I want to create a table that returns the top 10 aggregate cons_name over a given week, that repeats every day.
So for 5/29/2019 it will pull the top 10 cons_name by their sum dating back to 5/22/2019.
Then, for 5/28/2019, the top 10 cons_name by their sum back to 5/21/2019.
A table of top 10 dating back 7 days all the way to 2018-12-01.
I can make the simple code dating back 7 days but, I have tried Windows to no avail.
SELECT cons_name,
pricedate,
sum(shadow)
FROM spp.rtbinds
WHERE pricedate >= current_date - 7
GROUP BY cons_name, shadow, pricedate
ORDER BY shadow asc
LIMIT 10
This query generates the output below
cons_name pricedate sum
"TEMP17_24078" "2019-05-28 00:00:00" "-1473.29723333333"
"TEMP17_24078" "2019-05-28 00:00:00" "-1383.56638333333"
"TMP175_24736" "2019-05-23 00:00:00" "-1378.40504166667"
"TMP159_24149" "2019-05-23 00:00:00" "-1328.847675"
"TMP397_24836" "2019-05-23 00:00:00" "-1221.19560833333"
"TEMP17_24078" "2019-05-28 00:00:00" "-1214.9914"
"TMP175_24736" "2019-05-23 00:00:00" "-1123.83254166667"
"TEMP72_22893" "2019-05-29 00:00:00" "-1105.93840833333"
"TMP164_23704" "2019-05-24 00:00:00" "-1053.051375"
"TMP175_24736" "2019-05-27 00:00:00" "-1043.52104166667"
I would like a table and function that returns a table of each day's top 10 dating back a week.
Using window functions get's you on the right track but you should be reading further in the documentation about the possibilities.
We have multiple issues here that we need to solve:
gaps in the data (missing pricedate) not get us the correct number of rows (7) to calculate the overall sum
for the calculation itself we need all data rows so the WHERE clause cannot be used to limit only to the visible days
in order to select the top-10 for each day, we have to generate a row number per partition because the LIMIT clause cannot be applied per group
This is why I came up with the following CTE's:
CTE days: generate the gap-less date series and mark visible days
CTE daily: LEFT JOIN the data to the generated days and produce daily sums (and handle NULL entries)
CTE calc: produce the cumulative sums
CTE numbered: produce row numbers reset each day
select the actual visible rows and limit them to max. 10 per day
So for a specific week (2019-05-26 - 2019-06-01), the query will look like the following:
WITH
days (c_day, c_visible, c_lookback) as (
SELECT gen::date, (CASE WHEN gen::date < '2019-05-26' THEN false ELSE true END), gen::date - 6
FROM generate_series('2019-05-26'::date - 6, '2019-06-01'::date, '1 day'::interval) AS gen
),
daily (cons_name, pricedate, shadow_sum) AS (
SELECT
r.cons_name,
r.pricedate::date,
coalesce(sum(r.shadow), 0)
FROM days
LEFT JOIN spp.rtbinds AS r ON (r.pricedate::date = days.c_day)
GROUP BY 1, 2
),
calc (cons_name, pricedate, shadow_sum) AS (
SELECT
cons_name,
pricedate,
sum(shadow_sum) OVER (PARTITION BY cons_name ORDER BY pricedate ROWS BETWEEN 6 PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW)
FROM daily
),
numbered (cons_name, pricedate, shadow_sum, position) AS (
SELECT
calc.cons_name,
calc.pricedate,
calc.shadow_sum,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY calc.pricedate ORDER BY calc.shadow_sum DESC)
FROM calc
)
SELECT
days.c_lookback,
numbered.cons_name,
numbered.shadow_sum
FROM numbered
INNER JOIN days ON (days.c_day = numbered.pricedate AND days.c_visible)
WHERE numbered.position < 11
ORDER BY numbered.pricedate DESC, numbered.shadow_sum DESC;
Online example with generated test data: https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=postgres_11&fiddle=a83a52e33ffea3783207e6b403bc226a
Example output:
c_lookback | cons_name | shadow_sum
------------+--------------+------------------
2019-05-26 | TMP400_27000 | 4578.04474575352
2019-05-26 | TMP700_25000 | 4366.56857151864
2019-05-26 | TMP200_24000 | 3901.50325547671
2019-05-26 | TMP400_24000 | 3849.39595793188
2019-05-26 | TMP700_28000 | 3763.51693260809
2019-05-26 | TMP600_26000 | 3751.72016620729
2019-05-26 | TMP500_28000 | 3610.75970225036
2019-05-26 | TMP300_26000 | 3598.36888491176
2019-05-26 | TMP600_27000 | 3583.89777677553
2019-05-26 | TMP300_21000 | 3556.60386707587
2019-05-25 | TMP400_27000 | 4687.20302128047
2019-05-25 | TMP200_24000 | 4453.61603102228
2019-05-25 | TMP700_25000 | 4319.10566615313
2019-05-25 | TMP400_24000 | 4039.01832416654
2019-05-25 | TMP600_27000 | 3986.68667223025
2019-05-25 | TMP600_26000 | 3879.92447655788
2019-05-25 | TMP700_28000 | 3632.56970774056
2019-05-25 | TMP800_25000 | 3604.1630071504
2019-05-25 | TMP600_28000 | 3572.50801157858
2019-05-25 | TMP500_27000 | 3536.57885829499
2019-05-24 | TMP400_27000 | 5034.53660146287
2019-05-24 | TMP200_24000 | 4646.08844632655
2019-05-24 | TMP600_26000 | 4377.5741555281
2019-05-24 | TMP700_25000 | 4321.11906399066
2019-05-24 | TMP400_24000 | 4071.37184911687
2019-05-24 | TMP600_25000 | 3795.00857752701
2019-05-24 | TMP700_26000 | 3518.6449117614
2019-05-24 | TMP600_24000 | 3368.15348120732
2019-05-24 | TMP200_25000 | 3305.84444172308
2019-05-24 | TMP500_28000 | 3162.57388606668
2019-05-23 | TMP400_27000 | 4057.08620966971
2019-05-23 | TMP700_26000 | 4024.11812392669
...
Related
I have a table of match ups in different games, and I would like to calculate how dense the matchup space in regards to each game is. Example table:
id | game | start_dt
---+-------+-----------------
1 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 15:00
---+-------+-----------------
2 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 15:05
---+-------+-----------------
3 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 18:00
---+-------+-----------------
4 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 13:05
---+-------+-----------------
5 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 13:15
---+-------+-----------------
6 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 12:00
---+-------+-----------------
7 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 14:45
Would ideally yield:
id | game | start_dt | time_group_id
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
6 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 12:00| 1
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
1 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 15:00| 2
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
2 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 15:05| 2
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
3 | dota2 | 2020-01-01 18:00| 3
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
4 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 13:05| 4
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
5 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 13:15| 4
---+-------+-----------------+---------------
7 | cs-go | 2020-01-01 14:45| 5
Which basically means, that if a gap between the next game and the previous one is less or equal to 10 minutes, they are considered in the same time group. Else they are different time groups and it proceeds.
Those time_group_ids are then used to map useful information about matches and their time frequency.
My code is below, and it serves the purpose ideally, however, it doesn't give evenly spaced ids, so I have to use a composite of game VARCHAR and group_id for the field to uniquely represent a group. Please, run it in the dbfiddle to understand, what I mean.
CREATE TABLE fight(
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
date TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
game VARCHAR NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO fight(date, game)
VALUES
('2020-01-01 15:00'::TIMESTAMP, 'dota2'),
('2020-01-01 15:05'::TIMESTAMP, 'dota2'),
('2020-01-01 18:00'::TIMESTAMP, 'dota2'),
('2020-01-01 13:05'::TIMESTAMP, 'cs-go'),
('2020-01-01 13:15'::TIMESTAMP, 'cs-go'),
('2020-01-01 12:00'::TIMESTAMP, 'dota2'),
('2020-01-01 14:45'::TIMESTAMP, 'cs-go');
SELECT * FROM fight;
CREATE SEQUENCE seq START 1 CACHE 1;
SELECT
a.id,
a.game,
a.start_dt,
(CASE WHEN (a.start_dt - INTERVAL '10 min' <= a.prev_start_dt) THEN currval('seq')
ELSE nextval('seq')
END)::VARCHAR || '|' || a.game AS time_group_id
FROM
(
SELECT
fight.id,
fight.game,
fight.date AS start_dt,
LAG (fight.date, 1, fight.date) OVER (PARTITION BY fight.game ORDER BY fight.date) AS prev_start_dt
FROM fight CROSS JOIN (SELECT setval('seq', 1)) s
) a
ORDER BY a.game, a.start_dt;
The question is: is there the ideal way to do this, or should I stick with what I got?
You don't need a sequence for this, just a cumulative sum:
SELECT f.*,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE prev_date < date - interval '10 min') OVER (ORDER BY date) as time_group_id
FROM (SELECT f.*,
LAG(f.date) OVER (PARTITION BY f.game ORDER BY f.date) AS prev_date
FROM fight f
) f;
Notes: This might start at 0 rather than 1. If that makes a difference, use 1 +.
This produces a number, not a string. You can convert to a string (using ::text) if that is what you really need.
Here is a db<>fiddle
SELECT
b.id,
b.game,
b.start_dt,
sum(b.time_group_count) OVER (ORDER BY b.game, b.start_dt) as time_group_id
FROM
(SELECT
a.id,
a.game,
a.start_dt,
CASE WHEN a.prev_start_dt IS NULL THEN 1
WHEN (a.start_dt - INTERVAL '10 min' <= a.prev_start_dt) THEN 0
ELSE 1
END AS time_group_count
FROM
(
SELECT
fight.id,
fight.game,
fight.date AS start_dt,
LAG (fight.date, 1) OVER (PARTITION BY fight.game ORDER BY fight.date) AS prev_start_dt
FROM fight
) a
ORDER BY a.game, a.start_dt) b;
This query is what gave me the results I really wanted. Really grateful to the cumsum idea by #Gordon Linoff, thank you!
I am making a query to fetch the working minutes for employees. The problem I have is the Night Shift. I know that I need to subtract the "ShiftStartMinutesFromMidnight" but I can't find the right logic.
NOTE: I can't changing the database, I only can use the data from it.
Let's say I have these records.
+----+--------------------------+----------+
| ID | EventTime | ReaderNo |
-----+--------------------------+----------+
| 1 | 2019-12-04 11:28:46.000 | In |
| 1 | 2019-12-04 12:36:17.000 | Out |
| 1 | 2019-12-04 12:39:23.000 | In |
| 1 | 2019-12-04 12:51:21.000 | Out |
| 1 | 2019-12-05 07:37:49.000 | In |
| 1 | 2019-12-05 08:01:22.000 | Out |
| 2 | 2019-12-04 22:11:46.000 | In |
| 2 | 2019-12-04 23:06:17.000 | Out |
| 2 | 2019-12-04 23:34:23.000 | In |
| 2 | 2019-12-05 01:32:21.000 | Out |
| 2 | 2019-12-05 01:38:49.000 | In |
| 2 | 2019-12-05 06:32:22.000 | Out |
-----+--------------------------+----------+
WITH CT AS (SELECT
EIn.PSNID, EIn.PSNNAME
,CAST(DATEADD(minute, -0, EIn.EventTime) AS date) AS dt
,EIn.EventTime AS LogIn
,CA_Out.EventTime AS LogOut
,DATEDIFF(minute, EIn.EventTime, CA_Out.EventTime) AS WorkingMinutes
FROM
VIEW_EVENT_EMPLOYEE AS EIn
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT TOP(1) EOut.EventTime
FROM VIEW_EVENT_EMPLOYEE AS EOut
WHERE
EOut.PSNID = EIn.PSNID
AND EOut.ReaderNo = 'Out'
AND EOut.EventTime >= EIn.EventTime
ORDER BY EOut.EventTime
) AS CA_Out
WHERE
EIn.ReaderNo = 'In'
)
SELECT
PSNID
,PSNNAME
,dt
,LogIn
,LogOut
,WorkingMinutes
FROM CT
WHERE dt BETWEEN '2019-11-29' AND '2019-12-05'
ORDER BY LogIn
;
OUTPUT FROM QUERY
+----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
| ID | date | In | Out | WorkingMinutes |
-----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
| 1 | 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-04 11:28:46.000 | 2019-12-04 12:36:17.000 | 68 |
| 1 | 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-04 12:39:23.000 | 2019-12-04 12:51:21.000 | 12 |
| 1 | 2019-12-05 | 2019-12-05 07:37:49.000 | 2019-12-05 08:01:22.000 | 24 |
-----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
I was thinking something like this. When Out is between 06:25 - 6:40. But I also need to check If employee, previous day has In between 21:50 - 22:30. I need that second condition because some employee from first shift maybe can Out, for example at 6:30.
*(1310 is the ShiftStartMinutesFromMidnight
Line 3 of Query
CAST(DATEADD(minute, -0, EIn.EventTime) AS date) AS dt
Updating the Line 3 with this code.
CASE
WHEN CAST(CA_Out.LogDate AS time) BETWEEN '06:25:00' AND '06:40:00'
AND CAST(EIn.LogDate AS time) BETWEEN '21:50:00' AND '22:30:00' THEN CAST(DATEADD(minute, -1310, EIn.LogDate) AS date)
ELSE CAST(DATEADD(minute, -0, EIn.LogDate) AS date)
END as dt
Expected Output
+----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
| ID | date | In | Out | WorkingMinutes |
-----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
| 2 | 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-04 22:11:46.000 | 2019-12-04 23:06:17.000 | 55 |
| 2 | 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-04 23:34:23.000 | 2019-12-05 01:32:21.000 | 118 |
| 2 | 2019-12-04 | 2019-12-05 01:38:49.000 | 2019-12-05 06:32:22.000 | 294 |
-----+------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+----------------+
Assuming that total minutes per separate date is enough:
WITH
/* enumerate pairs */
cte1 AS ( SELECT *,
COUNT(CASE WHEN ReaderNo = 'In' THEN 1 END)
OVER (PARTITION BY ID
ORDER BY EventTime) pair
FROM test ),
/* divide by pairs */
cte2 AS ( SELECT ID, MIN(EventTime) starttime, MAX(EventTime) endtime
FROM cte1
GROUP BY ID, pair ),
/* get dates range */
cte3 AS ( SELECT CAST(MIN(EventTime) AS DATE) minDate,
CAST(MAX(EventTime) AS DATE) maxDate
FROM test),
/* generate dates list */
cte4 AS ( SELECT minDate theDate
FROM cte3
UNION ALL
SELECT DATEADD(dd, 1, theDate)
FROM cte3, cte4
WHERE theDate < maxDate ),
/* add overlapped dates to pairs */
cte5 AS ( SELECT ID, starttime, endtime, theDate
FROM cte2, cte4
WHERE theDate BETWEEN CAST(starttime AS DATE) AND CAST(endtime AS DATE) ),
/* adjust borders */
cte6 AS ( SELECT ID,
CASE WHEN starttime < theDate
THEN theDate
ELSE starttime
END starttime,
CASE WHEN CAST(endtime AS DATE) > theDate
THEN DATEADD(dd, 1, theDate)
ELSE endtime
END endtime,
theDate
FROM cte5 )
/* calculate total minutes per date */
SELECT ID,
theDate,
SUM(DATEDIFF(mi, starttime, endtime)) workingminutes
FROM cte6
GROUP BY ID,
theDate
ORDER BY 1,2
fiddle
The solution is specially made detailed, step by step, so that you can easily understand the logic.
You may freely combine some CTEs into one. You may also use pre-last cte5 combined with cte2 if you need the output strongly as shown.
The solution assumes that none records are lost in source data (each 'In' matches strongly one 'Out' and backward, and no adjacent or overlapped pairs).
Don't know where you stopped but here is how I do,
Night shift 20:00 - 05:00 so in one day 00:00 - 5:00; 22:00 - 24:00
day shift 5:00 - 22:00
To get easier overlapping checking you need to change all dates to unix timestamp. so you don't have to split time intervals like shown above
So generate map of each period work for fetch period date_from and date_till, make sure to add holiday and pre-holiday exceptions where periods are different
something like:
Unix values is only for understanding.
unix_from_tim, unix_till_tim, shift_type
1580680800, 1580680800, 1 => example 02-02-2020:22:00:00, 03-02-2020:05:00:00, 1
1580680800, 1580680800, 0 => example 03-02-2020:05:00:00, 03-02-2020:22:00:00, 0
1580680800, 1580680800, 1 => example 03-02-2020:22:00:00, 04-02-2020:05:00:00, 1
...
Make sure you don't calculate overlapping minutes on period start/end..
And there is worker one row
with unix_from_tim, unix_from_tim
1580680800, 1580680800=> something like 02-02-2020:16:30:00, 03-02-2020:07:10:00
When you check overlapping you can get ms like this:
MIN(work_period:till,worker_period:till) - MAX(work_period:from, worker_period:from);
example in simple numbers:
work_period 3 - 7
worker_period 5 - 12
MIN(7,12) - MAX(3,5) = 7 - 5 = 2 //overlap
work_period 3 - 7
worker_period 8 - 12
MIN(7,12) - MAX(3,8) = 7 - 8 = -1 //if negative not overlap!
work_period 3 - 13
worker_period 8 - 12
MIN(13,12) - MAX(3,8) = 13 - 8 = 5 //full overlap!
And you have to check each worker period on all overlaping time generated work intervals.
May be someone can make select where you don't have to generate work_shift overlapping but its not a easy task if you add more holidays, transferred days, reduced time days etc.
Hope it helps
I am trying to track the usage of material with my SQL. There is no way in our database to link when a part is used to the order it originally came from. A part simply ends up in a bin after an order arrives, and then usage of parts basically just creates a record for the number of parts used at a time of transaction. I am attempting to, as best I can, link usage to an order number by summing over the data and sequentially assigning it to order numbers.
My sub queries have gotten me this far. Each order number is received on a date. I then join the usage table records based on the USEDATE needing to be equal to or greater than the RECEIVEDATE of the order. The data produced by this is as such:
| ORDERNUM | PARTNUM | RECEIVEDATE | ORDERQTY | USEQTY | USEDATE |
|----------|----------|-------------------------|-----------|---------|------------------------|
| 4412 | E1125 | 10/26/2016 1:32:25 PM | 1 | 1 | 11/18/2016 1:40:55 PM |
| 4412 | E1125 | 10/26/2016 1:32:25 PM | 1 | 3 | 12/26/2016 2:19:32 PM |
| 4412 | E1125 | 10/26/2016 1:32:25 PM | 1 | 1 | 1/3/2017 8:31:21 AM |
| 4111 | E1125 | 10/28/2016 2:54:13 PM | 1 | 1 | 11/18/2016 1:40:55 PM |
| 4111 | E1125 | 10/28/2016 2:54:13 PM | 1 | 3 | 12/26/2016 2:19:32 PM |
| 4111 | E1125 | 10/28/2016 2:54:13 PM | 1 | 1 | 1/3/2017 8:31:21 AM |
| 0393 | E1125 | 12/22/2016 11:52:04 AM | 3 | 3 | 12/26/2016 2:19:32 PM |
| 0393 | E1125 | 12/22/2016 11:52:04 AM | 3 | 1 | 1/3/2017 8:31:21 AM |
| 7812 | E1125 | 12/27/2016 10:56:01 AM | 1 | 1 | 1/3/2017 8:31:21 AM |
| 1191 | E1125 | 1/5/2017 1:12:01 PM | 2 | 0 | null |
The query for the above section looks as such:
SELECT
B.*,
NVL(B2.QTY, ‘0’) USEQTY
B2.USEDATE USEDATE
FROM <<Sub Query B>>
LEFT JOIN USETABLE B2 ON B.PARTNUM = B2.PARTNUM AND B2.USEDATE >= B.RECEIVEDATE
My ultimate goal here is to join USEQTY records sequentially until they have filled enough ORDERQTY’s. I also need to add an ORDERUSE column that represents what QTY from the USEQTY column was actually applied to that record. Not really sure how to word this any better so here is example of what I need to happen based on the table above:
| ORDERNUM | PARTNUM | RECEIVEDATE | ORDERQTY | USEQTY | USEDATE | ORDERUSE |
|----------|----------|-------------------------|-----------|---------|------------------------|-----------|
| 4412 | E1125 | 10/26/2016 1:32:25 PM | 1 | 1 | 11/18/2016 1:40:55 PM | 1 |
| 4111 | E1125 | 10/28/2016 2:54:13 PM | 1 | 3 | 12/26/2016 2:19:32 PM | 1 |
| 0393 | E1125 | 12/22/2016 11:52:04 AM | 3 | 2 | 12/26/2016 2:19:32 PM | 2 |
| 0393 | E1125 | 12/22/2016 11:52:04 AM | 3 | 1 | 1/3/2017 8:31:21 AM | 1 |
| 7812 | E1125 | 12/27/2016 10:56:01 AM | 1 | 0 | null | 0 |
| 1191 | E1125 | 1/5/2017 1:12:01 PM | 2 | 0 | null | 0 |
If I can get the query to pull the information like above, I will then be able to group the records together and sum the ORDERUSE column which would get me the information I need to know what orders have been used and which have not been fully used. So in the example above, if I were to sum the ORDERUSE column for each of the ORDERNUMs, orders 4412, 4111, 0393 would all show full usage. Orders 7812, 1191 would show not being fully used.
If i am reading this correctly you want to determine how many parts have been used. In your example it looks like you have 5 usages and with 5 orders coming to a total of 8 parts with the following orders having been used.
4412 - one part - one used
4111 - one part - one used
7812 - one part - one used
0393 - three
parts - two used
After a bit of hacking away I came up with the following SQL. Not sure if this works outside of your sample data since thats the only thing I used to test and I am no expert.
WITH data
AS (SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM sub_b1
join (SELECT ROWNUM rn
FROM dual
CONNECT BY LEVEL < 15) a
ON a.rn <= sub_b1.orderqty
ORDER BY receivedate)
WHERE ROWNUM <= (SELECT SUM(useqty)
FROM sub_b2))
SELECT sub_b1.ordernum,
partnum,
receivedate,
orderqty,
usage
FROM sub_b1
join (SELECT ordernum,
Max(rn) AS usage
FROM data
GROUP BY ordernum) b
ON sub_b1.ordernum = b.ordernum
You are looking for "FIFO" inventory accounting.
The proper data model should have two tables, one for "received" parts and the other for "delivered" or "used". Each table should show an order number, a part number and quantity (received or used) for that order, and a timestamp or date-time. I model both in CTE's in my query below, but in your business they should be two separate table. Also, a trigger or similar should enforce the constraint that a part cannot be used until it is available in stock (that is: for each part id, the total quantity used since inception, at any point in time, should not exceed the total quantity received since inception, also at the same point in time). I assume that the two input tables do, in fact, satisfy this condition, and I don't check it in the solution.
The output shows a timeline of quantity used, by timestamp, matching "received" and "delivered" (used) quantities for each part_id. In the sample data I illustrate a single part_id, but the query will work with multiple part_id's, and orders (both for received and for delivered or used) that include multiple parts (part id's) with different quantities.
with
received ( order_id, part_id, ts, qty ) as (
select '0030', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-18 15:00:33', 20 from dual union all
select '0032', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-22 15:00:33', 13 from dual union all
select '0034', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-24 10:00:33', 18 from dual union all
select '0036', '11A4', timestamp '2015-04-01 15:00:33', 25 from dual
),
delivered ( order_id, part_id, ts, qty ) as (
select '1200', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-18 16:30:00', 14 from dual union all
select '1210', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-23 10:30:00', 8 from dual union all
select '1220', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-23 11:30:00', 7 from dual union all
select '1230', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-23 11:30:00', 4 from dual union all
select '1240', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-26 15:00:33', 1 from dual union all
select '1250', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-26 16:45:11', 3 from dual union all
select '1260', '11A4', timestamp '2015-03-27 10:00:33', 2 from dual union all
select '1270', '11A4', timestamp '2015-04-03 15:00:33', 16 from dual
),
(end of test data; the SQL query begins below - just add the word WITH at the top)
-- with
combined ( part_id, rec_ord, rec_ts, rec_sum, del_ord, del_ts, del_sum) as (
select part_id, order_id, ts,
sum(qty) over (partition by part_id order by ts, order_id),
null, cast(null as date), cast(null as number)
from received
union all
select part_id, null, cast(null as date), cast(null as number),
order_id, ts,
sum(qty) over (partition by part_id order by ts, order_id)
from delivered
),
prep ( part_id, rec_ord, del_ord, del_ts, qty_sum ) as (
select part_id, rec_ord, del_ord, del_ts, coalesce(rec_sum, del_sum)
from combined
)
select part_id,
last_value(rec_ord ignore nulls) over (partition by part_id
order by qty_sum desc) as rec_ord,
last_value(del_ord ignore nulls) over (partition by part_id
order by qty_sum desc) as del_ord,
last_value(del_ts ignore nulls) over (partition by part_id
order by qty_sum desc) as used_date,
qty_sum - lag(qty_sum, 1, 0) over (partition by part_id
order by qty_sum, del_ts) as used_qty
from prep
order by qty_sum
;
Output:
PART_ID REC_ORD DEL_ORD USED_DATE USED_QTY
------- ------- ------- ----------------------------------- ----------
11A4 0030 1200 18-MAR-15 04.30.00.000000000 PM 14
11A4 0030 1210 23-MAR-15 10.30.00.000000000 AM 6
11A4 0032 1210 23-MAR-15 10.30.00.000000000 AM 2
11A4 0032 1220 23-MAR-15 11.30.00.000000000 AM 7
11A4 0032 1230 23-MAR-15 11.30.00.000000000 AM 4
11A4 0032 1230 23-MAR-15 11.30.00.000000000 AM 0
11A4 0034 1240 26-MAR-15 03.00.33.000000000 PM 1
11A4 0034 1250 26-MAR-15 04.45.11.000000000 PM 3
11A4 0034 1260 27-MAR-15 10.00.33.000000000 AM 2
11A4 0034 1270 03-APR-15 03.00.33.000000000 PM 12
11A4 0036 1270 03-APR-15 03.00.33.000000000 PM 4
11A4 0036 21
12 rows selected.
Notes: (1) One needs to be careful if at one moment the cumulative used quantity exactly matches cumulative received quantity. All rows must be include in all the intermediate results, otherwise there will be bad data in the output; but this may result (as you can see in the output above) in a few rows with a "used quantity" of 0. Depending on how this output is consumed (for further processing, for reporting, etc.) these rows may be left as they are, or they may be discarded in a further outer-query with the condition where used_qty > 0.
(2) The last row shows a quantity of 21 with no used_date and no del_ord. This is, in fact, the "current" quantity in stock for that part_id as of the last date in both tables - available for future use. Again, if this is not needed, it can be removed in an outer query. There may be one or more rows like this at the end of the table.
I have a table of hourly product usage (how many times the product is used) data –
ID (bigint)| ProductId (tinyint)| Date (int - YYYYMMDD) | Hour (tinyint)| UsageCount (int)
#|1 | 20140901 | 0 | 10
#|1 | 20140901 | 1 | 15
#|1 | 20140902 | 5 | 25
#|1 | 20140903 | 5 | 25
#|1 | 20140904 | 3 | 25
#|1 | 20140905 | 7 | 25
#|1 | 20140906 | 10 | 25
#|1 | 20140907 | 9 | 25
#|1 | 20140908 | 5 | 25
#|2 | 20140903 | 16 | 10
#|2 | 20140903 | 13 | 115
Likewise, I have the usage data for 4 different products (ProductId from 1 through 4) stored for every hour in the product_usage table. As you can imagine, it is constantly growing as the nightly ETL process dumps the data for the entire previous day. If a product is not used on any hour of a day, the record for that hour won’t appear in this table. Similarly, if a product is not used for the entire day, there won’t be any record for that day in the table. I need to generate a report that gives daily usage and last 7 days’ rolling average –
For example:
ProductId | Date | DailyUsage | RollingAverage
1 | 20140901 | sum of usages of that day | (Sum of usages from 20140901 through 20140826) / 7
1 | 20140901 | sum of usages of that day | (Sum of usages from 20140901 through 20140826) / 7
1 | 20140902 | sum of usages of that day | (Sum of usages from 20140902 through 20140827) / 7
2 | 20140902 | sum of usages of that day | (Sum of usages from 20140902 through 20140827) / 7
And so on..
I am planning to create an Indexed View in SQL server 2014. Can you think of an efficient SQL query to do this?
Try:
select x.*,
avg(dailyusage) over(partition by productid order by productid, date rows between 6 preceding and current row) as rolling_avg
from (select productid, date, sum(usagecount) as dailyusage
from tbl
group by productid, date) x
Fiddle:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!6/f674a7/4/0
Replace "avg(dailusage) over...." with sum (rather than avg) if what you really want is the sum for the past week. In your title you say you want the average but later you say you want the sum. The query should be the same other than that, so use whichever you actually want.
As was pointed out by Gordon this is basically the average of the past 6 dates in which the product was used, which might be more than just the past 6 days if there are days without any rows for that product on the table because it wasn't used at all. To get around that you could use a date table and your products table.
You have to be careful if you can be missing data on some days. If I assume that there is data for some product on each day, then this approach will work:
select p.productid, d.date, sum(usagecount),
sum(sum(usagecount)) over (partition by p.productid order by d.date
rows between 6 preceding and current row) as Sum7day
from (select distinct productid from hourly) p cross join
(select distinct date from hourly) d left join
hourly h
on h.productid = p.productid and h.date = p.date
group by p.productid, d.date;
I'm facing a challenging request that's had me beating my head against the keyboard. I need to implement a script which will sort and summarize a dataset while accounting for overlapping values which are associated with different identifiers. The table from which I am selecting contains the following columns:
BoxNumber (Need to group by this value, which serves as the identifier)
ProdBeg (Contains the first 'page number' for the document/record)
ProdEnd (Contains the last 'page number' for the document/record)
DateProduced (Date the document was produced)
ArtifactID (Unique identifier for each document)
NumPages (Contains the number of pages associated with each document)
Selecting a sample of the data with no conditions resembles the following (sorry for lousy formatting):
BoxNumber | ProdBeg | ProdEnd | DateProduced | ArtifactID | NumPages
1200 | ABC01 | ABC10 | 12/4/2013 | 1564589 | 10
1201 | ABC11 | ABC20 | 12/4/2013 | 1498658 | 10
1200 | ABC21 | ABC30 | 12/4/2013 | 1648596 | 10
1200 | ABC31 | ABC40 | 12/4/2013 | 1489535 | 10
Using something like the following effectively groups and sorts the data by box number while accounting for different DateProduced dates, but does not account for overlapping ProdBeg/ProdEnd values between different BoxNumbers:
SELECT BoxNumber, MIN(ProdBeg) AS 'ProdBeg', MAX(ProdEnd) AS 'ProdEnd', DateProduced, COUNT(ArtifactID) AS 'Documents', SUM(NumPages) AS 'Pages'
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY BoxNumber, DateProduced
ORDER BY ProdBeg, ProdEnd
This yields:
BoxNumber | ProdBeg | ProdEnd| DateProduced | Documents| Pages
1200 | ABC01 | ABC40 | 12/4/2013 | 3 | 30
1201 | ABC11 | ABC20 | 12/4/2013 | 1 | 10
Here, it becomes apparent that the ProdBeg/ProdEnd values for box 1201 overlap those for box 1200. No variation on the script above will work, as it will inherently ignore any overlaps and only select the min/max. We need something which will produce the following result:
BoxNumber | ProdBeg | ProdEnd | DateProduced | Documents| Pages
1200 | ABC01 | ABC10 | 12/4/2013 | 1 | 10
1201 | ABC11 | ABC20 | 12/4/2013 | 1 | 10
1200 | ABC21 | ABC40 | 12/4/2013 | 2 | 20
I'm just not sure how we can group by box number without showing only distinct values (which can result in overlaps for ProdBeg/ProdEnd). Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated! The environment version is SQL 2008 R2 (SP1).
Yuch. This would be helped at least if you had lead()/lag() as in SQL Server 2012. But it is doable.
The idea is the following:
Add a variable that is the number part of the code (the last two digits).
Calculate the next number in the sequence.
Calculate a flag if there is a gap to the next number. This is the start of a "group".
Calculate the cumulative sum of the "start of a group" flag. This is a group id.
Do the aggregation.
The following query follows this logic. I didn't include the date produced. This seems redundant with the number, unless a box can appear on multiple days. (Adding the date produced is just a matter of adding the condition to the where clauses.) The resulting query is:
with bp as (
select t.*,
cast(right(prodbeg, 2) as int) as pbeg,
cast(right(prodend, 2) as int) as pend
from mytable t
),
bp1 as (
select bp.*,
(select top 1 pbeg
from bp bp2
where bp2.pbeg < bp.pbeg and pb2.BoxNumber = pb.BoxNumber
order by bp2.pbeg desc
) as prevpend
from bp
),
bp2 as (
select bp1.*,
(select sum(case when prevpend = pbeg - 1 then 0 else 1 end)
from bp1 bp1a
where bp1a.pbeg < bp1.pbeg and pb1a.BoxNumber = pb1.BoxNumber
) as groupid
from bp1
)
select BoxNumber, MIN(ProdBeg) AS ProdBeg, MAX(ProdEnd) AS ProdEnd, DateProduced,
COUNT(ArtifactID) AS 'Documents', SUM(NumPages) AS 'Pages'
FROM bp2
GROUP BY BoxNumber, groupid
ORDER BY ProdBeg, ProdEnd;