Currently I'm using ZF3 with two modules.
The first module handles the authentication of the users.
The second module should use informations about the authentication status of the users.
In Detail: The second module should verify if the user is logged in.
Depending on that status it should allow routing to certain Controllers.
E.g. in the template of the first module, I can use: $this->auth()->isLoggedIn()
But - of course - I'm not able to use auth() in the second modules templates.
I'm still learning ZF, so I don't know how to inform the second module about the status of the authentication.
I guess it has something to do with ZFs ServiceManager or PluginManager, but I'm not sure.
Any help would be appreciated...
Thanks to some explanations on https://www.tutorialspoint.com/zend_framework/zend_framework_service_manager.htm I solved it!
In FooControllerFactory::__invoke I used the Container to find the AuthManager
$authManager = $container->get(\Vendor\Auth\Manager::class);
Then, I returned it:
return new FooController($entityManager, $FooManager, $authManager);
(entityManager is from doctrine, FooManager is the manager for this model)
In FooController.php I added the authManager to the constructor
$this->authManager = $authManager;
Now I can get e.g. a username in any FooAction! :)
$this->authManager->getIdentity()->username
(replace "username" with the correct name of the user_id row)
Related
I've been using Netlify for storing 100% of my app (both frontend and backend) for the last three months. So far, so good.
The only problem now is that I need to store a custom property for each user (say, the phone number), and apparently Netlify Identity doesn't support this (only email, name and roles https://www.netlify.com/docs/identity/).
I don't want to change the whole app to migrate to another hosting provider just for this detail (actually, I can't, it's for a client and I just don't have time), because it works great, but at the same time I need it.
Can you think of any workaround to this? The less "hackish", the better, but I understand that I'm going beyond the intended use of Netlify Identity.
So it actually does look like Netlify's GoTrue API has a specific endpoint for updating custom user data. After a user is created, you can update metadata by including it as "data" within an authenticated PUT request to /user.
PUT /user
{
"data" {
"custom_key": "value",
}
}
See https://github.com/netlify/gotrue for more info.
There are dozens of ways to do this, so I'll talk about two generally applicable ways now:
the most "generally capable" one is probably using lambda functions: https://www.netlify.com/docs/functions . This lets you run dynamic code, such as "store to database hosted elsewhere" or "email to our office manager to update a spreadsheet" or even "commit to our closed git repo so it's available in-code" (last one is probably a worst practice, but is possible). You can similarly use a function to read that data back out without exposing API tokens (code example: https://github.com/netlify/code-examples/tree/master/function_examples/token-hider)
you could have the data gathered via a form submission (https://www.netlify.com/docs/form-handling). I'd probably use zapier.com to receive a notification of the form submission (https://www.netlify.com/docs/form-handling/#notifications). Zapier can of course connect to just about anything on the planet :) . Getting the data back out if you want to show it in your UI is a bit more of a challenge, but you could use the above mentioned functions if you need to connect to some private data store to pull it out. Or for an MVP, just not show it, only let people enter/update it ;)
I'm struggling to find an answer to this (perhaps because I'm not asking the question properly) ...
I'm building API to expose resources for a basic social networking service I'm creating.
My understanding is that the structure of URLs in an API is essentially a hierarchy, directory like structure. I think that means I can have multiple endpoints to reach the same resources or collections of resource links.
For example:
I have an endpoint
www.domain.api.org/users/{:uid}/posts
Which will return all posts sent by the user or that the user is tagged in. Seems ok, but what if I have an endpoint such as:
www.domain.api.org/posts
Which when hit with a http GET will return all public posts (i.e. all users' posts plus his friends' and public posts).
The difference is that the first URL points to user owned resources whereas the second to public ones (of which the users posts are included of course)
Are these okay or am I doing it the wrong / less sensible way?
To reiterate, can I have multiple endpoints which point to different contexts/views of the same resource?
Basically multiple endpoints for the same resources should be avoided. However in this particular case it does make sense.
What you can do is to introduce optional query param userId to the following endpoint:
www.domain.api.org/posts/?userId=<userId>
If this substitutes the first endpoint you mentioned that's the way to go.
I would like to add ontop of #Opal's answer.
Are these okay or am I doing it the wrong / less sensible way?
Ideally, like Opal mentioned, you would use queryParams in your url. For many applications I have build, I don't know the uids returned from the api beforehand, so selecting an item and passing it inside my url as a query parameter makes sense. But it also has the added benefit of having your key inside your url, allowing you to bookmark it, pass the url to another user and they will automatically see the same data you want them to see.
To iterate: Is your current implementation wrong? No, but ideally you would use a combination of both route parameters are query parameters to achieve this
To create an endpoints, you have to be sure that you have these information at once:
Name of the endpoint
Status: activate or not (required) - is the endpoint activated or disable
Service profile (required) - ID of the Service Profile assigned to the endpoint.
Tariff profile (required) - ID of the tariff Profile assigned to the endpoint.
You can add another optional informations, and be sure of the structure of your endpoint.
Hope this helps you.
I want to use numbers as username in Kohana Auth. For example, username 100001?
While adding new user Kohana returns me error: ORM_Validation_Exception [ 0 ]: Failed to validate array
Is is possible to user numbers as username in Kohana?
EDIT: This answer looks simpler and better than mine, but try to understand it at all.
You need to extend User Model, I'll help you using auth with the ORM driver.
Steps to extend User Model:
If you didn't yet, configure Auth module to use orm and create a database table with the fields you want. Here is a good example of how to doing it (It's an old tutorial using ko3.1 but you can still learn from it). PS.: you can have any columns at the 'users' table and you don't need to have the 'username' column if you do not want.
Open and read carefully this file: MODULES/orm/classes/model/auth/user.php (It's self documented and I hope you understand it. If not, stop reading this answer here and read the kohana docs. Some shortcuts: Auth - Kohana User Guide, Auth (orm) methods, addons:auth
Copy the file (don't edit the original) to APPPATH/classes/model/auth/user.php and edit it how you want. Some functions that you may like to edit are: rules, filters and unique_key (<- useful). Be creative, you also can add custom functions.
Test and change whatever else needed.
You can change the login method to works as you like. You can set login by e-mail, make a custom validation method or parse values before saving in the database (see public function filters()). This is helpful for whatever you try to do with auth module using ORM... But... if you really don't want to use ORM, you can build your own driver, learn how.
I made this some time ago in kohana 3.2 but I think you won't get problems with 3.3. If you still have questions, this question on kohana forum may help.
I want to ask one question, that if I want to get the id of any user in config/main.php file of yii, then how can I get this ? If any one has idea please tell ?
Thanks
Your config/main.php is used to build your application, hence it is not possible to get data in there that is only available after Yii::app() is available.
But you can get your user id by Yii::app()->user->id;
You can use that everywhere, for example in Controller->init() that will execute before your SiteController is ran.
You can still set your language after you config.
Yii::app()->language = Helper::getLanguageFromUser(Yii::app()->user->id);
Ofc Helper is a fictive class here, it can be any thing. See an example here.
Hi I'm am trying to get the list of issues from a JIRA server using the SOAP API provided by JIRA.
I'm trying to filter the issues based on a custom field (and latter I will want to set that custom field).
If I get the list of issue it returns the custom fields for those issues along with them (I get customfieldId, key, values for each custom field) and I can get the custom field with getCustomFields methods provided by the API (to look for the ID of the field with a given name).
The issue I have is that if I login with an account that is not an admin (using the API) I can't call the getCustomFields method (it throws an exception saying I have to be an admin to do that).
My question is: Is there any other way to know which is the ID of the custom field I desire that can be done using a normal user account?
Also if you know how to set a custom field for an issue, it would also be very helpful :) (I would also like to be able to do it with a regular user account).
You have to be an admin to get a list of custom fields. Any 'normal' account can act on the custom fields via the API provided the user knows the customfield ID.
You can set the value of a custom field too, even with a 'normal' account. Again, the user needs the appropriate permissions to do this. Example provided here.
More here and here.
You can also use getFieldsForEdit(token, issueKey), which will return RemoteField[] for all fields available for edit on that issue (even if it has not yet been defined on the issue). It does not require admin permissions, but because it has the word "Edit" in the method, it does require that you have permission to edit the issue (which means, e.g., if the issue is status=Closed, it will raise an exception unless you allow editing closed issues. Unfortunately, I have yet to find a way to retrieve the RemoteField[] list (in order to map id to name), so getCustomFields() and getFieldsForEdit() appear to be the only options.
Have you tried getting a list of issues from the project, picking one, zeroing out the data, and using that as a template? That might work.
SOAP is being deprecated in favor of the REST API, which also has a better method to get this information