I have three tables (example) STAFF, STU, EMP.
I want to combine the column EMPID in table STAFF and table EMP into 1 column?
My previous query is like this,
SELECT *
FROM STU s
FULL OUTER JOIN STAFF st ON st.STAFFID = STUID
FULL OUTER JOIN EMP e ON s.STUID = st.EMPID
The result is like this
The expected result is just like the above screenshot, but I want to join EMPID into one column only.
UPDATE:
I tried using this query:
SELECT
stu.stuid, stu.stuname, stu.stucode,
s.staffid, s.staffname, s.staffcode,
emp.empname, emp.empcode,
COALESCE (emp.empid, staff.staffid) AS col
FROM
STU, Staff, EMP
FULL OUTER JOIN
STAFF s ON s.STAFFID = stu.STUID
FULL OUTER JOIN
EMP e ON stu.STUID = s.EMPID
but it displays an error like this
Use below query to get the desired result.
SELECT s.StuID, s.StuName, s.Stucode, st.StaffId, st.StaffName, st.Staffcode, isnull(st.EmpId, e.EmpId) EmpId, e.EmpCode, e.EmpName
FROM STU s FULL outer JOIN
STAFF st
ON st.STAFFID = STUID FULL OUTER JOIN
EMP e
ON s.STUID = st.EMPID
Note: You will get the one emp Id column as needed. If Staff emp id is not null then staff emp id will be displayed else employee emp id will be displayed
Related
I need to join two tables together to create a table with columns for employee id, employee name and their boss' name.
The 'hier' table
The 'employees' table
The query I wrote is almost working, putting an employee name in the right spot, but not the right employee:
SELECT em.emp_id, em.emp_name, em.emp_name AS boss_name
FROM employees em
LEFT JOIN hier h ON (h.boss_id = em.emp_name)
Which outputs:
I need to have each person's boss to have the right name, and in the case of Big Boss, 'N/A'. Like so:
You need a self join with Employee table
SELECT em.emp_id, em.emp_name, e1.emp_name AS boss_name
FROM employees em
LEFT JOIN employees em1 ON em.boss_id = em1.emp_id
Hello I'm trying to solve this question with a subquery:
Select names, service number, jobs and salaries of
people working in the same city as HAVET. (havet is a name)
And I have only two table the first one is the emp table with the column (noserv, name, job, salaries) and the second one is the SERV table with the column (noserv, nameserv, city)
I know that I have to use a subquery but I don't know how to do it.
Semi-pseudocode (CTE won't work, obviously).
with emp (noserv, name, job, salaries),
serv (noserv, nameserv, city)
-- This is what you're looking for, I presume
select e.*
from emp e join serv s on e.noserv = s.noserv
where s.city = -- subquery returns city where HAVET lives
(select s1.city
from serv s1 join emp e1 on e1.noserv = s1.noserv
where e1.name = 'HAVET'
);
Try this:
-- This is a normal query with a left join
select *
from emp e
left join s on e.noserv = s.noserv
where s.city =
-- get Havet's city from the subquery.
(select s.city
from emp e
left join s on e.noserv = s.noserv
where e.name = 'HAVET')
Try this one, change the column name according to your table and column names.
Select e.name,e.serviceNubmer,e.Job,e.salaries
from emp e,serv s
where
e.noserv = s.noserv
and s.city ='HAVET';
I am having a question in SQL Joins. I have table employee with employeeid as primary key and some other columns for employee. And there is another table called employeeaddress where there can be multiple employeeid is a foreign key. One employee can have many employeeaddresses just to explain one to many relationship.
If I want to write a query which will fetch the following columns
employee.employeeid, employee.empname,
employeeaddress.employeeaddressid, employeeaddress.addr1,
employeeaddress.addr2
So there can be an employee with no employeeaddress. But anyway I wanted to fetch all the employees who may have zero or multiple addresses.
Do I need to apply left join or left outer join? I want the following result for a table that has 2 employees John and Michael where John has two employeeaddresses with employeeaddressid 21 and 22 and Michael has no employeeaddress
1, John, 21, addr1 for John, addr2 for John
1, John, 22, another addr1 for John, another addr2 for John
2, Michael, NULL , NULL , NULL
The above result is arranged in the following fashion
employee.employeeid, employee.empname, employeeaddress.employeeaddressid, employeeaddress.addr1, employeeaddress.addr2
Please help.
Based on your description it sounds like you're looking for a query as follows. If you also wanted the address details, you'll just have to add a left join to the outer query.
Also, as comments have eluded to, LEFT JOIN is shorthand for LEFT OUTER JOIN, they will produce the same results.
SELECT *
FROM employee
inner join
(
SELECT
employeeid,
count(*) as addresscount
FROM employee
left join employeeaddress ON employeeaddress.employeeaddressid = employee.employeeaddressid
group by employeeid
) counts on counts.employeeid = employee.employeeid
WHERE counts.addresscount = 0 -- Or 1, or 5 or > 1, etc.
LEFT JOIN should be all you need.
SQL Fiddle Example
SELECT e.employeeID ,
e.empName ,
ea.employeeAddressID ,
ea.addr1 ,
ea.addr2
FROM Employee e
LEFT JOIN EmployeeAddress ea ON ea.employeeID = e.employeeID
Using Oracle Apex Browser, image of database
http://imgur.com/a/Hhblp#0
select s_ID, c_sec_ID, grade
from s_ID.ID, c_sec_ID.csID, grade.ID, grade.csID
where c_sec_ID = 1000
^ All I think of and I'm not sure if I'm suppose to join them together or group them either.
You have to join these tree tables COURSE_SECTION, ENROLLMENT and STUDENT to get desired output. Put INNER JOIN on three tables and add
Where Clause to filter records.
You can try this
SELECT S.s_ID, C.c_sec_ID, E.grade
FROM COURSE_SECTION C INNER JOIN ENROLLMENT E ON C.C_SEC_ID = E.C_SEC_ID
INNER JOIN STUDENT S ON S.S_ID = E.S_ID
WHERE C.C_SEC_ID = 1000
I am trying to convert the following query:
select *
from employees
where emp_id not in (select distinct emp_id from managers);
into a form where I represent the subquery as a join. I tried doing:
select *
from employees a, (select distinct emp_id from managers) b
where a.emp_id!=b.emp_id;
I also tried:
select *
from employees a, (select distinct emp_id from managers) b
where a.emp_id not in b.emp_id;
But it does not give the same result. I have tried the 'INNER JOIN' syntax as well, but to no avail. I have become frustrated with this seemingly simple problem. Any help would be appreciated.
Assume employee Data set of
Emp_ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Assume Manger data set of
Emp_ID
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
select *
from employees
where emp_id not in (select distinct emp_id from managers);
The above isn't joining tables so no Cartesian product is generated... you just have 7 records you're looking at...
The above would result in 6 and 7 Why? only 6 and 7 from Employee Data isn't in the managers table. 8,9 in managers is ignored as you're only returning data from employee.
select *
from employees a, (select distinct emp_id from managers) b
where a.emp_id!=b.emp_id;
The above didnt' work because a Cartesian product is generated... All of Employee to all of Manager (assuming 7 records in each table 7*7=49)
so instead of just evaluating the employee data like you were in the first query. Now you also evaluate all managers to all employees
so Select * results in
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,8
1,9
2,1
2,2...
Less the where clause matches...
so 7*7-7 or 42. and while this may be the answer to the life universe and everything in it, it's not what you wanted.
I also tried:
select *
from employees a, (select distinct emp_id from managers) b
where a.emp_id not in b.emp_id;
Again a Cartesian... All of Employee to ALL OF Managers
So this is why a left join works
SELECT e.*
FROM employees e
LEFT OUTER JOIN managers m
on e.emp_id = m.emp_id
WHERE m.emp_id is null
This says join on ID first... so don't generate a Cartesian but actually join on a value to limit the results. but since it's a LEFT join return EVERYTHING from the LEFT table (employee) and only those that match from manager.
so in our example would be returned as e.emp_Di = m.Emp_ID
1,1
2,2
3,3
4,4
5,5
6,NULL
7,NULL
now the where clause so
6,Null
7,NULL are retained...
older ansii SQL standards for left joins would have been *= in the where clause...
select *
from employees a, managers b
where a.emp_id *= b.emp_id --I never remember if the * is the LEFT so it may be =*
and b.emp_ID is null;
But I find this notation harder to read as the join can get mixed in with the other limiting criteria...
Try this:
select e.*
from employees e
left join managers m on e.emp_id = m.emp_id
where m.emp_id is null
This will join the two tables. Then we discard all rows where we found a matching manager and are left with employees who aren't managers.
Your best bet would probably be a left join:
select
e.*
from employees e
left join managers m on e.emp_id = m.emp_id
where
m.emp_id is null;
The idea here is you're saying that you want to select everything from employees, including anything that matches in the manager table based on emp_id and then filtering out the rows that actually have something in the manager table.
Use Left Outer Join instead
select e.*
from employees e
left outer join managers m
on e.emp_id = m.emp_id
where m.emp_id is null
left outer join will preserve the rows from m table even if they do not have a match i e table based on the emp_id field. The we filter on where m.emp_id is null - give me all the rows from e where there's no matching record in m table.
A bit more on the subject can be found here:
Visual representation of joins
from employees a, (select distinct emp_id from managers) b implies cross join - all posible combinations between tables (and you needed left outer join instead)
The MINUS keyword should do the trick:
SELECT e.* FROM employees e
MINUS
Select m.* FROM managers m
Hope that helps...
select *
from employees
where Not (emp_id in (select distinct emp_id from managers));