i'm using following code to get the uid of a content object in my controller:
$this->configurationManager->getContentObject()->data['uid']
In TYPO3 9.5 backend at Upgrade -> Scan Extension Files there is a notice, that this function is deprecated. Until now i couldn't find an alternative to get the uid.
I'm not sure if i understand the message correctly, will this function still work in TYPO3 10?
Thanks for your help!
You don't need to worry about this deprecation message. In the migration notes you can see that the warning is about getContentObject in AbstractContentObject, and it tells you to rename getContentObject() to getContentObjectRenderer().
However, yours is not for an AbstractContentObject class, it detects it on a ConfigurationManagerInterface class, which has a getContentObject but no getContentObjectRenderer.
So you can safely ignore the message. As the Scan Extension Files window says at the top: "false positives/negatives are impossible to avoid".
Related
We are trying to add one additional feature to our method for TBO. The feature needs to be executed only when a new document for that object type is imported and should not be executed in any other case like checkin checkout or any changes in attributes.
However the new code is getting called everytime we make any changes to attribute to that document.
We have put that code in doSave() method.
I tried isNew method for distinguish between newly imported Document and other scenarios, however could not get success, may be missing the usage details of the method.
Can anyone suggest anything?
We are on Documentum version 7.2.
I always use isNew() method to check is object new or versioned, I don't remember having problems with it at any DFC version.
Only one thing that comes in mind is to make sure you don't use super.doSave() while inside the code since right after it method will return false.
But this is expected behaviour.
If you really need to do this - some calulations based on programatically preset data - make sure you use value saved within local variable throughout your code.
If you think you are experiencing bug with the method try with another DFC version or report a bug to the Support.
I installed the MvcScaffolding4TwitterBootstrapMvc package which is based on the scaffolding stuff Steve Sanderson has done. Now I'm attempting to create a new view based on it and I'm just receiving PS errors.
I'm typing this:
Scaffold View LocationType CreateOrEdit -Template _CreateOrEdit
(I've tried other view templates as well)
I receive this error message:
t4(115,64) : error CS1061: Compiling transformation: 'EnvDTE.CodeProperty' does not contain a definition for 'IsScaffoldable' and no extension method 'IsScaffoldable' accepting a first argument of type 'EnvDTE.CodeProperty' could be found
At packages\MvcScaffolding4TwitterBootstrapMvc.1.0.2\tools\RazorView\MvcScaffolding.RazorView.ps1:42 char:27
Obviously the template is causing the error because it can't find something (maybe the T4 library)? But I'm not really sure what or where I'd fix it.
It looks like the IsScaffoldable extension method doesn't exist in the version of the T4Scaffolding.DLL that is installed with the NuGet package.
If found this work item which lead me to GitHub and I see this method exists. Since I'm not really using this attribute, I decided it's probably just simpler for me to remove the .IsScaffoldable() call from the T4 template instead of pulling down the source and compiling a new version of T4Scaffolding.
i am using Transloadit to process and store my pic to amazon s3. The upload works fine, however upon successful redirect back to my app i get an error when trying to access one of the vales from the hash of params sent by transloadit.
<%= params[:transloadit][:ok] %>
The error returned is
can't convert Symbol into Integer
and the hash of params looks like this:
{"transloadit"=>"{\"ok\":\"ASSEMBLY_COMPLETED\",
\"message\":\"The assembly was successfully completed.\",
\"assembly_id\":\".........\",
\"assembly_url\":\"http://api2.donnie.transloadit.com/assemblies/....\",
\"bytes_received\":351697,
\"bytes_expected\":351697,.........}
I am using the gem transloadit/rails-sdk for easy integration into my app. On their github page they say and i quote:
"If you want to use the automatic transload parameter decoding, you have to include the Transloadit::Rails::ParamsDecoder module into your controller
class YourController
include Transloadit::Rails::ParamsDecoder
end
that way the param[:transloadit] is automatically decoded for you, if it exists"
I am not sure what they mean by this (even if i include this into my controller i get an error with a different set of params). What is the purpose of this line?
All i need is to access the params[:transloadit][:ok] parameter. How can i get hold of this parameter? thanks
I had a similar problem. If you use key names instead of symbols, it might help. I'm not sure why, but that's what I had to do. Try params["transloadit"]["ok"] or some variation of that.
I am curious about the proper way to stop a user from activating my plugin if their system does not meet certain requirements. Doing the checks is easy and I don't need any help with that, I am more curious how to tell WordPress to exit and display an error message.
Currently I have tried both exit($error_message) and die($error_message) in the activation hook method. While my message is displayed and the plugin is not activated, a message saying Fatal Error is also displayed (see image below).
Does anyone know of a better way, that would display my message in a proper error box without displaying Fatal error, it just looks really bad for new users to see that.
Thanks for any help in advance.
This is a little undocumented, as you might have noticed. Instead of die(), do it like this:
$plugin = dirname(__FILE__) . '/functions.php';
deactivate_plugins($plugin);
wp_die('<p>The <strong>X</strong> plugin requires version WordPress 2.8 or greater.</p>','Plugin Activation Error',array('response'=>200,'back_link'=>TRUE));
The lines above wp_die() are to deactivate this plugin. Note that we use functions.php in this case because that's where I have my Plugin Name meta data comment declaration -- and if you use a different file, then change the code above. Note that the path is very specific for a match. So, if you want to see what your path would normally be, use print_r(get_option('active_plugins'));die(); to dump that out so that you know what path you need. Since I had a plugin_code.php where the rest of my plugin code was, and since it was in the same directory as functions.php, I merely had to do dirname(__FILE__) for the proper path.
Note that the end of the wp_die() statement is important because it provides a backlink and prevents an error 500 (which is the default Apache code for wp_die()).
It is only a idea though. Try checking the wordpress version and compare then use php to through custom exception/error. PHP 5.0 try catch can be a good way to do it. Here is some resources.
http://www.w3schools.com/php/php_exception.asp
http://php.net/manual/en/internals2.opcodes.throw.php
You can try the first link. It is pretty basic. Thanks! hope the information will be helpful.
I'm fairly new to CakePHPand am building a site using the Auth component. A couple of times I have tried to do things with this component which have caused the error
Fatal error: Call to undefined method stdClass::user() in /ftphome/site/app/controllers/users_controller.php on line 395
The line it refers to in this case is
$this->User->read(null, $this->Auth->user('id'));
This error does not disappear when I revert the code back to how it was before the error and I only seem to be able to get rid of it by removing some files on the server (I'm not sure which files, when I tried removing all files in the tmp directory the error persisted so I removed the entire site and restored from the latest svn revesion.
In this particular case I think I caused the error by putting the following code in app_controller
class AppController extends Controller {
function beforeRender() {
$this->set('test', $this->Auth->user());
}
}
Which I copied from this thread http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/ee9456de93d2eece/cff6fe580d13622b?lnk=gst&q=auth
A previous time I caused the issue by attempting to update the Auth user details after updating the user in the database.
I can see I'm somehow removing the user object from the Auth object but I can't understand why I need to delete files in the site to get it back or how the code above removes it - any help would be much appreciated.
Edit
It looks like in the case I mentioned above, the problem was the app_controller.php file which I'd copied into my app/controllers directory. Just having the file with an empty class declaration causes this error - can anyone provide further insight?
Further edit
I've realised I've been a bit silly and the problem was caused by me putting app_controller.php in /app/controllers/app_controller.php when there was already one in /app/app_controller.php - thanks for the input though Andy, it helps me understand a bit more what was happening.
This error is normally thrown when a class instance (in your case an instance of Auth) has been serialised to disk, then re-read/deserialised in another request but the class definition (i.e. Auth) has not been loaded yet, so PHP creates it as an "stdClass" (standard class.)
When you remove your site files, you're removing the session storage (IIRC it's the Cache folder in a CakePHP app) so at the next request, a new session is created from scratch.
It's been a while since I last used CakePHP (I switched to Zend) so I cannot remember if Cake includes files it requires using an __autoload function or not.
On that mailing list post, someone says that you can this $this->Auth->user() in a view, but in the controller, you can use $session->read('Auth.User') to get the user component. Not sure what the difference is, maybe $this->Auth is a view helper, so isn't available in the controller?