.
1. Find the desired registry url
Using hub.docker.com won't work, you'll get the following error:
Error response from daemon: login attempt to https://hub.docker.com/v2/ failed with status: 404 Not Found
Default docker hub registry url can be found like this:
docker info | grep Registry
Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
index.docker.io is what I was looking for.
2. Set the environment variables in gitlab settings
I wanted to publish gableroux/unity3d images using gitlab-ci, here's what I used in Gitlab's project > Settings > CI/CD > Variables
CI_REGISTRY_USER=gableroux
CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD=********
CI_REGISTRY=docker.io
CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE=index.docker.io/gableroux/unity3d
CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE is important to set.
It defaults to registry.gitlab.com/<username>/<project>
regsitry url needs to be updated so use index.docker.io/<username>/<project>
Since docker hub is the default registry when using docker, you can also use <username>/<project> instead. I personally prefer when it's verbose so I kept the full registry url.
This answer should also cover other registries, just update environment variables accordingly. 🙌
To expand on the GabLeRoux's answer,
I had issues on the pushing stage of the GitLab CI build:
denied: requested access to the resource is denied
By changing my CI_REGISTRY to docker.io (remove the index.) I was able to successfully push.
In official docs we can see:
# docker build github.com/creack/docker-firefox
It just works fine to me. docker-firefox is a repository and has Dockerfile within root dir.
Then I want to buid redis image and exact version 2.8.10 :
# docker build github.com/docker-library/redis/tree/99c172e82ed81af441e13dd48dda2729e19493bc/2.8.10
2014/11/05 16:20:32 Error trying to use git: exit status 128 (Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/docker-build-git067001920/.git/
error: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing https://github.com/docker-library/redis/tree/99c172e82ed81af441e13dd48dda2729e19493bc/2.8.10/info/refs
fatal: HTTP request failed
)
I got error above. What's the right format with build docker image from github repos?
docker build url#ref:dir
Git URLs accept context configuration in their fragment section,
separated by a colon :. The first part represents the reference that
Git will check out, this can be either a branch, a tag, or a commit
SHA. The second part represents a subdirectory inside the repository
that will be used as a build context.
For example, run this command to use a directory called docker in the
branch container:
docker build https://github.com/docker/rootfs.git#container:docker
https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/build/
The thing you specified as repo URL is not a valid git repository. You will get error when you will try
git clone github.com/docker-library/redis/tree/99c172e82ed81af441e13dd48dda2729e19493bc/2.8.10
Valid URL for this repo is github.com/docker-library/redis. So you may want to try following:
docker build github.com/docker-library/redis
But this will not work too. To build from github, docker requires Dockerfile in repository root, howerer, this repo doesn't provide this one. So, I suggest, you only have to clone this repo and build image using local Dockerfile.
One can use the following example which sets up a Centos 7 container for testing ORC file format. Make sure to escape the # sign:
$ docker build https://github.com/apache/orc.git\#:docker/centos7 -t orc-centos7