I am writing a UCWA application to receive each user's presence and note. At the moment, I subscribe to all my desired contacts, I initiate my event stream and then I receive around 200 events. I loop through them to receive my contacts presence and notes using a for loop, meaning I send around 100 requests, which, according to Microsoft documentation, can drain battery on mobile devices or impact performance. I would like to use batching to fix this problem.
onEvent(events) {
for (var i in events) {
const event = events[i]
switch (event.link.rel) { // 250 events filtered down to around 100
case 'contactPresence':
case 'presence':
this.setPresence(event.link.href, this.getUser(event))
break
case 'contactNote':
case 'note':
this.setNote(event.link.href, this.getUser(event))
break
case 'presenceSubscription':
...
break
}
}
}
After searching through Microsoft's documentation, I couldn't find any help on how to format a batch request. I tried following one of the examples provided, but I received a 400 error like this:
{
"code":"BadRequest",
"message":"Your request couldn\u0027t be completed."
}
Eventually I tried sending a batch following formatting that I've seen from this post, like so:
batch() {
const boundary = Date.now()
fetch(this.hub + this.response._links.batch.href, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
Accept: 'multipart/batching',
Authorization: `Bearer ${this.token}`,
'Content-Type': `multipart/batching;boundary=${boundary}`
},
body: `--${boundary}\r\nContent-Type: application/http; msgtype=request\r\n\r\nGET ${this.response._links.self.href + '/people/contacts'} HTTP/1.1\r\nAccept: application/json\r\nHost: ${this.hub}\r\n\r\n--${boundary}--`
}).then(r => r.json())
.then(data => console.log(data))
}
Here is the request payload:
--1557482296198
Content-Type: application/http; msgtype=request
GET /ucwa/oauth/v1/applications/103357029549/people/contacts HTTP/1.1
Accept: application/json
Host: https://webpoolam41e02.infra.lync.com
--1557482296198--
This returns a 500 error, however, like this:
{
"code":"ServiceFailure","message":"Your request couldn\u0027t be completed.",
"debugInfo":{
"errorReportId":"8d6499597a54443495627bd2b3e3c5b6"
},
"reasonId":"1000005"
}
I have spent a long time searching for an answer but I cannot find one that works.
Does anyone know how to properly format a batch request?
I have found an answer to my own question. It turns out that the final batch requires 3 line breaks:
\r\n\r\n\r\n
Rather than 2:
\r\n\r\n
Related
I am creating a Firefox extension which posts some data to a database.
I made all parts in a modular fashion and am now combining everything piece by piece.
As such I know that my code to POST data to the database works.
Now here is the part that stumps me :
When I then add this code to my firefox extension
I get the following error:
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource at http://localhost:3003/timed_shot_create. (Reason: CORS header ‘Access-Control-Allow-Origin’ missing). Status code: 400.
Now ofcourse CORS was nothing new and to be expected when dealing with Cross Origin Resource Sharing, it is even in the name.
But the reason why I am here is because this pertains only to the response of the POST request. The request itself is fine and allowed with the following piece of config in the server:
app.use(
cors({
//todo change to proper origin when live
origin: "moz-extension://d07f1e99-96a0-4934-8ff4-1ce222c06d0d",
method: ["GET", "POST"],
})
);
Which was later changed to:
app.use(
cors({
origin: "*",
method: ["GET", "POST"],
})
);
And then simplified even more to:
app.use(cors())
This is in Nodejs btw using cors middleware.
But none of this seems to work when it is used inside a firefox extension, as a local client page works as intended but as soon as I add this to a firefox extension I get a CORS error specifically pertaining to the reponse message.
The client side post (in the background script of the extension) is:
async function postTimedShot(post_options) {
const response = await fetch(post_endpoint, post_options);
//console.log(response);
const json_response = await response.json();
console.log(json_response);
}
let post_options = {
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
},
body: JSON.stringify(response_data),
};
postTimedShot(post_options);
And the api looks like this:
app.post("/timed_shot_create", (req, res) => {
console.log("Received POST request");
const data = req.body;
console.log(data);
const timeStamp = data.time_stamp;
//TODO add screenshot and Description text maybe??
//const lastName = data.last_name
const queryString =
"INSERT INTO " + timed_shots_database + " (time_stamp) VALUES (?)";
getConnection().query(queryString, [timeStamp], (err, results, fields) => {
if (err) {
console.log("Failed to insert new user: " + err);
res.sendStatus(500);
return;
}
//Todo change this message when adding more data in body
//res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "moz-extension://d07f1e99-96a0-4934-8ff4-1ce222c06d0d");
res.json({
status: "Success!!!",
time_stamp: timeStamp,
});
console.log("Inserted a new user with id: ", results.insertId);
});
});
Furthermore, this extension is only for personal use and will work with a local server under my complete control so complications due to security or cloud usage that people want to mention are appreciated but not necessary (I think, I am a bit of novice).
I will be happy to clarify anything that is unclear, or change this post if necessary, but I think it is a unique question as far as I could see on SO. Additionally if I need to provide more of the codebase I will.
I will also update this post if I find out more about this problem.
Thank you for reading :3.
After reading about this post https://stackoverflow.com/a/53025865/5055963
on SO I found out that it had to do with the permissions in the manifest of the extension.
Adding this line: "://.localhost/*".
Solved the issue for me.
I am learning TestCafe and am trying to create an account on a website and then logging in to Gmail to find the activation link. When I try to do this I just get a browser isn't secure message when I get to the part to enter a password. How do I get Gmail to trust TestCafe?
While you might succeed in doing so, this is not a good approach because:
it's slow doing this via GUI
it's britle because selectors will likely change, and you have no control over Google email selectors, so you won't even know if they change them
A better approach wuld be to use a service like Mailosaur where you can create an account and receive emails that you can later query via an API. Instead of doing a whole e2e flow over GUI, you request an email on Mailosaur's API, and if such an email exists, you'll receive a response you can parse and check for various things.
I've done this in the past, you can see my post here: https://sqa.stackexchange.com/questions/40427/automating-verification-of-sent-email-sms-messages/45721#45721 It's exactly Mailosaur and Testcafe (plus it requires axios as a package), so it seems to be what you're looking for.
To add the same code here:
import config from '../config';
import { customAlphabet } from 'nanoid';
import axios from 'axios';
import Newsletter from '../Objects/newsletter';
async function request (reqObject) {
try {
return await axios(reqObject);
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
}
}
function serverId () {
return process.env.MAILOSAUR_SERVER_ID;
}
function mailosaurFullEmail (id) {
return (id ? id : nanoid()) + '.' + serverId()
+ '#' + config.mailosaurDomain;
}
fixture `Newsletter`
.page(baseUrl);
test
('Sign Up For Newsletter', async t => {
const id = (customAlphabet('1234567890', 10))();
await t
.typeText(Newsletter.newsEmailInput, mailosaurFullEmail(id))
.click(Newsletter.consent)
.click(Newsletter.sendButton);
let res = await request({
method: 'POST',
url: config.mailosaurUrlEmail + serverId(),
headers: {
'Authorization': 'Basic '
+ Buffer.from(process.env.MAILOSAUR_API_KEY)
.toString('base64'),
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
data: {
sentTo: mailosaurFullEmail(id)
}
});
await t
.expect(res.status).eql(200);
});
and it requires some config values:
{
"mailosaurUrlEmail": "https://mailosaur.com/api/messages/await?server=",
"mailosaurDomain": "mailosaur.io"
}
This is definitely much better, but it still has some limitations:
Mailosaur's API can still change, so it won't be exactly without any maintenance
it assumes that an email is sent immediately after a user action (newsletter in my case), but that might be far from reality in many situations such as when emails are sent to a queue where it can easily take several minutes to send an email
If you absolutely have to do it via Gmail, you will still be better off looking at their API that should allow you to search and query email messages as well.
There is an issue related to the Google login. You can try turning on the "Allow less secure apps" Google account setting to workaround this issue. Please note that this setting is available for the disabled 2-Step Verification.
I’m currently looking at Botium Box, and I’m wondering if it is possible to send an additional request to our endpoint after each test case? Let me give you some background information about how we set up the HTTP(S)/JSON connector in Botium Box and how we are sending information to our bot:
HTTP(S) endpoint:
https://MyChatBotsEndpoint.com/?userinput={{msg.messageText}}
HTTP method: POST
We also send cookies through the header template in the request builder. Like this:
{
"Cookie": "JSESSIONID={{context.sessionId}}"
}
The response is given back in JSON.
When a test ends (when it is successful but also when it fails), we need to send an additional request to our endpoint. The endpoint URL of that request should look like this:
https://MyChatBotsEndpoint.com/endsession
The header should include the cookie as described before.
Is there a way to achieve this in Botium?
Botium has many extension points to plug in your custom functionality. In this case, I guess the SIMPLEREST_STOP_HOOK is the best choice.
Write a small javascript file calling your endpoint, and register is with the SIMPLEREST_STOP_HOOK capability in botium.json. The context (session context from the HTTP/JSON connector) is part of the hook arguments.
in botium.json:
...
"SIMPLEREST_STOP_HOOK": "my-stop-hook.js"
...
my-stop-hook.js:
const request = require('request')
module.exports = ({ context }) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
request({
method: 'GET',
uri: 'https://MyChatBotsEndpoint.com/endsession',
headers: {
Cookie: "JSESSIONID=" + context.sessionId
}
}, (err) => {
if (err) reject(err)
else resolve()
})
})
}
When my Telegram bot sends sendMessage to Telegram server it gets the error message:
{"ok":false,"error_code":400,"description":"Bad Request: message text is empty"}
The problem appeared this morning, before that my bot worked a whole year without errors. GetUpdates command works well as before. I use GET HTTP method to send commads:
https://api.telegram.org/bot<MyToken>/sendMessage
with UTF-8-encoded data attached:
{"chat_id":123456789,"text":"any text"}
Has anyone encountered this?
If the issue still persists, try to modify your curl request. For me adding header
'Content-Type: application/json' and -d '{"chat_id":12309832,"text":"any text"}' fixed issue
Another way to send a message by emulating a form :
curl -s -X POST https://api.telegram.org/bot{apitoken}/sendMessage \
-F chat_id='-1234567890' -F text='test message'
Well, i wrote wrapper on C language to communicate via SSL with telegram bot api. SO now I can clearly answer questions about telegram API spec.
Problem number one
First of all if we are talking about raw queries we need to remember about specifications.
By default HTTP/HTTPS post requests should consists of:
<METHOD>[space]<PATH with only valid chars> <\r\n>
<HOST valid regexed\r\n>
<Content-type valid regexed><\r\n>
<Content-Length with length of your POST body data><\r\n>
<\r\n before body>
<body>
So, i tried to send raw queries with out Content-Length and i had error same as yours. That's the first problem.
Problem number two
By default if you trying to send non valid request with sendMessage method - telegram bot api will response with error same as yours. So, yeah, that's pretty tricky error to debug...
If you trying to send raw query, be sure that your JSON data is serialized nicely and there is no errors like shielding.
Summarizing
Request:
POST /bot<token>/sendMessage HTTP/1.1
Host: api.telegram.org:443
Connection: close
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 36
{"chat_id":<integer>, "text":"test \\lol"}
Second backslash if shielding.
Code on C
sprintf(reqeustCtx.request,
"POST /bot%s/%s HTTP/1.1\r\n"
"Host: %s\r\n"
"Connection: close\r\n"
"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
"Content-Length: %d\r\n"
"\r\n"
"%s\r\n", bot_token, bot_method,
reqeustCtx.res_addr, strlen(body), body);
BIO_puts(bio, reqeustCtx.request);
BIO_flush(bio);
memset(reqeustCtx.response, '\0', BUFFSIZE);
read_bytes = BIO_read(bio, reqeustCtx.response, BUFFSIZE);
if (read_bytes <= 0) {
printf("No response");
exit(-1);
}
cert_free(cert_store, ssl_ctx, ca_cert_bio);
// free memory //
reqeustCtx.method(reqeustCtx.res_addr, reqeustCtx.request,
reqeustCtx.current_work_dir, reqeustCtx.current_cert);
/* json response, need to parse */
return reqeustCtx.response;
I got this error too.
I used sendMessage() method only with "low-level" Node https:
const https = require('https');
const data = JSON.stringify({
chat_id: config.telegram.chatId,
text: 'some ASCII text'),
});
const options = {
hostname: 'api.telegram.org',
port: 443,
path: `/bot${config.telegram.botToken}/sendMessage`,
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
'Content-Length': data.length
}
};
const req = https.request(options, (res) => {
let chunks = [];
res.on('data', chunk => chunks.push(chunk));
res.on('end', () => {
const resBody = Buffer.concat(chunks).toString('utf8');
if (res.statusCode === 200) {
console.log(`Message sent`);
} else {
console.error(`${res.statusCode} ${res.statusMessage} ${res.headers['content-type']}
${resBody}`)
}
});
});
req.on('error', (error) => {
reject(error)
});
req.write(data);
req.end();
And for ASCII text it was ok, however for some non-ASCII text I got:
const data = JSON.stringify({
chat_id: config.telegram.chatId,
text: 'Привет Мир!'),
});
Error:
400 Bad Request application/json
{"ok":false,"error_code":400,"description":"Bad Request: message text is empty"}
In my case content length was calculated with invalid length 'Content-Length': data.length (invalid for Telegram?...), so I comment out this header and now it works for UTF-8!
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
//'Content-Length': data.length
}
In my case, I was using curl_setopt($this->curl, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, json_encode($fields)); to post this json via sendMessage method:
{
"chat_id":000000000,
"text":"Choose one of the following options: ",
"reply_to_message_id":292,
"reply_markup":{
"keyboard":[
[
"Enable",
"Disable"
]
]
}
}
The problem was that when passing fields to the curl_setopt method, I was encoding the whole php array so I solved it by just encoding the reply_markup array which was a part of my json.
Try to put "Message" object with chat_id & text to HttpEntity in your restTemplate service, like below:
public MessageDto sendMessage(Message message) {
return restTemeplate.exchange(
"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/sendMessage",
HttpMethod.POST,
new HttpEntity<>(message, HttpHeaders.EMPTY),
MessageDto.class
).getBody();
}
I've been trying to post a paste to Pastebin in Node.js, but it appears that I'm doing it wrong.
I'm getting a Bad API request, invalid api_option, however I'm clearly setting the api_option to paste like the documentation asks for.
var http = require('http');
var qs = require('qs');
var query = qs.stringify({
api_option: 'paste',
api_dev_key: 'xxxxxxxxxxxx',
api_paste_code: 'Awesome paste content',
api_paste_name: 'Awesome paste name',
api_paste_private: 1,
api_paste_expire_date: '1D'
});
var req = http.request({
host: 'pastebin.com',
port: 80,
path: '/api/api_post.php',
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'multipart/form-data',
'Content-Length': query.length
}
}, function(res) {
var data = '';
res.on('data', function(chunk) {
data += chunk;
});
res.on('end', function() {
console.log(data);
});
});
req.write(query);
req.end();
console.log(query) confirms that the string is well encoded and that api_option is there and set to paste.
Now, I've been searching forever on possible causes. I also tried setting the encoding on the write req.write(query, 'utf8') because the Pastebin API mentions that the POST must be UTF-8 encoded. I rewrote the thing over and over and re-consulted the Node HTTP documentation many times.
I'm pretty sure I completely missed something here, because I don't see how this could fail. Does anyone have an idea of what I have done wrong?
What you're creating isn't a properly-formed multipart/form-data request; it looks more like an application/x-www-form-urlencoded request. From what I can tell about pastebin's API (I've never actually used it) the latter is what you really want, so try changing the Content-Type to it.
It does not answer directly your question but maybe it could help...
Have you try to use the request module ?
Your example would be much easier to read and you might find the problem...
mikeal/request