How to get publicly accessible crashlytics report url? - crash

I want to share my crashlytics crash report to some 3rd parties.
How can I get a publicly accessible url like below?
http://crashes.to/s/419b5b28766
I am bit new here, is it a old deprecated crashlytics feature?
I don't seem to find in my fabric crashlytics dashboard.

Zubair - from Fabric/Firebase. Great question. We deprecated that share link feature, so those won’t be accessible anymore. The decision to drop support for it was based on customer feedback, and because we don’t plan to carry over the share links feature over to Firebase.
Definitely not ideal if you were using that feature a lot, but as a workaround I recommend downloading the stacktrace and issue details with the "Download .txt" file button and sharing that instead.

Downloading the stacktrace and issue details with the "Download .txt" file button was part of the Fabric.io. In Google Firebase, using the BigQuery is the best way to get that data. To to that make sure, you have enabled the BQ Integration under Project Settings > Integrations > BigQuery

Related

Does Google Identity Platform have a local emulator?

I would like to know if there is an emulator for local development and if there is documentation about it.
I know Firebase has one but I don't know if it's exactly the same.
As of now, there's no emulator feature for Google Cloud Identity Platform (GCIP) yet. As reference, this is also mentioned on a Google Groups thread. Currently there is no ETA when this feature would be available in the future. These are the current beta emulators that are available .
What I could suggest is file a feature request through this link to report issues and feature request.

Tool to remotely log (debug) React Native production app

Is there some tool available for React Native to remotely debug or send logs from production app to me?
I want to use it to track what errors my test users getting without them need to interact with app.
Have you thought about raygun? This gives you an api to log your errors and then a portal to view them. I use it on a project at work and it's worth looking at https://raygun.com/
There are a few options for you which will be quite easy for you to implement. The first one I would suggest you is react-native-firebase and use it for pushing events to the analytics in firebase.
The second option would be react-native-flurry-sdk offered by yahoo flurry analytics which is also very easy and efficient.
If your app is on google play store already then you can use the build in crash reporting system which reports most of the errors but if you need something specific and in your own control like if you want the app to send you a specific error etc then its best to use react-native-flurry-sdk. you can get it from here:
https://github.com/flurry/react-native-flurry-sdk

draw.io plugins in chrome app

In an online version of draw.io you can enable extra plugins using their url like this https://www.draw.io/?p=svgdata (svgdata is the plugin id)
Is there a way to enable a plugin using Chrome app?
No.
In online version, the Plugins is listed under extras.
In offline as well as in Chrome App, you can't see such an Option
Which means you can't add plugins in the offline version.
Remaining functionalities that you will miss in the offline version
You can’t access or store diagrams using cloud services like Dropbox, GitHub, etc.
Save diagrams to your device or browser instead.
Online help is not available
You can’t insert PlantUML text data.
Math typesetting is not available.
Templates are not available for creating new diagrams.
You can’t export to PDF, but you can print as PDF.
The interface is only available in English.
source : draw.io
Then why?
May be because of issues with caching. If you add many plugins, each of them contains many files. Caching large number of files for offline usage will make the app worst and also consume more memory.
Anyway, you can submit a feature request here

Is it a bad idea to call phaser.min.js directly from GitHub?

As a jQuery user, I link the remote library from Google using
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
which is very clever because it's already loaded in the brower cache if the reader visited another site that did the same.
As I discover Phaser, I was hoping to see people on the web doing the same with
<script src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/photonstorm/phaser/master/build/phaser.min.js"></script>
or any library hoster, but apparently no one does.
Is there a reason why Phaser users don't do that?
I would strongly advise against linking to the master release as it will absolutely break your games over time. Most of the 2.0.x updates have been non-API changing, but 2.1 and above will be altering some core aspects of Phaser. You should only ever link to specific versions.
For a similar service to the Google hosted APIs (of which they only host very specific libraries that they've selected) we use CDN.js, which offers the same thing. You can find details in the Phaser README or just go to http://cdnjs.com/ and search for Phaser.
There is as such no issue if you link to a specific version. But you don't want the latest build, as this can potentially break your site by making changes.
I don't know Github's policies on referencing their site like this.

Sonatype Insight - Application Health Check - Is it ok to share application composition details to the remote Sonatype Insight Server

Has anybody used the Sonatype Insight-Application Health Checker ? It requires you to scan your application ( war, jar, zip etc ) and then uploads its findings onto the Sonatype Insight Server. After this, you get the report via the email which also contains an online link to the interactive report.
The problem that i find with this approach is that my application composition details get uploaded to a remote server ( outside my organizational control ) and then the report gets published at an online link which can be accessed by anyone. I do not want this. Is there a way to generate this report without uploading the details to the 'remote server' ?
But the bigger question is, are application owners and organizations ready to share their application composition details to a server outside their reach while performing IP audits on their applications ?
Please let me know what the general pereception about this is ?
Generally, if you're only sending meta-data about your open source usage - that's not sensitive information.
If you have privacy issues, you can also check out White Source software that provide similar service on cloud.
lots of people use the system to generate a quick and easy manifest of their application based on open source component use. If you a are concerned about anyone else theoretically knowing what open source components you are using, then you may be interested in our on-premises version of this tool for enterprises.